How eco-efficient are low-input cropping systems in Western Europe, and what can be done to improve their eco-efficiency?

Sustainability (Switzerland)

Volumn 5, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 3722-3743

  Kulak, Michal ^a   Nemecek, Thomas ^a   Frossard, Emmanuel ^b   Gaillard, Gérard ^a  

^a AGROSCOPE RECKENHOLZ TÄNIKON RESEARCH STATION ART   (Switzerland)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Cropping systems; Eco efficiency; Environmental impacts. Life cycle assessment; Low input farming; Sustainable intensification

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL INTENSIFICATION; CROPPING PRACTICE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; INTENSIVE AGRICULTURE; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 84887038370     PISSN: 20711050     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/su5093722     Document Type: Article

References (116)

1. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations. FAOSTAT Database. Production. Available online: http://faostat.fao.org/ (accessed on 19 July 2013).
2. European Statistical Office. General and Regional Statistics. Available online: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/eurostat/home/ (accessed on 19 July 2013).
3. Stoate, C.; Boatman, N.D.; Borralho, R.J.; Carvalho, C.R.; de Snoo, G.R.; Eden, P. Ecological impacts of arable intensification in Europe. J. Environ. Manag. 2001, 63, 337-365.
4. Tilman, D.; Cassman, K.G.; Matson, P.A.; Naylor, R.; Polasky, S. Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 2002, 418, 671-677.
5. Liebhardt, W.C.; Andrews, R.W.; Culik, M.N.; Harwood, R.R.; Janke, R.R.; Radke, J.K.; Riegerschwartz, S.L. Crop production during conversion from conventional to low-input methods. Agron. J. 1989, 81, 150-159.
6. Parr, J.F.; Papendick, R.I.; Youngberg, I.G.; Meyer, R.E. Sustainable Agriculture in the United States. In Sustainable Agricultural Systems; Edwards, C.A., Madden, R.L.P., Miller, R., House, G., Eds.; Soil and Water Conservation Society: Ankeny, CA, USA, 1990.
7. Gosme, M.; Suffert, F.; Jeuffroy, M.H. Intensive versus low-input cropping systems: What is the optimal partitioning of agricultural area in order to reduce pesticide use while maintaining productivity? Agric. Syst. 2010, 103, 110-116.
8. Strijker, D. Marginal lands in Europe-Causes of decline. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2005, 6, 99-106.
9. Loyce, C.; Meynard, J.M.; Bouchard, C.; Rolland, B.; Lonnet, P.; Bataillon, P.; Bernicot, M.H.; Bonnefoy, M.; Charrier, X.; Debote, B.; et al. Growing winter wheat cultivars under different management intensities in France: A multicriteria assessment based on economic, energetic and environmental indicators. Field Crop. Res. 2012, 125, 167-178.
10. Bouchard, C.; Bernicot, M.H.; Félix, I.; Guérin, O.; Loyce, C.; Omon, B.; Rolland, B. Associer des itinéraires techniques de niveau d'intrants variés à des variétés rustiques de blé tendre: Évaluation économique, environnementale et énergétique (In French). Courr. environ. INRA 2008, 55, 53-57.
11. European Environment Agency. Agriculture and Environment in EU-15-The IRENA Indicator Report; European Environment Agency: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2005. Available online: http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/eea_report_2005_6/ (accessed on 14 August 2013).
12. Sebillotte, M. Some Concepts for Analysing Farming and Cropping Systems and for Understanding Their Different Effects. In Proceedings of the 1st Congress of European Society of Agronomy, Paris, France, 5-7 December 1990; Scaife, A., Ed.; European Society of Agronomy: Paris, France, 1990; pp. 1-16.
13. Schmidheiny, S. Changing Course: A Global Business Perspective on Development and the Environment; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1992.
14. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO). Save and Grow: A Policymaker's Guide to the Sustainable Intensification of Smallholder Crop Production; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2011.
