Functional magnetic resonance imaging adaptation reveals the cortical networks for processing grasp-relevant object properties

Cerebral Cortex

Volumn 24, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1540-1554

  Monaco, Simona ^a,b   Chen, Ying ^a,b   Medendorp, W P ^c   Crawford, J D ^a,b,d   Fiehler, Katja ^e   Henriques, Denise Y P ^a,b,d  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b Canadian Action and Perception Network CAPnet   (Canada)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^d YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^e JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Functional magnetic resonance imaging adaptation; Grasp relevant dimension; Grasping; Object size

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BOLD SIGNAL; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN FUNCTION; CALCARINE SULCUS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; GRASP RELEVANT OBJECT PROPERTY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGING SYSTEM; LEFT HEMISPHERE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OCCIPITAL CORTEX; PARIETO-OCCIPITAL SULCUS; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; PRECENTRAL SULCUS; PREMOTOR CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SUPERIOR PARIETAL OCCIPITAL CORTEX; TASK PERFORMANCE; WHOLE BODY MRI; BRAIN MAPPING; HAND; NERVE TRACT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SIGNAL PROCESSING; STIMULATION; VISION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBRAL CORTEX; FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; HAND; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NEURAL PATHWAYS; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84887420035     PISSN: 10473211     EISSN: 14602199     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bht006     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Allman J, Miezin F, McGuinness E. 1985. Stimulus specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field: neurophysiological mechanisms for local-global comparisons in visual neurons. Annu Rev Neurosci. 8:407-430.
2. Amedi A, Jacobson G, Hendler T, Malach R, Zohary E. 2002. Convergence of visual and tactile shape processing in the human lateral occipital complex. Cereb Cortex. 12(11):1202-1212.
3. Amedi A, Malach R, Hendler T, Peled S, Zohary E. 2001. Visuo-haptic object-related activation in the ventral visual pathway. Nat Neuro-sci. 4(3):324-330.
4. Amedi A, Raz N, Azulay H, Malach R, Zohary E. 2010. Cortical activity during tactile exploration of objects in blind and sighted humans. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 28(2):143-156.
5. Amedi A, Stern WM, Camprodon JA, Bermpohl F, Merabet L, Rotman S, Hemond C, Meijer P, Pascual-Leone A. 2007. Shape conveyed by visual-to-auditory sensory substitution activates the lateral occipital complex. Nat Neurosci. 10(6):687-689.
6. Amiez C, Kostopoulos P, Champod AS, Petrides M. 2006. Local morphology predicts functional organization of the dorsal premotor region in the human brain. J Neurosci. 26(10):2724-2731.
7. Asher I, Stark E, Abeles M, Prut Y. 2007. Comparison of direction and object selectivity of local field potentials and single units in macaque posterior parietal cortex during prehension. J Neurophy-siol. 97(5):3684-3695.
8. Begliomini C, Caria A, Grodd W, Castiello U. 2007. Comparing natural and constrained movements: new insights into the visuomotor control of grasping. PLoS One. 2(10):e1108.
9. Begliomini C, Wall MB, Smith AT, Castiello U. 2007. Differential cortical activity for precision and whole-hand visually guided grasping in humans. Eur J Neurosci. 25(4):1245-1252.
10. Binkofski F, Dohle C, Posse S, Stephan KM, Hefter H, Seitz RJ, Freund HJ. 1998. Human anterior intraparietal area subserves prehension: a combined lesion and functional MRI activation study. Neurology. 50(5):1253-1259.
11. Borra E, Belmalih A, Calzavara R, Gerbella M, Murata A, Rozzi S, Luppino G. 2008. Cortical connections of the macaque anterior intraparietal (AIP) area. Cereb Cortex. 18(5):1094-1111.
12. Cavina-Pratesi C, Goodale MA, Culham JC. 2007. FMRI reveals a dissociation between grasping and perceiving the size of real 3D objects. PLoS One. 2(5):e424.
