Innovating not-for-profit social ventures: Exploring the microfoundations of internal and external absorptive capacity routines

International Small Business Journal

Volumn 31, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 785-810

  Chalmers, Dominic M ^a   Balan Vnuk, Eva ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

absorptive capacity; dynamic capabilities; organisational routines; Social entrepreneurship; social innovation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886893416     PISSN: 02662426     EISSN: 17412870     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0266242612465630     Document Type: Article

References (100)

1. Abell P,Felin T,Foss N.Building micro-foundations for the routines, capabilities, and performance links.Managerial and Decision Economics. 2008;29 (6): 489-502.
2. Alcock P.Building the Big Society: A new policy environment for the third sector in England.Voluntary Sector Review. 2010;1 (3): 379-389.
3. Alvord SH,Brown LD,Letts CW.Social entrepreneurship and societal transformation.Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 2004;40 (3): 260-282.
4. Austin J,Stevenson H,Wei-Skillern J.Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both?.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2006;30:1-22.
5. Barraket J, Collyer N, O'Connor M, et al. (2010) Finding Australia's social enterprise sector: Final report. Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology.
6. Bornstein DHow to Change the World: Social Entrepreneurship and the Power of Ideas. New York: Oxford; 2004:.
7. Bull M,Crompton HBusiness Practices in Social Enterprises. Manchester: Manchester Metropolitan University Business School; 2006:.
8. Byrne D.Deindustrialisation and dispossession: An examination of social division in the industrial city.Sociology. 1995;29 (1): 95-115.
9. Chesbrough HOpen Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press; 2003:.
10. Clark J,Newman JThe Managerial State: Power, Politics and Ideology in the Remaking of Social Welfare. London: Sage; 1997:.
11. Cohen WM,Levinthal DA.Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D.The Economic Journal. 1989;99 (1): 569-596.
12. Cohen W,Levinthal D.Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation.Administrative Science Quarterly. 1990;35 (397): 128-152.
13. Considine M.Governance and competition: The role of non-profit organisations in the delivery of public services.Australian Journal of Political Science. 2003;38 (1): 63-77.
14. CramC (2012) A dogfight for public sector procurement. The Guardian, 29February. Available at: www.guardian.co.uk/public-leaders-network/2012/feb/29/competition-public-sector-procurement (accessed 22 May 2011).
15. CurtisA (2010) The next generation of service providers? The benefits and limitations of micro and small voluntary and community sector groups providing services. Available at: www.ncvo-vol.org.uk/sites/default/files/UploadedFiles/NCVO/Research/Research_Conference/Curtis_0.pdf. Accessed 16 April 2011.
16. Cyert RM,March JGA Behavioural Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1963:.
17. Dart R.The legitimacy of social enterprise.Nonprofit Management and Leadership. 2004;14 (4): 411-424.
18. Di Domenico M,Haugh H,Tracey P.Social bricolage: Theorizing social value creation in social enterprises.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2010;34 (4): 681-703.
19. Di Domenico M,Tracey P,Haugh H.The dialectic of social exchange: Theorizing corporate social enterprise collaboration.Organisation Studies. 2009;30 (8): 887-907.
20. Dosi G,Nelson RR,Winter SGThe Nature and Dynamics of Organisational Capabilities. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000:.
21. Eisenhardt KM.Building theories from case study research.Academy of Management Review. 1989;14 (4): 532-550.
22. Eisenhardt KM,Graebner ME.Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges.Academy of Management Journal. 2007;50 (1): 25-32.
23. Elmquist M,Fredberg T,Ollila S.Exploring the field of open innovation.European Journal of Innovation Management. 2009;12 (3): 326-345.
24. European Commission (2003) Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs) Definition. Brussels: European Commission. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sme/facts-figures-analysis/sme-definition/index_en.htm. Accessed 1 March 2011.
25. Fabrizio KR.Absorptive capacity and the search for innovation.Research Policy. 2009;38 (2): 255-267.
26. FASES (2010) Social Enterprise in Australia: A preliminary snapshot. Queensland: Social Traders and the Australian Centre for Philanthropy and Nonprofit Studies, Queensland University of Technology.
27. Felin T,Foss NJ.Organisational routines and capabilities: Historical drift and a course-correction toward microfoundations.Scandinavian Journal of Management. 2009;25 (2): 157-167.
28. Gassmann O,Enkel E,Chesbrough H.The future of open innovation.R&D Management. 2010;40 (3): 213-221.
29. George G,Zahra SA,Wheatley KK, et al.The effects of alliance portfolio characteristics and absorptive capacity on performance: A study of biotechnology firms.Journal of High Technology Management Research. 2001;12 (2): 205-226.