15. Her Majesty Government. The Future of Food and Farming; The Government Office for Science: London, UK, 2011.
16. Royal Society. Reaping the Benefits: Science and the Sustainable Intensification of Global Agriculture; Royal Society: London, UK, 2009.
17. Tilman, D.; Balzer, C.; Hill, J.; Befort, B.L. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 20260-20264.
18. Godfray, H.C.J.; Beddington, J.R.; Crute, I.R.; Haddad, L.; Lawrence, D.; Muir, J.F.; Pretty, J.; Robinson, S.; Thomas, S.M.; Toulmin, C. Food security: The challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 2010, 327, 812-818.
19. Garnett, T.; Appleby, M.; Balmford, A.; Bateman, I.; Benton, T.; Bloomer, P.; Burlingame, B.; Dawkins, M.; Dolan, L.; Fraser, D. Sustainable intensification in agriculture: Premises and policies. Science 2013, 341, 33-34.
20. Huppes, G.; Ishikawa, M. Eco-efficiency and its terminology. J. Ind. Ecol. 2005, 9, 43-46.
21. Finnveden, G.R.; Hauschild, M.Z.; Ekvall, T.; Guinée, J.; Heijungs, R.; Hellweg, S.; Koehler, A.; Pennington, D.; Suh, S. Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 91, 1-21.
22. Corson, M.S.; van der Werf, H.M.G. Abstracts of the 8th International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-Food Sector (LCA Food 2012), Saint Malo, France, 1-4 October 2012; Corson, M.S., van der Werf, H.M.G., Eds.; INRA, Rennes: Saint Malo, France, 2012.
23. Tuomisto, H.; Hodge, I.; Riordan, P.; Macdonald, D. Does organic farming reduce environmental impacts?-A meta-analysis of European research. J. Environ. Manag. 2012, 112, 309-320.
24. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Environmental Management-Life Cycle Assessment-Principles and Framework; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2006; Vol. ISO 14040:2006.
25. Roches, A.; Nemecek, T.; Gaillard, G.; Plassmann, K.; Sim, S.; King, H.; Milài Canals, L. MEXALCA: A modular method for the extrapolation of crop LCA. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2010, 15, 842-854.
26. Brentrup, F.; Kusters, J.; Lammel, J.; Barraclough, P.; Kuhlmann, H. Environmental impact assessment of agricultural production systems using the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology II. The application to N fertilizer use in winter wheat production systems. Eur. J. Agron. 2004, 20, 265-279.
27. Nemecek, T.; Huguenin-Elie, O.; Dubois, D.; Gaillard, G.; Schaller, B.; Chervet, A. Life cycle assessment of Swiss farming systems: II. Extensive and intensive production. Agric. Syst. 2011, 104, 233-245.
28. Hauschild, M.Z.; Wenzel, H. Environmental Assessment of Products; Chapman & Hall: London, UK, 1998; Volume 2 Scientific Background, p. 565.
29. Williams, A.G.; Audsley, E.; Sandars, D.L. Determining the Environmental Burdens and Resource Use in the Production of Agricultural and Horticultural Commodities; Defra Project Report IS0205; Cranfield University, DEFRA: Bedford, UK, 2006.
30. Cranfield University Centre for Environmental Risk and Futures. Agri-LCI Model. Available online: http://www.cranfield.ac.uk/sas/cerf/lca.html (accessed on 19 July 2013).
31. Flavell, R. Knowledge and technologies for sustainable intensification of food production. New Biotechnol. 2010, 27, 505-516.
32. Murray, W.J. Sustainable Crop Production Intensification. In Proceedings of the International Scientific Symposium Biodiversity and Sustainable Diets United Against Hunger, FAO Headquarters, Rome, Italy, 3-5 November 2010; Burlingame, B., Dernini, S., Eds.; FAO Nutrition and Consumer Protection Division: Rome, Italy, 2012.
