Drawing Causal Inferences Using Propensity Scores: A Practical Guide for Community Psychologists

American Journal of Community Psychology

Volumn 52, Issue 3-4, 2013, Pages 380-392

  Lanza, Stephanie T ^a   Moore, Julia E ^b   Butera, Nicole M ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Causal inference; Preschool; Propensity scores; Reading development

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; COHORT ANALYSIS; EARLY CHILDHOOD INTERVENTION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PROPENSITY SCORE; PSYCHOLOGY; READING; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS;

CAUSALITY; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COHORT STUDIES; EARLY INTERVENTION (EDUCATION); FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PROPENSITY SCORE; PSYCHOLOGY; READING;

EID: 84886733795     PISSN: 00910562     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10464-013-9604-4     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Allison, P. D. (2002). Missing data. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
2. Austin, P. C. (2011a). An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46, 399-424.
3. Austin, P. C. (2011b). A tutorial and case study in propensity score analysis: An application to estimating the effect of in-hospital smoking cessation counseling on mortality. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46, 119-151.
4. Brookhart, M. A., Schneeweiss, S., Rothman, K. J., Glynn, R. J., Avorn, J., & Sturmer, T. (2006). Variable selection for propensity score models. American Journal of Epidemiology, 163(12), 1149-1156.
5. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
6. Cook, T. D. (2003). Why have educational evaluators chosen not to do randomized experiments? Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 589, 114-149.
7. D'Agostino, R. B. (1998). Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Statistics in Medicine, 17, 2265-2281.
8. Harder, V. S., Stuart, E. A., & Anthony, J. C. (2010). Propensity score techniques and the assessment of measured covariate balance to test causal associations in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 15(3), 234-249.
9. Hirano, K., & Imbens, G. W. (2001). Estimation of causal effects using propensity score weighting: An application to data on right heart catheterization. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 2, 259-278.
10. Imai, K., King, G., & Stuart, E. A. (2008). Misunderstandings between experimentalists and observationalists about causal inference. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 171(2), 481-502.
11. Imbens, G. W. (2003). Sensitivity to exogeneity assumptions in program evaluation. The American Economic Review, 93(2), 126-132.
12. King, G., & Zeng, L. (2006). The dangers of extreme counterfactuals. Political Analysis, 14(2), 131-159.
13. Lee, B., Lessler, J., & Stuart, E. A. (2009). Improving propensity score weighting using machine learning. Statistics in Medicine, 29(3), 337-346.
14. Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: Wiley.
15. Luellen, J. K., Shadish, W. R., & Clark, M. H. (2005). Propensity scores: An introduction and experiemental test. Evaluation Review, 29(6), 530-558.
16. McCaffrey, D. F., Ridgeway, G., & Morral, A. R. (2004). Propensity score estimation with boosted regression for evaluating causal effects in observational studies. Psychological Methods, 9, 403-425.
17. McCall, R. B., & Green, B. (2004). Beyond the methodological gold standards of behavioral research: Considerations for practice and policy. Social Policy Report, 18(2), 3-19.
18. Mercer, S. L., DeVinney, B. J., Fine, L. J., Green, L. W., & Dougherty, D. (2007). Study designs for effectiveness and translation research: Identifying trade-offs. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 33(2), 139-154.
19. Pearl, J. (2010). On a class of bias-amplifying covariates that endanger effect estimates. UCLA Cognitive Systems Laboratory, Technical Report (R-356). In P. Grunwald & P. Spirtes (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-sixth conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence (pp. 417-424). Corvallis, OR.
20. Potter, F. J. (1993). The effect of weight trimming on nonlinear survey estimates. In Proceedings of the section on survey research methods of American Statistical Association. American Statistical Association, San Francisco, CA.
21. Rhoades, B. L., Warren, H. K., Domitrovich, C. E., & Greenberg, M. T. (2010). Examining the link between preschool social-emotional competence and first grade academic achievement: The role of attention skills. Early Childhood Research Quarterly. doi: 10. 1016/j. ecresq. 2010. 07. 003.
22. Rosenbaum, P. R. (1984). The consequences of adjustment for a concomitant variable that has been affected by the treatment. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General), 147, 656-666.
23. Rosenbaum, P. R. (2002). Observational studies (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
24. Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41-55.
25. Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1984). Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, 516-524.
26. Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1985). Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. American Statistician, 39, 33-38.
27. Sanson-Fisher, R. W., Bonevski, B., Green, L. W., & D'Este, C. (2007). Limitations of the randomized controlled trial in evaluating population-based health interventions. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 33(2), 155-161.
28. Schafer, J. L. (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. London: Chapman & Hall.
29. Schafer, J. L., & Kang, J. D. Y. (2008). Average causal effects from non-randomized studies: A practical guide and simulated example. Psychological Methods, 13(4), 279-313.
30. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
31. Steiner, P. M., Cook, T. D., Shadish, W. R., & Clark, M. H. (2010). The importance of covariate selection in controlling for selection bias in observational studies. Psychological Methods, 15, 250-267.
32. Stuart, E. A. (2010). Matching methods for causal inference: A review and look forward. Statistical Science, 25(1), 1-21.
33. Stuart, E. A., & Green, K. M. (2008). Using full matching to estimate causal effects in nonexperimental studies: Examining the relationship between adolescent marijuana use and adult outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 44(2), 395-406.
34. Stuart, E. A., Perry, D. F., Le, H.-N., & Ialongo, N. S. (2008). Estimating intervention effects of prevention programs: Accounting for noncompliance. Prevention Science, 9, 288-298.
35. US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2009). Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Kindergarten Class of 1998-99 (ECLS-K) Kindergarten through Eighth Grade Full Sample Public-Use Data and Documentation(DVD). (NCES 2009-005). Washington, DC: Author.
36. VanderWeele, T. (2006). The use of propensity scores in psychiatric research. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 15(2), 95-103.
37. West, S. G. (2009). Alternatives to randomized experiments. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(5), 299-304.