Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Quebec back pain disability scale to European Portuguese language

Spine

Volumn 38, Issue 23, 2013, Pages

  Cruz, Eduardo Brazete ^a   Fernandes, Rita ^a   Carnide, Filomena ^b   Vieira, Ana ^c   Moniz, Sara ^d   Nunes, Filipa ^e  

^a INSTITUTO POLITÉCNICO DE SETÚBAL   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSIDADE DE LISBOA   (Portugal)

^c Centro de Medicina e Reabilitação Reafi   (Portugal)

^d EPE Madeira   (Portugal)

^e Hospital do Litoral Alentejano   (Portugal)

Author keywords

CLBP; disability; outcome measures; QBPDS

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVERGENT VALIDITY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; CRONBACH ALPHA COEFFICIENT; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; LANGUAGE; LOW BACK PAIN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PORTUGUESE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; QUEBEC BACK PAIN DISABILITY SCALE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REFERRED PAIN; REPRODUCIBILITY; ROLAND MORRIS DISABILITY QUESTIONNAIRE; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; TRANSLATING (LANGUAGE); VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ADULT; CHRONIC PAIN; CULTURAL CHARACTERISTICS; DISABILITY EVALUATION; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOW BACK PAIN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PORTUGAL; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TRANSLATING;

EID: 84887311558     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a439cc     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Andersson GB. Epidemiological features of chronic low back pain. Lancet 1999; 354: 581-5.
2. Deyo RA, Cherkin D, Conrad D, et al. Cost, controversy, crisis: low back pain and the health of the public. Ann Rev Public Health 1991; 12: 141-56.
3. Walker BF, Muller R, Grant WD. Low back pain in Australian adults. Prevalence and associated disability. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2004; 27: 238-44.
4. Walker BF, Muller R, Grant WD. Low back pain in Australian adults: the economic burden. Asia Pac J Public Health 2003; 15: 79-87.
5. Hoya D, Brooks P, Blyth F, et al. The epidemiology of low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2010; 24: 769-81.
6. da C Menezes Costa L, Maher CG, Hancock MJ, et al. The prognosis of acute and persistent low-back pain: a meta-analysis. Can Med Assoc J 2012; 184: E613-24.
7. Kent PM, Keating JL. The epidemiology of low back pain in primary care. Chiropr Osteopath 2005; 26: 13.
8. Ekman M, Jönhagen S, Hunsche E, et al. Burden of illness of chronic low back pain in Sweden: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in primary care setting. Spine 2005; 30: 1777-85.
9. Gouveia M, Augusto M. Custos Indirectos da Dor crónica em Portugal. Revista Portuguesa de Saúde Pública 2011; 29: 100-7.
10. Von Korff M, Saunders KW. The course of back pain in primary care. Spine 1996; 21: 2833-7.
11. Dunn KM, Jordan K, Croft PR. Characterizing the course of low back pain: a latent class analysis. Am J Epidemiol 2006; 163: 754-61.
12. Wasiak R, Young AE, Dunn KM, et al. Back pain recurrence: an evaluation of existing indicators and direction for future research. Spine 2009; 34: 970-7.
13. Heuch I, Foss IS. Acute low back usually resolves quickly but persistent low back pain often persists. J Physiother 2013; 59: 127.
14. van Tulder MW, Koes B, Bombardier C. Low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2002; 16: 761-75.
15. Deyo RA. Measuring the functional status of patients with low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988; 69: 1044-53.
16. Balagué F, Mannion AF, Pellisé F, et al. Non-specific low back pain. Lancet 2012; 379: 482-91.
17. Airaksinen O, Brox JI, Cedraschi C, et al. Chapter 4. European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain. Eur Spine J 2006; 15 (suppl 2): S192-300.
18. Davidson M, Keating JL. A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness. Phys Ther 2002; 82: 8-24.
19. Ostelo RW, Deyo RA, Stratford P, et al. Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change. Spine 2008; 33: 90-4.
20. Smeets R, Köke A, Lin CW, et al. Measures of function in low back pain/disorders: Low Back Pain Rating Scale (LBPRS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation (PILE), Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (QBPDS), and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ). Arthritis Care Res 2011; 63 (suppl 11): S158-73.
21. Rocchi MB, Sisti D, Benedetti P, et al. Critical comparison of nine different self-administered questionnaires for the evaluation of disability caused by low back pain. Eura Medicophys 2005; 41: 275-81.
22. Kopec JA, Esdaile JM, Abrahamovicz M, et al. The Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Conceptualization and development. J Clin Epidemiol 1996; 49: 151-61.
23. Kopec JA, Esdaile JM, Abrahamovicz M, et al. The Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: measurements properties. Spine 1995; 20: 341-52.
