The nature, scope and impact of genomic prediction in beef cattle in the United States

Genetics Selection Evolution

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Garrick, Dorian J ^a,b  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; CATTLE; CHROMOSOME; CORRELATION; GENOMICS; NATURAL SELECTION; PHENOTYPE; PREDICTION; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; STAKEHOLDER;

UNITED STATES;

ANIMALIA; BOS;

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BREEDING; CATTLE; DAIRYING; GENETIC SELECTION; GENOME; GENOTYPE; MEAT; PHENOTYPE; REVIEW; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALS; BREEDING; CATTLE; DAIRYING; GENOME; GENOTYPE; MEAT; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; SELECTION, GENETIC; UNITED STATES;

EID: 80052801816     PISSN: 0999193X     EISSN: 12979686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1297-9686-43-17     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. ® - The Business Breed. http://www.angus.org/nce/genetictrends.aspx (Accessed 18 February 2011)
2. Red Angus EDP Trends. http://redangus.org/genetics/epd-trends (Accessed 18 February 2011)
3. Reducing bias in maintenance energy expected progeny difference by accounting for selection on weaning and yearling weights. Williams JL, Garrick DJ, Speidel SE, J Anim Sci 2009 87 1628 1637 10.2527/jas.2008-1442 19151154
4. Milestones in beef cattle genetic evaluation. Golden BL, Garrick DJ, Benyshek LL, J Anim Sci 2009 87 3 E10 10.2527/jas.2008-1430 19028854
5. Producing and using genetic evaluations in the United States beef industry of today. Garrick DJ, Golden BL, J Anim Sci 2009 87 11 E18 10.2527/jas.2008-1431 18849385
6. Derivation, calculation, and use of national animal model information. VanRaden PM, Wiggans GR, J Dairy Sci 1991 74 2737 2746 10.3168/jds.S0022- 0302(91)78453-1 1918547
7. Differences in susceptibility to Marek's disease in chickens carrying two different B locus blood group alleles. Hansen MP, Law GRJ, Van Zandt JN, Poult Sci 1967 46 1268 1268
8. Mapping quantitative trait loci controlling milk production in dairy cattle by exploiting progeny testing. Georges M, Nielsen D, Mackinnon M, Mishra A, Okimoto R, Pasquino AT, Sargeant LS, Sorensen A, Steele MR, Zhao X, Womack JE, Hoeschele I, Genetics 1995 139 907 920 7713441
9. Power of daughter and granddaughter designs for determining linkage between marker loci and quantitative trait loci in dairy cattle. Weller JI, Kashi Y, Soller M, J Dairy Sci 1990 73 2525 2537 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(90) 78938-2 2258496
10. Commercial application of marker- and gene-assisted selection in livestock: strategies and lessons. Dekkers JCM, J Anim Sci 2004 82 313 E328 15471812
11. Development and characterization of a high density SNP genotyping assay for cattle. Matukumalli LK, Lawley CT, Schnabel RD, Taylor JF, Allan MF, Heaton MP, C'Connell J, Moore SS, Smith TPL, Sonstegard TS, Van Tassell CP, PLoS ONE 2009 4 5350 10.1371/journal.pone.0005350 19390634
12. Animal breeding programs: a systematic approach to their design. Harris DL, Stewart TS, Arboleda CR, Advances in agricultural technology Agricultural Research Service, USDA-ARS Bull 1984 1 14
13. Evidence of genotype by environment interaction for reproductive and maternal traits in beef cattle. Morris CA, Baker RL, Hickey SM, Johnson DL, Cullen NG, Wilson JA, Anim Prod 1993 56 69 83 10.1017/S0003356100006176
14. The covariance between relatives for characters composed of components contributed by related individuals. Willham RL, Biometrics 1963 19 18 10.2307/2527570
15. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Meuwissen THE, Hayes B, Goddard ME, Genetics 2001 157 1819 1829 11290733 (Pubitemid 32298846)
16. Additive genetic variability and the Bayesian alphabet. Gianola D, de los Campos G, Hill WG, Manfredi E, Fernando R, Genetics 2009 183 347 363 10.1534/genetics.109.103952 19620397