33. World Bank. Investments in Sustainable Agricultural Intensification. In Agricultural Investment Sourcebook. Module 4; The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank:Washington, DC, USA, 2004.
34. Pretty, J. Can ecological agriculture feed nine billion people? Mon. Rev. 2009, 61, 46-58.
35. Cassman, K.G. Ecological intensification of cereal production systems: Yield potential, soil quality, and precision agriculture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 5952-5959.
36. Doré, T.; Makowski, D.; Malézieux, E.; Munier-Jolain, N.; Tchamitchian, M.; Tittonell, P. Facing up to the paradigm of ecological intensification in agronomy: Revisiting methods, concepts and knowledge. Eur. J. Agron. 2011, 34, 197-210.
37. Pretty, J.N. The sustainable intensification of agriculture. Nat. Resour. Forum 1997, 21, 247-256.
38. Vayssières, J.; Vigne, M.; Alary, V.; Lecomte, P. Integrated participatory modelling of actual farms to support policy making on sustainable intensification. Agric. Syst. 2011, 104, 146-161.
39. Haas, G.; Wetterich, F.; Kopke, U. Comparing intensive, extensified and organic grassland farming in southern Germany by process life cycle assessment. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2001, 83, 43-53.
40. Charles, R.; Jolliet, O.; Gaillard, G.; Pellet, D. Environmental analysis of intensity level in wheat crop production using life cycle assessment. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2006, 113, 216-225.
41. Glendining, M.J.; Dailey, A.G.; Williams, A.G.; van Evert, F.K.; Goulding, K.W.T.; Whitmore, A.P. Is it possible to increase the sustainability of arable and ruminant agriculture by reducing inputs? Agric. Syst. 2009, 99, 117-125.
42. Goglio, P.; Bonari, E.; Mazzoncini, M. LCA of cropping systems with different external input levels for energetic purposes. Biomass Bioenerg. 2012, 42, 33-42.
43. Jarecki, M.K.; Lal, R. Crop management for soil carbon sequestration. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2003, 22, 471-502.
44. Govaerts, B.; Verhulst, N.; Castellanos-Navarrete, A.; Sayre, K.D.; Dixon, J.; Dendooven, L. Conservation agriculture and soil carbon sequestration: Between myth and farmer reality. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2009, 28, 97-122.
45. Soane, B.D.; Ball, B.C.; Arvidsson, J.; Basch, G.; Moreno, F.; Roger-Estrade, J. No-till in northern, western and south-western Europe: A review of problems and opportunities for crop production and the environment. Soil Tillage Res. 2012, 118, 66-87.
46. Lal, R. Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science 2004, 304, 1623-1627.
47. West, T.O.; Post, W.M. Soil organic carbon sequestration rates by tillage and crop rotation: A global data analysis. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2002, 66, 1930-1946.
48. Kim, S.; Dale, B.E. Environmental aspects of ethanol derived from no-tilled corn grain: Nonrenewable energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Biomass Bioenergy 2005, 28, 475-489.
49. Borze{ogonek}cka-Walker, M.; Faber, A.; Jarosz, Z.; Syp, A.; Pudełko, R. Greenhouse gas emissions from rape seed cultivation for FAME production in Poland. J. Food Agric. Environ. 2013, 11, 1064-1068.
50. Syp, A.; Jarosz, Z.; Faber, A.; Borzecka-Walker, M.; Pudelko, R. Greenhouse gas emissions from winter wheat cultivation for bioethanol production in Poland. J. Food Agric. Environ. 2012, 10, 1169-1172.
51. Gelfand, I.; Sahajpal, R.; Zhang, X.; Izaurralde, R.C.; Gross, K.L.; Robertson, G.P. Sustainable bioenergy production from marginal lands in the US Midwest. Nature 2013, 493, 514-517.
