Modularity: Implications for imitation, innovation, and sustained advantage

Academy of Management Review

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 995-1011

  Pil, Frits K ^a   Cohen, Susan K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750394136     PISSN: 03637425     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5465/AMR.2006.22528166     Document Type: Article

References (102)

1. Alexander, C. 1964. Notes on the synthesis of form. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2. Andrews, K. R. 1971. The concept of corporate strategy. New York: McGraw-Hill.
3. Appleyard, M. 1996. How does knowledge flow? Interfirm patterns in the semiconductor industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 137-154.
4. Argote, L. 1999. Organizational learning: Creating, retaining, and transferring knowledge. Boston: Kluwer Academic Press.
5. Baldwin, C. Y., & Clark, K. B. 1997a. Sun wars: Competition within a modular cluster, 1985-1990. In D. B. Yoffie (Ed.), Competing in the age of digital convergence: 123-158. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
6. Baldwin, C. Y., & Clark, K. B. 1997b. Managing in the age of modularity. Harvard Business Review, 71(2): 86-96.
7. Baldwin, C. Y., & Clark, K. B. 2000. Design rules: The power of modularity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Barney, J. B. 1995. Looking inside for competitive advantage. Academy of Management Executive, 16(2): 53-57.
9. Bower, G. H., & Hilgard, E. R. 1981. Theories of learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
10. Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. 1998. Competing on the edge: Strategy as structured chaos. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
11. Brusoni, S., & Prencipe, A. 2001. Unpacking the black box of modularity: Technologies, products and organizations. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10: 179-205.
12. Christensen, C., Suarez, F., & Utterback, J. 1998. Strategies for survival in fast-changing industries. Management Science, 44(12): S207-S220.
13. Christensen, C. M. 1992. The innovator's challenge: Understanding the influence of market environment on processes of technology development in the rigid disk drive industry. D.B.A. thesis. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
14. Clark, K. 1985. The interaction of design hierarchies and market concepts in technological evolution. Research Policy, 14: 235-251.
15. Cohen, W. M. 1995. Empirical studies of innovative activity. In P. Stoneman (Ed.), Handbook of economics of innovation and technological change: 182-265. Oxford: Blackwell.
16. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1): 128-152.
17. Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. 2000. Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why US manufacturing firms patent (or not). NBER working paper No. 7552, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
18. D'Aveni, R. A. 1994. Hypercompetition. NewYork: Free Press.
19. Dierickx, I., & Cool, K. 1989. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35: 1504-1514.
20. Eisenhardt, K. 1989. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14: 57-74.
21. Eisenhardt, K. 2002. Has strategy changed? Sloan Management Review, 43(2): 88-91.
22. Eisenhardt, K., & Martin J. 2000. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21: 1105-1121.
23. El-Haik, B., & Yang, K. 1999. The components of complexity in engineering design. IIE Transactions, 31: 925-947.
24. Ethiraj, S., & Levinthal, D. 2004. Modularity and innovation in complex systems. Management Science, 50: 159-173.
25. Fichman, R., & Kemerer, C. 1993. Adoption of software engineering process innovations: The case of object orientation. Sloan Management Review, 34(2): 7-22.
26. Fine, C. 1998. Clockspeed: Winning industry control in the age of temporary advantage. Reading, MA: Perseus Books.
27. Fleming, L., & Sorenson, O. 2001. The dangers of modularity. Harvard Business Review, 79(8): 20-21.
28. Fujimoto, T. 2000. Why product architectures matter. Jetro, November: 10-13.
29. Galunic, D. C., & Eisenhardt, K. M. 2001. Architectural innovation and modular corporate forms. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 1229-1249.
30. Galvin, P., & Morkel, A. 2001. The effect of product modularity on industry structure: The case of the world bicycle industry. Industry & Innovation, 8: 31-47.
31. Garud, R. 1997. Technological choices and the inevitability of errors. In R. Garud, R. N. Praveen, & Z. B. Shapira (Eds.), Technological innovation: Oversights and foresights: 20-40. New York: Cambridge University Press.
32. Garud, R., & Kumaraswamy, A. 1995. Technological and organizational designs for realizing economies of substitution. Strategic Management Journal, 16(Summer Special Issue): 93-110.
33. Gershenson, J. K., Prasad, G. J., & Zhang, Y. 2003. Product modularity: Definitions and benefits. Journal of Engineering Design, 14: 295-313.
