Communication about scientific uncertainty: How scientists and science journalists deal with uncertainties in nanoparticle research

Environmental Sciences Europe

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Heidmann, Ilona ^a   Milde, Jutta ^a  

^a Rheinland Pfälzische Technische Universität Kaiserslautern Landau   (Germany)

Author keywords

Environment; Media coverage; Nanoparticles; Nanotechnology; Scientific uncertainty

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL FATE; ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUE; MASS MEDIA; NANOTECHNOLOGY; RESEARCH WORK; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION; DATA SET; PARTICLE SIZE; POLLUTANT SOURCE; RISK FACTOR;

EID: 84886880272     PISSN: 21904707     EISSN: 21904715     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/2190-4715-25-25     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Piccinno F, Gottschalk F, Seeger S, Nowack B: Industrial production quantities and uses of ten engineered nanomaterials in Europe and the world. J Nanopart Res 2012, 1109:1-11.
2. Benn T, Cavanagh B, Hristovski K, Posner JD, Westerhoff P: The release of nanosilver from consumer products used in the home. J Environ Qual 2010, 39:1875-1882.
3. Benn TM, Westerhoff P: Nanoparticle silver released into water from commercially available sock fabrics. Environ Sci Technol 2008, 42:4133-4139. (Pubitemid 351770073)
4. 2 -based nanoparticles released in water from commercialized sunscreens in a life-cycle perspective: structures and quantities. Environ Pollut 2011, 159:1543-1548.
5. Gottschalk F, Nowack B: The release of engineered nanomaterials to the environment. J Environ Monit 2011, 13:1145-1155.
6. Kaegi R, Sinnet B, Zuleeg S, Hagendorfer H, Mueller E, Vonbank R, Boller M, Burkhardt M: Release of silver nanoparticles from outdoor facades. Environ Pollut 2010, 158:2900-2905.
7. Kiser MA, Westerhoff P, Benn T, Wang Y, Perez-Rivera J, Hristovski K: Titanium nanomaterial removal and release from wastewater treatment plants. Environ Sci Technol 2009, 43:6757-6763.
8. Nowack B, Ranville JF, Diamond S, Gallego-Urrea JA, Metcalfe C, Rose J, Horne N, Koelmans AA, Klaine SJ: Potential scenarios for nanomaterial release and subsequent alteration in the environment. Environ Toxicol Chem 2012, 31:50-59.
9. Lowry GV, Hotze EM, Bernhardt ES, Dionysiou DD, Pedersen JA, Wiesner MR, Xing BS: Environmental occurrences, behavior, fate, and ecological effects of nanomaterials: an introduction to the special series. J Environ Qual 2010, 39:1867-1874.
10. Som C, Berges M, Chaudhry Q, Dusinska M, Fernandes TF, Olsen SI, Nowack B: The importance of life cycle concepts for the development of safe nanoproducts. Toxicology 2010, 269:160-169.
11. Klaine SJ, Koelmans AA, Horne N, Carley S, Handy RD, Kapustka L, Nowack B, von der Kammer F: Paradigms to assess the environmental impact of manufactured nanomaterials. Environ Toxicol Chem 2012, 31:3-14.
12. Kwon SY, Kim YG, Lee SH, Moon JH: Uncertainty analysis of measurements of the size of nanoparticles in aqueous solutions using dynamic light scattering. Metrologia 2011, 48:417-425.
13. Wagner R, Moon R, Pratt J, Shaw G, Raman A: Uncertainty quantification in nanomechanical measurements using the atomic force microscope. Nanotechnology 2011, 22:455703.
14. Grieger KD, Hansen SF, Baun A: The known unknowns of nanomaterials: describing and characterizing uncertainty within environmental, health and safety risks. Nanotoxicology 2009, 3:1-U17.
15. Einsiedel EF, Thorn B: Public responses to uncertainty. In Communicating Uncertainty: Media Coverage of New and Controversial Science. Edited by: Friedman SM, Dunwoody S, Rogers CL. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1999:43-57.
16. Nelkin D: Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology. New York: W. H. Freeman; 1995.
17. Cobb MD: Framing effects on public opinion about nanotechnology. Sci Commun 2005, 27:221-239. (Pubitemid 41795480)
18. Kahan DM, Braman D, Slovic P, Gastil J, Cohen GL: Cultural cognition of the risks and benefits of nanotechnology. Nat Nanotechnol 2009, 4:87-91.
19. Retzbach A, Marschall J, Rahnke M, Otto L, Maier M: Public understanding of science and the perception of nanotechnology: the roles of interest in science, methodological knowledge, epistemological beliefs, and beliefs about science. J Nanopart Res 2011, 13:6231-6244.
