Cell biological responses of osteoblasts on anodized nanotubular surface of a titanium-zirconium alloy

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 101, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 3416-3430

  Sista, Subhash ^a   Nouri, Alireza ^b   Li, Yuncang ^b   Wen, Cuie ^c   Hodgson, Peter D ^b   Pande, Gopal ^a  

^a CENTRE FOR CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY   (India)

^b DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

anodization; gene expression; nanotubes; osteoblast; titanium alloy

Indexed keywords

ANODIZATIONS; BIOLOGICAL PROPERTIES; BIOLOGICAL RESPONSE; CONTACT ANGLE GONIOMETRY; CONTROLLED CONDITIONS; EXTRACELLULAR MATRICES; NANO-SCALE ROUGHNESS; OSTEOBLAST DIFFERENTIATION;

ALLOYS; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CELL ADHESION; GENE EXPRESSION; NANOTUBES; OSTEOBLASTS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY; TITANIUM;

TITANIUM ALLOYS;

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; ALLOY; BONE SIALOPROTEIN; COLLAGEN TYPE 1; COLLAGEN TYPE 3; DENTIN MATRIX PROTEIN 1; FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR 2; FIBRONECTIN; FOCAL ADHESION KINASE; INTEGRIN; NANOTUBE; OSTEOCALCIN; OSTEONECTIN; OSTEOPONTIN; SOMATOMEDIN; TITANIUM; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR RUNX2; VITRONECTIN; ZIRCONIUM;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SPREADING; CELL STRUCTURE; CONTACT ANGLE; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; FOCAL ADHESION; GENE EXPRESSION; GONIOMETRY; HYDROPHILICITY; IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MORPHOLOGY; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; OSTEOBLAST; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SECRETION (PROCESS); SURFACE PROPERTY; TOPOGRAPHY; WETTABILITY;

ANODIZATION; GENE EXPRESSION; NANOTUBES; OSTEOBLAST; TITANIUM ALLOY;

