Effects of TET1 knockdown on gene expression and DNA methylation in porcine induced pluripotent stem cells

Reproduction

Volumn 146, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 569-579

  Fan, Anran ^a   Ma, Kuiying ^a   An, Xinglan ^a   Ding, Yu ^a   An, Peipei ^a   Song, Guangqi ^a   Tang, Lina ^a   Zhang, Sheng ^a   Zhang, Peng ^a   Tan, Wentao ^a   Tang, Bo ^a   Zhang, Xueming ^a   Li, Ziyi ^a  

^a JILIN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

KRUPPEL LIKE FACTOR 2; KRUPPEL LIKE FACTOR 4; LYMPHOID ENHANCER FACTOR 1; MYC PROTEIN; OCTAMER TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR 4; OXYGENASE; STEM CELL FACTOR; TEN ELEVEN TRANSLOCATION1 PROTEIN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR GATA 6; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR NANOG; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR PITX2; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR SOX2; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA METHYLATION; DOWN REGULATION; FIBROBLAST; GENE EXPRESSION; IMMUNOCYTOCHEMISTRY; NONHUMAN; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;

ANIMALS; CELLS, CULTURED; DIOXYGENASES; DNA METHYLATION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE KNOCKDOWN TECHNIQUES; INDUCED PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS; MICE; MICE, INBRED NOD; MICE, SCID; PROTO-ONCOGENES; RNA, SMALL INTERFERING; SWINE;

