Feasibility of using time-space prism to represent available opportunities and choice sets for destination choice models in the context of dynamic urban environments

Transportation

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 807-823

  Yoon, Seo Youn ^a   Deutsch, Kathleen ^a   Chen, Yali ^a   Goulias, Konstadinos G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Choice set building; Dynamic urban environment; Flexibility in scheduling; Location choice; Time space prism

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL DEMANDS; CONSTRAINT-BASED; DESTINATION CHOICE; HOUSEHOLD TRAVEL SURVEYS; LEVEL OF SERVICE; LOCATION CHOICE; PAPER TESTS; SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA; TIME GEOGRAPHY; TIME OF DAY; TIME-SPACE PRISM; URBAN ENVIRONMENTS;

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS; SCHEDULING; TRANSPORTATION; URBAN PLANNING;

PRISMS;

COMPLEXITY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; LOCATION DECISION; NUMERICAL METHOD; NUMERICAL MODEL; URBAN AREA;

EID: 84861779424     PISSN: 00494488     EISSN: 15729435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11116-012-9407-8     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Auld, J., Mohammadian, A.: Planning constrained destination choice in the ADAPTS activity-based model. Paper presented at the 90th annual transportation research board meeting, Washington DC (2011).
2. Bierlaire, M., Hurtubia, R., Flötteröd, G.: An analysis of the implicit choice set generation using the constrained multinomial logit model. Paper presented at the 88th annual transportation research board meeting, Washington DC (2009).
3. Black, W. C.: Choice set definition in patronage modeling. J. Retail. 60, 63-85 (1984).
4. Bowman, J., Bradley, M.: Activity based travel forcasting model for SACOG. Intermediate stop location models. Technical Memo (2006).
5. Cascetta, E., Pagliara, F., Axhausen, K.: Dominance attributes for alternatives' perception in choice set formation: an application to spatial choices. Paper presented at the 86th annual transportation research board meeting, Washington DC (2007).
6. Chen, Y., Ravulaparthy, S., Deutsch, K. E., Dalal, P., Yoon, S. Y., Lei, T., Goulias, K. G., Pendyala, R. M., Bhat, C. R., Hu, H.-H.: Development of opportunity-based accessibility indicators. Transp. Res. Rec. 2255, 58-68 (2011).
7. Deutsch, K. E., Yoon, S. Y., Goulias, K. G.: Modeling sense of place using a structural equation model. Paper presented at the 90th annual transportation research board meeting, Washington DC (2011).
8. Hägerstrand, T.: What about people in regional science? Pap. Proc. Regional Sci. Assoc. 24, 7-24 (1970).
9. Kim, H.-M., Kwan, M.-P.: Space-time accessibility measures: a geocomputational algorithm with focus on the feasible opportunity set and possible activity duration. J. Geogr. Syst. 5, 71-91 (2003).
10. Kwan, M.-P.: Space-time and integral measures of individual accessibility: a comparative analysis using a point-based framework. Geogr. Anal. 30, 191-217 (1998).
11. Kwan, M., Hong, X.: Network-based constraints-oriented choice set formation using GIS. Geogr. Syst. 5, 139-162 (1998).
12. Lee, B. H. Y., Waddell, P., Wang, L., Pendyala, R. M.: Operationalizing time-space prism accessibility in a building-level residential choice model: empirical results from the puget sound region. Paper presented at the 88th annual transportation research board meeting, Washington DC (2009).
13. Manski, C.: The structure of random utility models. Theor. Decis. 8, 229-254 (1977).
14. Miller, E. J., O'Kelly, M. E.: Estimating shopping destination models from travel diary data. Prof. Geogr. 35, 440-449 (1983).
15. Miller, H. J.: Modeling accessibility using space-time prism concepts within geographical information systems. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Syst. 5, 287-301 (1991).
16. Scott, D. M.: Constrained destination choice set generation: a comparison of GIS-based approaches. Paper presented at the 85th annual transportation research board meeting, Washington DC (2006).
17. Termansen, M., McClean, C. J., Skov-Petersen, H.: Recreational site choice modelling using high-resolution spatial data. Environ. Plan. A. 36, 1085-1099 (2004).
18. Thill, J. C.: Choice set formation for destination choice modeling. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 16, 361-382 (1992).
19. Yoon, S. Y., Goulias, K. G.: Impact of time-space prism accessibility on time use behavior and its propagation through intra-household interaction. Transp. Lett. 2, 245-260 (2010).
20. Weber, J., Kwan, M.-P.: Bringing time back in: a study on the influence of travel time variations and facility opening hours on individual accessibility. Prof. Geogr. 54(2), 226-240 (2002).
21. Zheng, J., Guo, J.: A destination choice model incorporating choice set formation. Paper presented at the 87th annual transportation research board meeting, Washington DC (2008).