Bringing the real world into the fMRI scanner: Repetition effects for pictures versus real objects

Scientific Reports

Volumn 1, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Snow, Jacqueline C ^a   Pettypiece, Charles E ^a   McAdam, Teresa D ^a   McLean, Adam D ^a   Stroman, Patrick W ^b   Goodale, Melvyn A ^a   Culham, Jody C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

OXYGEN;

ARTICLE; BLOOD; BRAIN CIRCULATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; VASCULARIZATION; VISION; VISUAL CORTEX;

CEREBROVASCULAR CIRCULATION; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OXYGEN; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84859779950     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep00130     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Kanwisher, N. G., Chun, M. M., McDermott, J. & Ledden, P. J. Functional imaging of human visual recognition. Cogn. Brain Res. 5, 55-67 (1996). (Pubitemid 27095237)
2. Malach, R., et al. Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA92, 8135-8139 (1995).
3. Grill-Spector, K. The neural basis of object perception. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 13, 159-166 (2003). (Pubitemid 36556272)
4. Konen, C. S. & Kastner, S. Two hierarchically organized neural systems for object information in human visual cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 11, 224-231 (2008). (Pubitemid 351170496)
5. Kourtzi, Z. & Kanwisher, N. Cortical regions involved in perceiving object shape. J. Neurosci. 20, 3310-3318 (2000). (Pubitemid 30263147)
6. Grill-Spector, K. & Malach, R. The human visual cortex. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 27, 649-677 (2004). (Pubitemid 39050416)
7. Grill-Spector, K., et al. Differential processing of objects under various viewing conditions in the human lateral occipital complex. Neuron 24, 187-203 (1999). (Pubitemid 29466158)
8. Squire, L. R., et al. Activation of the hippocampus in normal humans: a functional anatomical study of memory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 1837-1841 (1992).
9. Stern, C. E., et al. The hippocampal formation participates in novel picture encoding: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 8660-8665 (1996). (Pubitemid 26269616)
10. Buckner, R. L., et al. Functional-anatomic correlates of object priming in humans revealed by rapid presentation event-related fMRI. Neuron 20, 285-296 (1998).
11. Wiggs, C. L. & Martin, A. Properties and mechanisms of perceptual priming. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 8, 227-233 (1998). (Pubitemid 28247804)
12. Grill-Spector, K. & Malach, R. fMR-adaptation: a tool for studying the functional properties of human cortical neurons. Acta Psychol. (Amst).107, 293-321 (2001). (Pubitemid 33647324)
13. Henson, R. N. Neuroimaging studies of priming. Prog. Neurobiol. 70, 53-81 (2003). (Pubitemid 36966641)
14. Desimone, R. Neural mechanisms for visual memory and their role in attention. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 13494-13499 (1996). (Pubitemid 26424147)
15. Grill-Spector, K., Henson, R. & Martin, A. Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends Cogn. Sci. 10, 14-23 (2006). (Pubitemid 43049768)
16. Miller, E. K., Li, L. & Desimone, R. A neural mechanism for working and recognition memory in inferior temporal cortex. Science 254, 1377-1379 (1991). (Pubitemid 21917473)
17. Li, L., Miller, E. K. & Desimone, R. The representation of stimulus familiarity in anterior inferior temporal cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 69, 1918-1929 (1993). (Pubitemid 23195661)
18. Krekelberg, B., Boynton, G. M. & van Wezel, R. J. A. Adaptation: from single cells to BOLD signals. Trends Neurosci. 29, 250-256 (2006).
19. Kourtzi, Z., Erb, M., Grodd, W. & Bulthoff, H. H. Representation of the perceived 3-D object shape in the human lateral occipital complex. Cereb. Cortex 13, 911-920 (2003). (Pubitemid 37064828)
20. Kourtzi, Z. & Huberle, E. Spatiotemporal characteristics of form analysis in the human visual cortex revealed by rapid event-related fMRI adaptation. Neuroimage 28, 440-452 (2005). (Pubitemid 41443513)
21. Kourtzi, Z., Tolias, A. S., Altmann, C. F., Augath, M. & Logothetis, N. K. Integration of local features into global shapes: monkey and human FMRI studies. Neuron 37, 333-346 (2003). (Pubitemid 36143827)
22. James, T. W., et al. Haptic study of three-dimensional objects activates extrastriate visual areas. Neuropsychologia 40, 1706-1714 (2002). (Pubitemid 34462878)
23. Koutstaal, W., et al. Perceptual specificity in visual object priming: functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence for a laterality difference in fusiform cortex. Neuropsychologia 39, 184-199 (2001). (Pubitemid 32036998)
24. Vuilleumier, P., Henson, R. N., Driver, J. & Dolan, R. J. Multiple levels of visual object constancy revealed by event-related fMRI of repetition priming. Nat. Neurosci. 5, 491-499 (2002). (Pubitemid 34454257)
25. Kourtzi, Z. & Kanwisher, N. Representation of perceived object shape by the human lateral occipital complex. Science 293, 1506-1509 (2001). (Pubitemid 32801555)
26. Culham, J. C., et al. Visually guided grasping produces fMRI activation in dorsal but not ventral stream brain areas. Exp. Brain Res. 153, 180-189 (2003). (Pubitemid 37445310)
27. Cavina-Pratesi, C., et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging reveals the neural substrates of arm transport and grip formation in reach-to-grasp actions in humans. J. Neurosci. 30, 10306-10323 (2010).
