The effect of genomic information on optimal contribution selection in livestock breeding programs

Genetics Selection Evolution

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Clark, Samuel A ^a   Kinghorn, Brian P ^a   Hickey, John M ^a   Van Der Werf, Julius H J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; ANCESTRY; DAIRY FARMING; DATA ACQUISITION; DNA; GENETIC MARKER; GENOME; INBREEDING; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; MAMMAL; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; SIMULATION;

ANIMALIA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BREEDING; CATTLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; GENOME; GENOTYPE; INBREEDING; LIVESTOCK; MALE; PHENOTYPE; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

ANIMALS; BREEDING; CATTLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; GENOME; GENOTYPE; INBREEDING; LIVESTOCK; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84886520072     PISSN: 0999193X     EISSN: 12979686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1297-9686-45-44     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Falconer DS, MacKay TFC, Introduction to quantitative genetics Harlow: Longman Scientific & Technical 4 1996
2. The nature, scope and impact of genomic prediction in beef cattle in the United States. Garrick DJ, Genet Sel Evol 2011 43 17 10.1186/1297-9686-43-17 21569623
3. Inbreeding in genome-wide selection. Daetwyler HD, Villanueva B, Bijma P, Woolliams JA, J Anim Breed Genet 2007 124 369 376 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2007. 00693.x 18076474 (Pubitemid 350231129)
4. Increasing long-term response to selection. Wray NR, Goddard ME, Genet Sel Evol 1994 26 431 451 10.1186/1297-9686-26-5-431 (Pubitemid 2144782)
5. Maximizing the response of selection with a predetermined rate of inbreeding. Meuwissen THE, J Anim Sci 1997 75 934 940 9110204 (Pubitemid 127441682)
6. Optimisation of contribution of candidate parents to maximise genetic gain and restricting inbreeding using semidefinite programming. Pong-Wong R, Woolliams JA, Genet Sel Evol 2007 39 3 25 10.1186/1297-9686-39-1-3 17212945 (Pubitemid 46103348)
7. Invited review: reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. VanRaden PM, Van Tassell CP, Wiggans GR, Sonstegard TS, Schnabel RD, Taylor JF, Schenkel FS, J Dairy Sci 2009 92 16 24 10.3168/jds.2008-1514 19109259
8. Genomic selection requires genomic control of inbreeding. Sonesson AK, Woolliams JA, Meuwissen THE, Genet Sel Evol 2012 44 27 10.1186/1297-9686-44-27 22898324
9. Variation in actual relationship as a consequence of Mendelian sampling and linkage. Hill WG, Weir BS, Genet Res 2011 93 47 64 10.1017/S0016672310000480
10. Fast and flexible simulation of DNA sequence data. Chen GK, Marjoram P, Wall JD, Genome Res 2009 19 136 142 19029539
11. Different models of genetic variation and their effect on genomic evaluation. Clark SA, Hickey JM, van der Werf JHJ, Genet Sel Evol 2011 43 18 10.1186/1297-9686-43-18 21575265
12. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME, Genetics 2001 157 1819 1829 11290733 (Pubitemid 32298846)
13. Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix. Hayes BJ, Visscher PM, Goddard ME, Genet Res 2009 91 47 60 10.1017/S0016672308009981
14. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. VanRaden PM, J Dairy Sci 2008 91 4414 4423 10.3168/jds.2007-0980 18946147
15. Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ, Cullis BR, Thompson R, ASReml User Guide Release 3.0 Hemel Hempstead: VSN International Ltd 2009
16. Differential Evolution: numerical optimization made easy. Price K, Storn R, Dr. Dobb's Journal 1997 18 24
17. Optimum contribution selection using traditional best linear unbiased prediction and genomic breeding values in aquaculture breeding schemes. Nielsen HM, Sonesson AK, Meuwissen THE, J Anim Sci 2011 89 630 638 10.2527/jas.2009-2731 21036937
18. Mendelian sampling terms as a selective advantage in optimum breeding schemes with restrictions on the rate of inbreeding. Avendano S, Woolliams JA, Villanueva B, Genet Res 2004 83 55 64 10.1017/S0016672303006566 15125067 (Pubitemid 38477500)
19. The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values. Habier D, Fernando RL, Dekkers JCM, Genetics 2007 177 2389 2397 18073436 (Pubitemid 350277013)
20. The impact of genetic relationship information on genomic breeding values in German Holstein cattle. Habier D, Tetens J, Seefried FR, Lichtner P, Thaller G, Genet Sel Evol 2010 42 5 10.1186/1297-9686-42-5 20170500
21. The importance of information on relatives for the prediction of genomic breeding values and the implications for the makeup of reference data sets in livestock breeding schemes. Clark SA, Hickey JM, Daetwyler HD, van der Werf JHJ, Genet Sel Evol 2010 44 4
22. Controlling inbreeding and maximizing genetic gain using semi-definite programming with pedigree-based and genomic relationships. Schierenbeck S, Pimentel ECG, Tietze M, Koerte J, Reents R, Reinhardt F, Simianer H, Koenig S, J Dairy Sci 2011 94 6143 6152 10.3168/jds.2011-4574 22118102
23. Novel strategies to minimize progeny inbreeding while maximizing genetic gain using genomic information. Pryce JE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME, J Dairy Sci 2012 95 377 388 10.3168/jds.2011-4254 22192217