ACTINS; ALLOYS; ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINE; CELL MOVEMENT; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SHAPE; ELECTRODES; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; MICE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; NANOTUBES; OSTEOBLASTS; OSTEOCALCIN; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 84886729260     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.34638     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Branemark PI,. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthetic Dentistry 1983; 50: 399-410.
2. Schwartz Z, Boyan B,. Underlying mechanisms at the bone-biomaterial interface. J Cell Biochem 1994; 56: 340-347.
3. Martin J, Schwartz Z, Hummert T, Schraub D, Simpson J, Lankford J Jr, Dean D, Cochran D, Boyan B,. Effect of titanium surface roughness on proliferation, differentiation, and protein synthesis of human osteoblast-like cells (MG63). J Biomed Mater Res 1995; 29: 389-401.
4. 2 thin films deposited on borosilicate glass. J Biomed Mater Res A 2012; 100: 1168-1178.
5. 2 particulate-reinforced titanium composites and scaffolds by powder metallurgy. J Mater Sci 2012; 47: 4410-4414.
6. Xiong J, Li Y, Hodgson PD, Wen C,. In vitro osteoblast-like cell proliferation on nano-hydroxyapatite coatings with different morphologies on a titanium-niobium shape memory alloy. J Biomed Mater Res A 2010; 95: 766-773.
7. Park JB, Lakes RS,. Biomaterials: an introduction. Plenum Pub Corp, New York; 1992.
8. Pohler OEM,. Unalloyed titanium for implants in bone surgery. Injury 2000; 31: D7-D13.
9. Long M, Rack H,. Titanium alloys in total joint replacement-a materials science perspective. Biomaterials (Guildford) 1998; 19: 1621-1639.
10. Thompson G, Puleo D., Ti-6Al-4V ion solution inhibition of osteogenic cell phenotype as a function of differentiation timecourse in vitro. Biomaterials 1996; 17: 1949-1954.
11. Okazaki Y,. Effect of friction on anodic polarization properties of metallic biomaterials. Biomaterials 2002; 23: 2071-2077.
12. Kobayashi E, Matsumoto S, Doi H, Yoneyama T, Hamanaka H,. Mechanical properties of the binary titanium-zirconium alloys and their potential for biomedical materials. J Biomed Mater Res 1995; 29: 943-950.
13. Wen C, Yamada Y, Hodgson P,. Fabrication of novel TiZr alloy foams for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng C 2006; 26: 1439-1444.
14. Ho WF, Chen WK, Wu SC, Hsu HC,. Structure, mechanical properties, and grindability of dental Ti-Zr alloys. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 2008; 19: 3179-3186.
15. Sista S, Wen C, Hodgson PD, Pande G,. The influence of surface energy of titanium-zirconium alloy on osteoblast cell functions in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res A 2011; 97: 27-36.
16. Hallab NJ, Urban RM, Jacobs JJ, editors. Corrosion and Biocompatibility of Orthopaedic Implants. UK: Informa Health Care; 2003. 65 p.
17. Hildebrand H, Hornez J, editors. Biological Response and Biocompatibility. Chichester, UK: Wiley; 1998. 265-290 p.
18. Rolf S, editor. The Corrosion Properties of Titanium and Titanium Alloys. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2001. 145 p.
19. Jonášová L, Müller FA, Helebrant A, Strnad J, Greil P,. Biomimetic apatite formation on chemically treated titanium. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 1187-1194.
20. Xiao F, Tsuru K, Hayakawa S, Osaka A,. In vitro apatite deposition on titania film derived from chemical treatment of Ti substrates with an oxysulfate solution containing hydrogen peroxide at low temperature. Thin Solid Films 2003; 441: 271-276.
21. Wu JM, Hayakawa S, Tsuru K, Osaka A,. Porous titania films prepared from interactions of titanium with hydrogen peroxide solution. Scripta Mater 2002; 46: 101-106.
22. Fujibayashi S, Neo M, Kim HM, Kokubo T, Nakamura T,. Osteoinduction of porous bioactive titanium metal. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 443-450.
23. Sul YT, Johansson CB, Jeong Y, Albrektsson T,. The electrochemical oxide growth behaviour on titanium in acid and alkaline electrolytes. Med Eng Phys 2001; 23: 329-346.
24. Yang B, Uchida M, Kim HM, Zhang X, Kokubo T,. Preparation of bioactive titanium metal via anodic oxidation treatment. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 1003-1010.
25. Shah A, Sinha R, Hickok N, Tuan R,. High-resolution morphometric analysis of human osteoblastic cell adhesion on clinically relevant orthopedic alloys. Bone 1999; 24: 499-506.