28. Verhagen, L., Dijkerman, H. C., Grol, M. J. & Toni, I. Perceptuo-motor interactions during prehension movements. J. Neurosci. 28, 4726-4735 (2008).
29. Gallivan, J. P., Cavina-Pratesi, C. & Culham, J. C. Is that within reach? fMRI reveals that the human superior parieto-occipital cortex encodes objects reachable by the hand. J. Neurosci. 29, 4381-4391 (2009).
30. Ishai, A., Ungerleider, L. G., Martin, A., Schouten, J. L. & Haxby, J. V. Distributed representation of objects in the human ventral visual pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 9379-9384 (1999). (Pubitemid 29374763)
31. Sakata, H., Taira, M., Murata, A. & Mine, S. Neural mechanisms of visual guidance of hand action in the parietal cortex of the monkey. Cereb. Cortex 5, 429-438 (1995).
32. Murata, A., Gallese, V., Luppino, G., Kaseda, M. & Sakata, H. Selectivity for the shape, size, and orientation of objects for grasping in neurons of monkey parietal area AIP. J. Neurophysiol. 83, 2580-2601 (2000). (Pubitemid 30321452)
33. Verhoef, B. E., Vogels, R. & Janssen, P. Contribution of inferior temporal and posterior parietal activity to three-dimensional shape perception. Curr. Biol. 20, 909-913 (2010).
34. Srivastava, S., Orban, G. A., De Maziere, P. A. & Janssen, P. A distinct representation of three-dimensional shape in macaque anterior intraparietal area: fast, metric, and coarse. J. Neurosci. 29, 10613-11026 (2009).
35. Janssen, P., Srivastava, S., Ombelet, S. & Orban, G. A. Coding of shape and position in macaque lateral intraparietal area. J Neurosci 28, 6679-6690 (2008).
36. Sakata, H., et al. Neural representation of three-dimensional features of manipulation objects with stereopsis. Exp. Brain Res. 128, 160-169 (1999). (Pubitemid 29425615)
37. Culham, J. C. & Valyear, K. F. Human parietal cortex in action. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 16, 205-212 (2006).
38. Goodale, M. A. & Milner, A. D. Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends Neurosci. 15, 20-25 (1992).
39. Georgieva, S., Peeters, R., Kolster, H., Todd, J. T. & Orban, G. A. The processing of three-dimensional shape from disparity in the human brain. J. Neurosci. 29, 727-742 (2009).
40. Loftus, G. R. & Masson, M. E. J. Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 1, 476-490 (1994).
41. Belia, S., Fidler, F., Williams, J. & Cumming, G. Researchers misunderstand confidence intervals and standard error bars. Psychol. Methods 10, 389-396 (2005). (Pubitemid 43083750)
42. Wandell, B. A., Dumoulin, S. O. & Brewer, A. A. Visual field maps in human cortex. Neuron 56, 366-383 (2007).
43. Amedi, A., Jacobson, G., Hendler, T., Malach, R. & Zohary, E. Convergence of visual and tactile shape processing in the human lateral occipital complex. Cereb. Cortex 12, 1202-1212 (2002). (Pubitemid 35191421)
44. Schacter, D. L., et al. Brain regions associated with retrieval of structurally coherent visual information. Nature 376, 587-590 (1995).
