Exploration and comparison of inborn capacity of aerobic and anaerobic metabolisms of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for microbial electrical current production

Bioengineered

Volumn 4, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 420-430

  Mao, Longfei ^a   Verwoerd, Wynand S ^a  

^a LINCOLN UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Bioelectricity; FATMIN; Flux balance analysis; Flux minimization; Flux variability analysis; MFC; Microbial fuel cell; Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL DEHYDROGENASE; FORMATE DEHYDROGENASE; GLUTAMATE DEHYDROGENASE; GLYCERALDEHYDE 3 PHOSPHATE DEHYDROGENASE (NADP); MALATE DEHYDROGENASE; METHYLENETETRAHYDROFOLATE DEHYDROGENASE; PHOSPHOGLYCERATE DEHYDROGENASE; REDUCED NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE; METHYLENETETRAHYDROFOLATE DEHYDROGENASE (NAD);

AEROBIC METABOLISM; ANAEROBIC METABOLISM; ARTICLE; BIOMASS ENERGY; BIOMASS PRODUCTION; COST; ELECTRIC CURRENT; ELECTRON TRANSPORT; FERMENTATION; GLUCOSE TRANSPORT; MICROBIAL GROWTH; NONHUMAN; OXIDATIVE PHOSPHORYLATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; ANAEROBIC GROWTH; BIOENERGY; BIOMASS; ELECTRICITY; ENZYMOLOGY; FATMIN; FLUX BALANCE ANALYSIS; FLUX MINIMIZATION; FLUX VARIABILITY ANALYSIS; METABOLIC ENGINEERING; METABOLISM; MFC; MICROBIAL FUEL CELL;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

BIOELECTRICITY; FATMIN; FLUX BALANCE ANALYSIS; FLUX MINIMIZATION; FLUX VARIABILITY ANALYSIS; MFC; MICROBIAL FUEL CELL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

