Removal of enzymatic and fermentation inhibitory compounds from biomass slurries for enhanced biorefinery process efficiencies

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 102, Issue 17, 2011, Pages 7850-7859

  Gurram, Raghu N ^a   Datta, Saurav ^b   Lin, Yupo J ^b   Snyder, Seth W ^b   Menkhaus, Todd J ^a  

^a South Dakota School of Mines and Technology   (United States)

^b ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Biorenewables; Detoxification; Electrodeionization; Lignocelluosic biomass; Polyelectrolytes

Indexed keywords

BIOREFINERIES; BIOREFINERY PROCESS; BIORENEWABLES; CELLULOSE CONVERSION; DILUTE ACIDS; ELECTRO-DEIONIZATION; ETHANOL PRODUCTION; ETHANOL YIELD; HYDROLYSIS RATE; INHIBITORY COMPOUNDS; LIGNOCELLUOSIC BIOMASS; POLYMER ADSORPTION; PONDEROSA PINES; SEPARATION TECHNOLOGIES;

ACETIC ACID; ADSORPTION; ALDEHYDES; BIOMASS; DETOXIFICATION; ETHANOL; FURFURAL; HYDROLYSIS; METHANOL; POLYELECTROLYTES; REFINING; SLURRIES; SUGARS; SULFURIC ACID; YEAST;

FERMENTATION;

5 HYDROXYMETHYLFURFURAL; ACETIC ACID; ALCOHOL; CELLULOSE; FURFURAL; GLUCOSE; POLYELECTROLYTE; SULFURIC ACID;

ADSORPTION; BIOMASS; CELLULOSE; DETOXIFICATION; EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION; INHIBITOR; IONIZATION; MICROBIAL ACTIVITY; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; POLYMER; REACTION RATE; SEPARATION; SLURRY; SUGAR; SULFURIC ACID; YEAST;

ARTICLE; BIOMASS; BIOMASS CONVERSION; BIOMASS FERMENTATION; BIOMASS SLURRY; DETOXIFICATION; HYDROLYSIS; IONIZATION; NONHUMAN; POLYELECTROLYTE POLYMER ADSORPTION; PONDEROSA PINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESIN WAFER ELECTRODEIONIZATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; WASTE COMPONENT REMOVAL;