20. Ho S, Scheufele D, Corley E: Making sense of policy choices: understanding the roles of value predispositions, mass media, and cognitive processing in public attitudes toward nanotechnology. J Nanopart Res 2010, 12:2703-2715.
21. Anderson A, Allan S, Petersen A, Wilkinson C: The framing of nanotechnologies in the British newspaper press. Sci Commun 2005, 27:200-220. (Pubitemid 41795479)
22. Boholm M, Boholm A: The many faces of nano in newspaper reporting. J. Nanopart. Res. 2012, 14:722-740.
23. Dudo A, Dunwoody S, Scheufele DA: The emergence of nano news: tracking thematic trends and changes in U.S. newspaper coverage of nanotechnology. Journalism Mass Comm 2011, 88:55-75.
24. Friedman SM, Egolf BP: A longitudinal study of newspaper and wire service coverage of nanotechnology risks. Risk Anal 2011, 31:1701-1717.
25. Groboljsek B, Mali F: Daily newspapers' views on nanotechnology in Slovenia. Sci Commun 2012, 34:30-56.
26. Kjærgaard RS: Making a small country count: nanotechnology in Danish newspapers from 1996 to 2006. Public Underst Sci 2010, 19:80-97.
27. Kjølberg KL: Representations of nanotechnology in Norwegian newspapers - implications for public participation. Nano Ethics 2009, 3:61-72.
28. Weaver DA, Lively E, Bimber B: Searching for a frame: news media tell the story of technological progress, risk, and regulation. Sci Commun 2009, 31:139-166.
29. Wilkinson C, Allan S, Anderson A, Petersen A: From uncertainty to risk?: Scientific and news media portrayals of nanoparticle safety. Health Risk Soc 2007, 9:145-157. (Pubitemid 46993392)
30. Lewenstein BV, Gorss J, Radin J: ICA 2005: Communication: Questioning the Dialogue. 55th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association: 26-30 May 2005; New York City. Washington, D.C: ICA; 2005.
31. Cacciatore MA, Anderson AA, Choi D-H, Brossard D, Scheufele DA, Liang X, Ladwig PJ, Xenos M, Dudo A: Coverage of emerging technologies: a comparison between print and online media. New Media Soc 2012, 14:1039-1059.
32. Fitzgerald S: Constructing risk: media coverage of nanotechnology. In ASA 2007: 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association: August 2007; New York City. Washington, D.C: ASA; 2007.
33. Donk A, Metag J, Kohring M, Marcinkowski F: Framing emerging technologies: risk perceptions of nanotechnology in the German press. Sci Commun 2012, 34:5-29.
34. Stephens LF: News narratives about nano s&t in major U.S. and non-U.S. newspapers. Sci Commun 2005, 27:175-199. (Pubitemid 41795478)
35. Petersen A, Anderson A, Wilkinson C, Allan S: Nanotechnologies, risk and society. Health Risk Soc 2007, 9:117-124. (Pubitemid 46993390)
36. Grobe A, Eberhard C, Hutterli M: Nanotechnologie im Spiegel der Medien: Medienanalyse zur Berichterstattung über Chancen und Risiken der Nanotechnologie. St. Gallen: Stiftung Risiko-Dialog; 2005.
37. Friedman SM, Egolf BP: Nanotechnology: risks and the media. IEEE Technol Soc Mag 2005, 24:5-11. (Pubitemid 43009961)
38. Heidmann I: Metal oxide nanoparticle transport in porous media - an analysis about (un)certainties in environmental research. J Phys Conf Ser 2013, 429:012042 (1-10).
39. Commission E: Scientific Research in the Media. Special Eurobarometer 282: TNS Opinion & Social. Brüssel: European Commission; 2007.
40. Ben-Moshe T, Dror I, Berkowitz B: Transport of metal oxide nanoparticles in saturated porous media. Chemosphere 2010, 81:387-393.
41. 2 rutile nanoparticles in saturated porous media under low-ionic-strength conditions: measurements and mechanisms. Langmuir 2011, 27:5393-5402.
42. 2 nanoparticle transport in porous media: role of solution chemistry, nanoparticle concentration, and flowrate. J Colloid Interface Sci 2011, 360:548-555.
43. Fang J, Shan XQ, Wen B, Lin JM, Owens G: Stability of titania nanoparticles in soil suspensions and transport in saturated homogeneous soil columns. Environ Pollut 2009, 157:1101-1109.
44. 2 in saturated porous media: effects of pH, surfactants and flow velocity. Water Res 2011, 45:839-851.
45. Jiang XJ, Tong MP, Lu RQ, Kim H: Transport and deposition of ZnO nanoparticles in saturated porous media. Colloids Surf., A 2012, 401:29-37.
