How to Collect and Analyze Qualitative Data

Research Methods in Second Language Acquisition: A Practical Guide

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 180-200

  Friedman, Debra A ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

"the social turn" in SLA; Data elicitation method; discourse analysis, alternative approach; EFL context; post positivism, postmodern paradigms; Qualitative approach use; Qualitative data, collection, analysis; Qualitative inquiry in SLA; Qualitative inquiry, and open inquiry; Sets of beliefs, or paradigms

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887161997     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781444347340.ch10     Document Type: Chapter

References (35)

1. Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J. (1984). Introduction. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 1-15). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
2. Benson, P., Chik, A., Gao, X., Huang, J., & Wang, W. (2009). Qualitative research in language teaching and learning journals, 1997-2006. Modern Language Journal, 93, 79-90.
3. Block, D. (2003). The social turn in second language acquisition. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
4. Cekaite, A. (2007). A child's development of interactional competence in a Swedish L2 classroom. Modern Language Journal, 91, 45-62.
5. Chapelle, C. A., & Duff, P. A. (Eds.). (2003). Some guidelines for conducting quantitative and qualitative research in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 37, 163-178.
6. Duff, P. (2006). Beyond generalizability: Contextualization, complexity, and credibility in applied linguistics research. In M. Chalhoub-Deville, C. A. Chapelle, & P. Duff (Eds.), Inference and generalizability in applied linguistics (pp. 65-95). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
7. Edge, J., & Richards, K. (1998). May I see your warrant please? Justifying outcomes in qualitative research. Applied Linguistics, 19, 334-356.
8. Gan, Z., Humphreys, G., & Hamp-Lyons, L. (2004). Understanding successful and unsuccessful EFL students in Chinese universities. Modern Language Journal, 88, 229-244.
9. Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In C. Geertz, Interpretation of cultures (pp. 4-30). New York, NY: Basic Books.
10. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: Aldine.
11. Green, J., Franquiz, M., & Dixon C. (1997). The myth of the objective transcript: Transcribing as a situated act. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 172-176.
12. Gullberg, M., & McCafferty, S. G. (Eds.). (2008). Gesture and SLA: Toward an integrated approach [Special issue]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(2).
13. Haneda, M. (2006). Classrooms as communities of practice: A reevaluation. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 807-817.
14. Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. (2002). Active interviewing. In D. Weinberg (Ed.), Qualitative research methods (pp. 112-126). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
15. Kasper, G. (2006). Beyond repair: Conversation analysis as an approach to SLA. AILA Review, 19, 83-99.
16. Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
17. Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
18. Lazaraton, A. (2000). Current trends in research methodology and statistics in applied linguistics. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 175-181.
19. Lazaraton, A. (2003). Evaluative criteria for qualitative research in applied linguistics: Whose criteria and whose research? Modern Language Journal, 87, 1-12.
20. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 163-188). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
21. Markee, N. (Ed.). (2004). Classroom talks [Special issue]. Modern Language Journal, 88(4).
22. Markee, N., & Kasper, G. (2004). Classroom talks: An introduction. Modern Language Journal, 88, 491-500.
23. Norton, B. (2000). Identity and language learning: Gender, ethnicity and educational change. Harlow, England: Longman.
24. Pavlenko, A. (2007). Autobiographic narratives as data in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 28, 163-188.
25. Richards, K. (2003). Qualitative inquiry in TESOL. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
26. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.
27. Schiffrin, D. (1994). Approaches to discourse. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
28. Spada, N., & Lyster, R. (1997). Macroscopic and microscopic views of L2 classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 787-795.
29. Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. New York, NY: Holt Rinehart & Winston.
30. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Technique and procedures for producing grounded theory (2nd ed.). London, England: SAGE.
31. Talmy, S. (2010). Qualitative interviews in applied linguistics: From research instrument to social practice. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 128-148.
32. Talmy, S., & Richards, K. (Eds.). (2011). Qualitative interviews in applied linguistics: Discursive perspectives [Special issue]. Applied Linguistics, 32(1).
33. Ten Have, P. (1999). Doing conversation analysis: A practical guide. London, England: Sage.
34. Watson-Gegeo, K. A. (2004). Mind, language, and epistemology: Toward a language socialization paradigm for SLA. Modern Language Journal, 88, 31-350.
35. Zuengler, J., & Mori, J. (Eds.). (2002). Microanalyses of classroom discourse: A critical consideration of method [Special issue]. Applied Linguistics, 23(3).