Public understanding of science and the perception of nanotechnology: The roles of interest in science, methodological knowledge, epistemological beliefs, and beliefs about science

Journal of Nanoparticle Research

Volumn 13, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 6231-6244

  Retzbach, Andrea ^a   Marschall, Joachim ^a   Rahnke, Marion ^a   Otto, Lukas ^a   Maier, Michaela ^a  

^a France   (Germany)

Author keywords

Beliefs about science; Benefit perceptions; Epistemological beliefs; Nanotechnology; Public understanding of science; Risk perceptions; Societal implications

Indexed keywords

BELIEFS ABOUT SCIENCE; BENEFIT PERCEPTIONS; EPISTEMOLOGICAL BELIEFS; PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE; SOCIETAL IMPLICATIONS;

HEALTH RISKS; NANOTECHNOLOGY; POPULATION STATISTICS;

RISK PERCEPTION;

EPISTEMOLOGY; HEALTH BELIEF; KNOWLEDGE; MASS MEDIUM; NANOENGINEERING; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCIENCE; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; SCIENTIST;

EID: 84857046678     PISSN: 13880764     EISSN: 1572896X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11051-011-0582-x     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. Anderson A, Brossard D, Scheufele D (2010) The changing information environment for nanotechnology: online audiences and content. J Nanopart Res 12:1083-1094
2. Berube DM, Cummings CL, Frith JH, Binder AR, Oldendick R (2011) Comparing nanoparticle risk perceptions to other known EHS risks. J Nanopart Res 13:3089-3099
3. Besley J (2010) Current research on public perceptions of nanotechnology. Emerg Health Threats J 3:e8
4. Besley J, Kramer V, Priest S (2008) Expert opinion on nano-technology: risks, benefits, and regulation. J Nanopart Res 10:549-558
5. Brossard D, Scheufele DA, Kim E, Lewenstein BV (2009) Religiosity as a perceptual filter: examining processes of opinion formation about nanotechnology. Public Underst Sci 18:546-558
6. Cacciatore MA, Scheufele DA, Corley EA (2011) From enabling technology to applications: the evolution of risk perceptions about nanotechnology. Public Underst Sci 20:385-404
7. Cobb MD (2005) Framing effects on public opinion about nanotechnology. Sci Commun 27:221-239 (Pubitemid 41795480)
8. Cobb MD (2011) Creating informed public opinion: citizen deliberation about nanotechnologies for human enhancements. J Nanopart Res 13:1533-1548
9. Cobb MD, Macoubrie J (2004) Public perceptions about nano-technology: risks, benefits and trust. J Nanopart Res 6: 395-405
10. Cobern WW, Loving CC (2002) Investigation of preservice elementary teachers' thinking about science. J Res Sci Teach 39:1016-1031
11. Conley AM, Pintrich PR, Vekiri I, Harrison D (2004) Changes in epistemological beliefs in elementary science students. Contemp Edu Psych 29:186-204 (Pubitemid 38482772)
12. Cronbach LJ (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16:297-334
13. Friedman S, Egolf B (2005) Nanotechnology: risks and the media. IEEE Technol Soc Mag 24:5-11 (Pubitemid 43009961)
14. Gott R, Duggan S (1998) Understanding scientific evidence. In: Ratcliff M (ed) ASE guide to secondary science education. Stanley Thornes, Cheltenham, pp 92-99
15. Ho SS, Scheufele DA, Corley EA (2010) Making sense ofpolicy choices: understanding the roles of value predispositions, mass media, and cognitive processing in public attitudes toward nanotechnology. J Nanopart Res 12:2703-2715
16. Ho SS, Scheufele DA, Corley EA (2011) Value predispositions, mass media, and attitudes toward nanotechnology: the interplay of public and experts. Sci Commun 33:167-200
17. Hofer BK, Pintrich PR (eds) (2002) Personal epistemology: the psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. Erlbaum, Mahwah
18. HRA (Hart Research Associates, Inc) (2009) Nanotechnology, synthetic biology, & public opinion. A report of findings conducted on behalf of: Project on emerging nanotech-nologies, The Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. http://www.nanotechproject.org/publications/archive/8286/. Assessed 6 May 2011
19. Kahan DM, Braman D, Slovic P, Gastil J, Cohen G (2009) Cultural cognition of the risks and benefits of nanotech-nology. Nat Nano 4:87-90