ADSORPTION; BIOMASS; CHROMATOGRAPHY, HIGH PRESSURE LIQUID; ENZYME INHIBITORS; FERMENTATION; HYDROLYSIS; POLYETHYLENEIMINE;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 79960839793     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.05.043     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Arora M.B., Hestekin J.A., Snyder S.W., Martin E.J., Donnelly M.I., Sanville-Millard C., Lin Y.J. The separative bioreactor: A continuous separation process for the simultaneous production and direct capture of organic acids. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2007, 42:2519-2538.
2. Bosch, P., Wallberg, O., Joelsson, E., Galbe, M., Zacchi, G., 2010. Impact of dual temperature profile in dilute acid hydrolysis of spruce for ethanol production. Biotechnol. Biofuels 3:15. 10.1186/1754-6834-3-15.
3. Burke D.R., Anderson J., Gilcrease P.C., Menkhuas T.J. Enhanced solid-liquid clarification of lignocellulosic slurries using polyelectrolyte flocculating agents. Biomass Bioenergy 2011, 35:391-401.
4. Cantarella M., Cantarella L., Gallifuoco A., Spera A., Alfani F. Effect of inhibitors released during steam-explosion treatment of poplar wood on subsequent enzymatic hydrolysis and SSF. Biotechnol. Prog. 2004, 20(1):200-206.
5. Carter, B., Gilcrease P.C., Menkhaus T.J., 2011a. Removal and recovery of furfural, 5-hydroxymethylfurfural and acetic acid from aqueous solutions using a soluble polyelectrolyte. Biotechnol. Bioeng., in press. doi:10.1002/bit.23153.
6. Carter, B., Squillace, P., Gilcrease, P.C., Menkhaus, T.J., 2011b. Detoxification of a lingocellulosic biomass slurry by soluble polyelectrolyte adsorption for improved fermentation efficiency. Biotechnol. Bioeng., in press. doi:10.1002/bit.23152.
7. Franden M.A., Pienkos P.T., Zhang M. Development of high-throughput method to evaluate the impact of inhibitory compounds from lignocellulosic hydrolysates on the growth of Zymomonas mobilis. J. Biotechnol. 2009, 144(4):259-267.
8. Garcia-Aparicio M.P., Ballesteros I., Gonzalez A., Oliva J.M., Ballesteros M., Negro M.J. Effect of inhibitors released during steam-explosion pretreatment of barley straw on enzymatic hydrolysis. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2006, 6:129-132.
9. Hamelinck C.N., van Hooijdonk G., Faaij A.P.C. Ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass: techno-economic performance in short-, middle- and long-term. Biomass Bioenergy 2005, 28:384-410.
10. Horváth I., Sjöde A., Alriksson B., Jönsson L., Nilvebrant N.-O. Critical conditions for improved fermentability during overliming of acid hydrolysates from spruce. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2005, 121-124:1031-1044.
11. Jing X., Zhang X., Bao J. Inhibition performance of lignocellulose degradation products on industrial cellulase enzymes during cellulose hydrolysis. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2009, 159:696-707.
12. Jonsson L., Palmqvist E., Nilvebrant N., Hahn-Hagerdal B. Detoxification of wood hydrolysates with laccase and peroxidase from the white-rot fungus Trametes versicolor. Appl. Microbiol. Biotech. 1998, 49(6):691-697.
13. Klinke H.B., Thomsen A.B., Ahring B.K. Inhibition of ethanol producing yeast and bacteria by degradation products produced during pretreatment of biomass. Appl. Microb. Biotechnol. 2004, 66:10-26.
14. Larsson S., Quintana-Sainz A., Reimann A., Nilvebraat N.-O., Jonsson L.J. The influence of lignocellulose-derived aromatic compounds on oxygen limited growth and ethanol fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2000, 84-86:617-632.
15. Larsson S., Reimann A., Nilvebrant N., Jönsson L. Comparison of different methods for the detoxification of lignocellulose hydrolyzates of spruce. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 1999, 77(1):91-103.
16. Liu Z.L., Slininger P.J., Gorsich S.W. Enhanced biotransformation of furfural and hydroxymethylfurfural by newly developed ethanologenic yeast strains. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2005, 121(1-3):451-460.
17. Luo X., Gleisner R., Tian S., Negron J., Zhu W., Horn E., Pan X.J., Zhu J.Y. Evaluation of mountain beetle-infested lodgepole pine for cellulosic ethanol production by sulfite pretreatment to overcome recalcitrance of lignocellulose. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2010, 49:8258-8266.
18. Martinez A., Rodriguez M.E., Wells M.L., York S.W., Preston J.F., Ingram L.O. Detoxification of dilute acid hydrolysates of lignocellulose with lime. Biotechnol. Prog. 2001, 17(2):287-293.
19. Mosier N., Wyman C.E., Dale B., Elander R., Lee Y.Y., Holtzapple M. Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 2005, 96:673-686.
20. Mussatto S., Roberto I. Alternatives for detoxification of diluted-acid lignocellulosic hydrolyzates for use in fermentative processes: a review. Bioresour. Technol. 2004, 93(1):1-10.
21. Nichols N.N., Dien B.S., Cotta M.A. Fermentation of bioenergy crops into ethanol using biological abatement for removal of inhibitors. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101(19):7545-7550.
22. Nilvebrant N.-O., Anders R., Larsson S., Jonsson L.J. Detoxification of lignocellulose hydrolysates with ion-exchange resins. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2001, 91-93(1-9):35-49.
23. Palmqvist E., Almeida J.S., Hahen-Hagerdal B. Influence of furfural on anaerobic glycolytic kinetics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in batch culture. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1999, 62:447-454.
24. Palmqvist E., Hahn-Hägerdal B. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. II: Inhibitors and mechanisms of inhibition. Bioresour. Technol. 2000, 74(1):25-33.
25. Pampulha M.E., Loureiro-Dias M.C. Activity of glucolytic enzymes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in the presence of acetic acid. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1990, 34:375-380.
26. Persson P., Andersson J., Gorton L., Larsson S., Nilvebrant N.-O., Jonsson L.J. Effect of different forms of alkali treatment on specific fermentation inhibitors and on the fermentability of lignocellulose hydrolysates for production of fuel ethanol. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 2002, 50:5318-5325.
27. Rachma W., Ria M., Siti S., Ririn M., Yulian A. Effect of furfural, hydroxymethylfurfural and acetic acid on indigenous microbial isolate for bioethanol production. Agric. J. 2010, 5(2):105-109.
28. Szengyel Z., Zacchi G. Effect of acetic acid and furfural on cellulase production of Trichoderma reesei RUT C30. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2000, 89(1):31-42.
29. Tanner R.S. Manual of Environmental Microbiology 2007, American Society for Microbiology, Washington DC.
30. Tengborg C., Galbe M., Zacchi G. Reduced inhibition of enzymatic hydrolysis of steam-pretreated softwood. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2001, 28:835-844.
31. Tian S., Luo X.L., Yang X.S., Zhu J.Y. Robust cellulosic ethanol production from SPORL-pretreated lodgepole pine using an adapted strain Saccharomyces cerevisiae without detoxification. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:8678-8685.
32. Tofighi A., Azin M., Mazheri Assadi M., Assadi-rad M.H.A., Nejadsattari T., Fallahian M.R. Inhibitory effect of high concentration of furfural on industrial strain of Saccharomyces cerevesiae. Int. J. Environ. Res. 2010, 4(1):137-142.
33. Tucker M.P., Kim K.H., Newman M.M., Nguyen Q.A. Effects of temperature and moisture on dilute-acid steam explosion pretreatment of corn stover and cellulose enzyme digestibility. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2003, 105-108. (165-177).
34. Von Sivers M., Zacchi G. A techno-economical comparison of three processes for the production of ethanol from pine. Bioresour. Technol. 1995, 51:43-52.
35. Yang B., Wyman C.E. Pretreatment: The key to unlocking low-cost cellulosic ethanol. Biofuels, Bioprod. Biorefin. 2008, 2(1):26-40.
36. Zaldivar J., Ingram L.O. Effect of organic acids on the growth and fermentation of ethanologenic Escherichia coli LY01. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1999, 66(4):203-210.