17. Technical note: Derivation of equivalent computing algorithms for genomic predictions and reliabilities of animal merit. Strandén I, Garrick DJ, J Dairy Sci 2009 92 2971 2975 10.3168/jds.2008-1929 19448030
18. Effect of total allelic relationship on accuracy of evaluation and response to selection. Nejati-Javaremi A, Smith C, Gibson JP, J Anim Sci 1997 75 1738 1745 9222829 (Pubitemid 127444988)
19. Power of a genome scan to detect and locate quantitative trait loci in cattle using dense single nucleotide polymorphisms. MacLeod IM, Hayes BJ, Savin KW, Chamberlain AJ, McPartlan HC, Goddard ME, J Anim Breed Genet 2009 127 133 142
20. Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximization of long term response. Goddard ME, Genetica 2009 136 245 257 10.1007/s10709-008-9308-0 18704696
21. Invited review: Reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. VanRaden PM, Van Tassell CP, Wiggans GR, Sonstegard TS, Schnabel RD, Taylor JF, Schenkel FS, J Dairy Sci 2009 92 16 24 10.3168/jds.2008-1514 19109259
22. A relationship matrix including full pedigree and genomic information. Legarra A, Aguilar I, Misztal I, J Dairy Sci 2009 92 4656 4663 10.3168/jds.2009-2061 19700729
23. Hot topic: a unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score. Aguilar I, Misztal I, Johnson DL, Legarra A, Tsuruta S, Lawlor TJ, J Dairy Sci 2010 93 743 752 10.3168/jds.2009-2730 20105546
24. Genetic evaluation of Angus cattle for carcass marbling using ultrasound and genomic indicators. MacNeil MD, Nkrumah JD, Woodward BW, Northcutt SL, J Anim Sci 2010 88 517 522 10.2527/jas.2009-2022 19897629
25. Genetic correlations between carcass traits and molecular breeding values in Angus cattle. MacNeil MD, Northcutt SL, Schnabel RD, Garrick DJ, Woodward BW, Taylor JF, Proceedings of the Ninth World Congress on Genetics applied to Livestock Production: 1-6 August 2010; Leipzig 2010 482
26. Estimation of the proportion of variation accounted for by DNA tests I. Genetic variance. Hanford K, Thallman M, Kachman S, Kuehn L, Quaas R, Tempelman R, Fernando R, Pollak J, Proceedings of the Ninth World Congress on Genetics applied to Livestock Production: 1-6 August 2010; Leipzig 2010 822
27. Development and characterization of a high-density SNP genotyping assay for cattle. Matukumalli LK, Lawley CT, Schnabel RD, Taylor JF, Allan MF, Heaton MP, O'Connell J, Moore SS, Smith TPL, Sonstegard TS, Van Tassell CP, PLoS ONE 2009 4 5350 10.1371/journal.pone.0005350 19390634
28. Genomic selection: Marker-assisted selection on a genome wide scale. Meuwissen T, J Anim Breed Genet 2007 124 321 322 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2007.00708. x 18076468 (Pubitemid 350231123)
29. Accuracy of predicting the genetic risk of disease using a genome-wide approach. Daetwyler HD, Villanueva B, Woolliams JA, PLoS ONE 2008 3 3395 10.1371/journal.pone.0003395 18852893
30. A genome scan for quantitative trait loci influencing carcass, post-natal growth and reproductive traits in commercial Angus. McClure MC, Morsci N, Schnabel RD, Kim JW, Yao P, Rolf MM, McKay SD, Gregg SJ, Chapple RH, Northcutt SL, Taylor JF, Anim Genet 2010 41 597 607 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2010.02063.x 20477797
31. ® profile for Angus goes HD. http://www. angusbeefbulletin.com/extra/2010/02feb10/0210mg-agi-merial.html (Accessed 25 November 2010)
32. Whole genome selection. Thallman RM, http://animalscience.ucdavis.edu/ animalbiotech/Outreach/Whole-Genome-Selection.pdf (Accessed 25 November 2010)
33. Carcass merit project: DNA marker validation. Thallman RM, Moser DW, Dressler EW, Totir LR, Fernando RL, Kachman SD, Rumph JM, Dikeman ME, Pollak EJ, http://www.beefimprovement.org/proceedings/genetic-prediction-workshop/GPW- CarcassMeritProject-Final.pdf (Accessed 25 November 2010)
34. National beef cattle evaluation consortium: commercial genetic test validation. http://www.nbcec.org/validation.html (Accessed 27 April 2011)
