Assessment of extent of breast cancer: Comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography

Clinical Radiology

Volumn 68, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 1254-1259

  Mun, H S ^a,b   Kim, H H ^a   Shin, H J ^a   Cha, J H ^a   Ruppel, P L ^c   Oh, H Y ^a,d   Chae, E Y ^a  

^a University of Ulsan College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^c Innovative Analytics   (United States)

^d Kangwon National University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SIZE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FULL FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84887194994     PISSN: 00099260     EISSN: 1365229X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2013.07.006     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. American Joint Committee on Cancer AJCC cancer staging manual 7th ed. 2010 Springer-Verlag New York, NY
2. D. Fornvik, S. Zackrisson, and O. Ljungberg Breast tomosynthesis: accuracy of tumor measurement compared with digital mammography and ultrasonography Acta Radiol 51 2010 240 247
3. B.D. Fornage, O. Toubas, and M. Morel Clinical, mammographic, and sonographic determination of preoperative breast cancer size Cancer 60 1987 765 771 (Pubitemid 17126288)
4. W.T. Yang, W.W. Lam, and H. Cheung Sonographic, magnetic resonance imaging, and mammographic assessments of preoperative size of breast cancer J Ultrasound Med 16 1997 791 797 (Pubitemid 27510090)
5. F. Tresserra, J. Feu, and P.J. Grases Assessment of breast cancer size: sonographic and pathologic correlation J Clin Ultrasound 27 1999 485 491 (Pubitemid 29519435)
6. A. Shoma, A. Moutamed, and M. Ameen Ultrasound for accurate measurement of invasive breast cancer tumor size Breast J 12 2006 252 256
7. L.T. Niklason, B.T. Christian, and L.E. Niklason Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging Radiology 205 1997 399 406 (Pubitemid 27467317)
8. I. Sechopoulos, S. Suryanarayanan, and S. Vedantham Computation of the glandular radiation dose in digital tomosynthesis of the breast Med Phys. 34 2007 221 232 (Pubitemid 46035245)
9. I. Andersson, D.M. Ikeda, and S. Zackrisson Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings Eur Radiol 18 2008 2817 2825
10. S.P. Poplack, T.D. Tosteson, and C.A. Kogel Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography AJR Am J Roentgenol 189 2007 616 623 (Pubitemid 47328544)
11. R.H. Moore, D.B. Kopans, and E.A. Rafferty Initial callback rates for conventional and digital breast tomosynthesis mammography comparison in the screening setting Radiological Society of North America Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting Program 2007 Radiological Society of North America Oak Brook, Ill SSG01-01, p. 381 (Abstract)
12. L. Bassett, W. Berg, and S. Feig Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System BI-RADS: Mammography 4th ed. 2003 American College of Radiology Reston: VA
13. Anon. NIH Consensus Conference Treatment of early-stage breast cancer JAMA 265 1991 391 395
14. J.M. Boone, A.L. Kwan, and K. Yang Computed tomography for imaging the breast J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 11 2006 103 111 (Pubitemid 46111259)
15. L. Turnbull, S. Brown, and I. Harvey Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial Lancet 375 2010 563 571
16. N.F. Boyd, H. Guo, and L.J. Martin Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer N Engl J Med 356 2007 227 236 (Pubitemid 46143226)
17. I. Andersson Radiographic screening for breast carcinoma. III. Appearance of carcinoma and number of projections to be used at screening Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 22 1981 407 420 (Pubitemid 12244548)
18. A.K. Hackshaw, N.J. Wald, and M.J. Michell An investigation into why two-view mammography is better than one-view in breast cancer screening Clin Radiol 55 2000 454 458 (Pubitemid 32054552)
19. W.A. Berg, L. Gutierrez, and M.S. NessAiver Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer Radiology 233 2004 830 849