20. Lee C, Scheufele DA (2006) The influence of knowledge and deference toward scientific authority: a media effects model for public attitudes toward nanotechnology. Journal Mass Commun Q 83:819-834 (Pubitemid 46547090)
21. Lee C, Scheufele DA, Lewenstein BV (2005) Public attitudes toward emerging technologies. Sci Commun 27:240-267
22. Lewenstein BV, Gorss J, Radin J (2005) The salience of small: nanotechnology coverage in the American press, 1986-2004. Paper presented at the annual conference of International Communication Association, New York
23. Macoubrie J (2006) Nanotechnology: public concerns, reasoning and trust in government. Public Underst Sci 15: 221-241 (Pubitemid 43384519)
24. Marschall J, Rahnke M, Otto L, Maier M (2011) The representation of scientific evidence in German science TV shows and recipients' understanding of science: results from an online field experiment. Paper presented at the annual conference of International Communication Association, Boston. http://www.uni-koblenz-landau.de/landau/fb8/ikms/ikm/forschung/wiskom)
25. Miller JD (1983) Scientific literacy: a conceptual and empirical review. Daedalus 112 (2):29-48
26. National Science Board (2010) Science and engineering indicators: 2010. National Science Foundation, Arlington
27. Peters EM, Burraston B, Mertz CK (2004) An emotion-based model of risk perception and stigma susceptibility: cognitive appraisals of emotion, affective reactivity, world-views, and risk perceptions in the generation of technological stigma. Risk Anal 24:1349-1367 (Pubitemid 39532464)
28. Pidgeon N, Rogers-Hayden T (2007) Opening up nanotech-nology dialogue with the publics: risk communication or 'upstream engagement'? Health. Risk Soc 9:191-210 (Pubitemid 46993395)
29. Pidgeon N, Herr Harthorn B, Bryant K, Rogers-Hayden T (2009) Deliberating the risks of nanotechnologies for energy and health applications in the United States and United Kingdom. Nat Nano 4:95-98
30. Priest S (2006) The North American opinion climate for nano-technology and its products: opportunities and challenges. J Nanopart Res 8:563-568 (Pubitemid 44744641)
31. Priest S, Greenhalgh T, Kramer V (2010) Risk perceptions starting to shift? U.S. citizens are forming opinions about nanotechnology. J Nanopart Res 12:11-20
32. Satterfield T, Kandlikar M, Beaudrie CEH, Conti J, Herr Har-thorn B (2009) Anticipating the perceived risk of nano-technologies. Nat Nano 4:752-758
33. Scheufele DA, Lewenstein B (2005) The public and nanotech-nology: how citizens make sense of emerging technologies. J Nanopart Res 7:659-667 (Pubitemid 41767366)
34. Scheufele DA, Corley EA, Dunwoody S, Shih T, Hillback E, Guston DH (2007) Scientists worry about some risks more than the public. Nat Nano 2:732-734 (Pubitemid 350223352)
35. Schommer M (1994) Synthesizing epistemological belief research: tentative understandings and provocative confusions. Educ Psych Rev 6:293-319
36. Siegrist M (2010) Predicting the future: review of public perception studies in nanotechnology. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 16:837-846
37. Siegrist M, Keller C, Kastenholz H, Frey S, Wiek A (2007) Laypeople's and experts' perception of nanotechnology hazards. Risk Anal 27:59-69 (Pubitemid 46411634)
38. Simons J, Zimmer R, Vierboom C, Härlen I, Hertel R, Böl G (2009) The slings and arrows of communication on nano-technology. J Nanopart Res 11:1555-1571
39. Stephens LF (2005) News narratives about nano S&T in major U.S. and non-U.S. newspapers. Sci Commun 27:175-199 (Pubitemid 41795478)
40. Stewart CO, Dickerson DL, Hotchkiss R (2009) Beliefs about science and news frames in audience evaluations of embryonic and adult stem cell research. Sci Commun 30:427-452
41. Stocklmayer SM, Bryant C (2011) Science and the public-what should people know? Int J Sci Educ B. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.543186
42. Vandermoere F, Blanchemanche S, Bieberstein A, Marette S, Roosen J (2010) The morality of attitudes toward nano-technology: about God, techno-scientific progress, and interfering with nature. J Nanopart Res 12:373-381
43. Vandermoere F, Blanchemanche S, Bieberstein A, Marette S, Roosen J (2011) The public understanding of nanotech-nology in the food domain. Public Underst Sci 20:195-206