EID: 84886772728     PISSN: 14701626     EISSN: 17417899     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1530/REP-13-0212     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Aasen T, Raya A, Barrero MJ, Garreta E, Consiglio A, Gonzalez F, Vassena R, Bilic J, Pekarik V, Tiscornia G et al. 2008 Efficient and rapid generation of induced pluripotent stem cells from human keratinocytes. Nature Biotechnology 26 1276-1284. (doi:10.1038/nbt.1503)
2. Bird A 2002 DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. Genes and Development 16 6-21. (doi:10.1101/gad.947102) (Pubitemid 34049633)
3. Cedar H & Bergman Y 2009 Linking DNA methylation and histone modification: patterns and paradigms. Nature Reviews. Genetics 10 295-304. (doi:10.1038/nrg2540)
4. Cheng L & Xiao L 2009 Pig induced pluripotent stem cells: a new resource for generating genetically modified pigs. Regenerative Medicine 4 787-789. (doi:10.2217/rme.09.56)
5. Dawlaty MM, Ganz K, Powell BE, Hu YC, Markoulaki S, Cheng AW, Gao Q, Kim J, Choi SW, Page DC et al. 2011 Tet1 is dispensable for maintaining pluripotency and its loss is compatible with embryonic and postnatal development. Cell Stem Cell 9 166-175. (doi:10.1016/j.stem. 2011.07.010)
6. Eminli S, Utikal J, Arnold K, Jaenisch R & Hochedlinger K 2008 Reprogramming of neural progenitor cells into induced pluripotent stem cells in the absence of exogenous Sox2 expression. Stem Cells 26 2467-2474. (doi:10.1634/stemcells.2008-0317)
7. Esteban MA, Xu J, Yang J, Peng M, Qin D, Li W, Jiang Z, Chen J, Deng K, Zhong M et al. 2009 Generation of induced pluripotent stem cell lines from Tibetan miniature pig. Journal of Biological Chemistry 284 17634-17640. (doi:10.1074/jbc. M109.008938)
8. Ezashi T, Telugu BP, Alexenko AP, Sachdev S, Sinha S & Roberts RM 2009 Derivation of induced pluripotent stem cells from pig somatic cells. PNAS 106 10993-10998. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0905284106)
9. Ficz G, Branco MR, Seisenberger S, Santos F, Krueger F, Hore TA, Marques CJ, Andrews S & Reik W 2011 Dynamic regulation of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mouse ES cells and during differentiation. Nature 473 398-402. (doi:10.1038/nature10008)
10. Freudenberg JM, Ghosh S, Lackford BL, Yellaboina S, Zheng X, Li R, Cuddapah S, Wade PA, Hu G & Jothi R 2012 Acute depletion of Tet1-dependent 5-hydroxymethylcytosine levels impairs LIF/Stat3 signaling and results in loss of embryonic stem cell identity. Nucleic Acids Research 40 3364-3377. (doi:10.1093/nar/gkr1253)
11. Giorgetti A, Montserrat N, Aasen T, Gonzalez F, Rodriguez-Piza I, Vassena R, Raya A, Boue S, Barrero MJ, Corbella BA et al. 2009 Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells from human cord blood using OCT4 and SOX2. Cell Stem Cell 5 353-357. (doi:10.1016/j.stem. 2009.09.008)
12. Hackett JA, Sengupta R, Zylicz JJ, Murakami K, Lee C, Down TA & Surani MA 2013 Germline DNA demethylation dynamics and imprint erasure through 5-hydroxymethylcytosine. Science 339 448-452. (doi:10.1126/science.1229277)
13. Ho L, Jothi R, Ronan JL, Cui K, Zhao K & Crabtree GR 2009a An embryonic stem cell chromatin remodeling complex, esBAF, is an essential component of the core pluripotency transcriptional network. PNAS 106 5187-5191. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0812888106)
14. Ho L, Ronan JL, Wu J, Staahl BT, Chen L, Kuo A, Lessard J, Nesvizhskii AI, Ranish J & Crabtree GR 2009b An embryonic stem cell chromatin remodeling complex, esBAF, is essential for embryonic stem cell selfrenewal and pluripotency. PNAS 106 5181-5186. (doi:10.1073/pnas. 0812889106)
15. Ito S, D'Alessio AC, Taranova OV, Hong K, Sowers LC & Zhang Y 2010 Role of Tet proteins in 5mC to 5hmC conversion, ES-cell self-renewal and inner cell mass specification. Nature 466 1129-1133. (doi:10.1038/nature09303)
16. Kim JB, Zaehres H, Wu G, Gentile L, Ko K, Sebastiano V, Arauzo-Bravo MJ, Ruau D, Han DW, Zenke M et al. 2008 Pluripotent stem cells induced from adult neural stem cells by reprogramming with two factors. Nature 454 646-650. (doi:10.1038/nature07061)
17. Koh KP, Yabuuchi A, Rao S, Huang Y, Cunniff K, Nardone J, Laiho A, Tahiliani M, Sommer CA, Mostoslavsky G et al. 2011 Tet1 and Tet2 regulate 5-hydroxymethylcytosine production and cell lineage specification in mouse embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 8 200-213. (doi:10.1016/j.stem.2011.01.008)
18. Livak KJ & Schmittgen TD 2001 Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2 (KDelta Delta C (T)) method. Methods 25 402-408. (doi:10.1006/meth.2001.1262) (Pubitemid 34164012)
19. Mattout A, Biran A & Meshorer E 2011 Global epigenetic changes during somatic cell reprogramming to iPS cells. Journal of Molecular Cell Biology 3 341-350. (doi:10.1093/jmcb/mjr028)
