Cue and target processing modulate the onset of inhibition of return

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 42-52

  Gabay, Shai ^a   Chica, Ana B ^b   Charras, Pom ^b   Funes, Maria J ^b   Henik, Avishai ^a  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Cue processing; Exogenous orienting; IOR

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHYSIOLOGY; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; CUES; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; SPACE PERCEPTION; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84864338260     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0023675     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Aston-Jones, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2005). An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: Adaptive gain and optimal performance. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 28, 403-450.
2. Aston-Jones, G., Rajkowski, J., & Cohen, J. (2000). Locus coeruleus and regulation of behavioral flexibility and attention. Progress in Brain Research, 126, 165-182.
3. Aston-Jones, G., Rajkowski, J., Kubiak, P., & Alexinsky, T. (1994). Locus coeruleus neurons in monkey are selectively activated by attended cues in a vigilance task. The Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 4467-4480.
4. Berger, A., Henik, A., & Rafal, R. (2005). Competition between endogenous and exogenous orienting of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 207-221.
5. Chica, A. B., & Lupiáñez, J. (2009). Effects of endogenous and exogenous attention on visual processing: An Inhibition of Return study. Brain Research, 1278, 75-85.
6. Chica, A. B., Lupiáñez, J., & Bartolomeo, P. (2006). Dissociating inhibition of return from endogenous orienting of spatial attention: Evidence from detection and discrimination tasks. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23, 1015-1034.
7. Clayton, E. C., Rajkowski, J., Cohen, J. D., & Aston-Jones, G. (2004). Phasic activation of monkey locus ceruleus neurons by simple decisions in a forced-choice task. The Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 9914-9920.
8. Dukewich, K. R. (2009). Reconceptualizing inhibition of return as habituation of the orienting response. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(2), 238-251.
9. Gabay, S., & Henik, A. (2010). Temporal expectancy modulates inhibition of return in a discrimination task. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 17, 47-51.
10. Gabay, S., Henik, A., & Gradstein, L. (2010). Ocular motor ability and covert attention in patients with duane retraction syndrome. Neuropsychologia, 48, 3102-3109.
11. Gabay, S., Pertzov, Y., & Henik, A. (2011). Orienting of attention, pupil size and the norepinephrine system. Attention Perception and Psychophysics. 73, 123-129.
12. Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 494-500.
13. Hu, F. K., Samuel, A. G., & Chan, A. S. (2011). Eliminating inhibition of return by changing salient nonspatial attributes in a complex environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 35-50.
14. Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175-219.
15. Klein, R. (2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 138-146.
16. Luo, C., Lupiáñez, J., Fu, X., & Weng, X. (2010). Spatial Stroop and spatial orienting: The role of onset versus offset cues. Psychological Research, 74, 277-290.
17. Lupiáñez, J. (2010). Inhibition of return. In A. C. Nobre, & J. T. Coull (Eds.), Attention and time (pp. 17-34). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
18. Lupiáñez, J., Decaix, C., Sieroff, E., Chokron, S., Milliken, B., & Bartolomeo, P. (2004). Independent effects of endogenous and exogenous spatial cueing: Inhibition of return at endogenously attended target locations. Experimental Brain Research, 159, 447-457.
19. Lupiáñez, J., Klein, R., & Bartolomeo, P. (2006). Inhibition of return: Twenty years after. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23, 1003-1014.
20. Lupiáñez, J., Milan, E. G., Tornay, F. J., Madrid, E., & Tudela, P. (1997). Does IOR occur in discrimination tasks? Yes, it does, but later. Perception and Psychophysics, 59, 1241-1254.
21. Lupiáñez, J., & Milliken, B. (1999). Inhibition of return and the attentional set for integrating versus differentiating information. The Journal of General psychology, 126, 392-418.
22. Lupiáñez, J., Ruz, M., Funes, M. J., & Milliken, B. (2007). The manifestation of attentional capture: Facilitation or IOR depending on task demands. Psychological Research, 71, 77-91.
23. Lupiáñez, J., & Weaver, B. (1998). On the time-course of the exogenous cueing attentional effects. A commentary on Tassinari et al. (1994). Vision Research, 38, 1619-1621.
24. Maylor, E. A., & Hockey, R. (1985). Inhibitory component of externally controlled covert orienting in visual space. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 777-787.
25. Nieuwenhuis, S., Gilzenrat, M. S., Holmes, B. D., & Cohen, J. D. (2005). The role of the locus coeruleus in mediating the attentional blink: A neurocomputational theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 291-307.
26. Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. P. C. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X (pp. 531-556). London: Erlbaum.
27. Rafal, R., Davies, J., & Lauder, J. (2006). Inhibitory tagging at subsequently fixated locations: Generation of "inhibition of return" without saccade inhibition. Visual Cognition, 13, 308-323.
28. Ruz, M., & Lupiáñez, J. (2002). A review of attentional capture: On its automaticity and sensitivity to endogenous control. Psicologica, 23, 283-309.
29. Sapir, A., Soroker, N., Berger, A., & Henik, A. (1999). Inhibition of return in spatial attention: Direct evidence for collicular generation. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 1053-1054.
30. Tassinari, G., Aglioti, S., Chelazzi, L., Peru, A., & Berlucchi, G. (1994). Do peripheral non-informative cues induce early facilitation of target detection? Vision Research, 34, 179-189.
31. Terry, K. M., Valdes, L. A., & Neill, W. T. (1994). Does "inhibition of return" occur in discrimination tasks? Perception and Psychophysics, 55, 279-286.
32. Tzelgov, J., & Cohen Kadosh, R. (2009). From automaticity to control in bilinguals. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 455.
33. Verguts, T., & Notebaert, W. (2009). Adaptation by binding: A learning account of cognitive control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 252-257.