52. Baker, J.M.; Ochsner, T.E.; Venterea, R.T.; Griffis, T.J. Tillage and soil carbon sequestration-What do we really know? Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2007, 118, 1-5.
53. Blanco-Canqui, H.; Lal, R. No-tillage and soil-profile carbon sequestration: An on-farm assessment. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2008, 72, 693-701.
54. Iriarte, A.; Rieradevall, J.; Gabarrell, X. Environmental impacts and energy demand of rapeseed as an energy crop in Chile under different fertilization and tillage practices. Biomass Bioenergy 2011, 35, 4305-4315.
55. Tuomisto, H.; Hodge, I.; Riordan, P.; Macdonald, D. Comparing global warming potential, energy use and land use of organic, conventional and integrated winter wheat production. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2012, 161, 116-126.
56. Van der Werf, H.M.G. Life Cycle Analysis of field production of fibre hemp, the effect of production practices on environmental impacts. Euphytica 2004, 140, 13-23.
57. Hocking, P.; Randall, P.; Horst, W.J.; Schenk, M.K.; Bürkert, A.; Claassen, N.; Flessa, H.; Frommer, W.B.; Goldbach, H.; Olfs, H.W.; et al. Better growth and phosphorus nutrition of sorghum and wheat following organic acid secreting crops. Plant Nutr. 2002, 92, 548-549.
58. Muchane, M.; Jama, B.; Othieno, C.; Okalebo, R.; Odee, D.; Machua, J.; Jansa, J. Influence of improved fallow systems and phosphorus application on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi symbiosis in maize grown in western Kenya. Agrofor. Syst. 2010, 78, 139-150.
59. Pypers, P.; Huybrighs, M.; Diels, J.; Abaidoo, R.; Smolders, E.; Merckx, R. Does the enhanced P acquisition by maize following legumes in a rotation result from improved soil P availability? Soil Biol. Biochem. 2007, 39, 2555-2566.
60. Gaiser, T.; Perkons, U.; Kuper, P.M.; Puschmann, D.U.; Peth, S.; Kautz, T.; Pfeifer, J.; Ewert, F.; Horn, R.; Kopke, U. Evidence of improved water uptake from subsoil by spring wheat following lucerne in a temperate humid climate. Field Crop. Res. 2012, 126, 56-62.
61. Nemecek, T.; von Richthofen, J.-S.; Dubois, G.; Casta, P.; Charles, R.; Pahl, H. Environmental impacts of introducing grain legumes into European crop rotations. Eur. J. Agron. 2008, 28, 380-393.
62. Chen, S.Y.; Porter, P.M.; Reese, C.D.; Stienstra, W.C. Crop sequence effects on soybean cyst nematode and soybean and corn yields. Crop Sci. 2001, 41, 1843-1849.
63. Crookston, R.K.; Kurle, J.E.; Copeland, P.J.; Ford, J.H.; Lueschen, W.E. Rotational cropping sequence affects yield of corn and soybean. Agron. J. 1991, 83, 108-113.
64. Howard, D.D.; Chambers, A.Y.; Lessman, G.M. Rotation and fertilization effects on corn and soybean yields and soybean cyst nematode populations in a no-tillage system. Agron. J. 1998, 90, 518-522.
65. Long, J.H.; Todd, T.C. Effect of crop rotation and cultivar resistance on seed yield and the soybean cyst nematode in full-season and double-cropped soybean. Crop Sci. 2001, 41, 1137-1143.
66. West, T.D.; Griffith, D.R.; Steinhardt, G.C.; Kladivko, E.J.; Parsons, S.D. Effect of tillage and rotation on agronomic performance of corn and soybean: Twenty-year study on dark silty clay loam soil. J. Prod. Agric. 1996, 9, 241-248.
67. Kirkegaard, J.; Christen, O.; Krupinsky, J.; Layzell, D. Break crop benefits in temperate wheat production. Field Crop. Res. 2008, 107, 185-195.
