The use of space-time constraints for the selection of discretionary activity locations

Journal of Transport Geography

Volumn 33, Issue , 2013, Pages 146-152

  Justen, Andreas ^a   Martínez, Francisco J ^b   Cortés, Cristián E ^b  

^a GERMAN AEROSPACE CENTER DLR   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

Detour factor; Discretionary activity; Location choice; Potential path area; Space time constraints

Indexed keywords

ACTIVITY PATTERN; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; GIS; LOCATION DECISION; TRANSPORTATION MODE;

CHILE;

EID: 84886451417     PISSN: 09666923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.10.009     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bradley M., Bowman J.L., Griesenbeck B. SACSIM: an applied activity-based model system with fine-level spatial and temporal solution. Journal of Choice Modelling 2010, 3(1):5-31.
2. Burns L.D. Transportation, Temporal and Spatial Components of Accessibility 1979, Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.
3. Cascetta E. Transportation Systems Analysis: Models and Applications 2009, Springer, New York. second ed.
4. de Cea, J., Fernández, E., Dekock, V., Soto, A., Friesz, T., 2003. ESTRAUS: a computer package for solving supply-demand equilibrium problems on multimodal urban transportation networks with multiple user classes. In: 82nd Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting. Washington, DC, 12-16 January 2003.
5. Davidson W., Donnelly R., Vovsha P., Freedman J., Ruegg S., Hicks J., Castiglione J., Picado R. Synthesis of first practices and operational research approaches in activity-based travel demand modeling. Transportation Research Part A 2007, 41(5):464-488.
6. DICTUC - Dirección de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas de la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, 2001. Encuesta Origen Destino 2001: Informe Final. Santiago de Chile.
7. Dijst M. Two-earner families and their action spaces: a case study of two Dutch communities. GeoJournal 1999, 48:195-206.
8. Farber S., Páez A. Running to stay in place: the time-use implications of automobile oriented land-use and travel. Journal of Transport Geography 2011, 19:782-793.
9. Hägerstrand T. What about people in regional science?. Papers in Regional Science 1970, 24(1):6-21.
10. Hensher D.A., Button K.J. Handbook of Transport Modelling 2008, Elsevier, Amsterdam. second ed.
11. Horni, A., Scott, D.M., Balmer, M., Axhausen, K.W., 2008. Location choice for shopping and leisure activities implemented in the activity-based multi-agent transport simulation MATSim. In: 8th Swiss Transport Research Conference.
12. Justen, A., 2011. A Time-Space Constrained Approach for Modeling Travel and Activity Patterns. Doctoral Thesis. Humboldt-University, Berlin.
13. Kim H.-M., Kwan M.-P. Space-time accessibility measures: a geocomputational algorithm with a focus on the feasible opportunity set and possible activity duration. Journal of Geographical Systems 2003, 5:71-91.
14. Kwan M.-P. Space-time and integral measures of individual accessibility: a comparative analysis using a point-based framework. Geographical Analysis 1998, 30(3):191-216.
15. Kwan M.-P., Hong X.-D. Network-based constraints-oriented choice set formation using GIS. Geographical Systems 1998, 5:139-162.
16. Lee, B.H.Y., Waddell, P., Wang, L., Pendyala, R.M., 2009. Operationalizing time-space prism accessibility in a building-level residential choice model - empirical results from the Puget sound region. In: 88th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting. Washington, DC, 11-15 January 2009.
17. Lenntorp B. Paths in space-time environments: a time-geographic study of movement possibilities of individuals. Lund Studies in Geography 1978, B44.
18. Miller H.J. Modelling accessibility using space-time prism concepts within geographical information systems. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 1991, 5(3):287-301.
19. Miller H.J. Activities in space and time. Handbook of Transport: Transport Geography and Spatial Systems 2004, vol. 5:647-658. Elsevier, Oxford.
20. Newsome T.H., Walcott W.A., Smith P.D. Urban activity spaces: illustrations and application of a conceptual model for integrating the time and space dimensions. Transportation 1998, 25:357-377.
21. Pendyala, R.M., Kitamura, R., Kikuchi, A., 2004. FAMOS: The Florida Activity Mobility Simulator. Conference Progress in Activity-based Analysis.
22. Schönfelder S., Axhausen K.W. Activity spaces: measures of social exclusion?. Transport Policy 2003, 10:273-286.
23. SECTRA - Secretaría de Planificación de Transporte, 2002. Mobility Survey EOD 2001: Executive Report. Santiago de Chile.
24. Timmermans H., Arentze T., Joh C.-H. Analysing space-time behaviour: new approaches to old problems. Progress in Human Geography 2002, 26(2):175-190.
25. Witlox F. Evaluating the reliability of reported distance data in urban travel behaviour analysis. Journal of Transport Geography 2007, 15:172-183.
26. Yoon S.Y., Deutsch K., Chen Y., Goulias K.G. Feasibility of using time-space prism to represent available opportunities and choice sets for destination choice models in the context of dynamic urban environments. Transportation 2012, 39:807-823.