Membrane separations for solid-liquid clarification within lignocellulosic biorefining processes

Biotechnology Progress

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 1246-1254

  Leberknight, Jennifer ^a   Menkhaus, Todd J ^a  

^a South Dakota School of Mines and Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomass; Biorefinery; Clarification; Lignin; Microfiltration

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL CHARACTERIZATION; BIOMASS HYDROLYSATES; BIOREFINERIES; LOWER HYDROPHOBICITY; MEMBRANE PERFORMANCE; MEMBRANE PROPERTIES; MEMBRANE SEPARATION; PHYSICAL ENTRAPMENT;

BIOMASS; CHARACTERIZATION; CLARIFIERS; ENERGY UTILIZATION; ESTERS; FOULING; LIGNIN; MEMBRANES; MICROFILTRATION; REFINING; SURFACE ROUGHNESS;

CLARIFICATION;

ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; CELLULOSE; LIGNIN; LIGNOCELLULOSE; POLYETHERSULFONE; POLYMER; SULFONE;

ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; BIOMASS; CHEMICAL PHENOMENA; CHEMISTRY; FILTRATION; PROCEDURES; WATER MANAGEMENT;

BIOMASS; CELLULOSE; FILTRATION; HYDROPHOBIC AND HYDROPHILIC INTERACTIONS; LIGNIN; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; POLYMERS; SULFONES; WATER PURIFICATION;

EID: 84886747067     PISSN: 87567938     EISSN: 15206033     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/btpr.1778     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Cardona CA, Sánchez ÓJ. Fuel ethanol production: process design trends and integration opportunities. Bioresour Technol. 2007;98:2415-2457.
2. Burke DR, Anderson J, Gilcrease PC, Menkhaus TJ. Enhanced solid-liquid clarification of lignocellulosic slurries using polyelectrolyte flocculating agents. Biomass Bioenergy. 2011;35:391-401.
3. Arora A, Dien B, Belyea R, Wang P, Singh V, Tumbleson ME, Rausch K. Thin stillage fractionation using ultrafiltration: resistance in series model. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2009;32:225-233.
4. Ho C-C, Duclose-Orsello C, Li WL. A three mechanism model to describe fouling of microfiltration membranes. J Membr Sci. 2006;280:856-866.
5. Ho C-C, Zydney AL. A combined pore blockage and cake filtration model for protein fouling during microfiltration. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2000;232:389-399.
6. Evans PJ, Bird MR, Pihlajamäki A, Nyström M. The influence of hydrophobicity, roughness and charge upon ultrafiltration membranes for black tea liquor clarification. J Membr Sci. 2008;313:250-262.
7. Aroujalian A, Belkacemi K, Davids SJ, Turcotte G, Pouliot Y. Effect of residual sugars in fermentation broth on pervaporation flux and selectivity for ethanol. Desalination. 2006;193:103-108.
8. Satyanarayana SV, Bhattacharya PK, De S. Flux decline during ultrafiltration of kraft black liquor using different flow modules: a comparative study. Sep Purif Technol. 2000;20:155-167.
9. Gurram RN, Datta S, Lin YJ, Snyder SW, Menkhaus TJ. Removal of enzymatic and fermentation inhibitory compounds from biomass slurries for enhanced biorefinery process efficiencies. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102:7850-7859.
10. Yamagishi H, Crivello JV, Belfort G. Evaluation of photochemically modified poly (arylsulfone) ultrafiltration membranes. J Membr Sci. 1995;105:249-259.
11. Yamagishi H, Crivello JV, Belfort G. Development of a novel photochemical technique for modifying poly (arylsulfone) ultrafiltration membranes. J Membr Sci. 1995;105:237-247.
12. Bhattacharya PK, Agarwal S, De S, Rama Gopal UVS. Ultrafiltration of sugar cane juice for recovery of sugar: analysis of flux and retention. Sep Purif Technol. 2001;21:247-259.
13. Li M, Zhao Y, Zhou S, Xing W, Wong F-S. Resistance analysis for ceramic membrane microfiltration of raw soy sauce. J Membr Sci. 2007;299:122-129.
14. Rai P, Rai C, Majumdar GC, DasGupta S, De S. Resistance in series model for ultrafiltration of mosambi (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck) juice in a stirred continuous mode. J Membr Sci. 2006;283:116-122.
15. Vladisavljević GT, Vukosavljević P, Bukvić B. Permeate flux and fouling resistance in ultrafiltration of depectinized apple juice using ceramic membranes. J Food Eng. 2003;60:241-247.
16. Leberknight J, Wielenga B, Lee-Jewett A, Menkhaus TJ. Recovery of high value protein from a corn ethanol process by ultrafiltration and an exploration of the associated membrane fouling. J Membr Sci. 2011;366:405-412.
17. Loh S, Beuscher U, Poddar TK, Porter AG, Wingard JM, Husson SM, Wickramasinghe SR. Interplay among membrane properties, protein properties and operating conditions on protein fouling during normal-flow microfiltration. J Membr Sci. 2009;332:93-103.
18. Nunes CA, Lima CF, Barbosa LCA, Colodette JL, Gouveia AFG, Silvério FO. Determination of Eucalyptus spp lignin S/G ratio: a comparison between methods. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101:4056-4061.
19. Taniguchi M, Belfort G. Low protein fouling synthetic membranes by UV-assisted surface grafting modification: varying monomer type. J Membr Sci. 2004;231:147-157.
20. Rahimpour A. UV photo-grafting of hydrophilic monomers onto the surface of nano-porous PES membranes for improving surface properties. Desalination. 2011;265:93-101.
21. Rahimpour A, Madaeni SS. Improvement of performance and surface properties of nano-porous polyethersulfone (PES) membrane using hydrophilic monomers as additives in the casting solution. J Membr Sci. 2010;360:371-379.
22. Wang Y-N, Tang CY. Protein fouling of nanofiltration, reverse osmosis, and ultrafiltration membranes-the role of hydrodynamic conditions, solution chemistry, and membrane properties. J Membr Sci. 2011;376:275-282.
23. Wang K, Xu F, Sun R. Molecular characteristics of Kraft-AQ pulping lignin fractionated by sequential organic solvent extraction. Int J Mol Sci. 2010;11:2988-3001.
24. Zeman LJ, Zydney AL. Microfiltration and Ultrafiltration: Principles and Applications. Boca Ratan, FL: CRC Press; 1996.
25. Riedl K, Girard B, Lencki RW. Influence of membrane structure on fouling layer morphology during apple juice clarification. J Membr Sci. 1998;139:155-166.
26. Broussous L, Schmitz P, Boisson H, Prouzet E, Larbot A. Hydrodynamic aspects of filtration antifouling by helically corrugated membranes. Chem Eng Sci. 2000;55:5049-5057.
27. Izák P, Godinho MH, Brogueira P, Figueirinhas JL, Crespo JG. 3D topography design of membranes for enhanced mass transport. J Membr Sci. 2008;321:337-343.