68. Cook, R.J.; Schillinger, W.F.; Christensen, N.W. Rhizoctonia root rot and take-all of wheat in diverse direct-seed spring cropping systems. Can. J. Plant Pathol. Revue Can. De Phytopathol. 2002, 24, 349-358.
69. Vandermeer, J. The Ecology of Intercropping; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1989.
70. Whitmore, A.P.; Schröder, J.J. Intercropping reduces nitrate leaching from under field crops without loss of yield: A modelling study. Eur. J. Agron. 2007, 27, 81-88.
71. Picard, D.; Ghiloufi, M.; Saulas, P.; de Tourdonnet, S. Does undersowing winter wheat with a cover crop increase competition for resources and is it compatible with high yield. Field Crop. Res. 2010, 115, 9-18.
72. Carof, M.; de Tourdonnet, S.; Saulas, P.; Le Floch, D.; Roger-Estrade, J. Undersowing wheat with different living mulches in a no-till system. I. Yield analysis. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2007, 27, 347-356.
73. Hauggaard-Nielsen, H.; Andersen, M.K.; Jornsgaard, B.; Jensen, E.S. Density and relative frequency effects on competitive interactions and resource use in pea-barley intercrops. Field Crop. Res. 2006, 95, 256-267.
74. Pelzer, E.; Bazot, M.; Makowski, D.; Corre-Hellou, G.; Naudin, C.; Al Rifaï, M.; Baranger, E.; Bedoussac, L.; Biarnés, V.R.; Boucheny, P.; et al. Pea-wheat intercrops in low-input conditions combine high economic performances and low environmental impacts. Eur. J. Agron. 2012, 40, 39-53.
75. Hauggaard-Nielsen, H.; Gooding, M.; Ambus, P.; Corre-Hellou, G.; Crozat, Y.; Dahlmann, C.; Dibet, A.; von Fragstein, P.; Pristeri, A.; Monti, M.; et al. Pea-barley intercropping and short-term subsequent crop effects across European organic cropping conditions. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 2009, 85, 141-155.
76. Andersen, M.K.; Hauggaard-Nielsen, H.; Ambus, P.; Jensen, E.S. Biomass production, symbiotic nitrogen fixation and inorganic N use in dual and tri-component annual intercrops. Plant Soil 2004, 266, 273-287.
77. Graves, A.R.; Burgess, P.J.; Liagre, F.; Terreaux, J.P.; Borrel, T.; Dupraz, C.; Palma, J.; Herzog, F. Farm-SAFE: The process of developing a plot- and farm-scale model of arable, forestry, and silvoarable economics. Agrofor. Syst. 2011, 81, 93-108.
78. Eichhorn, M.P.; Paris, P.; Herzog, F.; Incoll, L.D.; Liagre, F.; Mantzanas, K.; Mayus, M.; Moreno, G.; Papanastasis, V.P.; Pilbeam, D.J.; et al. Silvoarable systems in europe-past, present and future prospects. Agrofor. Syst. 2006, 67, 29-50.
79. Dupraz, C. Adequate design of control treatments in long term agroforestry experiments with multiple objectives. Agrofor. Syst. 1998, 43, 35-48.
80. Graves, A.R.; Burgess, P.J.; Palma, J.; Keesman, K.J.; van der Werf, W.; Dupraz, C.; van Keulen, H.; Herzog, F.; Mayus, M. Implementation and calibration of the parameter-sparse Yield-SAFE model to predict production and land equivalent ratio in mixed tree and crop systems under two contrasting production situations in Europe. Ecol. Model. 2010, 221, 1744-1756.
81. Sanchez, P.A.; Buresh, R.J.; Leakey, R.R.B. Trees, soils, and food security. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 1997, 352, 949-960.
82. Danso, S.K.A.; Bowen, G.D.; Sanginga, N. Biological nitrogen fixation in trees in agroecosystems. Plant Soil 1992, 141, 177-196.
