An investigation into why two-view mammography is better than one-view in breast cancer screening

Clinical Radiology

Volumn 55, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 454-458

  Hackshaw, A K ^a   Wald, N J ^a   Michell, M J ^b   Field, S ^c   Wilson, A R M ^d  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b KING S COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c KENT AND CANTERBURY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d NOTTINGHAM CITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Mammography; Screening

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CALCIFICATION; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER LOCALIZATION; CANCER RESEARCH; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER SIZE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENSITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; ORGAN SIZE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 0034526881     PISSN: 00099260     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/crad.2000.0448     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. UKCCCR multicentre randomized controlled trial of one and two view mammography in breast cancer screening
2. Results from the NHS breast screening programme 1990-1993
3. Uber effizienz and praktikabilitat der schragaufnahme als 1-ebenen-mammographie
4. The oblique view at mammography
5. Number of projections in mammography. Influence on detection of breast disease
6. Radiographic screening for breast carcinoma, III. Appearance of carcinoma and number of projections to be used at screening
7. Film screen mammography: Comparison of views
8. Use of two-view mammography compared with one-view in the detection of small invasive cancers: Further results from the National Health Service breast screening programme
9. Observer variability in cancer detection during routine repeat (incident) mammographic screening in a study of two versus one view mammography