메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 90-94

Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: Towards international consensus regarding minimal important change

Author keywords

Low back pain; Minimal important change; Outcome measures

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; DISABILITY; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; LOW BACK PAIN; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; SCORING SYSTEM; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

EID: 37649018995     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815e3a10     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (1553)

References (30)
  • 1
    • 0032530938 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use
    • Deyo RA, Battie M, Beurskens AJ, et al. Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine 1998;23:2003-13.
    • (1998) Spine , vol.23 , pp. 2003-2013
    • Deyo, R.A.1    Battie, M.2    Beurskens, A.J.3
  • 2
    • 0034671278 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Outcome assessments in the evaluation of treatment of spinal disorders: Summary and general recommendations
    • Bombardier C. Outcome assessments in the evaluation of treatment of spinal disorders: summary and general recommendations. Spine 2000;25:3100-3.
    • (2000) Spine , vol.25 , pp. 3100-3103
    • Bombardier, C.1
  • 3
    • 0034671285 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire
    • Roland M, Fairbank J. The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Spine 2000;25:3115-24.
    • (2000) Spine , vol.25 , pp. 3115-3124
    • Roland, M.1    Fairbank, J.2
  • 4
    • 0034671462 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Assessing global pain severity by selfreport in clinical and health services research
    • von Korff M, Jensen MP, Karoly P. Assessing global pain severity by selfreport in clinical and health services research. Spine 2000;25:3140-51.
    • (2000) Spine , vol.25 , pp. 3140-3151
    • von Korff, M.1    Jensen, M.P.2    Karoly, P.3
  • 5
    • 0030298376 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The minimal important difference: Who's to say what is important?
    • Wright JG. The minimal important difference: who's to say what is important? J Clin Epidemiol 1996;49:1221-2.
    • (1996) J Clin Epidemiol , vol.49 , pp. 1221-1222
    • Wright, J.G.1
  • 6
    • 0028055059 scopus 로고
    • Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire
    • Juniper EF, Guyatt GH, Willan A, et al. Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire. J Clin Epidemiol 1994;47:81-7.
    • (1994) J Clin Epidemiol , vol.47 , pp. 81-87
    • Juniper, E.F.1    Guyatt, G.H.2    Willan, A.3
  • 7
    • 0037567512 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life
    • Crosby RD, Kolotkin RL, Williams GR. Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life. J Clin Epidemiol 2003;56:395-407.
    • (2003) J Clin Epidemiol , vol.56 , pp. 395-407
    • Crosby, R.D.1    Kolotkin, R.L.2    Williams, G.R.3
  • 8
    • 0020583112 scopus 로고
    • A study of the natural history of back pain. I. Development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain
    • Roland M, Morris R. A study of the natural history of back pain. I. Development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine 1983;8:141-4.
    • (1983) Spine , vol.8 , pp. 141-144
    • Roland, M.1    Morris, R.2
  • 9
    • 0019163885 scopus 로고
    • The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire
    • Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, et al. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 1980;66:271-3.
    • (1980) Physiotherapy , vol.66 , pp. 271-273
    • Fairbank, J.C.1    Couper, J.2    Davies, J.B.3
  • 10
    • 0028869470 scopus 로고
    • The Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Measurement properties
    • Kopec JA, Esdaile JM, Abrahamowicz M, et al. The Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Measurement properties. Spine 1995;20:341-52.
    • (1995) Spine , vol.20 , pp. 341-352
    • Kopec, J.A.1    Esdaile, J.M.2    Abrahamowicz, M.3
  • 11
    • 0028961245 scopus 로고
    • Measuring the functional status of patients with low back pain. Assessment of the quality of four diseasespecific questionnaires
    • Beurskens AJ, de Vet HC, Köke AJ, et al. Measuring the functional status of patients with low back pain. Assessment of the quality of four diseasespecific questionnaires. Spine 1995;20:1017-28.
    • (1995) Spine , vol.20 , pp. 1017-1028
    • Beurskens, A.J.1    de Vet, H.C.2    Köke, A.J.3
  • 12
    • 13444266411 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Concurrent comparison of responsiveness in pain and functional status measurements used for patients with low back pain
    • Grotle M, Brox JI, Vollestad NK. Concurrent comparison of responsiveness in pain and functional status measurements used for patients with low back pain. Spine 2004;29:E492-E501.
    • (2004) Spine , vol.29
    • Grotle, M.1    Brox, J.I.2    Vollestad, N.K.3
  • 13
    • 0345701405 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain
    • Hagg O, Fritzell P, Nordwall A. The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 2003;12:12-20.
    • (2003) Eur Spine J , vol.12 , pp. 12-20
    • Hagg, O.1    Fritzell, P.2    Nordwall, A.3
  • 14
    • 33645524359 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Minimal clinically important change for pain intensity, functional status, and general health status in patients with nonspecific low back pain
    • van der Roer N, Ostelo RW, Bekkering GE, et al. Minimal clinically important change for pain intensity, functional status, and general health status in patients with nonspecific low back pain. Spine 2006;31:578-82.
    • (2006) Spine , vol.31 , pp. 578-582
    • van der Roer, N.1    Ostelo, R.W.2    Bekkering, G.E.3
  • 15
    • 0034748159 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale
    • Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, et al. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain 2001;94:149-58.
    • (2001) Pain , vol.94 , pp. 149-158
    • Farrar, J.T.1    Young Jr, J.P.2    LaMoreaux, L.3
  • 16
    • 20344382770 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain
    • Childs JD, Piva SR, Fritz JM. Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain. Spine 2005;30:1331-4.
    • (2005) Spine , vol.30 , pp. 1331-1334
    • Childs, J.D.1    Piva, S.R.2    Fritz, J.M.3
  • 17
    • 0029970411 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Defining the minimum level of detectable change for the Roland-Morris Questionnaire
    • Stratford PW, Binkley J, Solomon P, et al. Defining the minimum level of detectable change for the Roland-Morris Questionnaire. Phys Ther 1996;76:359-65.
    • (1996) Phys Ther , vol.76 , pp. 359-365
    • Stratford, P.W.1    Binkley, J.2    Solomon, P.3
  • 18
    • 0031431844 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Measurement properties of the RM-18. A modified version of the Roland-Morris Disability Scale
    • Stratford PW, Binkley JM. Measurement properties of the RM-18. A modified version of the Roland-Morris Disability Scale. Spine 1997;22:2416-21.
    • (1997) Spine , vol.22 , pp. 2416-2421
    • Stratford, P.W.1    Binkley, J.M.2
  • 19
    • 0031791580 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Sensitivity to change of the Roland-Morris Back Pain Questionnaire: Part 2
    • Riddle DL, Stratford PW, Binkley JM. Sensitivity to change of the Roland-Morris Back Pain Questionnaire: part 2. Phys Ther 1998;78:1197-207.
    • (1998) Phys Ther , vol.78 , pp. 1197-1207
    • Riddle, D.L.1    Stratford, P.W.2    Binkley, J.M.3
  • 20
    • 0031788970 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Sensitivity to change of the Roland-Morris Back Pain Questionnaire: Part 1
    • Stratford PW, Binkley JM, Riddle DL, et al. Sensitivity to change of the Roland-Morris Back Pain Questionnaire: part 1. Phys Ther 1998;78:1186-96.
    • (1998) Phys Ther , vol.78 , pp. 1186-1196
    • Stratford, P.W.1    Binkley, J.M.2    Riddle, D.L.3
  • 21
    • 0036144045 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: Reliability and responsiveness
    • Davidson M, Keating JL. A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness. Phys Ther 2002;82:8-24.
    • (2002) Phys Ther , vol.82 , pp. 8-24
    • Davidson, M.1    Keating, J.L.2
  • 22
    • 0033026278 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Cross-cultural adaptation of the Roland-Morris Questionnaire for German-speaking patients with low back pain
    • Wiesinger GF, Nuhr M, Quittan M, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Roland-Morris Questionnaire for German-speaking patients with low back pain. Spine 1999;24:1099-103.
    • (1999) Spine , vol.24 , pp. 1099-1103
    • Wiesinger, G.F.1    Nuhr, M.2    Quittan, M.3
  • 23
    • 0031719631 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Subacute and chronic low back pain. Reliability and validity of a Swedish version of the Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire
    • Johansson E, Lindberg P. Subacute and chronic low back pain. Reliability and validity of a Swedish version of the Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire. Scand J Rehabil Med 1998;30:139-43.
    • (1998) Scand J Rehabil Med , vol.30 , pp. 139-143
    • Johansson, E.1    Lindberg, P.2
  • 24
    • 0035257054 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Translation, adaptation and validation of the Roland-Morris Questionnaire-Brazil Roland-Morris
    • Nusbaum L, Natour J, Ferraz MB, et al. Translation, adaptation and validation of the Roland-Morris Questionnaire-Brazil Roland-Morris. Braz J Med Biol Res 2001;34:203-10.
    • (2001) Braz J Med Biol Res , vol.34 , pp. 203-210
    • Nusbaum, L.1    Natour, J.2    Ferraz, M.B.3
  • 25
    • 0033844675 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A comparison study of the back pain functional scale and Roland Morris Questionnaire. North American Orthopaedic Rehabilitation Research Network
    • Stratford PW, Binkley JM. A comparison study of the back pain functional scale and Roland Morris Questionnaire. North American Orthopaedic Rehabilitation Research Network. J Rheumatol 2000;27:1928-36.
    • (2000) J Rheumatol , vol.27 , pp. 1928-1936
    • Stratford, P.W.1    Binkley, J.M.2
  • 26
    • 0034663427 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Development and initial validation of the back pain functional scale
    • Stratford PW, Binkley JM, Riddle DL. Development and initial validation of the back pain functional scale. Spine 2000;25:2095-102.
    • (2000) Spine , vol.25 , pp. 2095-2102
    • Stratford, P.W.1    Binkley, J.M.2    Riddle, D.L.3
  • 27
    • 0035166635 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Responsiveness of generic and specific measures of health outcome in low back pain
    • Garratt AM, Klaber Moffett J, Farrin AJ. Responsiveness of generic and specific measures of health outcome in low back pain. Spine 2001;26:71-7.
    • (2001) Spine , vol.26 , pp. 71-77
    • Garratt, A.M.1    Klaber Moffett, J.2    Farrin, A.J.3
  • 28
    • 29144467134 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A minimal clinically important difference was derived for the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire for low back pain
    • Jordan K, Dunn KM, Lewis M, et al. A minimal clinically important difference was derived for the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire for low back pain. J Clin Epidemiol 2006;59:45-52.
    • (2006) J Clin Epidemiol , vol.59 , pp. 45-52
    • Jordan, K.1    Dunn, K.M.2    Lewis, M.3
  • 29
    • 0032574199 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Interpreting treatment effects in randomised trials
    • Guyatt GH, Juniper EF, Walter SD, et al. Interpreting treatment effects in randomised trials. BMJ 1998;316:690-3.
    • (1998) BMJ , vol.316 , pp. 690-693
    • Guyatt, G.H.1    Juniper, E.F.2    Walter, S.D.3
  • 30
    • 37649020535 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • FDA Guidance on PRO. Guidance for Industry Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims. Rockville, MD: Food and Drug Administration; 2006.
    • FDA Guidance on PRO. Guidance for Industry Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims. Rockville, MD: Food and Drug Administration; 2006.


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.