30. Gioia DA,Chittipeddi K.Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation.Strategic Management Journal. 1991;12 (6): 433-448.
31. Goldsmith S,Georges G,Burke TG, et alThe Power of Social Innovation: How Civic Entrepreneurs Ignite Community Networks for Good. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons; 2010:.
32. Contribution of the Not-for-profit Sector: Productivity Commission Research Report. Canberra, ACT: Government of Australia; 2010:.
33. Hamalainen TJ,Heiskala RSocial Innovations, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance: Making Sense of Structural Adjustment Processes in Industrial Sectors, Regions, and Societies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 2007:.
34. Harding R (2006) Social Entrepreneurs: Specialist Summary. London: Global Entrepreneurship Monitor.
35. Harvey C,Maclean M,Gordon J, et al.Andrew Carnegie and the foundations of contemporary entrepreneurial philanthropy.Business History. 2011;53 (3): 425-450.
36. Haugh H.A research agenda for social entrepreneurship.Social Enterprise Journal. 2005;1 (1): 1-12.
37. Haugh H.Community-led social venture creation.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2007;31 (2): 161-182.
38. Howaldt J and Schwarz M (2011) Social innovation: social challenges and future research fields enabling innovation. In: Jeschke S, Isenhardt I, Hees F, et al. (eds) Heidelberg: Springer, pp.203-224.
39. IltisJ (1966) Chisholm, Caroline (1808-1877) Australian Dictionary of Biography. National Centre of Biography, Australian National University. Available at: http://adb.anu.edu.au/biography/chisholm-caroline-1894/text2231 (accessed 22 October 2012).
40. Jiménez-Barrionuevo MM,García-Morales VJ,Molina LM.Validation of an instrument to measure absorptive capacity.Technovation. 2011;31 (5-6): 190-202.
41. Kanter RM,Summers DThe Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook. Powell WW, ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1987:154-166.
42. Kistruck GM,Beamish PW.The interplay of form, structure, and embeddedness in social intrapreneurship.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2010;34 (4): 735-761.
43. Kogut B,Zander U.Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology.Organisation Science. 1992;3 (3): 383-397.
44. Kumar N,Stern LW,Anderson JC.Conducting interorganisational research using key informants.Academy of Management Journal. 1993;36 (6): 1633-1651.
45. Lane PJ,Lubatkin M.Relative absorptive capacity and interorganisational learning.Strategic Management Journal. 1998;19 (4): 461-477.
46. Lane PJ,Koka BR,Pathak S.The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvination of the construct.Academy of Management Review Archive. 2006;31 (5): 833-863.
47. Laursen K,Salter A.Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms.Strategic Management Journal. 2006;27 (2): 131-150.
48. Leadbeater CThe Rise of the Social Entrepreneur. London: Demos; 1997:.
49. Lettice F,Parekh M.The social innovation process: Themes, challenges and implications for practice.International Journal of Technology Management. 2010;51 (1): 139-158.
50. Levin DZ,Cross R.The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer.Management Science. 2004;50 (11): 1477-1490.
51. Lewin AY,Massini SOrganisations as Knowledge Systems: Knowledge, Learning, and Dynamic Capabilities. Tsoukas HMylonopoulos N, ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2003:209-237.
52. Lewin AY,Massini S,Peeters C.Microfoundations of internal and external absorptive capacity routines.Organisation Science. 2011;22 (1): 81-98.
53. Low C.A framework for the governance of social enterprise.International Journal of Social Economics. 2006;33 (5-6): 376-385.
54. Lyon F,Sepulveda L.Mapping social enterprises: Past approaches, challenges and future directions.Social Enterprise Journal. 2009;5 (1): 83-94.
55. McAdam R, Antony J and Kumar M, et al. (2011) Absorbing new knowledge in small and medium-sized enterprises: A multiple case analysis of Six Sigma. International Small Business Journal. Epub ahead of print, 20 October 2011. DOI: 10.1177/0266242611406945.
56. McCracken GThe Long Interview: Qualitative Research Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1988:.
57. McKelvie A,Wiklund J,Short JCEntrepreneurial Strategic Processes. Lumpkin GTKatz JA, ed. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing; 2007:159-185.
58. Mair J,Martí I.Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight.Journal of World Business. 2006;41 (1): 36-44.
59. Mair J,Martí I.Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: A case study from Bangladesh.Journal of Business Venturing. 2009;24 (5): 419-435.
60. Martin R,Osberg S.Social entrepreneurship: The case for definition.Stanford Social Innovation Review. 2007;5 (2): 29-39.
61. Massini S,Lewin AY,Greve HR.Innovators and imitators: Organisational reference groups and adoption of organisational routines.Research Policy. 2005;34 (10): 1550-1569.
62. Miller D,Toulouse J-M.Chief executive personality and corporate strategy and structure in small firms.Management Science. 1986;32 (11): 1389-1409.
63. Mohan J.Geographies of welfare and social exclusion.Progress in Human Geography. 2000;24 (2): 291-300.