20. Ooi SK & Bestor TH 2008 The colorful history of active DNA demethylation. Cell 133 1145-1148. (doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.06.009) (Pubitemid 351852922)
21. Park IH, Arora N, Huo H, Maherali N, Ahfeldt T, Shimamura A, Lensch MW, Cowan C, Hochedlinger K & Daley GQ 2008 Diseasespecific induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell 134 877-886. (doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.041)
22. Piccolo FM, Bagci H, Brown KE, Landeira D, Soza-Ried J, Feytout A, Mooijman D, Hajkova P, Leitch HG, Tada T et al. 2013 Different roles for Tet1 and Tet2 proteins in reprogramming-mediated erasure of imprints induced by EGC fusion. Molecular Cell 49 1023-1033. (doi:10.1016/j. molcel.2013.01.032)
23. Pruitt K, Zinn RL, Ohm JE, McGarvey KM, Kang SH, Watkins DN, Herman JG & Baylin SB 2006 Inhibition of SIRT1 reactivates silenced cancer genes without loss of promoter DNA hypermethylation. PLoS Genetics 2 e40. (doi:10.1371/journal.pgen. 0020040)
24. Qin D, Gan Y, Shao K, Wang H, Li W, Wang T, He W, Xu J, Zhang Y, Kou Z et al. 2008 Mouse meningiocytes express Sox2 and yield high efficiency of chimeras after nuclear reprogramming with exogenous factors. Journal of Biological Chemistry 283 33730-33735. (doi:10.1074/jbc. M806788200)
25. Raynal NJ, Si J, Taby RF, Gharibyan V, Ahmed S, Jelinek J, Estecio MR & Issa JP 2012 DNA methylation does not stably lock gene expression but instead serves as a molecular mark for gene silencing memory. Cancer Research 72 1170-1181. (doi:10.1158/0008-5472. CAN-11-3248)
26. Sasaki H & Matsui Y 2008 Epigenetic events in mammalian germ-cell development: reprogramming and beyond. Nature Reviews. Genetics 9 129-140. (doi:10.1038/nrg2295)
27. Seisenberger S, Andrews S, Krueger F, Arand J, Walter J, Santos F, Popp C, Thienpont B, Dean W & Reik W 2012 The dynamics of genome-wide DNA methylation reprogramming in mouse primordial germ cells. Molecular Cell 48 849-862. (doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2012.11.001)
28. Sun N, Panetta NJ, Gupta DM, Wilson KD, Lee A, Jia F, Hu S, Cherry AM, Robbins RC, Longaker MT et al. 2009 Feeder-free derivation of induced pluripotent stem cells from adult human adipose stem cells. PNAS 106 15720-15725. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0908450106)
29. Surani MA, Hayashi K & Hajkova P 2007 Genetic and epigenetic regulators of pluripotency. Cell 128 747-762. (doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007. 02.010) (Pubitemid 46273582)
30. Tahiliani M, Koh KP, Shen Y, Pastor WA, Bandukwala H, Brudno Y, Agarwal S, Iyer LM, Liu DR, Aravind L et al. 2009 Conversion of 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mammalian DNA by MLL partner TET1. Science 324 930-935. (doi:10.1126/science. 1170116)
31. Takahashi K & Yamanaka S 2006 Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126 663-676. (doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024) (Pubitemid 44233629)
32. Tang L, Yin Y, Zhou H, Song G, Fan A, Tang B, Shi W & Li Z 2012 Proliferative capacity and pluripotent characteristics of porcine adult stem cells derived from adipose tissue and bone marrow. Cellular Reprogramming 14 342-352. (doi:10.1089/cell.2011.0098)
33. Vincent JJ, Huang Y, Chen PY, Feng S, Calvopina JH, Nee K, Lee SA, Le T, Yoon AJ, Faull K et al. 2013 Stage-specific roles for tet1 and tet2 in DNA demethylation in primordial germ cells. Cell Stem Cell 12 470-478. (doi:10.1016/j.stem.2013.01.016)
34. Williams K, Christensen J & Pedersen MT 2011 TET1 and hydroxymethylcytosine in transcription and DNA methylation fidelity. Nature 473 343-348. (doi:10.1038/nature10066)
35. Wu Z, Chen J, Ren J, Bao L, Liao J, Cui C, Rao L, Li H, Gu Y, Dai H et al. 2009 Generation of pig induced pluripotent stem cells with a druginducible system. Journal of Molecular Cell Biology 1 46-54. (doi:10. 1093/jmcb/mjp003)
36. Wu H, D'Alessio AC, Ito S, Xia K, Wang Z, Cui K, Zhao K, Sun YE & Zhang Y 2011 Dual functions of Tet1 in transcriptional regulation in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nature 473 389-393. (doi:10.1038/nature09934)
37. Xu Y, Wu F, Tan L, Kong L, Xiong L, Deng J, Barbera AJ, Zheng L, Zhang H, Huang S et al. 2011 Genome-wide regulation of 5hmC, 5mC, and gene expression by Tet1 hydroxylase in mouse embryonic stem cells. Molecular Cell 42 451-464. (doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2011.04.005)
38. Yamaguchi S, Hong K, Liu R, Shen L, Inoue A, Diep D, Zhang K & Zhang Y 2012 Tet1 controls meiosis by regulating meiotic gene expression. Nature 492 443-447. (doi:10.1038/nature11709)