Effects of relevant and irrelevant color singletons on inhibition of return and attentional capture

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 75, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 1687-1702

  Ansorge, Ulrich ^a,b   Priess, Heinz Werner ^a   Kerzel, Dirk ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSNABRÜCK   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Attention; Cueing; Inhibition of return; Saccades

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; COLOR VISION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTIVE INHIBITION; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; VISION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; CUES; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REACTIVE INHIBITION; SACCADES; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84887596855     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: 1943393X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13414-013-0521-2     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Abrams, R. A., & Dobkin, R. S. (1994). Inhibition of return: Effects of attentional cuing on eye movement latencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 20, 467-477. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 20. 3. 467.
2. Anderson, B. A., & Folk, C. L. (2010). Variations in the magnitude of attentional capture: Testing a two-process model. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 342-352. doi: 10. 3758/APP. 72. 2. 342.
3. Ansorge, U., & Horstmann, G. (2007). Preemptive control of attentional capture by color: Evidence from trial-by-trial analysis and ordering of onsets of capture effects in RT distributions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 952-975.
4. Ansorge, U., Kiss, M., Worschech, F., & Eimer, M. (2011). The initial stage of visual selection is controlled by top-down task set: New ERP evidence. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 113-122.
5. Awh, E., Vogel, E. K., & Oh, S. H. (2006). Interactions between attention and working memory. Neuroscience, 139, 201-208. doi: 10. 1016/j. neuroscience. 2005. 08. 023.
6. Belopolsky, A. V., & Theeuwes, J. (2009). Inhibition of saccadic eye movements to locations in spatial working memory. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 620-631. doi: 10. 3758/APP. 71. 3. 620.
7. Belopolsky, A. V., & Theeuwes, J. (2011). Selection within visual memory representations activates the oculomotor system. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1605-1610.
8. Briand, K. A., Larrison, A. L., & Sereno, A. B. (2000). Inhibition of return in manual and saccadic response systems. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1512-1524.
9. Burnham, B. R. (2007). Displaywide visual features associated with a search display's appearance can mediate attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 392-422. doi: 10. 3758/BF03194082.
10. Burnham, B. R. (2013). Using response-time distributions to examine top-down influences of attentional capture. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75, 257-277.
11. Carbone, E., & Schneider, W. X. (2010). The control of stimulus-driven saccades is subject not to central, but to visual attention limitations. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 2168-2175.
12. Cole, G. G., Kuhn, G., Heywood, C. A., & Kentridge, R. W. (2009). The prioritization of feature singletons in the allocation of visual attention. Experimental Psychology, 56, 134-146.
13. Deubel, H. (2008). The time course of presaccadic attention shifts. Psychological Research, 72, 630-640.
14. Deubel, H., & Schneider, W. X. (1996). Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism. Vision Research, 36, 1827-1837. doi: 10. 1016/0042-6989(95)00294-4.
15. Dorris, M. C., Klein, R. M., Everling, S., & Munoz, D. P. (2002). Contribution of the primate superior colliculus to inhibition of return. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 1256-1263. doi: 10. 1162/089892902760807249.
16. Eimer, M., & Kiss, M. (2008). Involuntary attentional capture is determined by task set: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 1423-1433. doi: 10. 1162/jocn. 2008. 20099.
17. Folk, C. L., & Anderson, B. A. (2010). Target-uncertainty effects in attentional capture: Color-singleton set or multiple attentional control settings? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 421-426. doi: 10. 3758/PBR. 17. 3. 421.
18. Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. (1998). Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 24, 847-858. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 24. 3. 847.
19. Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1030-1044. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 18. 4. 1030.
20. Gabay, S., Chica, A. B., Charras, P., Funes, M. J., & Henik, A. (2012). Cue and target processing modulate the onset of inhibition of return. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 38, 42-52.
21. Gibson, B. S., & Amelio, J. (2000). Inhibition of return and attentional control settings. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 496-504.
22. Godijn, R., & Theeuwes, J. (2004). The relationship between inhibition of return and saccade trajectory deviations. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 30, 538-554.