13. Cavina-Pratesi C, Monaco S, Fattori P, Galletti C, McAdam TD, Quinlan DJ, Goodale MA, Culham JC. 2010. Functional magnetic resonance imaging reveals the neural substrates of arm transport and grip formation in reach-to-grasp actions in humans. J Neuro-sci. 30(31):10306-10323.
14. Chouinard PA, Large ME, Chang EC, Goodale MA. 2009. Dissociable neural mechanisms for determining the perceived heaviness of objects and the predicted weight of objects during lifting: an fMRI investigation of the size-weight illusion. Neuroimage. 44(1):200-212.
15. Cohen MS. 1997. Parametric analysis of fMRI data using linear systems methods. Neuroimage. 6(2):93-103.
16. Cohen NR, Cross ES, Tunik E, Grafton ST, Culham JC. 2009. Ventral and dorsal stream contributions to the online control of immediate and delayed grasping: a TMS approach. Neuropsychologia. 47 (6):1553-1562.
17. Culham JC, Danckert SL, DeSouza JF, Gati JS, Menon RS, Goodale MA. 2003. Visually guided grasping produces fMRI activation in dorsal but not ventral stream brain areas. Exp Brain Res. 153 (2):180-189.
18. Dale AM, Buckner RL. 1997. Selective averaging of rapidly presented individual trials using fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp. 5(5):329-340.
19. Dumoulin SO, Bittar RG, Kabani NJ, Baker CL Jr, Le Goualher G, Bruce Pike G, Evans AC. 2000. A new anatomical landmark for reliable identification of human area V5/MT: A quantitative analysis of sulcal patterning. Cereb Cortex 10(5):454-463.
20. Fattori P, Breveglieri R, Raos V, Bosco A, Galletti C. 2012. Vision for action in the macaque medial posterior parietal cortex. J Neurosci. 32(9):3221-3234.
21. Fattori P, Breveglieri R, Marzocchi N, Filippini D, Bosco A, Galletti C. 2009. Hand orientation during reach-to-grasp movements modu lates neuronal activity in the medial posterior parietal area V6A. J Neurosci 29(6):1928-1936.
22. Fattori P, Raos V, Breveglieri R, Bosco A, Marzocchi N, Galletti C. 2010. The dorsomedial pathway is not just for reaching: grasping neurons in the medial parieto-occipital cortex of the macaque monkey. J Neurosci 30(1):342-349.
23. Felleman DJ, Van Essen DC. 1991. Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex. 1(1):1-47.
24. Fiehler K, Burke M, Engel A, Bien S, Rosler F. 2008. Kinesthetic working memory and action control within the dorsal stream. Cereb Cortex. 18(2):243-253.
25. Fitzpatrick D. 2000. Seeing beyond the receptive field in primary visual cortex. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 10(4):438-443.
26. Forman SD, Cohen JD, Fitzgerald M, Eddy WF, Mintun MA, Noll DC. 1995. Improved assessment of significant activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): use of a cluster-size threshold. Magn Reson Med. 33(5):636-647.
27. Frey SH, Vinton D, Norlund R, Grafton ST. 2005. Cortical topography of human anterior intraparietal cortex active during visually guided grasping. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 23(2-3):397-405.
28. Gallivan JP, McLean DA, Valyear KF, Pettypiece CE, Culham JC. 2011. Decoding action intentions from preparatory brain activity in human parieto-frontal networks. J Neurosci. 31(26):9599-9610.
29. Gamberini M, Passarelli L, Fattori P, Zucchelli M, Bakola S, Luppino G, Galletti C. 2009. Cortical connections of the visuomotor parie-tooccipital area V6Ad of the macaque monkey. J Comp Neurol. 513(6):622-642.
30. Ganel T, Goodale MA. 2003. Visual control of action but not perception requires analytical processing of object shape. Nature. 426 (6967):664-667.
31. Gardner EP, Babu KS, Ghosh S, Sherwood A, Chen J. 2007. Neuro-physiology of prehension. III. Representation of object features in posterior parietal cortex of the macaque monkey. J Neurophysiol. 98(6):3708-3730.