83. Akinnifesi, F.K.; Ajayi, O.C.; Sileshi, G.; Chirwa, P.W.; Chianu, J. Fertilizer trees for sustainable food security in the maize-based production systems of East and Southern Africa. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2010, 30, 615-629.
84. Ndufa, J.K.; Gathumbi, S.M.; Kamiri, H.W.; Giller, K.E.; Cadisch, G. Do mixed-species legume fallows provide long-term maize yield benefit compared with monoculture legume fallows? Agron. J. 2009, 101, 1352-1362.
85. Grünewald, H.; Böhm, C.; Quinkenstein, A.; Grundmann, P.; Eberts, J.; von Wühlisch, G. Robinia pseudoacacia L. A lesser known tree species for biomass production. BioEnergy Res. 2009, 2, 123-133.
86. Grünewald, H.; Brandt, B.K.V.; Schneider, B.U.; Bens, O.; Kendzia, G.; Hättl, R.F. Agroforestry systems for the production of woody biomass for energy transformation purposes. Ecol. Eng. 2007, 29, 319-328.
87. Kiaer, L.P.; Skovgaard, I.M.; Østergård, H. Grain yield increase in cereal variety mixtures: A meta-analysis of field trials. Field Crop. Res. 2009, 114, 361-373.
88. Mundt, C.C. Use of multiline cultivars and cultivar mixtures for disease management. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2002, 40, 381-410.
89. Naudin, C.; van der Werf, H.M.G.; Jeuffroy, M.H.; Corre-Hellou, G. LCA Applied to Pea-Wheat Intercrops: The Significance of Allocation. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on LCA in the Agri-Food Sector, St. Malo, France, 1-4 October 2012; Corson, M.S., van der Werf, H.M.G., Eds.; INRA-Rennes: St. Malo, France, 2013.
90. McDevitt, J.E.; Milài Canals, L. Can life cycle assessment be used to evaluate plant breeding objectives to improve supply chain sustainability? A worked example using porridge oats from the UK. Int. J. Agric. Sustain. 2011, 9, 484-494.
91. Phillips, S.L.; Wolfe, M.S. Evolutionary plant breeding for low input systems. J. Agric. Sci. 2005, 143, 245-254.
92. Ceccarelli, S. Specific adaptation and breeding for marginal conditions. Euphytica 1994, 77, 205-219.
93. Ceccarelli, S.; Grando, S.; Hamblin, J. Relationship between barley-grain yield measured in low-yielding and high-yielding environments. Euphytica 1992, 64, 49-58.
94. Fess, T.L.; Kotcon, J.B.; Benedito, A. Crop breeding for low input agriculture: A sustainable response to feed a growing population. Sustainability 2011, 3, 1742-1772.
95. Guarda, G.; Padovan, S.; Delogu, G. Grain yield, nitrogen-use efficiency and baking quality of old and modern Italian bread-wheat cultivars grown at different nitrogen levels. Eur. J. Agron. 2004, 21, 181-192.
96. Tester, M.; Langridge, P. Breeding technologies to increase crop production in a changing world. Science 2010, 327, 818-822.
97. Kooistra, K.J.; Pyburn, R.; Termorshuizen, A.J. The Sustainability of Cotton. Consequences for Man and Environment; Report 223; Wetenschapswinkel Wageningen Universiteit en Reseachcentrum: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2006.
98. Park, J.R.; McFarlane, I.; Phipps, R.H.; Ceddia, G. The role of transgenic crops in sustainable development. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2011, 9, 2-21.
99. Sanahuja, G.; Banakar, R.; Twyman, R.M.; Capell, T.; Christou, P. Bacillus thuringiensis: A century of research, development and commercial applications. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2011, 9, 283-300.
100. Leroy, B. Soil Food Web, C and N Transformations and Soil Structure: Interactions and Feedback Mechanisms as a Function of the Quality of Exogenous Organic Matter. Ph.D. Thesis, Gent University, Gent, Belgium, 2008.