46. Joo SH, Al-Abed SR, Luxton T: Influence of carboxymethyl cellulose for the transport of titanium dioxide nanoparticles in clean silica and mineral-coated sands. Environ Sci Technol 2009, 43:4954-4959.
47. Kanel SR, Al-Abed SR: Influence of pH on the transport of nanoscale zinc oxide in saturated porous media. J Nanopart Res 2011, 13:4035-4047.
48. Lecoanet HF, Bottero JY, Wiesner MR: Laboratory assessment of the mobility of nanomaterials in porous media. Environ Sci Technol 2004, 38:5164-5169. (Pubitemid 39332049)
49. 2 nanoparticles in water-saturated porous media. Water Res 2011, 45:4409-4418.
50. Petosa AR, Brennan SJ, Rajput F, Tufenkji N: Transport of two metal oxide nanoparticles in saturated granular porous media: role of water chemistry and particle coating. Water Res 2012, 46:1273-1285.
51. 2 nanoparticles in a sandy porous media. Environ Sci Technol 2010, 44:4897-4902.
52. Zhao LJ, Peralta-Videa JR, Hernandez-Viezcas JA, Hong J, Gardea-Torresdey JL: Transport and retention behavior of ZnO nanoparticles in two natural soils: effect of surface coating and soil composition. J. Nano Res. 2012, 17:229-242.
53. Aschberger K, Micheletti C, Sokull-Kluttgen B, Christensen FM: Analysis of currently available data for characterising the risk of engineered nanomaterials to the environment and human health - lessons learned from four case studies. Environ Int 2011, 37:1143-1156.
54. Christian P, Von der Kammer F, Baalousha M, Hofmann T: Nanoparticles: structure, properties, preparation and behaviour in environmental media. Ecotoxicology 2008, 17:326-343.
55. Farre M, Sanchis J, Barcelo D: Analysis and assessment of the occurrence, the fate and the behavior of nanomaterials in the environment. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 2011, 30:517-527.
56. Klaine SJ, Alvarez PJJ, Batley GE, Fernandes TF, Handy RD, Lyon DY, Mahendra S, McLaughlin MJ, Lead JR: Nanomaterials in the environment: behavior, fate, bioavailability, and effects. Environ Toxicol Chem 2008, 27:1825-1851.
57. Lin DH, Tian XL, Wu FC, Xing BS: Fate and transport of engineered nanomaterials in the environment. J Environ Qual 2010, 39:1896-1908.
58. Mudunkotuwa IA, Grassian VH: The devil is in the details (or the surface): impact of surface structure and surface energetics on understanding the behavior of nanomaterials in the environment. J Environ Monit 2011, 13:1135-1144.
59. Nowack B, Bucheli TD: Occurrence, behavior and effects of nanoparticles in the environment. Environ Pollut 2007, 150:5-22. (Pubitemid 47592962)
60. Peralta-Videa JR, Zhao LJ, Lopez-Moreno ML, de la Rosa G, Hong J, Gardea-Torresdey JL: Nanomaterials and the environment: a review for the biennium 2008-2010. J Hazard Mater 2011, 186:1-15.
61. von der Kammer F, Ferguson PL, Holden PA, Masion A, Rogers KR, Klaine SJ, Koelmans AA, Horne N, Unrine JM: Analysis of engineered nanomaterials in complex matrices (environment and biota): general considerations and conceptual case studies. Environ Toxicol Chem 2012, 31:32-49.
62. Tiede K, Boxall ABA, Tear SP, Lewis J, David H, Hassellov M: Detection and characterization of engineered nanoparticles in food and the environment. Food Addit Contam 2008, 25:795-821. (Pubitemid 351917189)
63. Zehr SC: Scientists ' representations of uncertainty. In Communicating Uncertainty: Media Coverage of New and Controversial Science. Edited by: Friedman SM, Dunwoody S, Rogers CL. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1999:3-21.
64. Günther L, Ruhrmann G: Science journalists ' selection criteria and depiction of nanotechnology in German media. In ICA 2013: Challenging Communication Research. 63rd Annual Conference of the International Communication Association: June 2013; London. Washington, D.C: ICA; 2013.
65. Ebeling MFE: Mediating uncertainty: communicating the financial risks of nanotechnologies. Sci Commun 2008, 29:335-361.
66. Pidgeon N, Harthorn B, Satterfield T: Nanotechnology risk perceptions and communication: emerging technologies, emerging challenges. Risk Anal 2011, 31:1694-1700.
67. Milde J, Ruhrmann G: Molekulare Medizin in deutschen TV- Wissenschaftsmagazinen. Ergebnisse von Journalisteninterviews und Inhaltsanalysen. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft 2006, 54:430-456.