The impact of systemic vascular resistance on the accuracy of the FloTrac/Vigileo™ system in the perioperative period of cardiac surgery: A prospective observational comparison study

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 639-646

  Sotomi, Yohei ^a   Iwakura, Katsuomi ^a   Higuchi, Yoshiharu ^a   Abe, Kazuo ^a   Yoshida, Junko ^a   Masai, Takafumi ^a   Fujii, Kenshi ^a  

^a Sakurabashi Watanabe Hospital   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cardiac output; Cardiovascular surgery; FloTrac Vigileo system; Hemodynamic monitoring; Systemic vascular resistance; Vasoactive agents

Indexed keywords

ARTERIAL PRESSURES; CARDIAC OUTPUT; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING; PERCENTAGE ERROR; POSITIVE CORRELATIONS; PULMONARY ARTERY; RESISTANCE INDEX;

CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY; PATIENT MONITORING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

BLOOD PRESSURE;

ADRENALIN; ANGIOTENSIN RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST; ATRIAL NATRIURETIC FACTOR ALPHA; BETA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKING AGENT; DIPEPTIDYL CARBOXYPEPTIDASE INHIBITOR; DIURETIC AGENT; DOBUTAMINE; DOPAMINE; NICORANDIL; NITRATE; NORADRENALIN; PHOSPHODIESTERASE III INHIBITOR;

AGED; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ANESTHETIC EQUIPMENT; ARTERIAL PRESSURE BASED CARDIAC OUTPUT; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR EQUIPMENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; EXTUBATION; FEMALE; HEART OUTPUT; HEART OUTPUT MEASUREMENT; HEART SURGERY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULMONARY ARTERY CATHETER; PULMONARY ARTERY CATHETER BASED CARDIAC OUTPUT; PULSE WAVE; RELIABILITY; SWAN GANZ CATHETER; SYSTEMIC VASCULAR RESISTANCE; WAVEFORM;

AGED; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; CARDIAC OUTPUT; CARDIAC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; CATHETERIZATION, SWAN-GANZ; CRITICAL ILLNESS; FEMALE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PULMONARY ARTERY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TIME FACTORS; VASCULAR RESISTANCE; VASOCONSTRICTOR AGENTS;

