Comparison of two methods for cardiac output measurement in critically ill patients

British Journal of Anaesthesia

Volumn 106, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 690-694

  Saraceni, E ^a   Rossi, S ^a   Persona, P ^a   Dan, M ^b   Rizzi, S ^a   Meroni, M ^a   Ori, C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^b Azienda Ospedale Universita   (Italy)

Author keywords

arterial pressure; cardiac output; intensive care; measurement techniques; monitoring; thermodilution

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTERY CATHETERIZATION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT; FEMALE; HEART OUTPUT; HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE; LUNG ARTERY CATHETERIZATION; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THERMODILUTION;

EID: 79954546313     PISSN: 00070912     EISSN: 14716771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aer030     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Jaquet L, Hanique G, Glorieux D, et al. Analysis of the accuracy of continuous thermodilution cardiac output measurements. Intensive Care Med 1996; 22: 1125-29
2. Takala J. The pulmonary artery catheter: the tool versus treatments based on the tool. Crit Care 2006; 10: 162
3. Maneke GR. Edwards FloTrac sensor and Vigileo monitor: easy, accurate. Reliable cardiac output assessment using the arterial pulse wave. Expert Rev Med Devices 2005; 2: 523-27
4. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-10 (Pubitemid 16134762)
5. Matthieu B, Nouette-Gaulain K, Cottenceau W, et al. Cardiac output measurements in patients undergoing liver transplantation: pulmonary artery catheter versus uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis. Anaesth Analg 2008; 106: 1480-86 (Pubitemid 351571079)
6. Biancofiore G, Critchley LA, Lee A, et al. Evaluation of an uncalibrated arterial pulse contour cardiac output monitoring system in cirrhotic patients undergoing liver surgery. Br J Anaesth 2009; 102: 47-54
7. Mayer J, Boldt J, Wolf MW, Lang J, Suttner S. Cardiac output derived from arterial pressure waveform analysis in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: validity of a second generation device. Anesth Analg 2008; 106: 867-72 (Pubitemid 351301408)
8. Opdam HI, Wan L, Bellomo R. A pilot assessment of the FloTrac cardiac output monitoring system. Intensive Care Med 2007; 33: 334-9
9. de Waal EE, Kalkman CJ, Rex S, Buhre WF. Validation of a new arterial pulse contour-based cardiac output device. Crit Care Med 2007; 35: 1904-9 (Pubitemid 47220365)
10. Senn A, Button D, Zollinger A, Hofer CK. Assessment of cardiac output changes using a modified FloTrac/Vigileo algorithm in cardiac surgery patients. Crit Care. 2009; 13: R32
11. Manecke GR Jr, Auger WR. Cardiac output determination from the arterial pressure wave: clinical testing of a novel algorithm that does not require calibration. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2007; 21: 3-7 (Pubitemid 46199245)
12. Zimmermann A, Kufner C, Hofbauer S, et al. The accuracy of Vigileo/FloTrac continuous output monitor. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2008; 22: 388-93
13. Compton FD, Zukunft B, Hoffmann C, Zidek W, Schaefer JH. Performance of a minimally invasive uncalibrated cardiac output monitoring system (Flotrac/Vigileo) in haemodynamically unstable patients. Br J Anaesth 2008; 100: 451-6 (Pubitemid 351773603)
14. Cecconi M, Rodes A, Poloniecki J, Della Rocca G, Grounds RM. Bench-to-bedside review: the importance of the precision of the reference technique in method comparison studies-with specific reference to the measurement of cardiac output. Crit Care 2009; 13: 201