32. Gibson JJ. 1979. The ecological approach to visual perception. Michigan: Houghton Mifflin. p. 332.
33. Gilbert CD. 1998. Adult cortical dynamics. Physiol Rev. 78(2):467-485.
34. Gilbert CD. 1992. Horizontal integration and cortical dynamics. Neuron. 9(1):1-13.
35. Goebel R, Esposito F, Formisano E. 2006. Analysis of functional image analysis contest (FIAC) data with brainvoyager QX: from single-subject to cortically aligned group general linear model analysis and self-organizing group independent component analysis. Hum Brain Mapp. 27(5):392-401.
36. Grill-Spector K, Kourtzi Z, Kanwisher N. 2001. The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition. Vis Res. 41(10-11):1409-1422.
37. Grill-Spector K, Kushnir T, Edelman S, Avidan G, Itzchak Y, Malach R. 1999. Differential processing of objects under various viewing conditions in the human lateral occipital complex. Neuron. 24(1):187-203.
38. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN. 1968. Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. J Physiol. 195:215-243.
39. James TW, Humphrey GK, Gati JS, Menon RS, Goodale MA. 2002. Differential effects of viewpoint on object-driven activation in dorsal and ventral streams. Neuron. 35(4):793-801.
40. Kapadia MK, Ito M, Gilbert CD, Westheimer G. 1995. Improvement in visual sensitivity by changes in local context: parallel studies in human observers and in V1 of alert monkeys. Neuron. 15(4):843-856.
41. Kapadia MK, Westheimer G, Gilbert CD. 1999. Dynamics of spatial summation in primary visual cortex of alert monkeys. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 96(21):12073-12078.
42. Konen CS, Kastner S. 2008. Two hierarchically organized neural systems for object information in human visual cortex. Nat Neuro-sci. 11(2):224-231.
43. Kourtzi Z, Connor CE. 2011. Neural representations for object perception: structure, category, and adaptive coding. Annu Rev Neurosci. 34:45-67.
44. Kourtzi Z, Kanwisher N. 2001. Representation of perceived object shape by the human lateral occipital complex. Science. 293 (5534):1506-1509.
45. Kourtzi Z, Tolias AS, Altmann CF, Augath M, Logothetis NK. 2003. Integration of local features into global shapes: monkey and human FMRI studies. Neuron. 37(2):333-346.
46. Kroliczak G, McAdam TD, Quinlan DJ, Culham JC. 2008. The human dorsal stream adapts to real actions and 3D shape processing: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurophysiol. 100 (5):2627-2639.
47. Lamme VA, Super H, Spekreijse H. 1998. Feedforward, horizontal, and feedback processing in the visual cortex. Curr Opin Neuro-biol. 8(4):529-535.
48. Lehky SR, Sereno AB. 2007. Comparison of shape encoding in primate dorsal and ventral visual pathways. J Neurophysiol. 97 (1):307-319.
49. Lieberman MD, Cunningham WA. 2009. Type I and type II error concerns in fMRI research: re-balancing the scale. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 4(4):423-428.
50. Maunsell JHR, Newsome WT. 1987. Visual processing in monkey ex-trastriate cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci. 10:363-401.
51. Monaco S, Cavina-Pratesi C, Sedda A, Fattori P, Galletti C, Culham JC. 2011. Functional magnetic resonance adaptation reveals the involvement of the dorsomedial stream in hand orientation for grasping. J Neurophysiol. 106(5):2248-2263.
52. Monaco S, Sedda A, Cavina-Pratesi C, Culham JC. 2010. Where is it? How big is it? Different brain areas answer different questions about graspable three-dimensional object properties in an fMRI adaptation experiment. Society for Neuroscience, San Diego, CA. Abstract. 893.3.
53. Murata A, Gallese V, Luppino G, Kaseda M, Sakata H. 2000. Selectivity for the shape, size, and orientation of objects for grasping in neurons of monkey parietal area AIP. J Neurophysiol. 83(5):2580-2601.