45. Henson, R., Shallice, T. & Dolan, R. Neuroimaging evidence for dissociable forms of repetition priming. Science 287, 1269-1272 (2000). (Pubitemid 30112149)
46. Dolan, R. J., et al. How the brain learns to see objects and faces in an impoverished context. Nature 389, 596-599 (1997). (Pubitemid 27446175)
47. James, T. W. & Gauthier, I. Repetition-induced changes in BOLD response reflect accumulation of neural activity. Hum. Brain Mapp. 27, 37-46 (2006). (Pubitemid 43202733)
48. Hopfinger, J. B., Buonocore, M. H. & Mangun, G. R. The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control. Nat. Neurosci. 3, 284-291 (2000). (Pubitemid 30140792)
49. Silver, M. A., Ress, D. & Heeger, D. J. Topographic maps of visual spatial attention in human parietal cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 94, 1358-1371 (2005). (Pubitemid 41061370)
50. Corbetta, M., et al. A common network of functional areas for attention and eye movements. Neuron 21, 761-773 (1998). (Pubitemid 28498785)
51. Yi, D. J. & Chun, M. M. Attentional modulation of learning-related repetition attenuation effects in human parahippocampal cortex. J. Neurosci. 25, 3593-3600 (2005).
52. Murray, S. O. & Wojciulik, E. Attention increases neural selectivity in the human lateral occipital complex. Nat Neurosci. 7, 70-74 (2004). (Pubitemid 38032170)
53. Bakin, J. S., Nakayama, K. & Gilbert, C. D. Visual responses in monkey areas V1 and V2 to three-dimensional surface configurations. J. Neurosci. 20, 8188-8198 (2000).
54. Cumming, B. G. & Parker, A. J. Responses of primary visual cortical neurons to binocular disparity without depth perception. Nature 389, 280-283 (1997). (Pubitemid 27406640)
55. Cumming, B. G. & Parker, A. J. Local disparity not perceived depth is signaled by binocular neurons in cortical area V1 of the Macaque. J. Neurosci. 20, 4758-4767 (2000). (Pubitemid 30396641)
56. Poggio, G. F. & Fischer, B. Binocular interaction and depth sensitivity in striate and prestriate cortex of behaving rhesus monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 40, 1392-1405 (1977). (Pubitemid 8233147)
57. Poggio, G. F., Gonzalez, F. & Krause, F. Stereoscopic mechanisms in monkey visual cortex: binocular correlation and disparity selectivity. J. Neurosci. 8, 4531-4550 (1988). (Pubitemid 19015136)
58. Thomas, O. M., Cumming, B. G. & Parker, A. J. A specialization for relative disparity in V2. Nat. Neurosci. 5, 472-478 (2002). (Pubitemid 34454254)
59. von der Heydt, R., Zhou, H. & Friedman, H. S. Representation of stereoscopic edges in monkey visual cortex. Vision Res. 40, 1955-1967 (2000). (Pubitemid 30319287)
60. DeAngelis, G. C., Cumming, B. G. & Newsome, W. T. Cortical area MT and the perception of stereoscopic depth. Nature 394, 677-680 (1998). (Pubitemid 28389793)
61. DeAngelis, G. C. & Newsome, W. T. Organization of disparity-selective neurons in macaque area MT. J. Neurosci. 19, 1398-1415 (1999). (Pubitemid 29088922)
62. Maunsell, J. H. & Van Essen, D. C. Functional properties of neurons in middle temporal visual area of the macaque monkey. II. Binocular interactions and sensitivity to binocular disparity. J. Neurophysiol. 49, 1148-1167 (1983). (Pubitemid 13083979)
63. Roy, J. P., Komatsu, H. & Wurtz, R. H. Disparity sensitivity of neurons in monkey extrastriate area MST. J. Neurosci. 12, 2478-2492 (1992).
64. Shikata, E., Tanaka, Y., Nakamura, H., Taira, M. & Sakata, H. Selectivity of the parietal visual neurones in 3D orientation of surface of stereoscopic stimuli. Neuroreport 7, 2389-2394 (1996). (Pubitemid 26377802)
65. Taira, M., Tsutsui, K. I., Jiang, M., Yara, K. & Sakata, H. Parietal neurons represent surface orientation from the gradient of binocular disparity. J. Neurophysiol. 83, 3140-3146 (2000). (Pubitemid 30321501)
66. Janssen, P., Vogels, R. & Orban, G. A. Macaque inferior temporal neurons are selective for disparity-defined three-dimensional shapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96, 8217-8222 (1999). (Pubitemid 29328435)
67. Janssen, P., Vogels, R., Liu, Y. & Orban, G. A. Macaque inferior temporal neurons are selective for three-dimensional boundaries and surfaces. J. Neurosci 21, 9419-9429 (2001). (Pubitemid 33096885)
68. Janssen, P., Vogels, R. & Orban, G. A. Three-dimensional shape coding in inferior temporal cortex. 27, 385-397 (2000).
69. Janssen, P., Vogels, R. & Orban, G. A. Selectivity for 3D shape that reveals distinct areas within macaque inferior temporal cortex. 288, 2054-2056 (2000).