24. Mousavi SJ, Parnianpour M, Mehdian H, et al. The Oswestry Disability Index, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: translation and validation studies of the Iranian versions. Spine 2006; 31: E454-9.
25. Melikoglu MA, Kocabas H, Sezer I, et al. Validation of the Turkish version of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale for patients with low back pain. Spine 2009; 34: E219-24.
26. Rodrigues MF, Michel-Crosato E, Cardoso JR, et al. Psychometric properties and cross-cultural adaptation of the Brazilian Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale Questionnaire. Spine 2009; 34: E459-64.
27. Demoulin C, Ostelo R, Knottnerus JA, et al. Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale was responsive and showed reasonable interpretability after a multidisciplinary treatment. J Clin Epidemiol 2010; 63: 1249-55.
28. Campos J, Carlotto MS, Marôco J. Oldebburg Burnout Inventory- Student version: cultural adaptation and validation into Portuguese. Psicol Reflex Crít 2012; 25: 709-18.
29. Banville D, Desrosiers P, Genet-Volet Y. Translating questionnaires and inventories using a cross-cultural translation technique. J Teach Phys Educ 2000; 19: 374-87.
30. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 2000; 25: 3186-91.
31. Gjersing L, Caplehorn JR, Clausen T. Cross-cultural adaptation of research instruments: language, setting, time and statistical considerations. BMC Med Res Methodol 2010; 10: 13.
32. Kline P. Handbook of Psychological Testing. London: Routledge; 1993.
33. Domingues L, Cruz E. Adaptação Cultural e Contributo para a Validação da Escala Patient Global Impression of Change. Ifisionline 2011; 2: 31-31.
34. Monteiro J, Faísca L, Nunes O, et al. Questionário de Incapacidade de Roland Morris: Adaptação e Validação para os Doentes de Língua Portuguesa com Lombalgia. Acta Med Port 2010; 23: 761-6.
35. Schoppink LE, van Tulder MW, Koes BW, et al. Reliability and validity of the Dutch adaptation of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Phys Ther 1996; 76: 268-75.
36. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. COSMIN Checklist Manual. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: VU University Medical Center, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research; 2010.
37. Straford PW, Binkley J, Solomon P, et al. Defining the minimum level of detectable change for the Roland-Morris Questionnaire. Phys Ther 1996; 76: 359-359.
38. Grotle M, Brox JI, Vollestad NK. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Norwegian versions of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Index. J Rehabil Med 2003; 35: 241-7.
39. Brouwer S, Kuijer W, Dijkstra PU, et al. Reliability and stability of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire: intra class correlation and limits of agreement. Disabil Rehabil 2004; 26: 162-5.
40. Carlsson AM. Assessment of chronic pain, part I: aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale. Pain 1983; 16: 87-101.
41. Williams AC, Davies HT, Chadury Y. Simple pain rating scales hide complex idiosyncratic meanings. Pain 2000; 85: 457-63.
42. Ostelo RW, de Vet HC. Clinically important outcomes in low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2005; 19: 593-607.
43. Hjermstad MJ, Fayers PM, Haugen DF, et al. Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and visual analogue scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review. J Pain Symptom Manage 2011; 41: 1073-93.
44. Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials 1989; 10: 407-15.
45. Hurst H, Bolton J. Assessing the Significance of change scores recorded on subjective outcome measures. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2004; 27: 26-35.
46. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol 2010; 10: 22.
47. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007; 60: 34-42.
48. Streiner DL, Norman GR. " Precision" and "accuracy": two terms that are neither. J Clin Epidemiol 2006; 59: 327-30.
49. Mateus M, Brito A, Duarte I, et al. Gramática da Língua Portuguesa. 5th ed. Lisbon, Portugal: Caminho; 2003.
50. Bendeddouche I, Rostom S, Bahiri R, et al. Translation, adaptation and validation of the Moroccan version of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Clin Rheumatol 2012; 31: 943-9.
51. Suh KT, Kim JI, Lim JM, et al. Validation of the Korean version of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. J Spinal Disord Tech 2012; 25: 447-50.
52. Rash G. Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. Copenhagen, Denmark: Nielson & Lydiche; 1960.
53. Cleland J, Gillani R, Bienen EJ, et al. Assessing dimensionality and responsiveness of outcomes measures for patients with low back pain. Pain Pract 2011; 11: 57-69.
54. Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2008.
55. Yvanes-Thomas M, Calmels P, Béthoux F, et al. Validity of the French-language version of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale in low back pain patients in France. Joint Bone Spine 2002; 69: 397-405.