64. Morris MH,Webb JW,Franklin RJ.Understanding the manifestation of entrepreneurial orientation in the nonprofit context.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2011;35 (5): 947-971.
65. Mulgan G.The process of social innovation.Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization. 2006;1 (2): 145-162.
66. Mulgan G,Tucker S,Ali R, et alSocial Innovation: What It Is, Why It Matters, How It Can Be Accelerated. Oxford: Skoll Centre for Social Entrepreneurship; 2007:.
67. The UK Civil Society Almanac. London: National Council for Voluntary Organisations; 2008:.
68. Scottish Charity Register. Dundee: Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator; 2011:.
69. Peredo AM,Mclean M.Social entrepreneurship: A critical review of the concept.Journal of World Business. 2006;41 (1): 56-65.
70. Pol E,Ville S.Social innovation: Buzzword or enduring term?.Journal of Socio-economics. 2009;38 (6): 878-885.
71. Pro Bono Australia Pty Ltd (2011) Guide to giving: The Australian directory of not for profit organisations. Available at: www.probonoaustralia.com.au/directory (accessed 22 May 2011).
72. Shaw E,Carter S.Social entrepreneurship: Theoretical antecedents and empirical analysis of entrepreneurial processes and outcomes.Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. 2007;14:418-434.
73. Smith BR,Knapp J,Barr TF, et al.Social enterprises and the timing of conception: Organisational identity tension, management, and marketing.Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing. 2010;22 (3): 108-134.
74. Social Enterprise London Directory. London: Social Enterprise London; 2011:.
75. Social Enterprise Scotland Members Directory. Edinburgh: Social Enterprise Scotland; 2011:.
76. Fightback Britain: A Report on the State of Social Enterprise Survey. London: Social Enterprise UK; 2011:.
77. Spithoven A,Clarysse B,Knockaert M.Building absorptive capacity to organise inbound open innovation in traditional industries.Technovation. 2011;31 (1): 10-21.
78. Szulanski G.Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm.Strategic Management Journal. 1996;17:27-43.
79. Szulanski G,Cappetta R,Jensen RJ.When and how trustworthiness matters: Knowledge transfer and the moderating effect of casual ambiguity.Organisation Science. 2004;15 (5): 600-613.
80. Teddlie C,Yu F.Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples.Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2007;1 (1): 77-100.
81. Teece DJ.Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance.Strategic Management Journal. 2007;28 (13): 1319-1350.
82. Thompson JL.The world of the social entrepreneur.International Journal of Public Sector Management. 2002;15 (5): 412-431.
83. Tsai W.Social structure of 'coopetition' within a multiunit organisation: Coordination, competition, and intraorganisational knowledge sharing.Organisation Science. 2002;13 (2): 179-190.
84. Volberda HW,Foss NJ,Lyles MA.Perspective - Absorbing the concept of absorptive capacity: How to realize its potential in the organisation field.Organisation Science. 2010;21 (4): 931-951.
85. Von Hippel EThe Sources of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1988:.
86. Von Hippel E.Innovation by user communities: Learning from open-source software.Sloan Management Review. 2001;:82-86.
87. Waddock SA,Post JE.Social entrepreneurs and catalytic change.Public Administration Review. 1991;51:393-401.
88. Weber K,Glynn MA.Making sense with institutions: Context, thought and action in Karl Weick's theory.Organisation Studies. 2006;27 (11): 1639-1660.
89. Weerawardena J,Mort GS.Investigating social entrepreneurship: A multidimensional model.Journal of World Business. 2006;41 (1): 21-35.
90. Weerawardena J,McDonald RE,Mort GS.Sustainability of nonprofit organisations: An empirical investigation.Journal of World Business. 2010;45 (4): 346-356.
91. Weick KEThe Social Psychology of Organizing. 1979) The Social Psychology of Organizing (2nd edn). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1979:.
92. Weick KE.The collapse of sensemaking in organisations: The Mann Gulch disaster.Administrative Science Quarterly. 1993;38 (4): 628-652.
93. Weick KESensemaking in Organisations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1995:.
94. Weick KE,Sutcliffe KM,Obstfeld D.Organizing and the process of sensemaking.Organisation Science. 2005;16 (4): 409-421.
95. Winter SG.Understanding dynamic capabilities.Strategic Management Journal. 2003;24:991-995.
96. Wong KY,Aspinwall E.Characterizing knowledge management in the small business environment.Journal of Knowledge Management. 2004;8 (3): 44-61.
97. Yin RKCase Study Research: Design and Methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; 1994:.
98. Zahra S,George G.Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension.Academy of Management Review. 2002;27 (2): 185-203.
99. Zahra SA,Gedajlovic E,Neubaum DO, et al.A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges.Journal of Business Venturing. 2009;24 (5): 519-532.
100. Zhang M,Macpherson A,Jones O.Conceptualizing the learning process in SMEs.International Small Business Journal. 2006;24 (3): 299-323.