70. Hinkle, D. A. & Connor, C. E. Three-dimensional orientation tuning in macaque area V4. Nat. Neurosci. 5, 665-670 (2002). (Pubitemid 34742982)
71. Tanaka, H., Uka, T., Yoshiyama, K., Kato, M. & Fujita, I. Processing of shape defined by disparity in monkey inferior temporal cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 85, 735-744 (2001). (Pubitemid 32147775)
72. Uka, T., Tanaka, H., Yoshiyama, K., Kato, M. & Fujita, I. Disparity selectivity of neurons in monkey inferior temporal cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 84, 120-132 (2000). (Pubitemid 30490036)
73. Watanabe, M., Tanaka, H., Uka, T. & Fujita, I. Disparity-selective neurons in area V4 of macaque monkeys. J. Neurophysiol. 87, 1960-1973 (2002). (Pubitemid 34670759)
74. Gibson, J. J. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1979).
75. Marr, D. Vision (Freeman, San Francisco, 1982).
76. Ashbridge, E., Perrett, D. I., Oram, M. W. & Jellema, T. Effect of image orientation and size on object recognition: responses of single units in the macaque monkey temporal cortex. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 17, 13-34 (2000). (Pubitemid 30219832)
77. Chainay, H. & Humphreys, G. W. The real-object advantage in agnosia: Evidence for a role of surface and depth information in object recognition. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 18, 175-191 (2001). (Pubitemid 32303317)
78. Hiraoka, K., Suzuki, K., Hirayama, K. & Mori, E. Visual agnosia for line drawings and silhouettes without apparent impairment of real-object recognition: a case report. Behav. Neurol. 21, 187-192 (2009).
79. Servos, P., Goodale, M. A. & Humphrey, G. K. The drawing of objects by a visual form agnosic: contribution of surface properties and memorial representations. Neuropsychologia 31, 251-259 (1993). (Pubitemid 23103037)
80. Humphrey, G. K., Goodale, M. A., Jakobson, L. S. & Servos, P. The role of surface information in object recognition: studies of a visual form agnosic and normal subjects. Perception 23, 1457-1481 (1994).
81. Turnbull, O. H., Driver, J. & McCarthy, R. A. 2D but not 3D: pictorial-depth deficits in a case of visual agnosia. Cortex 40, 723-738 (2004). (Pubitemid 39303101)
82. Bushong, B., King, L. M., Camerer, C. F. & Rangel, A. Pavlovian Processes in Consumer Choice: The Physical Presence of a Good Increases Willingness-to-Pay. Am. Econ. Rev. 100, 1556-1571 (2010).
83. Vinberg, J. & Grill-Spector, K. Representation of shapes, edges, and surfaces across multiple cues in the human visual cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 99, 1380-1393 (2008). (Pubitemid 351413717)
84. De Baene, W. & Vogels, R. Effects of adaptation on the stimulus selectivity of macaque inferior temporal spiking activity and local field potentials. Cereb. Cortex 20, 2145-2165 (2010).
85. Mur, M., Ruff, D. A., Bodurka, J., Bandettini, P. A. & Kriegeskorte, N. Faceidentity change activation outside the face system: "release from adaptation" may not always indicate neuronal selectivity. Cereb. Cortex 20, 2027-2042 (2010).
86. Tolias, A. S., Keliris, G. A., Smirnakis, S. M. & Logothetis, N. K. Neurons in macaque area V4 acquire directional tuning after adaptation to motion stimuli. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 591-593 (2005). (Pubitemid 40594199)
87. Sawamura, H., Orban, G. A. & Vogels, R. Selectivity of neuronal adaptation does not match response selectivity: a single-cell study of the FMRI adaptation paradigm. Neuron 49, 307-318 (2006). (Pubitemid 43089646)
88. Marsolek, C. J. What antipriming reveals about priming. Trends Cogn. Sci. 12, 176-181 (2008).
89. Marsolek, C. J., et al. Identifying objects impairs knowledge of other objects: a relearning explanation for the neural repetition effect. Neuroimage 49, 1919-1932 (2010).
90. Proffitt, D. R. An Action Specific Approach to Spatial Perception. in Embodiment, Ego-Space, and Action (ed. R. L. Klatzky, B. MacWhinney & M. Behrmann) 177-201 (Psychology Press, New York, 2008).
91. Proffitt, D. R., Creem, S. H. & Zosh, W. D. Seeing mountains in mole hills: geographical-slant perception. Psychol. Sci. 12, 418-423 (2001). (Pubitemid 33653554)
92. Talairach, J. & Tournoux, P. Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human brain (Thieme Medical Publishers, New York, 1988).
93. Konen, C. S., Behrmann, M., Nishimura, M. & Kastner, S. The functional neuroanatomy of object agnosia: a case study. Neuron 71, 49-60 (2011).