26. Lincks J, Boyan B, Blanchard C, Lohmann C, Liu Y, Cochran D, Dean D, Schwartz Z,. Response of MG63 osteoblast-like cells to titanium and titanium alloy is dependent on surface roughness and composition. Biomaterials 1998; 19: 2219-2232.
27. Zreiqat H, Howlett CR,. Titanium substrata composition influences osteoblastic phenotype: In vitro study. J Biomed Mater Res 1999; 47: 360-366.
28. Postiglione L, Di Domenico G, Ramaglia L, Montagnani S, Salzano S, Di Meglio F, Sbordone L, Vitale M, Rossi G,. Behavior of SaOS-2 cells cultured on different titanium surfaces. J Dental Res 2003; 82: 692-696.
29. Jäger M, Urselmann F, Witte F, Zanger K, Li X, Ayers DC, Krauspe R,. Osteoblast differentiation onto different biometals with an endoprosthetic surface topography in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008; 86: 61-75.
30. Hallab NJ, Bundy KJ, O'Connor K, Moses RL, Jacobs JJ,. Evaluation of metallic and polymeric biomaterial surface energy and surface roughness characteristics for directed cell adhesion. Tissue Eng 2001; 7: 55-71.
31. Weiner S, Wagner HD,. The material bone: Structure-mechanical function relations. Ann Rev Mater Sci 1998; 28: 271-298.
32. Yao C, Perla V, McKenzie JL, Slamovich EB, Webster TJ., Anodized Ti, and Ti6Al4V possessing nanometer surface features enhances osteoblast adhesion. J Biomed Nanotechnol 2005; 1: 68-73.
33. Rodriguez R, Kim K, Ong JL,. In vitro osteoblast response to anodized titanium and anodized titanium followed by hydrothermal treatment. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003; 65: 352-358.
34. 2 nanotube surfaces. Nano Lett 2008; 8: 786-793.
35. Curtis ASG, Dalby M, Gadegaard N,. Cell signaling arising from nanotopography: Implications for nanomedical devices. Nanomedicine 2006; 1: 67-72.
36. 2 nanotube diameter directs cell fate. Nano Lett 2007; 7: 1686-1691.
37. Webster TJ, Ejiofor JU,. Increased osteoblast adhesion on nanophase metals: Ti, Ti6Al4V, and CoCrMo. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 4731-4739.
38. Decuzzi P, Ferrari M,. Modulating cellular adhesion through nanotopography. Biomaterials 2010; 31: 173-179.
39. Lamers E, van Horssen R, te Riet J, van Delft F, Luttge R, Walboomers X, Jansen J. The influence of nanoscale topographical cues on initial osteoblast morphology and migration. Eur Cells Mater 2010; 20: 329-343.
40. Webster TJ, Ergun C, Doremus RH, Siegel RW, Bizios R,. Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials 2000; 21: 1803-1810.
41. Webster TJ, Schadler LS, Siegel RW, Bizios R,. Mechanisms of enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase alumina involve vitronectin. Tissue Eng 2001; 7: 291-301.
42. Dalby MJ, Gadegaard N, Tare R, Andar A, Riehle MO, Herzyk P, Wilkinson CDW, Oreffo ROC,. The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. Nat Mater 2007; 6: 997-1003.
43. 2 nanotubes functionalized with regions of bone morphogenetic protein-2 increases osteoblast adhesion. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008; 84: 447-453.
44. Cui X, Kim HM, Kawashita M, Wang L, Xiong T, Kokubo T, Nakamura T,. Preparation of bioactive titania films on titanium metal via anodic oxidation. Dental Mater 2009; 25: 80-86.
45. Biggs MJP, Richards R, Gadegaard N, Wilkinson CDW, Dalby M,. The effects of nanoscale pits on primary human osteoblast adhesion formation and cellular spreading. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 2007; 18: 399-404.
46. Biggs MJP, Richards RG, Gadegaard N, McMurray RJ, Affrossman S, Wilkinson CDW, Oreffo ROC, Dalby MJ,. Interactions with nanoscale topography: Adhesion quantification and signal transduction in cells of osteogenic and multipotent lineage. J Biomed Mater Res A 2009; 91: 195-208.
47. Lamers E, Frank Walboomers X, Domanski M, te Riet J, van Delft FC, Luttge R, Winnubst LAJA, Gardeniers HJGE, Jansen JA. The influence of nanoscale grooved substrates on osteoblast behavior and extracellular matrix deposition. Biomaterials 2010; 31: 3307-3316.
48. Tsai WB, Ting YC, Yang JY, Lai JY, Liu HL,. Fibronectin modulates the morphology of osteoblast-like cells (MG-63) on nano-grooved substrates. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 2009; 20: 1367-1378.
49. 2 nanotubes. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006; 78: 97-103.
50. Yao C, Slamovich EB, Webster TJ,. Enhanced osteoblast functions on anodized titanium with nanotube-like structures. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008; 85: 157-166.
