Representations of nanotechnology in Norwegian newspapers - Implications for public participation

NanoEthics

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 61-72

  Kjølberg, Kamilla Lein ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

Author keywords

Media; Nanotechnology; Norway; Public participation; Upstream public engagement

Indexed keywords

EID: 64249085374     PISSN: 18714757     EISSN: 18714765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11569-008-0053-8     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Anderson A, Allan S, Petersen A, Wilkinson C (2005) The framing of nanotechnologies in the British newspaper press. Sci Commun 27:200-220 doi: 10.1177/1075547005281472
2. Bioteknologinemnda (2000) Genialt, 4, special issue on the consensus conference on genetically modified food
3. Bowman DM (2007) Nanotechnology and public interest dialogue: Some international observations. Bull Sci Technol Soc 27:18-132
4. European Commission (2005). Social values, science and technology special Eurobarometer 225, Brussels, Available from http://europa.eu.int/ comm/public_opinion/index_en.htm
5. European Commission. (2008) Socio-economic sciences & humanities and science in society in 2007, Highlights of the Year. EUR 23172
6. Escobar A, Alvarez SE (eds) (1992) The making of social movements in Latin America: Identity, strategy, and democracy. Westview Press, Boulder
7. Funtowicz SO, Ravetz J (1993) Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25:739-755 doi: 10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-L
8. Gavelin K, Wilson R, Doubleday R (2007) Democratic technologies? The final report of the Nanotechnology Engagement Group (NEG). Involve, London
9. Hafstad A (2006) På helsa løs? Når pressen tar pulsen på helse-Norge. [English title in my translation: Harming health? When the press takes a pulse on Health-Norway] IJ-forlaget, Kristiansand
10. Hornmoen H, Meyer G, Sylwan P (2006) Fornuften har flere stemmer [English title in my translation: Sense has many voices]. Cappelen Akademisk forlag, Oslo
11. IFE (2008) homepages information retrieved November 17, 2008, from http://www.ife.no/main_subjects_new/materialtechnology/nanomateriale-en
12. Joy B (2000) Why the future doesn't need us. Wired 8(4)
13. Kearnes M, Wynne B (2007) On nanotechnology and ambivalence: The politics of enthusiasm. NanoEthics 1:131-142 doi: 10.1007/ s11569-007-0014-7
14. Kitcher P (2007) Scientific research - Who should govern? NanoEtchics 1:177-184 doi: 10.1007/s11569-007-0019-2
15. Kjøslberg K, Wickson F (2007) Social and ethical interactions with nano: Mapping the early literature. NanoEthics 1:89-104 doi: 10.1007/s11569-007-0011-x
16. Macnaghten P, Kearnes M, Wynne B (2005) Nanotechnology, governance, and public deliberation: What role for the social sciences? Sci Commun 27:268-291 doi: 10.1177/1075547005281531
17. Norges Forskningsråd (2005) Nanoteknologier og nye materialer: Helse, miljø, etikk og samfunn [English title in my translation: nanotechnologies and new materials: Health, environment, ethics and society]. Report from the Research Council of Norway, Oslo
18. Norges forskningsråd. (2006) Nasjonal strategi for nanovitenskap og nanoteknologi [National strategy for nanoscience and nanotechnology]. Report from the Research Council of Norway, Oslo
19. Roco M, Bainbridge WS (2001) Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology. Kulwer,, Boston
20. Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering RE/RAE (2004) Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: Opportunities and uncertainties. Royal Society, London
21. Rogers-Hayden T, Mohr A, Pidgeon N (2007) Introduction: Engaging with nanotechnologies - Engaging differently? NanoEthics 1:123-130 doi: 10.1007/s11569-007-0013-8
22. Rogers-Hayden T, Pidgeon N (2007) Moving engagement "upstream"? Nanotechnologies and the royal society and royal academy of engineering's inquiry. Public Understand. Science 16:345-364
23. Sandberg P, Kraft N (eds) (1996) Kvikklaks og teknoburger, report from the first participatory consensus conference in Norway on biotechnology and agriculture. The National Ethical Committees, Oslo
24. SINTEF (2008) homepages, information retrieved November 17, 2008, from http://www.sintef.no/Home/Materials-and-Chemistry/ About-SINTEF-Materials-and Chemistry
25. Sjøberg S, Schreiner C (2006) Holdninger til og forestillinger om vitenskap og teknologi i Norge - En framstilling basert på data fra Eurobarometer og ROSE. University of Oslo, Oslo
26. Stephens LF (2005) News narratives about nano S&T in major U.S. and non-U.S. newspapers. Sci Commun 27:175-199 doi: 10.1177/1075547005281520
27. Stilgoe J (2007) Nanodialogues - Experiments in public engagement with science. Demos, London
28. Toumey C (2006) National discourses in democratizing nanotechnology. Quaderni 61:81-101
29. Willis R, Wilsdon J (2004) See-through science. Demos, London
30. Porsborg Nielsen A, Lassen J, Sandøe P (2007) Democracy at its best? The consensus conference in a cross-national perspective. J Agric Environ Ethics 20:13-35 doi: 10.1007/s10806-006-9018-5
31. Wynne B (1992) Uncertainty and environmental learning: Reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm. Glob Environ Change 2:111-127 doi: 10.1016/0959-3780(92)90017-2
32. Wynne B (1996) May the sheep safely graze? In: Lash SM, Szerszynski B, Wynne B (eds) Risk, environment and modernity: Towards a new ecology. Sage, London, pp 44-83
33. Adresseavisen, 8. September 2000: "Nano for liten, nano for stor"
34. Adresseavisen, 7. November 2001 "Noen grunner til nøkternhet"
35. Adresseavisen, 13. October 2004: "Det vi ikke kan se"
36. Aftenposten, 20. September 2001: "Vår nye ferd innover Rør til 5000 kr. Grammet"
37. Aftenposten, 21. September 2001: "Nano-medisinsk revolusjon"
38. Aftenposten, 15. March 2002: "Dette er USAs fremtidssoldat"
39. Aftenposten, 7. February 2007: "Fremtidens forskning"
40. Bergens Tidende, 7. June 2004: "Fysikk og teknologi i Afrika og på Mars"
41. Klassekampen, 8. April 2005: "Nano-revolusjon"
42. Dagbladet, 10. May 2003: "Nano for liten, nano for stor"
43. Dagbladet 31. December 2006. "Nano er Fremtida"
44. Dagsavisen, 8. March.2004: "Selvvaskende vinduer, Klær som ikke blir skitne, Billakk som ikke får riper, Nye behandlingsformer - Din nye mirakelhverdag"
45. Verdens Gang, 21.October 2004: "TEKNO-REVOLUSJONEN som vil forandre din hverdag"
46. Verdens Gang, 21.October 2004: "Utreder etikk"