A fröhlich effect and representational gravity in memory for auditory pitch

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 1153-1164

  Hubbard, Timothy L ^a   Ruppel, Susan E ^b  

^a TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA UPSTATE   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory motion; Displacement; Fr hlich effect; Pitch memory; Representational gravity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HEARING; HUMAN; MEMORY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; CUES; HUMANS; MEMORY; PITCH PERCEPTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SPACE PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84887551242     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0031103     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Carbone, E., & Ansorge, U. (2008). Investigating the contribution of metacontrast to the Fröhlich effect for size. Acta Psychologica, 128, 361-367.
2. Courtney, J. R., & Hubbard, T. L. (2008). Spatial memory and explicit knowledge: An effect of instruction on representational momentum. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1778-1784.
3. Eitan, Z., & Granot, R. Y. (2006). How music moves: Musical parameters and listeners' images of motion. Music Perception, 23, 221-248.
4. Elkin, J., & Leuthold, H. (2011). The representation of pitch in auditory imagery: Evidence from S-R compatibility and distance effects. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23, 76-91.
5. Freyd, J. J., & Johnson, J. Q. (1987). Probing the time course of representational momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 259-268.
6. Fröhlich, F. W. (1923). Ü ber die Messung der Empfindungszeit (Measuring the time of sensation). Zeitschrift für Sinnesphysiologie, 54, 58-78.
7. Geer, M., & Schmidt, W. C. (2006). Perception of initial moving target signals: Support for a cumulative lateral inhibition theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1185-1196.
8. Getzmann, S. (2005). Shifting the onset of a moving sound source: A Fröhlich effect in spatial hearing. Hearing Research, 210, 104-111.doi:10.1016/j.heares.2005.08.003.
9. Ghazanfar, A. A., & Maier, J. X. (2009). Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) hear rising frequency sounds as looming. Behavioral Neuroscience, 123, 822-827.
10. Godøy, R. I. (2001). Imagined action, excitation, and resonance. In R. I. Godøy, & H. Jørgensen (Eds.), Musical imagery (pp. 237-250). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
11. Hayes, A. E., & Freyd, J. J. (2002). Representational momentum when attention is divided. Visual Cognition, 9, 8-27.
12. Hubbard, T. L. (1990). Cognitive representation of linear motion: Possible direction and gravity effects in judged displacement. Memory & Cognition, 18, 299-309.
13. Hubbard, T. L. (1995). Environmental invariants in the representation of motion: Implied dynamics and representational momentum, gravity, friction, and centripetal force. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 322-338.
14. Hubbard, T. L. (1997). Target size and displacement along the axis of implied gravitational attraction: Effects of implied weight and evidence of representational gravity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1484-1493.
15. Hubbard, T. L. (2005). Representational momentum and related displacements in spatial memory: A review of the findings. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 822-851.
16. Hubbard, T. L. (in press). Auditory imagery contains more than audition. In S. Lacey & R. Lawson (Eds.), Multisensory imagery: Theories and applications. New York, NY: Springer.
17. Hubbard, T. L., & Bharucha, J. J. (1988). Judged displacement in apparent vertical and horizontal motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 211-221.
18. Hubbard, T. L., & Courtney, J. R. (2010). Cross-modal influences on representational momentum and representational gravity. Perception, 39, 851-862.
19. Hubbard, T. L., Kumar, A. M., & Carp, C. L. (2009). Effects of spatial cueing on representational momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 666-677.
20. Hubbard, T. L., & Motes, M. A. (2005). An effect of context on whether memory for initial position exhibits a Fröhlich effect or an onset repulsion effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 961-979.
21. Hubbard, T. L., & Ruppel, S. E. (2011). Effects of spatial cueing on the onset repulsion effect. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 2236-2248.
22. Johnston, H. M., & Jones, M. R. (2006). Higher order pattern structure influences auditory representational momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 2-17.
23. Kerzel, D. (2002a). Attention shifts and memory averaging. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 425-443.
24. Kerzel, D. (2002b). Different localization of motion onset with point and relative judgements [sic]. Experimental Brain Research, 145, 340-350.doi:10.1007/s00221-002-1126-5.
25. Kerzel, D. (2010). The Fröhlich effect: Past and present. In R. Nijhawan & B. Khurana (Eds.), Space and time in perception and action (pp. 321-337). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26. Kerzel, D., & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2004). Spatial distortions and processing latencies in the onset repulsion and Fröhlich effects, Vision Research, 44, 577-590.
27. Kirschfeld, K., & Kammer, T. (1999). The Fröhlich effect: A consequence of the interaction of visual focal attention and metacontrast. Vision Research, 39, 3702-3709.
28. Krumhansl, C. L. (1990). Cognitive foundations of musical pitch. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
29. Mateeff, S., & Gourevich, A. (1983). Peripheral vision and perceived visual direction. Biological Cybernetics, 49, 111-118.
30. Melara, R. D., & Marks, L. E. (1990). Processes underlying dimensional interactions: Correspondences between linguistic and nonlinguistic dimensions. Memory & Cognition, 18, 477-495.
31. Munger, M. P., Solberg, J. L., Horrocks, K. K., & Preston, A. S. (1999). Representational momentum for rotations in depth: Effects of shading and axis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 157-171.
32. Müsseler, J., & Aschersleben, G. (1998). Localizing the first position of a moving stimulus: The Fröhlich effect and an attention-shifting explanation. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 683-695.
33. Müsseler, J., & Kerzel, D. (2004). The trial context determines adjusted localization of stimuli: Reconciling the Fröhlich and onset repulsion effects. Vision Research, 44, 2201-2206.
34. Müsseler, J., Stork, S., & Kerzel, D. (2002). Comparing mislocalizations with moving stimuli: The Fröhlich effect, the flash-lag, and representational momentum. Visual Cognition, 9, 120-138.
35. Müsseler, J., van der Heijden, A. H. C., Mahmud, S. H., Deubel, H., & Ertsey, S. (1999). Relative mislocalization of briefly presented stimuli in the retinal periphery. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1646-1661.doi:10.3758/BF03213124.
36. Neuhoff, J. G. (2001). An adaptive bias in the perception of looming auditory motion. Ecological Psychology, 13, 87-110.
37. Neuhoff, J. G., & McBeath, M. K. (1996). The Doppler illusion: The influence of dynamic intensity change on perceived pitch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 970-985.
38. Posner, M. I., Nissen, M. J., & Ogden, W. C. (1977). Attended and unattended processing modes: The role of set for spatial location. In H. L. Pick & I. J. Saltzman (Eds.), Modes of perceiving and processing information (pp. 137-157). Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.
39. Ruppel, S. E., Fleming, C. N., & Hubbard, T. L. (2009). Representational momentum is not (totally) impervious to error feedback. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 49-58.
40. Rusconi, E., Kwan, B., Giordano, B. L., Umilta, C., & Butterworth, B. (2006). Spatial representation of pitch height: The SMARC effect. Cognition, 99, 113-129.
41. Shepard, R. N. (1982). Geometrical approximations to the structure of musical pitch. Psychological Review, 89, 305-333.
42. Spence, C. (2011). Crossmodal correspondences: A tutorial review. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 971-995.
43. Thornton, I. M. (2002). The onset repulsion effect. Spatial Vision, 15, 219-243.