35. Use of genomics to improve healthfulness and quality of meat. Reecy JM, Tait RG, VanOverbeke DL, Garmyn AJ, Mateescu RG, Van Eenennaam AL, Duan Q, Liu Q, Schoonmaker JP, Drewnoski ME, Beitz DC, Kizilkaya K, Fernando RL, Garrick DJ, Proceedings of the Ninth World Congress on Genetics applied to Livestock Production: 1-6 August 2010; Leipzig 2010 53
36. Genetics of disease resistance. Brigham BW, McCallister CM, Enns RM, http://www.rangebeefcow.com/2009/documents/BrighamEnns2009RBCS-pp.pdf (Accessed 25 November 2010)
37. Cooperative resources international: Genex to market Pfizer HD 50k. http://cri.crinet.com/news1001/GenexToMarketPfizerHD50K (Accessed 25 November 2010)
38. Genome-wide association study of growth in crossbred beef cattle. Snelling WM, Allan MF, Keele JW, Kuehn LA, McDaneld T, Smith TPL, Sonstegard TS, Thallman RM, Bennett GL, J Anim Sci 2010 88 837 848 10.2527/jas.2009-2257 19966163
39. Integration of DNA marker information into breeding value predictions. Spangler ML, Kachman S, Hanford K, Bennett G, Snelling W, Kuehn L, Pollak J, Nebraska Beef Cattle Report Lincoln 2011 11 12 http://www.nlc.state.ne.us/epubs/ U2300/T001-2011.pdf (Accessed 2 March 2011)
40. The impact of genetic relationship information on genomic breeding values in German Holstein cattle. Habier D, Tetens J, Seefried FR, Lichtner P, Thaller G, Genet Sel Evol 2010 42 5 10.1186/1297-9686-42-5 20170500
41. Extension of the Bayesian alphabet for genomic selection. Habier D, Fernando RL, Kizilkaya K, Garrick DJ, Proceedings of the Ninth World Congress on Genetics applied to Livestock Production: 1-6 August 2010; Leipzig 2010 468
42. Breeding value prediction for production traits in layers using pedigree or genomic relationships in a reduced animal model. Wolc A, Stricker C, Arango J, Settar P, Fulton JE, O'Sullivan NP, Habier D, Fernando R, Garrick DJ, Lamont SJ, Dekkers JCM, Genet Sel Evol 2011 43 5 10.1186/1297-9686-43-5 21255418
43. Deregressing estimated breeding values and weighting information for genomic regression analyses. Garrick DJ, Taylor JF, Fernando RL, Genet Sel Evol 2009 41 55 10.1186/1297-9686-41-55 20043827
44. The nature and scope of some whole genome analyses in US beef cattle. Garrick DJ, Proceedings of the Beef Improvement Federation 41st Annual Research Symposium: 30 April-3May 2009; Sacramento 2009 41 92 102
45. Genomic selection using low-density marker panels. Habier D, Fernando RL, Dekkers JC, Genetics 2009 182 343 353 10.1534/genetics.108.100289 19299339
46. Marker imputation with low-density marker panels in Dutch Holstein cattle. Zhang Z, Druet T, J Dairy Sci 2010 93 5487 5494 10.3168/jds.2010-3501 20965364
47. Genomic prediction of simulated multibreed and purebred performance using observed fifty thousand single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes. Kizilkaya K, Fernando RL, Garrick DJ, J Anim Sci 2010 88 544 551 10.2527/jas.2009-2064 19820059
48. Genomic selection in admixed and crossbred populations. Toosi A, Fernando RL, Dekkers JCM, J Anim Sci 2010 88 32 46 10.2527/jas.2009-1975 19749023
49. A genomic information nucleus to accelerate rates of genetic improvement in sheep. van der Werf J, Banks RG, Proceedings of the Ninth World Congress on Genetics applied to Livestock Production: 1-6 August 2010; Leipzig 2010 46
50. Accuracy of marker-assisted selection with single markers and marker haplotypes in cattle. Hayes BJ, Chamberlain AJ, McPartlan H, MacLeod I, Sethuraman L, Goddard ME, Genet Res (Camb) 2007 89 215 220 (Pubitemid 351516035)
51. Accurate prediction of genetic value for complex traits by whole-genome resequencing. Meuwissen T, Goddard ME, Genetics 2010 185 623 631 10.1534/genetics.110.116590 20308278
52. Marker-assisted selection using best linear unbiased prediction. Fernando RL, Grossman M, Genet Sel Evol 1989 21 467 477 10.1186/1297-9686-21-4-467
53. Fine mapping of a quantitative trait locus for twinning rate using combined linkage and linkage disequilibrium mapping. Meuwissen THE, Karlsen A, Lien S, Olsaker I, Goddard ME, Genetics 2002 161 373 379 12019251 (Pubitemid 34564064)