Multiple stimulus presentation yields larger deficits in children with developmental dyslexia: A study with reading and RAN-type tasks

Child Neuropsychology

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 639-647

  Zoccolotti, Pierluigi ^a,b   De Luca, Maria ^b   Lami, Laura ^c   Pizzoli, Claudia ^c   Pontillo, Maria ^a,b   Spinelli, Donatella ^b,d  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^b IRCCS FONDAZIONE SANTA LUCIA   (Italy)

^c ASL   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ROME FORO ITALICO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Dyslexia; RAN; Reading; Vocal RT

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DYSLEXIA; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PHONETICS; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REACTION TIME; READING;

CHILD; DYSLEXIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PHONETICS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REACTION TIME; READING;

EID: 84887449897     PISSN: 09297049     EISSN: 17444136     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09297049.2012.718325     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Barca, L., Burani, C., & Arduino, L. S. (2002). Word naming times and psycholinguistic norms for Italian nouns. Behavior Research Methods, 34, 424-434.
2. Blachman, B. A. (1984). Relationship of rapid naming ability and language analysis skills to kindergarten and first-grade reading achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 610-622.
3. Bowers, P. G., & Swanson, L. B. (1991). Naming speed deficits in reading disability: Multiple measures of a singular process. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 51, 195-219.
4. Chace, K. H., Rayner, K., & Well, A. D. (2005). Eye movements and phonological parafoveal preview: Effects of reading skill. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 209-217.
5. Chiappe, P., Stringer, R., Siegel, L. S., & Stanovich, K. E. (2002). Why the timing deficit hypothesis does not explain reading disability in adults. Reading and Writing, 15, 73-107.
6. Cornoldi, C., & Colpo, G. (1995). Nuove prove di lettura MT per la scuola media inferiore [New MT Reading Tests for Middle School]. Firenze: O.S. Organizzazioni Speciali.
7. De Luca, M., Burani, C., Paizi, D., Spinelli, D., & Zoccolotti, P. (2010). Letter and letter-string processing in developmental dyslexia. Cortex, 46, 1272-1283.
8. Denckla, M. B., & Rudel, R. G. (1976a). Naming of object-drawings by dyslexic and other learningdisabled children. Brain and Language, 3, 1-15.
9. Denckla, M. B., & Rudel, R. G. (1976b). Rapid "automatized naming" (R.A.N.): Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities. Neuropsychologia, 14, 471-479.
10. Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 35, 116-124.
11. Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (1990). Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 417-429.
12. Jones, M. W., Branigan, H. P., & Kelly, M. L. (2009). Dyslexic and nondyslexic reading fluency: Rapid automatized naming and the importance of continuous lists. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16, 567-572.
13. Jones, M. W., Obregón, M., Kelly, M. L., & Branigan, H. P. (2008). Elucidating the component processes involved in dyslexic and nondyslexic reading fluency: An eye-tracking study. Cognition, 109, 389-407.
14. Martens, V. E., & de Jong, P. F. (2006). The effect of word length on lexical decision in dyslexic and normal reading children. Brain and Language, 98, 140-149.
15. Morgan, J. L., & Meyer, A. S. (2005). Processing of extrafoveal objects during multiple-object naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 428-442.
16. Perfetti, C. A., Finger, E., & Hogabaum, T. (1978). Sources of vocalization latency differences between skilled and less skilled young readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 730-739.
17. Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2007). Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: The CDP+ model of reading aloud. Psychological Review, 114, 273-315.
18. Protopapas, A. (2007). CheckVocal: A program to facilitate checking the accuracy and response time of vocal responses from DMDX. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 859-862.
19. Pruneti, C. A., Fenu, A., Freschi, G., Rota, S., Cocci, D., Marchionni, M., et al. (1996). Aggiornamento della standardizzazione Italiana del test delle Matrici Progressive Colorate di Raven (CPM) [Update of the Italian Standardization of Raven's Coloured Progressive Matrices Test]. Bollettino di Psicologia Applicata, 217, 51-57.
20. Spinelli, D., De Luca, M., Di Filippo, G., Mancini, M., Martelli, M., & Zoccolotti, P. (2005). Length effect in word naming latencies: Role of reading experience and reading deficit. Developmental Neuropsychology, 27, 217-235.
21. Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Burgess, S., & Hecht, S. (1997). Contributions of phonological awareness and rapid automatic naming ability to the growth of word-reading skills in second-to fifth-grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 161-185.
22. Vukovic, R. K., & Siegel, L. S. (2006). The double-deficit hypothesis: A comprehensive analysis of the evidence. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 25-47.
23. Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1994). The development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bi-directional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 30, 73-87.
24. Wolf, M., & Bowers, P. G. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 415-438.
25. Wolff, P., Michel, G., & Ovrut, M. (1990). Rate variables and automatized naming in developmental dyslexia. Brain and Language, 39, 556-575.
26. Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., Ma-Wyatt, A., Ladner, D., & Schulte-Korne, G. (2003). Developmental dyslexia in different languages: Language-specific or universal? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 86, 169-193.