EID: 84887241537     PISSN: 13871307     EISSN: 15732614     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10877-013-9481-2     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Didier P, Gayat E. Which general intensive care unit patients can benefit from placement of the pulmonary artery catheter? Crit Care. 2006;10:S7.
2. Peters SG, Afessa B, Decker PA, Schroeder DR, Offord KP, Scott JP. Increase risk associated with pulmonary artery catheterization in the medical intensive care unit. J Crit Care. 2003;18:166-71.
3. Manecke GR. Edwards FloTrac sensor and Vigileo monitor: easy, accurate, reliable cardiac output assessment using the arterial pulse wave. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2005;2:523-7.
4. Headley JM. Arterial pressure-based technologies: a new trend in cardiac output monitoring. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2006;18:179-87.
5. Gödje O, Friedl R, Hannekum A. Accuracy of beat-to-beat cardiac output monitoring by pulse contour analysis in hemodynamical unstable patients. Med Sci Monit. 2001;7:1344-50.
6. Slagt C, Beute J, Hoeksema M, Malagon I, Mulder JW, Groeneveld JA. Cardiac output derived from arterial pressure waveform analysis without calibration versus thermodilution in septic shock: evolving accuracy of software versions. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010;27:550-4.
7. Mutoh T, Ishikawa T, Nishino K, Yasui N. Evaluation of the FloTrac uncalibrated continuous cardiac output system for perioperative hemodynamic monitoring after subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2009;21:218-25.
8. Hofer CK, Button D, Weibel L, Genoni M, Zollinger A. Uncalibrated radial and femoral arterial pressure waveform analysis for continuous cardiac output measurement: an evaluation in cardiac surgery patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2010;24:257-64.
9. De Backer D, Marx G, Tan A, Junker C, Van Nuffelen M, Hüter L, Ching W, Michard F, Vincent JL. Arterial pressure-based cardiac output monitoring: a multicenter validation of the third-generation software in septic patients. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37:233-40.
10. Zimmermann A, Steinwendner J, Hofbauer S, Kirnbauer M, Schneider J, Moser L, Pauser G. The accuracy of the Vigileo/FloTrac system has been improved follow-up after a software update: a blinded comparative study of 30 cardiosurgical patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2009;23:929-31.
11. Mayer J, Suttner S. Cardiac output derived from arterial pressure waveform. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2009;22:804-8.
12. Saraceni E, Rossi S, Persona P, Dan M, Rizzi S, Meroni M, Ori C. Comparison of two methods for cardiac output measurement in critically ill patients. Br J Anaesth. 2011;106:690-4.
13. Opdam HI, Wan L, Bellomo R. A pilot assessment of the FloTrac cardiac output monitoring system. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33:344-9.
14. Sander M, Spies CD, Grubitzsch H, Foer A, Müller M, von Heymann C. Comparison of uncalibrated arterial waveform analysis in cardiac surgery patients with thermodilution cardiac output measurements. Crit Care. 2006;21:R164.
15. Lin LI. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics. 1989;45:255-68.
16. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8:135-60.
17. Myles PS, Cui J. Using the Bland-Altman method to measure agreement with repeated measures. Br J Anaesth. 2007;99:309-11.
18. Peyton PJ, Chong SW. Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output during surgery and critical care: a meta-analysis of accuracy and precision. Anesthesiology. 2010;113:1220-35.
19. Levett JM, Replogle RL. Thermodilution cardiac output: acritical analysis and review of the literature. J Surg Res. 1979;27:392-404.
20. Sotomi Y, Nishiyama C, Shimizu T, Kita T, Maki N, Sasaki S. Reliability of a less-invasive cardiac output monitor in the perioperative period of a patient with severe dilated cardiomyopathy. Masui. 2011;60:203-7.
21. Biancofiore G, Critchley LA, Lee A, Bindi L, Bisà M, Esposito M, Meacci L, Mozzo R, DeSimone P, Urbani L, Filipponi F. Evaluation of an uncalibrated arterial pulse contour cardiac output monitoring system in cirrhotic patients undergoing liver surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102:47-54.
22. Junttila EK, Koskenkari JK, Ohtonen PP, Ala-Kokko TI. Uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis for cardiac output monitoring is biased by low peripheral resistance in patients with intracranial haemorrhage. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107:581-6.
23. Biais M, Nouette-Gaulain K, Cottenceau V, Vallet A, Cochard JF, Revel P, Sztark F. Cardiac output measurement in patients undergoing liver transplantation: pulmonary artery catheter versus uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:1480-6.
24. ®-derived cardiac output measurements: a prospective comparison study. Crit Care. 2009;13:R179.
25. Sakka SG, Kozieras J, Thuemer O, van Hout N. Measurement of cardiac output: a comparison between transpulmonary thermodilution and uncalibrated pulse contour analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2007;99:337-42.
26. Compton FD, Zukunft B, Hoffmann C, Zidek W, Schaefer JH. Performance of a minimally invasive uncalibrated cardiac output monitoring system (Flotrac/Vigileo) in haemodynamically unstable patients. Br J Anaesth. 2008;100:451-6.
27. Lorsomradee S, Cromheecke S, De Hert SG. Uncalibrated arterial pulse contour analysis versus continuous thermodilution technique: effects of alterations in arterial waveform. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007;21:636-43.
28. Monnet X, Anguel N, Jozwiak M, Richard C, Teboul JL. Third-generation FloTrac/Vigileo does not reliably track changes in cardiac output induced by norepinephrine in critically ill patients. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108:615-22.
29. Meng L, Tran NP, Alexander BS, Laning K, Chen G, Kain ZN, Cannesson M. The impact of phenylephrine, ephedrine, and increased preload on third-generation Vigileo-FloTrac and esophageal doppler cardiac output measurements. Anesth Analg. 2011;113:751-7.
30. Su BC, Tsai YF, Chen CY, Yu HP, Yang MW, Lee WC, Lin CC. Cardiac output derived from arterial pressure waveform analysis in patients undergoing liver transplantation: validity of a third-generation device. Transplant Proc. 2012;44:424-8.