AEROBIOSIS; ANAEROBIOSIS; BIOELECTRIC ENERGY SOURCES; BIOMASS; ELECTRICITY; ELECTRON TRANSPORT; GLUTAMATE DEHYDROGENASE; METABOLIC ENGINEERING; METABOLIC NETWORKS AND PATHWAYS; METHYLENETETRAHYDROFOLATE DEHYDROGENASE (NAD+); SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84887539642     PISSN: 19491018     EISSN: 19491026     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/bioe.26222     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Dequin S, Casaregola S. The genomes of fermentative Saccharomyces. C R Biol 2011; 334:687-693; PMID:21819951; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. crvi.2011.05.019
2. Gibbs PEM, Wang X-D, Li Z, McManus T P, McGregor WG, Lawrence CW, Maher VM. The function of the human homolog of Saccharomyces cerevisiae REV1 is required for mutagenesis induced by UV light. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000; 97:4186-4191; PMID:10760286; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/ pnas.97.8.4186
3. Reenan RA, Kolodner RD. Isolation and characterization of two Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes encoding homologs of the bacterial HexA and MutS mismatch repair proteins. Genetics 1992; 132:963-973; PMID:1459447
4. Garcerá A, Martínez AI, Castillo L, Elorza M V, Sentandreu R, Valentín E. Identification and study of a Candida albicans protein homologous to Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ssr1p, an internal cell-wall protein. Microbiology 2003; 149:2137-2145; PMID:12904553; http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.26301-0
5. Freire R, Murguía JR, Tarsounas M, Lowndes N F, Moens PB, Jackson SP. Human and mouse homo-logs of Schizosaccharomyces pombe rad1(+) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD17: linkage to checkpoint control and mammalian meiosis. Genes Dev 1998; 12:2560-2573; PMID:9716408; http://dx.doi. org/10.1101/gad.12.16.2560
6. Karathia H, Vilaprinyo E, Sorribas A, Alves R. Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a model organism: a comparative study. PLoS One 2011; 6:e16015; PMID:21311596; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0016015
7. Peralta-Yahya P P, Keasling JD. Advanced biofuel production in microbes. Biotechnol J 2010; 5:147-162; PMID:20084640; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ biot.200900220
8. Rabaey K, Verstraete W. Microbial fuel cells: novel biotechnology for energy generation. Trends Biotechnol 2005; 23:291-298; PMID:15922081; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2005.04.008
9. Babanova S, Hubenova Y, Mitov M. Influence of artificial mediators on yeast-based fuel cell performance. J Biosci Bioeng 2011; 112:379-387; PMID:21782506; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2011.06.008
10. Bullen RA, Arnot TC, Lakeman JB, Walsh FC. Biofuel cells and their development. Biosens Bioelectron 2006; 21:2015-2045; PMID:16569499; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.bios.2006.01.030
11. Mao L, Verwoerd W. Selection of organisms for systems biology study of microbial electricity generation: a review. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering 2013; 4:17; http://dx.doi. org/10.1186/2251-6832-4-17
12. Logan BE, Hamelers B, Rozendal R, Schröder U, Keller J, Freguia S, Aelterman P, Verstraete W, Rabaey K. Microbial fuel cells: methodology and technology. Environ Sci Technol 2006; 40:5181-5192; PMID:16999087; http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ es0605016
13. Heiskanen A, Spégel C, Kostesha N, Lindahl S, Ruzgas T, Emnéus J. Mediator-assisted simultaneous probing of cytosolic and mitochondrial redox activity in living cells. Anal Biochem 2009; 384:11-19; PMID:18812160; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2008.08.030
14. Sayed ET, Tsujiguchi T, Nakagawa N. Catalytic activity of baker's yeast in a mediatorless micro-bial fuel cell. Bioelectrochemistry 2012; 86:97-101; PMID:22357359; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bioel-echem.2012.02.001
15. Gunawardena A, Fernando S, To F. Performance of a yeast-mediated biological fuel cell. Int J Mol Sci 2008; 9:1893-1907; PMID:19325724; http://dx.doi. org/10.3390/ijms9101893
16. Raghavulu SV, Goud RK, Sarma PN, Mohan SV. Saccharomyces cerevisiae as anodic biocatalyst for power generation in biofuel cell: influence of redox condition and substrate load. Bioresour Technol 2011; 102:2751-2757; PMID:21146401; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.11.048
17. Oberhardt MA, Palsson BO, Papin JA. Applications of genome-scale metabolic reconstructions. Mol Syst Biol 2009; 5:320; PMID:19888215; http://dx.doi. org/10.1038/msb.2009.77
18. Lewis NE, Nagarajan H, Palsson BO. Constraining the metabolic genotype-phenotype relationship using a phylogeny of in silico methods. Nat Rev Microbiol 2012; 10:291-305; PMID:22367118
19. Mao L, Verwoerd WS. Genome-scale stoichiometry analysis to elucidate the innate capability of the cyano-bacterium Synechocystis for electricity generation. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2013; PMID:23851491; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10295-013-1308-0
20. Mao L, Verwoerd WS. Model-driven elucidation of the inherent capacity of Geobacter sulfurreducens for electricity generation. J Biol Eng 2013; 7:14; PMID:23718629; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-1611-7-14
21. Heavner BD, Smallbone K, Barker B, Mendes P, Walker L P. Yeast 5 - an expanded reconstruction of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolic network. BMC Syst Biol 2012; 6:55; PMID:22663945; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-6-55
22. Mao L, Verwoerd WS. Computational comparison of mediated MFC current generation capacity of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii in photosynthetic and respiratory growth modes. In press.
23. Cheetham NWH. Introducing Biological Energetics: How Energy and Information Control the Living World. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.
24. Kim BH, Park HS, Kim HJ, Kim GT, Chang IS, Lee J, Phung NT. Enrichment of microbial community generating electricity using a fuel-cell-type electrochemical cell. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2004; 63:672-681; PMID:12908088; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-003-1412-6
