Influence of platform switching on bone-level alterations: A three-year randomized clinical trial

Journal of Dental Research

Volumn 92, Issue 12, 2013, Pages

  Enkling, N ^a   Johren P ^b   Katsoulis, J ^a   Bayer, S ^c   Jervoe Storm P M ^c   Mericske Stern, R ^a   Jepsen, S ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WITTEN HERDECKE   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

Author keywords

alveolar bone loss; dental implant; dental implant abutment connection; dental implant abutment designs; dental implant abutment interface; single tooth dental implant

Indexed keywords

ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; ANATOMIC LANDMARK; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL ABUTMENT; DENTAL IMPLANT-ABUTMENT CONNECTION; DENTAL IMPLANT-ABUTMENT DESIGNS; DENTAL IMPLANT-ABUTMENT INTERFACE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; JAW; MALE; MANDIBLE; MIDDLE AGED; MOUTH HYGIENE; PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY; PHYSIOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SINGLE-TOOTH DENTAL IMPLANT; SURGICAL FLAPS; SURVIVAL; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; WOUND HEALING;

ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; DENTAL IMPLANT; DENTAL IMPLANT-ABUTMENT CONNECTION; DENTAL IMPLANT-ABUTMENT DESIGNS; DENTAL IMPLANT-ABUTMENT INTERFACE; SINGLE-TOOTH DENTAL IMPLANT;

ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; ALVEOLAR PROCESS; ANATOMIC LANDMARKS; CROWNS; DENTAL IMPLANT-ABUTMENT DESIGN; DENTAL IMPLANTS, SINGLE-TOOTH; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MANDIBLE; MIDDLE AGED; ORAL HYGIENE; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; RADIOGRAPHY, PANORAMIC; SURGICAL FLAPS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 84887464511     PISSN: 00220345     EISSN: 15440591     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022034513504953     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Al-Nsour MM, Chan HL, Wang HL. Effect of the platform-switching technique on preservation of peri-implant marginal bone: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 ; 27: 138-145
2. Albrektsson T, Isidor F. Consensus report of session IV. Proceedings of the 1st European Workshop on Periodontology ; 1994 London, UK: Quintessence Publishing Co ; 1994. 365.
3. Annibali S, Bignozzi I, Cristalli MP, Graziani F, La Monaca G, Polimeni A. Peri-implant marginal bone level: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing platform switching versus conventionally restored implants. J Clin Periodontol. 2012 ; 39: 1097-1113
4. Astrand P, Engquist B, Dahlgren S, Engquist E, Feldmann H, Gröndahl K. Astra Tech and Branemark System implants: a prospective 5-year comparative study. Results after one year. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 1999 ; 1: 17-26
5. Astrand P, Engquist B, Dahlgren S, Gröndahl K, Engquist E, Feldmann H. Astra Tech and Branemark system implants: a 5-year prospective study of marginal bone reactions. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 ; 15: 413-420
6. Atieh MA, Ibrahim HM, Atieh AH. Platform switching for marginal bone preservation around dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontol. 2010 ; 81: 1350-1366
7. Becker K, Mihatovic I, Golubovic V, Schwarz F. Impact of abutment material and dis-/re-connection on soft and hard tissue changes at implants with platform-switching. J Clin Periodontol. 2012 ; 39: 774-780
8. Brunner E, Dumhof S, Langer F Nonparametric Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Factorial Experiments. New York, NY: Wiley-Interscience ; 2002 :
9. Canullo L, Rasperini G. Preservation of peri-implant soft and hard tissues using platform switching of implants placed in immediate extraction sockets: a proof-of-concept study with 12- to 36-month follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 ; 22: 995-1000
10. Canullo L, Fedele GR, Iannello G, Jepsen S. Platform switching and marginal bone-level alterations: the results of a randomized-controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 ; 21: 115-121
11. Canullo L, Iannello G, Götz W. The influence of individual bone patterns on peri-implant bone loss: preliminary report from a 3-year randomized clinical and histologic trial in patients treated with implants restored with matching-diameter abutments or the platform-switching concept. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 ; 26: 618-630
12. Cappiello M, Luongo R, Di Iorio D, Bugea C, Cocchetto R, Celletti R. Evaluation of peri-implant bone loss around platform-switched implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2008 ; 28: 347-355
13. Crespi R, Capparè P, Gherlone E. Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone levels around platform-switched and non-platform-switched implants used in an immediate loading protocol. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 ; 24: 920-926
14. De Smet E, Jacobs R, Gijbels F, Naert I. The accuracy and reliability of radiographic methods for the assessment of marginal bone level around oral implants. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2002 ; 31: 176-181
15. Deserno TM, Rangarajan JR, Hoffmann J, Brägger U, Mericske-Stern R, Enkling N. A posteriori registration and subtraction of panoramic compared with intraoral radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 ; 108: e39-45
16. Duyck J, Ronold HJ, Van Oosterwyck H, Naert I, Vander Sloten J, Ellingsen JE. The influence of static and dynamic loading on marginal bone reactions around osseointegrated implants: an animal experimental study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001 ; 12: 207-218
17. Enkling N, Johren P, Klimberg V, Bayer S, Mericske-Stern R, Jepsen S. Effect of platform switching on peri-implant bone levels: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 ; 22: 1185-1192
18. Ericsson I, Persson LG, Berglundh T, Marinello CP, Lindhe J, Klinge B. Different types of inflammatory reactions in peri-implant soft tissues. J Clin Periodontol. 1995 ; 22: 255-261
19. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009 ; 41: 1149-1160
20. Fickl S, Zuhr O, Stein JM, Hurzeler MB. Peri-implant bone level around implants with platform-switched abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010 ; 25: 577-581
21. Hansson S. The implant neck: smooth or provided with retention elements. A biomechanical approach. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1999 ; 10: 394-405
22. Kielbassa AM, Martinez-de Fuentes R, Goldstein M, Arnhart C, Barlattani A, Jackowski J, et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing a variable-thread novel tapered and a standard tapered implant: interim one-year results. J Prosthet Dent. 2009 ; 101: 293-305
23. Lang NP, Jepsen S. Implant surfaces and design (Working Group 4). Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 ; 20: 228-231
24. Laurell L, Lundgren D. Marginal bone level changes at dental implants after 5 years in function: a meta-analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011 ; 13: 19-28
25. Lazzara RJ, Porter SS. Platform switching: a new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2006 ; 26: 9-17
26. Misch CE, Perel ML, Wang HL, Sammartino G, Galindo-Moreno P, Trisi P, et al. Implant success, survival, and failure: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference. Implant Dent. 2008 ; 17: 5-15
27. Prosper L, Redaelli S, Pasi M, Zarone F, Radaelli G, Gherlone EF. A randomized prospective multicenter trial evaluating the platform-switching technique for the prevention of postrestorative crestal bone loss. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 ; 24: 299-308
28. Shin YK, Han CH, Heo SJ, Kim S, Chun HJ. Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone level around implants with different neck designs after 1 year. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006 ; 21: 789-794
29. Trammell K, Geurs NC, O'Neal SJ, Liu PR, Haigh SJ, McNeal S, et al. A prospective, randomized, controlled comparison of platform-switched and matched-abutment implants in short-span partial denture situations. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2009 ; 29: 599-605
30. Vela-Nebot X, Rodriguez-Ciurana X, Rodado-Alonso C, Segala-Torres M. Benefits of an implant platform modification technique to reduce crestal bone resorption. Implant Dent. 2006 ; 15: 313-320
31. Vigolo P, Givani A. Platform-switched restorations on wide-diameter implants: a 5-year clinical prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 ; 24: 103-109