54. Polat U, Mizobe K, Pettet MW, Kasamatsu T, Norcia AM. 1998. Colli-near stimuli regulate visual responses depending on cell's contrast threshold. Nature. 391(6667):580-584.
55. Raos V, Umilta MA, Gallese V, Fogassi L. 2004. Functional properties of grasping-related neurons in the dorsal premotor area F2 of the macaque monkey. J Neurophysiol. 92(4):1990-2002.
56. Rice NJ, Valyear KF, Goodale MA, Milner AD, Culham JC. 2007. Orientation sensitivity to graspable objects: an fMRI adaptation study. Neuroimage. 36(Suppl 2):T87-T93.
57. Sawamura H, Georgieva S, Vogels R, Vanduffel W, Orban GA. 2005. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging to assess adaptation and size invariance of shape processing by humans and monkeys. J Neurosci. 25(17):4294-4306.
58. Scherberger H, Andersen RA. 2007. Target selection signals for arm reaching in the posterior parietal cortex. J Neurosci. 27 (8):2001-2012.
59. Sereno AB, Maunsell JH. 1998. Shape selectivity in primate lateral in-traparietal cortex. Nature. 395(6701):500-503.
60. Sereno ME, Trinath T, Augath M, Logothetis NK. 2002. Three-dimensional shape representation in monkey cortex. Neuron. 33 (4):635-652.
61. Shmuelof L, Zohary E. 2005. Dissociation between ventral and dorsal fMRI activation during object and action recognition. Neuron. 47 (3):457-470.
62. Singhal A, Kaufman L, Valyear K, Culham JC. 2006. fMRI reactivation of the human lateral occipital complex during delayed actions to remembered objects. Vis Cogn. 14(1):122-125.
63. Snow JC, Pettypiece CE, McAdam TD, McLean AD, Stroman PW, Goodale MA, Culham JC. 2011. Bringing the real world into the fMRI scanner: repetition effects for pictures versus real objects. Sci Rep. 1:130.
64. Snyder LH, Batista AP, Andersen RA. 1997. Coding of intention in the posterior parietal cortex. Nature. 386(6621):167-170.
65. Snyder LH, Batista AP, Andersen RA. 2000. Intention-related activity in the posterior parietal cortex: a review. Vis Res. 40(10-12):1433-1441.
66. Srivastava S, Orban GA, De Maziere PA, Janssen P. 2009. A distinct representation of three-dimensional shape in macaque anterior in-traparietal area: fast, metric, and coarse. J Neurosci. 29 (34):10613-10626.
67. Stark E, Asher I, Abeles M. 2007. Encoding of reach and grasp by single neurons in premotor cortex is independent of recording site. J Neurophysiol. 97(5):3351-3364.
68. Tal N, Amedi A. 2009. Multisensory visual-tactile object related network in humans: insights gained using a novel crossmodal adaptation approach. Exp Brain Res. 198(2-3):165-182.
69. Talairach J, Tournoux P. 1988. Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain. New York: Thieme Medical.
70. Valyear KF, Cavina-Pratesi C, Stiglick AJ, Culham JC. 2007. Does tool-related fMRI activity within the intraparietal sulcus reflect the plan to grasp? Neuroimage. 36(Suppl 2):T94-T108.
71. Valyear KF, Culham JC, Sharif N, Westwood D, Goodale MA. 2006. A double dissociation between sensitivity to changes in object identity and object orientation in the ventral and dorsal visual streams: a human fMRI study. Neuropsychologia. 44 (2):218-228.
72. Van Essen DC, Anderson CH, Felleman DJ. 1992. Information processing in the primate visual system: an integrated systems perspective. Science. 255(5043):419-423.
73. Verhagen L, Dijkerman HC, Grol MJ, Toni I. 2008. Perceptuo-motor interactions during prehension movements. J Neurosci. 28 (18):4726-4735.
74. Zipser K, Lamme VA, Schiller PH. 1996. Contextual modulation in primary visual cortex. J Neurosci. 16(22):7376-7389.