34. Gershenson, J. K., Prasad, G. J., & Zhang, Y. 2004. Product modularity: Measures and design methods. Journal of Engineering Design, 15: 33-51.
35. Graham, S., & Mowery, D. 2003. Submarines in software? Continuation patenting in software in the 1980s and 1990s and its implications for open source. Paper presented at the HBS/MIT Sloan Free/Open Software Conference, Boston.
36. Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. 1984. Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49: 149-164.
37. Hansen, M. T. 1999. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 82-111.
38. Henderson, R. 1992. Technological change and the management of architectural knowledge. In T. A. Kochan & M. Useem (Eds), Transforming organizations: 118-132. New York: Oxford University Press.
39. Henderson, R. 1995. Of life cycles real and imaginary: The unexpectedly long old age of optical lithography. Research Policy, 24: 631-643.
40. Henderson, R., & Clark, K. 1990. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 9-30.
41. Hoetker, G. 2006. Do modular products lead to modular organizations? Strategic Management Journal, 27: 501-518.
42. Iansiti, M. 1997. From technological potential to product performance: An empirical analysis, Research Policy, 26: 345-365.
43. Iansiti, M., & Clark, K. 1994. Integration and dynamic capability: Evidence from product development in automobiles and mainframe computers. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3: 557-605.
44. Iansiti, M., & Khanna, T. 1995. Technological evolution, system architecture and the obsolescence of firm capabilities. Industrial and Corporate Change, 4: 331-336.
45. Jelinek, M. 1977. Technology, organizations, and contingency. Academy of Management Review, 2: 17-26.
46. Jiao, J., & Tseng, M. 2000. Understanding product family for mass customization by developing commonality indices. Journal of Engineering Design, 11: 225-244.
47. Kauffman, S. A. 1993. The origins of order: Self organization and selection in evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.
48. Kogut, B., & Kulatilaka, N. 1994. Options thinking and platform investments: Investing in opportunity. California Management Review, 36(2): 52-71.
49. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. 1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3: 383-397.
50. Lane, P., & Lubatkin, M. 1998. The dynamics of learning alliances: Competition, cooperation and relative scope. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 461-477.
51. Langlois, R. 2002. Modularity in technology and organizations. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 49: 19-37.
52. Langlois, R. N., & Robertson, P. L. 1992. Networks and innovation in a modular system: Lessons from the microcomputer and stereo component industries. Research Policy, 21: 297-313.
53. Laudan, R. 1984. Cognitive change in technology and science. In R. Laudan (Ed.), The nature of technological knowledge: Are models of scientific change relevant? 83-104. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Reidel.
54. Levin, R., Klevorick, A., Nelson, R., & Winter, S. 1987. Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 3: 783-831.
55. Levinthal, D. 1997. Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Science, 43: 934-950.
56. Levinthal, D., & Warglien, M. 1999. Landscape design: Designing for local action in complex worlds. Organization Science, 10: 342-357.
57. Lippman, S., & Rumelt, R. 1982. Uncertain imitability: An analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition. Bell Journal of Economics, 13: 418-438.
58. Mansfield, E., Schwartz, M., & Wagner, S. 1981. Imitation costs and patents: An empirical study. Economic Journal, 91: 907-918.
59. March J. G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2: 71-87.
60. McEvily, S., & Chakravarthy, B. 2002. The persistence of knowledge-based advantage: An empirical test for product performance and technological knowledge. Strategic Management Journal, 23: 285-305.
61. McGaughey, S. 2002. Strategic interventions in intellectual asset flows. Academy of Management Review, 27: 248-274.
62. McNamara, G., & Vaaler, P. M. 2003. Same as it ever was: The search for evidence of increasing hypercompetition. Strategic Management Journal, 24: 261-278.
63. Meyer, M., & Lehnerd, A. 1997. The power of product platforms: Building value and cost leadership. New York: Free Press.
64. Meyer, M., Tertzakian, P., & Utterback, J. 1997. Metrics for managing research and development in the context of product family. Management Science, 43: 88-111.
65. Nelson, R., & Winter, S. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
66. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. 1995. The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
67. Orton, J. D., & Weick, K. E. 1990. Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 15: 203-224.