51. Bjursten LM, Rasmusson L, Oh S, Smith GC, Brammer KS, Jin S,. Titanium dioxide nanotubes enhance bone bonding in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res A 2010; 92: 1218-1224.
52. 2 nanotubes on Ti: Influence of nanoscale morphology on bone cell-materials interaction. J Biomed Mater Res A 2009; 90: 225-237.
53. Zhang Y, Bataillon-Linez P, Huang P, Zhao Y, Han Y, Traisnel M, Xu K, Hildebrand H,. Surface analyses of micro-arc oxidized and hydrothermally treated titanium and effect on osteoblast behavior. J Biomed Mater Res A 2004; 68: 383-391.
54. Feng B, Weng J, Yang B, Qu S, Zhang X,. Characterization of surface oxide films on titanium and adhesion of osteoblast. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 4663-4670.
55. Choi J, Wehrspohn RB, Lee J, Gösele U,. Anodization of nanoimprinted titanium: A comparison with formation of porous alumina. Electrochim Acta 2004; 49: 2645-2652.
56. Chiesa R, Sandrini E, Santin M, Rondelli G, Cigada A,. Osteointegration of titanium and its alloys by anodic spark deposition and other electrochemical techniques: A review. J Appl Biomater Biomech 2003; 1: 91-107.
57. Gong D, Grimes C, Varghese OK, Hu W, Singh R, Chen Z, Dickey EC,. Titanium oxide nanotube arrays prepared by anodic oxidation. J Mater Res 2001; 16: 3331-3334.
58. Suh JY, Jang BC, Zhu X, Ong JL, Kim K,. Effect of hydrothermally treated anodic oxide films on osteoblast attachment and proliferation. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 347-355.
59. Ercan B, Webster TJ,. Greater osteoblast proliferation on anodized nanotubular titanium upon electrical stimulation. Int J Nanomed 2008; 3: 477.
60. Dalby MJ, McCloy D, Robertson M, Agheli H, Sutherland D, Affrossman S, Oreffo ROC,. Osteoprogenitor response to semi-ordered and random nanotopographies. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 2980-2987.
61. Zhu X, Chen J, Scheideler L, Altebaeumer T, Geis-Gerstorfer J, Kern D,. Cellular reactions of osteoblasts to micron-and submicron-scale porous structures of titanium surfaces. Cells Tissues Organs 2004; 178: 13-22.
62. Zhao G, Zinger O, Schwartz Z, Wieland M, Landolt D, Boyan BD,. Osteoblast-like cells are sensitive to submicron-scale surface structure. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17: 258-264.
63. Zinger O, Zhao G, Schwartz Z, Simpson J, Wieland M, Landolt D, Boyan B,. Differential regulation of osteoblasts by substrate microstructural features. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 1837-1847.
64. Klein MO, Bijelic A, Toyoshima T, Götz H, Von Koppenfels RL, Al-Nawas B, Duschner H,. Long-term response of osteogenic cells on micron and submicron-scale-structured hydrophilic titanium surfaces: Sequence of cell proliferation and cell differentiation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21: 642-649.
65. Zhao G, Raines A, Wieland M, Schwartz Z, Boyan B,. Requirement for both micron-and submicron scale structure for synergistic responses of osteoblasts to substrate surface energy and topography. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 2821-2829.
66. Sista S, Wen C, Hodgson PD, Pande G,. Expression of cell adhesion and differentiation related genes in MC3T3 osteoblasts plated on titanium alloys: role of surface properties. Mater Sci Eng C 2013; 33: 1573-1582.
67. Das K, Bose S, Bandyopadhyay A,. Surface modifications and cell-materials interactions with anodized Ti. Acta Biomater 2007; 3: 573-585.
68. Zhu X, Chen J, Scheideler L, Reichl R, Geis-Gerstorfer J,. Effects of topography and composition of titanium surface oxides on osteoblast responses. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 4087-4103.
69. 2 nanotube layers on MC3T3-E1 preosteoblast adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation. J Biomed Mater Res A 2010; 94: 1012-1022.
70. Washburn NR, Yamada KM, Simon CG, Kennedy SB, Amis EJ,. High-throughput investigation of osteoblast response to polymer crystallinity: influence of nanometer-scale roughness on proliferation. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 1215-1224.
71. Kotobuki N, Matsushima A, Kato Y, Kubo Y, Hirose M, Ohgushi H,. Small interfering RNA of alkaline phosphatase inhibits matrix mineralization. Cell Tissue Res 2008; 332: 279-288.
72. Mendonça G, Mendonça D, Simões LGP, Araújo AL, Leite ER, Duarte WR, Aragão FJL, Cooper LF,. The effects of implant surface nanoscale features on osteoblast-specific gene expression. Biomaterials 2009; 30: 4053-4062.