101. D'Hose, T.; Cougnon, M.; de Vliegher, A.; Willekens, K.; van Bockstaele, E.; Reheul, D. Farm compost application: Effects on crop performance. Compost Sci. Util. 2012, 20, 49-56.
102. Möller, K.; Müller, T. Effects of anaerobic digestion on digestate nutrient availability and crop growth: A review. Eng. Life Sci. 2012, 12, 242-257.
103. Kong, D.; Shan, J.; Iacoboni, M.; Maguin, S.R. Evaluating greenhouse gas impacts of organic waste management options using life cycle assessment. Waste Manag. Res. 2012, 30, 800-812.
104. Leifeld, J. Low-input farming: A way towards climate-friendly agriculture? Carbon Manag. 2013, 4, 31-41.
105. Poeschl, M.; Ward, S.; Owende, P. Environmental impacts of biogas deployment-Part II: Life cycle assessment of multiple production and utilization pathways. J. Clean. Prod. 2012, 24, 184-201.
106. Lansche, J.; Müller, J. Life cycle assessment of energy generation of biogas fed combined heat and power plants: Environmental impact of different agricultural substrates. Eng. Life Sci. 2012, 12, 313-320.
107. Verheijen, F.G.A.; Jeffery, S.; Bastos, A.C.; van der Velde, M.; Diafas, I. Biochar Applications to Soils. A Critical Scientific Review of Effects on Soil Properties, Processes and Functions, EUR 24099 EN; Office for the Official Publications of the European Communities: Luxembourg, Luxembourg, 2010.
108. Navia, R.; Crowley, D.E. Closing the loop on organic waste management: Biochar for agricultural land application and climate change mitigation. Waste Manag. Res. 2010, 28, 479-480.
109. Lehmann, J.; Joseph, S. Biochar for Environmental Management; Earthscan: London, UK, 2009.
110. Steiner, C.; Teixeira, W.G.; Lehmann, J.; Nehls, T.; de Macedo, J.L.V.; Blum, W.E.H.; Zech, W. Long term effects of manure, charcoal and mineral fertilization on crop production and fertility on a highly weathered Central Amazonian upland soil. Plant Soil 2007, 291, 275-290.
111. Chan, K.Y.; Xu, Z. Biochar- Nutrient Properties and Their Enhancement. In Biochar for Environmental Management: Science and Technology; Lehman, J., Joseph, S., Eds.; Earthscan: London, UK, 2009; pp. 67-81.
112. Lehmann, J.; Gaunt, J.; Rondon, M. Bio-char sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems-A review. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Chang. 2006, 11, 395-419.
113. Roberts, K.G.; Gloy, B.A.; Joseph, S.; Scott, N.R.; Lehmann, J. Life Cycle Assessment of biochar systems: Estimating the Energetic, economic, and climate change potential. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 44, 827-833.
114. Ibarrola, R.; Shackley, S.; Hammond, J. Pyrolysis biochar systems for recovering biodegradable materials: A life cycle carbon assessment. Waste Manag. 2012, 32, 859-868.
115. Tuomisto, H.L.; Hodge, I.D.; Riordan, P.; Macdonald, D.W. Comparing energy balances, greenhouse gas balances and biodiversity impacts of contrasting farming systems with alternative land uses. Agric. Syst. 2012, 108, 42-49.
116. Jeanneret, P.; Baumgartner, D.U.; Knuchel, R.F.; Gaillard, G. A New LCIA Method for Assessing Impacts of Agricultural Activities on Biodiversity (SALCA-Biodiversity). In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on LCA in the Agri-Food Sector-Towards a sustainable management of the food chain, Zurich, Switzerland, 12-14 November 2008; Nemecek, T., Gaillard, G., Eds.; Agroscope ART: Zurich, Switzerland, 2008; pp. 34-39.