The control of stimulus-driven saccades is subject not to central, but to visual attention limitations

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 72, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 2168-2175

  Carbone, Elena ^a   Schneider, Werner X ^a  

^a BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649706244     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196692     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. AWH, E., ARMSTRONG, K. M., & MOORE, T. (2006). Visual and oculomotor selection: Links, causes and implications for spatial attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 124-130.
2. BRISSON, B., & JOLICŒUR, P. (2007). Electrophysiological evidence of central interference in the control of visuospatial attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 126-132.
3. BUNDESEN, C. (1990). A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 97, 523-547.
4. BUNDESEN, C., & HABEKOST, T. (2008). Principles of visual attention. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. BUNDESEN, C., HABEKOST, T., & KYLLINGSBÆK, S. (2005). A neural theory of visual attention: Bridging cognition and neurophysiology. Psychological Review, 112, 291-328.
6. CHUN, M. M., & POTTER, M. C. (1995). A two-stage model of multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 109-127.
7. DELL'ACQUA, R., SESSA, P., JOLICŒUR, P., & ROBITAILLE, N. (2006). Spatial attention freezes during the attentional blink. Psychophysiology, 43, 394-400.
8. DESIMONE, R., & DUNCAN, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193-222.
9. DEUBEL, H., & SCHNEIDER, W. X. (1996). Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism. Vision Research, 36, 1827-1837.
10. FINDLAY, J. M. (2009). Saccadic eye movement programming: Sensory and attentional factors. Psychological Research, 73, 127-135.
11. 1 decisions. Memory & Cognition, 26, 1014-1032.
12. JOLICŒUR, P. (1999a). Concurrent response-selection demands modulate the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 1097-1113.
13. JOLICŒUR, P. (1999b). Dual-task interference and visual encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 596-616.
14. JOLICŒUR, P., & DELL'ACQUA, R. (1998). The demonstration of short-term consolidation. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 138-202.
15. KAHNEMAN, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
16. KUSTOV, A. A., & ROBINSON, D. L. (1996). Shared neural control of attentional shifts and eye movements. Nature, 384, 74-77.
17. NEUMANN, O. (1990). Direct parameter specification and the concept of perception. Psychological Research, 52, 207-215.
18. PASHLER, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 16, 220-244.
19. PASHLER, H., CARRIER, M., & HOFFMAN, J. (1993). Saccadic eye movements and dual-task interference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 51-82.
20. SCHNEIDER, W. X. (1995). VAM: A neuro-cognitive model for visual attention control of segmentation, object recognition, and space-based motor action. Visual Cognition, 2, 331-375.
21. SCHNEIDER, W. X., & DEUBEL, H. (1995). Visual attention and saccadic eye movements: Evidence for obligatory and selective spatial coupling. In J. M. Findlay, R. Walker, &R. W. Kentridge (Eds.), Eye movement research: Mechanisms, processes, and applications (pp. 317-324). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
22. SCHNEIDER, W. X., & DEUBEL, H. (2002). Selection-for-perception and selection-for-spatial-motor-action are coupled by visual attention: A review of recent findings and new evidence from stimulus-driven saccade control. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and performance XIX (pp. 609-627). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. WISCHNEWSKI, M., BELARDINELLI, A., SCHNEIDER, W. X., & STEIL, J. J. (in press). Where to look next? Combining static and dynamic proto-objects in a TVA-based model of visual attention. Cognitive Computation.