Deciding to use an enterprise wiki: The role of social institutions and scripts

Knowledge Management Research and Practice

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 323-333

  Jackson, Paul ^a   Klobas, Jane ^b  

^a EDITH COWAN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b BOCCONI UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

Author keywords

collaborative systems; knowledge management practice; knowledge sharing

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887487005     PISSN: 14778238     EISSN: 14778246     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/kmrp.2012.20     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. ABERDEEN GROUP (2008) Customer 2.0: the business implications of social media. Aberdeen Group. [WWW document] http://www.aberdeen.com/summary/report/ benchmark/5195-RA-customer-20-social-media.asp (accessed 5 May 2012).
2. ARCHER M (2003) Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
3. AUTY RM (1993) Sustaining Development in Mineral Economies. Routledge, London.
4. BARLEY SR and TOLBERT PS (1997) Institutionalization and structuration: studying the links between action and institution. Organization Studies 18(1), 93-117. (Pubitemid 127345461)
5. BEACH R, BRERETON D and CLIFF D (2003) Workforce turnover in Australian FIFO mining operations: summary report. Centre for Social Responsibility in Mining and Minerals Industry Safety and Health Centre, Brisbane.
6. BLASCHKE S (2008) Wikis in organisationen: von kommunikation zu kollaboration. In Web 2.0: Eine Empirische Bestandsaufnahme (ALPAR P and BLASCHKE S, Eds), pp 185-203, Vieweg+Teubner, Wiesbaden.
7. BOSSON R and VARON B (1977) The Mining Industry and the Developing Countries. Oxford University Press, Washington.
8. BOURDIEU P (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
9. BRADLEY A (2009) The Six Core Principles of Social-Media-Based Collaboration, G00172930. Gartner Inc., Stamford, CT.
10. BUGHIN J, CHUI M and MILLER A (2009) How companies are benefiting from Web 2.0. McKinsey & Company. [WWW document] http://www.mckinseyquarterly. com/How-companies-are-benefiting-from-Web- 20-McKinsey-Global-Survey-Results- 2432?pagenum6 (accessed 5 May 2012).
11. CHO H, CHEN M and CHUNG S (2010) Testing an integrative theoretical model of knowledge-sharing behavior in the context of Wikipedia. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61(6), 1198-1212.
12. CHUI M, MILLER A and ROBERTS RP (2009) Six ways to make Web 2.0 work. McKinsey & Company. [WWW document] http://www.mckinsey quarterly.com/Six- ways-to-make-Web-20-work-2294 (accessed 5 May 2012).
13. CLEGG S (2010) The state, power and agency: missing in action in institutional theory? Journal of Management Enquiry 19(1), 4-13.
14. CURRIE WL (2009a) Contextualising the IT artefact: towards a wider research agenda for IS using institutional theory. Information Technology & People 22(1), 63-77.
15. CURRIE WL (2009b) Special issue on institutional theory in information systems research: contextualizing the IT artefact. Journal of Information Technology 24(4), 283-285.
16. DANIS C and SINGER D (2008) A Wiki instance in the enterprise: opportunities, concerns and reality. In CSCW 2008, (BEGOLE B and McDONALD DW, Eds), pp 495-504, ACM Publishing, Baltimore, MD.
17. DAVIS FD, BAGOZZI RP and WARSHAW RR (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 35(8), 982-1003.
18. DE VAUJANY F-X (2008) Capturing reflexivity modes in IS: a critical realist approach. Information & Organization 18(1), 51-72.
19. EBERSBACH A, KRIMMEL K and WARTA A (2008) Auswahl und Aussage von Kenngroessen innerbetrieblicher Wiki-Arbeit. In Web 20-Eine empirische Bestandsaufnahme (ALPAR P and BLASCHKE S, Eds), pp 131-155, Vieweg+Teubner, Wiesbaden.
20. FISHBEIN M and AJZEN I (1975) Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
21. GRABURN NHH (1969) Eskimo law in light of self-and group-interest. Law & Society Review 4(1), 45-60.
22. HAMMERSLEY M and ATKINSON P (1995) Ethnography: Principles in Practice 2nd edn, Routledge, Abingdon.
23. HASSELBLADH H and KALLINIKOS J (2000) The project of rationalization: a critique and reappraisal of neo-institutionalism in organization studies. Organization Studies 21(4), 697-720.
