Birth-death models and coalescent point processes: The shape and probability of reconstructed phylogenies

Theoretical Population Biology

Volumn 90, Issue , 2013, Pages 113-128

  Lambert, Amaury ^a,b   Stadler, Tanja ^c  

^a SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^b l'alimentation et l'Environnement   (France)

^c ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Incomplete sampling; Inference; Likelihood; Macroevolution; Random tree

Indexed keywords

COALESCENCE; MACROECOLOGY; MASS EXTINCTION; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY; PROBABILITY; SAMPLING; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY); TREE;

ARTICLE; BIRTH; DEATH; HUMAN; INCOMPLETE SAMPLING; INFERENCE; LIKELIHOOD; MACROEVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; PROBABILITY; RANDOM TREE; THEORETICAL MODEL;

INCOMPLETE SAMPLING; INFERENCE; LIKELIHOOD; MACROEVOLUTION; RANDOM TREE;

DEATH; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PARTURITION; PHYLOGENY; PROBABILITY;

EID: 84887060670     PISSN: 00405809     EISSN: 10960325     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2013.10.002     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Aldous D. Probability distributions on cladograms. Random Discrete Structures 1996, 1-18. Springer.
2. Aldous D. Stochastic models and descriptive statistics for phylogenetic trees, from Yule to today. Statist. Sci. 2001, 16(1):23-34.
3. Aldous D., Popovic L. A critical branching process model for biodiversity. Adv. Appl. Probab. 2005, 37(4):1094-1115.
4. Blum M., François O. Which random processes describe the tree of life? A large-scale study of phylogenetic tree imbalance. Syst. Biol. 2006, 55(4):685-691.
5. Edwards A.W.F. Estimation of the branch points of a branching diffusion process. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 1970, 32:155-174. (with discussion).
6. Etienne R.S., Haegeman B., Stadler T., Aze T., Pearson P.N., Purvis A., Phillimore A.B. Diversity-dependence brings molecular phylogenies closer to agreement with the fossil record. P. Roy. Soc. B.- Biol. Sci. 2012, 279(1732):1300-1309.
7. Etienne R.S., Rosindell J. Prolonging the past counteracts the pull of the present: protracted speciation can explain observed slowdowns in diversification. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61(2):204-213.
8. Ford D., Matsen E., Stadler T. A method for investigating relative timing information on phylogenetic trees. Syst. Biol. 2009, 58(2):167-183.
9. Gernhard T. The conditioned reconstructed process. J. Theoret. Biol. 2008, 253(4):769-778.
10. Gernhard T. New analytic results for speciation times in neutral models. Bull. Math. Biol. 2008, 70(4):1082-1097.
11. Hallinan N. The generalized time variable reconstructed birth-death process. J. Theoret. Biol. 2012, 300:265-276.
12. Harding E.F. The probabilities of rooted tree-shapes generated by random bifurcation. Adv. Appl. Probab. 1971, 3:44-77.
13. Hartmann K., Wong D., Stadler T. Sampling trees from evolutionary models. Syst. Biol. 2010, 59(4):465-476.
14. Höhna S. Fast simulation of reconstructed phylogenies under global time-dependent birth-death processes. Bioinformatics 2013, 29(11):1367-1374.
15. Höhna S., Stadler T., Ronquist F., Britton T. Inferring speciation and extinction rates under different sampling schemes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011, 28(9):2577-2589.
16. Kingman J. The coalescent. Stochastic Process. Appl. 1982, 13(3):235-248.
17. Lambert A. The allelic partition for coalescent point processes. Markov Proc. Relat. Fields. 2009, 15:359-386.
18. Lambert A. The contour of splitting trees is a Lévy process. Ann. Probab. 2010, 38(1):348-395.
19. Lambert, A., Morlon, H., Etienne, R.S., 2013. The reconstructed tree in the lineage-based model of protracted speciation. arxiv:1301.5512.
20. Lambert A., Steel M. Predicting the loss of phylogenetic diversity under non-stationary diversification models. J. Theoret. Biol. 2013, 337:111-124.
21. Morlon H., Parsons T., Plotkin J. Reconciling molecular phylogenies with the fossil record. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2011, 108(39):16327-16332.
22. Morlon H., Potts M., Plotkin J. Inferring the dynamics of diversification: a coalescent approach. PLoS Biol. 2010, 8(9):e1000493.
23. Nee S.C., May R.M., Harvey P.H. The reconstructed evolutionary process. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 1994, 344:305-311.
24. Paradis E. Analysis of diversification: combining phylogenetic and taxonomic data. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 2003, 270(1532):2499.
25. Rosindell J., Cornell S.J., Hubbell S.P., Etienne R.S. Protracted speciation revitalizes the neutral theory of biodiversity. Ecol. Lett. 2010, 13(6):716-727.
26. Semple C., Steel M. Phylogenetics. Oxford Lecture Series in Mathematics and its Applications 2003, vol. 24. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
27. Stadler T. On incomplete sampling under birth-death models and connections to the sampling-based coalescent. J. Theoret. Biol. 2009, 261(1):58-66.
28. Stadler T. Sampling-through-time in birth-death trees. J. Theoret. Biol. 2010, 267(3):396-404.
29. Stadler T. Inferring speciation and extinction processes from extant species data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2011, 108(39):16145-16146.
30. Stadler T. Mammalian phylogeny reveals recent diversification rate shifts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2011, 108(15):6187-6192.
31. Stadler T. Recovering speciation and extinction dynamics based on phylogenies. J. Evol. Biol. 2013, 26(6):1203-1219.
32. Stadler T., Bokma F. Estimating speciation and extinction rates for phylogenies of higher taxa. Syst. Biol. 2013, 62(2):220-230.
33. Thompson E.A. Human Evolutionary Trees 1975, Cambridge University Press.
34. Yang Z. Computational Molecular Evolution 2006, Oxford University Press, USA.
35. Yule G.U. A mathematical theory of evolution: based on the conclusions of Dr. J.C. Willis. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 1924, 213:21-87.