An epidemic of pain in an Australian radiology practice

European Journal of Information Systems

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 695-711

  Van Akkeren, Jeanette ^a   Rowlands, Bruce ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE SUNSHINE COAST   (Australia)

^b GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Health informatics practice; ICT authority assimilation; Social actor model

Indexed keywords

EID: 37249004684     PISSN: 0960085X     EISSN: 14769344     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000715     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. AJZEN I (1991) The theory of planned behaviour. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes 50(2), 179-211.
2. AJZEN I and FISHBEIN M (1980) Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Behaviour. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
3. ARMSTRONG CP and SAMBAMURTHY V (1999) Information technology assimilation in firms: the influence of senior leadership and IT infrastructures. Information Systems Research, Linthicum 10(4), 304-328.
4. AUDET A, DOTY M, PEUGH J, SHAMASDIN J, ZAPERT K and SCHOENBAUM S (2004) Information technologies: when will they make it into physicians' black bags? Medscape General Medicine 6(4), 106-112.
5. BARLEY S (1986) Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CAT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly 3(1), 78-108.
6. BODENHEIMER T and GRUMBACH K (2003) Electronic technology: a spark to revitalize primary care? Journal of the American Medical Association 290, 259-264.
7. CHIASSON M, REDDY M, KAPLAN B and DAVIDSON E (2006) Expanding multidisciplinary approaches to healthcare information technologies: what does information systems offer medical informatics? International Journal of Medical Informatics 5(10), 21-30.
8. DAVIS FD, BAGOZZI RP and WARSHAW RR (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 35(8), 982-1003.
9. DAVIDSON E and HESLINGA D (2007) Bridging the IT adoption gap for small physician practices: an action research study on electronic health records. Information Systems Management 24(1), 15-29.
10. DAVIS F (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13(3), 319-340.
11. DELONE WH and MCLEAN ERF (1992) Information systems success: the quest for the dependant variable. Information Systems Research 3(1), 60-95.
12. FICHMAN RG (2000) The diffusion and assimilation of information technology innovations. In Framing the Domains of IT Management: Projecting the Future through the Past (ZMUD R, Ed), Pinnaflex Publishing, Cincinnati, OH.
13. GALLIVAN M (2001) Organisational adoption and assimilation of complex technological innovations: development and application of a new framework. Databases for Advances in Information Systems 32(3), 51-85.
14. GARABALDI R (1998) Computers and the quality of care: a clinician's perspective. New England Journal of Medicine 338(4), 232-238.
15. HEEKS R (2006) Health information systems: failure, success and improvisation. International Journal of Medical Informatics 75, 125-137.
16. JENSEN T and AANESTAD M (2007) How healthcare professionals make sense of an electronic patient record system. Information Systems Management 24(1), 29-42.
17. KAPLAN B (1998) Social interactionist framework for information systems studies: the 4Cs. In IFIP WG8.2 and WG8.6 Joint Working Conference on Information Systems: Current Issues and Future Change (LARSON TJ, LEVINE L and DEGROSS JI, Eds), pp 327-340, International Federation for Information Processing, Helsinki.
18. KLECUN E and CRONFORD T (2005) A critical approach to evaluation. European Journal of Information Systems 14(3), 229-245.
19. KLING R, ROSENBAUM H and SAWYER S (2005) Understanding and communication social informatics: a framework for study and teaching the human contexts of ICTs. Information Today, Medford, NJ.
20. LAMB R (2003) Internet boundaries as guidelines for systems integration. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 7(4), 9-35.
21. LAMB R (2005) Social actor modelling in ICT research. In Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Information Technology Evaluation, (SUOMI R, Ed), pp 287-296, Academic Conferences International, Turku Finland.
22. LAMB R (2006) Alternative paths toward a social actor concept. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Americas Conference on Information Systems (RODRIGUEZ-ABITA, Ed), pp 4113-4123, Association for Information Systems, Acapulco, Mexico.
23. LAMB R and DAVIDSON E (2005) Information and communication technology challenges to scientific professional identity. The Information Society 21, 1-24.
24. LAMB R and KLING R (2003) Reconceptualising users as social actors in information systems research. MIS Quarterly 27(2), 197-235.
25. MARTINSONS MG and CHONG PK (1999) The influence of human factors and specialist involvement on information systems success. Human Relations 52(1), 123-152.
26. MILLER J (2003) Measuring and aligning information systems with the organization. Information and Management 25(4), 217-228.
27. ORLIKOWSKI W and IACONO S (2001) Research commentary: desperately seeking the 'IT' in IT research - a call to theorising the IT artefact. Information Systems Research 12(2), 121-134.
28. PURVIS R, SAMBAMURTHY V and ZMUD R (2001) The assimilation of knowledge platforms in organizations: an empirical investigation. Organization Science 12(2), 117-135.
29. RAHEB E (1992) There's no excuse for failure. Canadian Manager 17(3), 18-19.
30. ROGERS E (1995) Diffusion of Innovations, 3rd edn, The Free Press, New York.
31. ROWLANDS B (2006a) The user as social actor: a focus on systems development enactment. In 21st ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, (HADDAD H, Ed), pp 1540-1545, Association for Computing Machinery Inc, Dijon, France.
32. ROWLANDS B (2006b) A socio-technical account of how a systems development methodology is used in practice. European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems, Costa Blanca, Alicante, Spain.
33. SALLAS B, LANE S, MATHEWS R, WATKINS T and WILEY-PATTON S (2007) An iterative assessment approach to improve technology adoption and implementation decisions by healthcare managers. Information Systems Management 24(1), 43-57.
34. SAWYER S and CROWSTON K (2004) Information systems in organisations and society: speculating on the next 25 years of research. In Information Systems Research: Relevant Theory and Informed Practice (KAPLAN B, TRUEX DP, WASTELL D, WOOD- HARPER AT and DEGROSS J, Eds), pp 35-52, Kluwer, Boston.
35. SCOTT W (1995) Institutions and Organisations. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
36. SMITHSON S and HIRSCHHEIM RA (1998) Analysing information systems evaluation: another look at an old problem. European Journal of Information Systems 7(3), 155-174.
37. SYMONS VJ (1991) A review of information systems evaluation: content, context and process. European Journal of Information Systems 1(3), 205-212.
38. TAYLOR S and TODD PA (1995) Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Information Systems Research 6(2), 144-176.
39. WALSHAM G (1993) Interpreting Information Systems in Organisations. John Wiley, Chichester.
40. WALSHAM G (1995) Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems 4(2), 74-81.
41. WILSON V and SLOANE E (2007) From the guest editors. Information Systems Management 24, 3-4.
42. ZHU K and KRAEMER K (2005) Post-adoption variations in usage and value of e-Business by organizations: cross-country evidence from the retail industry. Information Systems Research 16(1), 61-84.