Speaking across levels-generating and addressing levels confusion in discourse

Chemistry Education Research and Practice

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 376-389

  Stieff, Mike ^a   Ryu, Minjung ^b   Yip, Jason C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886699555     PISSN: None     EISSN: 11094028     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1039/c3rp20158a     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Adadan E., Irving K. E. and Trundle K. C., (2009), Impacts of multi-representational instruction on high school students' conceptual understandings of the particulate nature of matter, Int. J. Sci. Educ., 31 (13), 1743-1775
2. Albanese A. and Vicentini M., (1997), Why do we believe that an atom is colourless? Reflections about the teaching of the particle model, Sci. Educ., 6 (3), 251-261
3. Ardac D. and Akaygun S., (2004), Effectiveness of multimedia-based instruction that emphasizes representations on students' understanding of chemical change, J. Res. Sci. Teach., 41 (4), 317-337
4. Banerjee A. C., (1995), Teaching chemical equilibrium and thermodynamics in undergraduate general chemistry classes, J. Chem. Educ., 72 (10), 879-881
5. Ben-Zvi R., Silberstein J. and Mamlok R., (1989), Macro-micro relationships: a key to the world of chemistry, in Licht P. and Waarlo A. J. (ed.), Relating macroscopic phenomena to microscopic particles. A central problem in secondary science education, Utrecht: CDss Press, pp. 184-197
6. Calyk M., Ayas A. and Ebenezer J. V., (2005), A review of solution chemistry studies: insights into students' conceptions, J. Sci. Educ. Technol., 14 (1), 29-50
7. Chi M. T. H., (2005), Commonsense conceptions of emergent processes: why some misconceptions are robust, J. Learn. Sci., 14 (2), 161-199
8. Chittleborough G. and Treagust D. F., (2007), The modelling ability of non-major chemistry students and their understanding of the sub-microscopic level, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 8 (3), 274-292
9. Cohen J., (1960), A coefficient for agreement for nominal scales, Educ. Psychol. Meas., 20, 37-46
10. de Vos W., (1990), Seven thoughts on teaching molecules, in Lijnse P. L., Licht P., de Vos W. and Waarlo A. J. (ed.), Relating macroscopic phenomena to microscopic particles, Utrecht, The Netherlands: Centre for Science and Mathematics Education
11. Dori Y. J. and Hameiri M., (2003), Multidimensional analysis system for quantitative chemistry problems: symbol, macro, micro and process aspects, J. Res. Sci. Teach., 40 (3), 278-302
12. Duncan R. G. and Reiser B., (2007), Reasoning across ontologically distinct levels: students' understandings of molecular genetics, J. Res. Sci. Teach., 44 (7), 938-959
13. Erduran S., (2005), Applying the philosophical concept of reduction to the chemistry of water, Sci. Educ., 14 (2), 161-171
14. Erickson F., (2006), Definition and analysis of data from videotape: some research procedures and their rationales, in Green J. L., Camilli G. and Elmore P. B. (ed.), Handbook of complementary methods in educationa research, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 177-192
15. Eylon B., Ben-Zvi R. and Silberstein J., (1986), Is an atom of copper malleable? J. Chem. Educ., 63 (1), 64-66
16. Gee J. P. and Green J. L., (1998), Discourse analysis, learning, and social practice, Rev. Res. Educ., 23, 119-169
17. Goldin-Meadow S., (1999), The role of gesture in communication and thinking, Trends Cognit. Sci., 3, 419-429
18. Goldin-Meadow S., Kim S. and Singer M., (1999), What the teacher's hands tell the student's mind about math, J. Educ. Psychol., 91, 720-730
19. Hmelo-Silver C. E., Marathe S. and Liu L., (2007), Fish swim, rocks sit, and lungs breathe: expert-novice understandings of complex systems, J. Learn. Sci., 16 (3), 307-331
20. Johnstone A. H., (1982), Macro- and micro-chemistry, Sch. Sci. Rev., 64, 377-379
21. Johnstone A. H., (1993), The development of chemistry teaching, J. Chem. Educ., 70 (9), 701-705
22. Johnstone A. H., (2010), You can't get there from here, J. Chem. Educ., 87 (1), 22-29
23. Kendon A., (1980), Gesticulation and speech: two aspects of the process of utterance, in Key M. R. (ed.), The relation between verbal and nonverbal communication, New York: Mouton, pp. 207-227
24. Kozma R., Chin E., Russell J. and Marx N., (2000), The role of representations and tools in the chemistry laboratory and their implications for chemistry learning, J. Learn. Sci., 9 (2), 105-143
25. Lemke J. L., (1990), Talking science: language, learning, and values, Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing
26. Lidar M., Lundzvist E. and Östman L., (2006), Teaching and learning in the science classroom: the interplay betwen teachers' epistemological moves and students' practical epistemology, Sci. Educ., 90, 148-163
27. McNeill D. H., (1992), Hand and Mind, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
28. Nathan M. J., Eilam B. and Kim S., (2007), To disagree, we must also agree: how intersubjectivity structures and perpetuates discourse in a mathematics classroom, J. Learn. Sci., 16 (4), 523-563
29. Rappoport L. T. and Ashkenazi G., (2008), Connecting levels of representation: emergent versus submergent perspective, Int. J. Sci. Educ., 30 (12), 1585-1603
30. Stieff M., Nighelli T., Yip J., Ryan S. and Berry A., (2012), The connected chemistry curriculum, vol. 1-9, Chicago: University of Illinois-Chicago
31. Stieff M. and Wilensky U., (2003), Connected chemistry-incorporating interactive simulations into the chemistry classroom, J. Sci. Educ. Technol., 12 (3), 285-302
32. Taber K., (2013), Revisiting the chemistry triplet: drawing upon the nature of chemical knowledge and the psychology of learning to inform chemistry education, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract 10.1039/C3RP00012E
33. Thiele R. B. and Treagust D. F., (1994), An interpretive examination of high school chemistry teachers' analogical explanations, J. Res. Sci. Teach., 31 (3), 227-242
34. Van Driel J. H., (1998), Developing secondary students' conceptions of chemical reactions: the introduction of chemical equilibrium, Int. J. Sci. Educ., 20 (4), 379-392
35. Wilbraham A., Staley D., Matta M. and Waterman E., (2000), Chemistry, 5th edn, Glenview, IL: Prentice Hall
36. Wilensky U. and Resnick M., (1999), Thinking in levels: a dynamic systems perspective to making sense of the world, J. Sci. Educ. Technol., 8 (1), 3-18