25. Haslett ND, Rawson FJ, Barriëre F, Kunze G, Pasco N, Gooneratne R, Baronian KHR. Characterisation of yeast microbial fuel cell with the yeast Arxula adeninivorans as the biocatalyst. Biosens Bioelectron 2011; 26:3742-3747; PMID:21493057; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.bios.2011.02.011
26. Ganguli R, Dunn BS. Kinetics of Anode Reactions for a Yeast-Catalysed Microbial Fuel Cell. Fuel Cells (Weinh) 2009; 9:44-52; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ fuce.200800039
27. Videla HA, Arvía AJ. The response of a bioelectro-chemical cell with Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolizing glucose under various fermentation conditions. Biotechnol Bioeng 1975; 17:1529-1543; PMID:241440; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bit.260171011
28. Park DH, Kim SK, Shin IH, Jeong YJ. Electricity production in biofuel cell using modified graphite electrode with Neutral Red. Biotechnol Lett 2000; 22:1301-1304; http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1005674107841
29. Park DH, Zeikus JG. Electricity generation in microbial fuel cells using neutral red as an electronophore. Appl Environ Microbiol 2000; 66:1292-1297; PMID:10742202; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/ AEM.66.4.1292-1297.2000
30. Jeong H, Tombor B, Albert R, Oltvai ZN, Barabási AL. The large-scale organization of metabolic networks. Nature 2000; 407:651-654; PMID:11034217; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1038/35036627
31. Famili I, Förster J, Nielsen J, Palsson BO. Saccharomyces cerevisiae phenotypes can be predicted by using constraint-based analysis of a genome-scale reconstructed metabolic network. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003; 100:13134-13139; PMID:14578455; http://dx.doi. org/10.1073/pnas.2235812100
32. Edwards JS, Ibarra RU, Palsson BO. In silico predictions of Escherichia coli metabolic capabilities are consistent with experimental data. Nat Biotechnol 2001; 19:125-130; PMID:11175725; http://dx.doi. org/10.1038/84379
33. Fong SS, Palsson BO. Metabolic gene-deletion strains of Escherichia coli evolve to computationally predicted growth phenotypes. Nat Genet 2004; 36:1056-1058; PMID:15448692; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng1432
34. Varma A, Palsson BO. Stoichiometric flux balance models quantitatively predict growth and metabolic by-product secretion in wild-type Escherichia coli W3110. Appl Environ Microbiol 1994; 60:3724-3731; PMID:7986045
35. Ibarra RU, Edwards JS, Palsson BO. Escherichia coli K-12 undergoes adaptive evolution to achieve in silico predicted optimal growth. Nature 2002; 420:186-189; PMID:12432395; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ nature01149
36. Burgard A P, Maranas CD. Optimization-based framework for inferring and testing hypothesized metabolic objective functions. Biotechnol Bioeng 2003; 82:670-677; PMID:12673766; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ bit.10617
37. Pereyra V, Saunders M, Castillo J. Equispaced Pareto front construction for constrained bi-objective optimization. Math Comput Model 2013; 57:2122-2131; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2010.12.044
38. Ekins S, Honeycutt JD, Metz J T. Evolving molecules using multi-objective optimization: applying to ADME/Tox. Drug Discov Today 2010; 15:451-460; PMID:20438859; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. drudis.2010.04.003
39. Kim K-Y, Chae K-J, Choi M-J, Ajayi F F, Jang A, Kim C-W, Kim IS. Enhanced Coulombic efficiency in glucose-fed microbial fuel cells by reducing metabolite electron losses using dual-anode electrodes. Bioresour Technol 2011; 102:4144-4149; PMID:21216140; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.12.036
40. Suthers PF, Zomorrodi A, Maranas CD. Genome-scale gene/reaction essentiality and synthetic lethality analysis. Mol Syst Biol 2009; 5:301; PMID:19690570; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/msb.2009.56
41. Zomorrodi AR, Maranas CD. Improving the iMM904 S. cerevisiae metabolic model using essentiality and synthetic lethality data. BMC Syst Biol 2010; 4:178; PMID:21190580; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-4-178
42. Schellenberger J, Que R, Fleming RM, Thiele I, Orth JD, Feist AM, Zielinski DC, Bordbar A, Lewis NE, Rahmanian S, et al. Quantitative prediction of cellular metabolism with constraint-based models: the COBRA Toolbox v2.0. Nat Protoc 2011; 6:1290-1307; PMID:21886097; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ nprot.2011.308
43. Mo ML, Palsson BO, Herrgård MJ. Connecting extracellular metabolomic measurements to intracel-lular flux states in yeast. BMC Syst Biol 2009; 3:37; PMID:19321003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-3-37
44. Varma A, Palsson B.O. Metabolic Flux Balancing: Basic Concepts, Scientific and Practical Use. Nat Biotechnol 1994; 12:994-998; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt1094-994
45. Orth JD, Thiele I, Palsson BO. What is flux balance analysis? Nat Biotechnol 2010; 28:245-248; PMID:20212490; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1614
46. Rocha I, Maia P, Evangelista P, Vilaça P, Soares S, Pinto J P, Nielsen J, Patil KR, Ferreira EC, Rocha M. OptFlux: an open-source software platform for in silico metabolic engineering. BMC Syst Biol 2010; 4:45; PMID:20403172; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-4-45
47. Virdis B, Freguia S, Rozendal RA, Rabaey K, Yuan Z, Keller J. 4.18 - Microbial Fuel Cells. In: Editor-in-Chief: Peter W, ed. Treatise on Water Science. Oxford: Elsevier, 2011:641-65.
48. Cheng S, Liu H, Logan BE. Increased power generation in a continuous flow MFC with advective flow through the porous anode and reduced electrode spacing. Environ Sci Technol 2006; 40:2426-2432; PMID:16646485; http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ es051652w
49. Zhao F, Harnisch F, Schröder U, Scholz F, Bogdanoff P, Herrmann I. Challenges and constraints of using oxygen cathodes in microbial fuel cells. Environ Sci Technol 2006; 40:5193-5199; PMID:16999088; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1021/es060332p
50. Schröder U. Anodic electron transfer mechanisms in microbial fuel cells and their energy efficiency. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2007; 9:2619-2629; PMID:17627307; http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b703627m