23. Grubert, A., & Eimer, M, (2013). Qualitative differences in the guidance of attention during single-color and multiple-color visual search: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. doi: 10. 1037/a0031046.
24. Hunt, A. R., & Kingstone, A. (2003). Inhibition of return: Dissociating attentional and oculomotor components. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 29, 1068-1074. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 29. 5. 1068.
25. Irons, J. L., Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. W. (2012). All set! Evidence of simultaneous attentional control settings for multiple target colors. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 38, 758-775.
26. Itti, L., Koch, C., & Niebur, E. (1998). A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 20, 1254-1259.
27. Kim, M.-S., & Cave, K. R. (1999). Top-down and bottom-up attentional control: On the nature of interference from a salient distractor. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1009-1023. doi: 10. 3758/BF03207609.
28. Klein, R. M. (2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 138-147. doi: 10. 1016/S1364-6613(00)01452-2.
29. Lamy, D. (2010). Reevaluating the disengagement hypothesis. Acta Psychologica, 135(2), 127-129.
30. Lamy, D., Leber, A., & Egeth, H. E. (2004). Effects of task relevance and stimulus-driven salience in feature-search mode. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 30, 1019-1031. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 30. 6. 1019.
31. Lupiàñez, J. (2010). Inhibition of return. In A. C. Nobre & J. T. Coull (Eds.), Attention and time (pp. 17-34). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
32. Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (1994). Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features. Memory and Cognition, 22, 657-672. doi: 10. 3758/BF03209251.
33. Pashler, H., Carrier, M., & Hoffman, J. (1993). Saccadic eye-movements and dual-task interference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 51-82.
34. Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531-556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. Pratt, J., & McAuliffe, J. (2002). Determining whether attentional control settings are inclusive or exclusive. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 1361-1370. doi: 10. 3758/BF03194778.
36. Remington, R. W., Folk, C. W., & McLean, J. P. (2001). Contingent attentional capture or delayed allocation of attention? Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 298-307.
37. Schreij, D., Owens, C., & Theeuwes, J. (2008). Abrupt onsets capture attention independent of top-down control settings. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 208-218. doi: 10. 3758/PP. 70. 2. 208.
38. Schreij, D., Theeuwes, J., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2010a). Abrupt onsets capture attention independent of top-down control settings II: Additivity is no evidence for filtering. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 672-682. doi: 10. 3758/APP. 72. 3. 672.
39. Schreij, D., Theeuwes, J., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2010b). Irrelevant onsets cause inhibition of return regardless of attentional set. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 1725-1729. doi: 10. 3758/APP. 72. 7. 1725.
40. Sokal, R. R., & Rohlf, J. F. (1981). Biometry: The principles and practice of statistics in biological research (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
41. Souto, D., & Kerzel, D. (2009). Evidence for an attentional component in saccadic inhibition of return. Experimental Brain Research, 195, 531-540.
42. Taylor, T. L., & Klein, R. M. (1998). On the cause and effects of inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 625-643.
43. Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 599-606. doi: 10. 3758/BF03211656.
44. Theeuwes, J. (2010). Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. Acta Psychologica, 123, 77-99. doi: 10. 1016/j. actpsy. 2010. 02. 006.
45. Theeuwes, J., Atchley, P., & Kramer, A. F. (2000). On the time course of top-down and bottom-up control of visual attention. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 105-125). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46. Tian, Y., Klein, R. M., Satel, J., Xu, P., & Yao, D. (2011). Electrophysiological explorations of the cause and effect of inhibition of return in a cue-target paradigm: A spatio-temporal theory. Brain Topography, 24, 164-182.
47. van Zoest, W., Donk, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2004). The role of stimulus-driven and goal-driven control in saccadic visual selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 30, 746-759. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 30. 4. 749.
48. Wang, Z., & Klein, R. M. (2010). Searching for inhibition of return in visual search-A review. Vision Research, 50, 220-228. doi: 10. 1016/j. visres. 2009. 11. 013.
49. Worschech, F., & Ansorge, U. (2012). Top-down search for color prevents voluntary directing of attention to informative singleton cues. Experimental Psychology, 59, 153-162.
50. Zhang, Y., & Zhang, M. (2011). Spatial working memory load impairs manual but not saccadic inhibition of return. Vision Research, 51, 147-153. doi: 10. 1016/j. visres. 2010. 10. 022.