68. O'Sullivan, A. 2001. Achieving modularity: Generating design rules in an aerospace design-build network. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Washington, DC.
69. Parnas, D. 1972. On the criteria to be used in decomposing systems into modules. Communications of the ACM, 15: 1053-1058.
70. Pavitt, K. 1998. Technologies, products and organization in the innovating firm: What Adam Smith tells us and Joseph Schumpeter doesn't. Industrial and Corporate Change, 7: 433-452.
71. Pil, F. K., & Holweg, M. 2004. Mitigating product variety's impact on the value chain. Interfaces, 34: 394-403.
72. Pil, F. K., & MacDuffie, J. P. 1996. The adoption of high-involvement work practices. Industrial Relations, 35: 423-455.
73. Pimmler, T. U., & Eppinger, S. D. 1994. Integration and analysis of product decompositions, Working paper No. 3690-94MS, Sloan, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston.
74. Polanyi, M. 1966. The tacit dimension. New York: Anchor Day Books.
75. Rivkin, J. 2000. Imitation of complex strategies. Management Science, 46: 824-845.
76. Rosenberg, N. 1982. Inside the black box: Technology and economics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
77. Roy, R., McEvily, S., & Sorenson, O. 2004. Technological capabilities, strategies, and incumbent survival in the machine tool industry, 1975-1995. Working paper, University of Pittsburgh.
78. Sako, M., & Murray, F. 1999. Modules in design, production, and use. International Motor Vehicle Program working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston.
79. Sanchez, H. 1995. Strategic flexibility in product competition. Strategic Management Journal, 16(Summer Special Issue): 135-159.
80. Sanchez, R. 1999. Modular architectures in the marketing process. Journal of Marketing, 63(4): 92-111.
81. Sanchez, R., & Mahoney, J. T. 1996. Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue): 63-76.
82. Sanderson, S., & Uzumeri, M. 1995. Managing product fami lies: The case of the Sony Walkman. Research Policy, 24: 761-782.
83. Schilling, M. 2000. Towards a general modular systems theory and its application to interfirm product modularity. Academy of Management Review, 25: 312-334.
84. Schilling, M., & Steensma, H. 2001. The use of modular organizational forms: An industry-level analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 1149-1169.
85. Sharma, A. 1997. Professional as agent: Knowledge asymmetry in agency exchange. Academy of Management Review, 22: 758-798.
86. Simon, H. 1962. The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106: 467-482.
87. Sorenson, O., Rivkin, J., & Fleming, L. 2003. Complexity, networks, and knowledge flow. Working paper No. 04-027, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA.
88. Suh, N. P. 1984. Development of the science base for the manufacturing field through the axiomatic approach. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 1: 397-415.
89. Takeishi, A. 2002. Knowledge partitioning in the interfirm division of labor: The case of automotive product development. Organization Science, 13: 321-339.
90. Takeishi, A., & Fujimoto, T. 2001. Modularization in the auto industry: Interlinked multiple hierarchies of product, production, and supplier systems. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, 1: 379-396.
91. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 509-533.
92. Thomke, S. 1997. The role of flexibility in the development of new products: An empirical study. Research Policy, 26: 105-119.
93. Thomke, S., & Kuemmerle, W. 2002. Asset accumulation, interdependence and technological change: Evidence from pharmaceutical drug discovery. Strategic Management Journal, 23: 619-635.
94. Thomke, S., & Reinertsen, D. 1998. Agile product development: Managing development flexibility in uncertain environments. California Management Review, 41(1): 8-30.
95. Ulrich, K. 1995. The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Research Policy, 24: 419-440.
96. Ulrich, K., & Tung, K. 1991. Fundamentals of product modularity. Proceedings of the ASME Winter Annual Meeting Symposium on Design and Manufacturing Integration: 73-39.
97. Ulrich, K. T., & Eppinger, S. D. 1999. Product design and development (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
98. Usher, A. P. 1954. A history of mechanical inventions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
99. Utterback, J. M. 1994. Mastering the dynamics of innovation: How companies can seize the opportunities in the face of technological change, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
100. Venkatesan, R. 1992. Strategic sourcing: To make or not to make. Harvard Business Review, 70(6): 98-107.
101. Vincenti, W. 1990. What engineers know and how they know it: Analytical studies from aeronautical history. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
102. Winter, S. 1987. Knowledge and competence as strategic assets. In D. Teece (Ed.), The competitive challenge: 159-184. New York: Harper & Row.