24. HOEBEL EA (1972) The Law of Primitive Man: A Study in Comparative Legal Dynamics. Atheneum, New York.
25. IRANI Z, DWIVEDI YK and WILLIAMS MD (2009) Understanding consumer adoption of broadband: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Journal of the Operational Research Society 60(10), 1322-1334.
26. JENSEN TB, KJAERGAARD A and SVEJVIG P (2009) Using institutional theory with sensemaking theory: a case study of information system implementation in healthcare. Journal of Information Technology 24(4), 343-353.
27. JERMIER JM (1998) Introduction: critical perspectives on organizational control. Administrative Science Quarterly 43(2), 235-256.
28. JOHNSON G, SMITH S and CODLING B (2000) Microprocesses of institutional change in the context of privatization. The Academy of Management Review 25(3), 572-580.
29. JORGENSEN DL (1989) Participant Observation: A Methodology for Human Studies. Sage Publications, Newbury Park.
30. KIMMERLE J, CRESS U and HELD C (2010) The interplay between individual and collective knowledge: technologies for organisational learning and knowledge building. Knowledge Management Research & Practice 8(1), 33-44.
31. KLOBAS J (2006) Wikis: Tools for Information Work and Collaboration. Chandos Publishing, Oxford.
32. KUMAR K, VAN DISSEL HG and BIELLI P (1998) The merchant of Prato-revisited: toward a third rationality of information systems. MIS Quarterly 22(2), 199-226.
33. LIANG H, SARAF N and HU Q (2007) Assimilation of enterprise systems: the effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management. MIS Quarterly 31(1), 59-87. (Pubitemid 46382518)
34. LYYTINEN K, NEWMAN M and AL-MUHARFI A-RA (2009) Institutionalizing enterprise resource planning in the Saudi steel industry: a punctuated socio-technical analysis. Journal of Information Technology 24(4), 286-304.
35. MCAFFEE A (2006) Enterprise 2.0: the dawn of emergent collaboration. Sloan Management Review 47(3), 22-28.
36. MCDIVITT JF and MANNERS G (1965) Minerals and Men: An Exploration of the World of Minerals and Metals, including some of the Major Problems that are Posed. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
37. MCFARLAND DJ and HAMILTON D (2006) Adding contextual specificity to the technology acceptance model. Computers in Human Behavior 22(3), 427-447. (Pubitemid 43052711)
38. MILES D (2009) Collaboration and Enterprise 2.0: work-meets-play or the future of business? AIIM Market Intelligence, Silver Spring, Maryland. [WWW document] http://www.aiim.org/PDFDocuments/36789.pdf (accessed 5 May 2012).
39. ORLIKOWSKI WJ (1993) Learning from notes: organizational issues in groupware implementation. The Information Society 9(3), 237-250.
40. ORLIKOWSKI WJ and BARLEY SR (2001) Technology and Institutions: what can research on information technology and research on organizations learn from each other? MIS Quarterly 25(2), 145-165. (Pubitemid 33738442)
41. SCHNECKENBERG D (2009) Web 2.0 and the shift in corporate governance from control to democracy. Knowledge Management Research & Practice 7(4), 234-248.
42. SCOTT WR (1995) Institutions and Organizations. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
43. SEO M-G and CREED WED (2002) Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: a dialectical perspective. The Academy of Management Review 27(2), 222-247.
44. TAN M and TEO TSH (2000) Factors influencing the adoption of Internet banking. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 1(5), 1-42.
45. TEDLOCK B (2000) Ethnography. In Handbook of Qualitative Research (DENZIN NK and LINCOLN YS, Eds), 2nd edn, pp 455-485, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
46. VAN AKKEREN J and ROWLANDS B (2007) An epidemic of pain in an Australian radiology practice. European Journal of Information Systems 16(6), 695-711.
47. WALSHAM G (1993) Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations. John Wiley, Chichester.
48. WOLCOTT HF (1990) On seeking-and rejecting-validity in qualitative research. In Qualitative Inquiry in Education: The Continuing Debate (EISNER W and PESHKIN A, Eds), pp 121-152, Teachers College Press, New York.
49. WU JH and WANG SC (2005) What drives mobile commerce? An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Information & Management 42(5), 719-729.