Sensitivity enhancement of (Hyper-)CEST image series by exploiting redundancies in the spectral domain

Contrast Media and Molecular Imaging

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 100-107

  Döpfert, Jörg ^a   Witte, Christopher ^a   Kunth, Martin ^a   Schröder, Leif ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ INSTITUT FÜR MOLEKULARE PHARMAKOLOGIE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biosensors; CEST agents; Compressed sensing; Hyperpolarized molecules; Low rank reconstruction; MRI; NMR; PCA; Undersampling; Xenon

Indexed keywords

PROTON; XENON;

ARTICLE; BIOSENSOR; HYPER CEST IMAGING; IMAGING; IN VIVO STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POLARIZATION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESSING; REDUNDANCY ANALYSIS; SAMPLING; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO;

BIOSENSORS; CEST AGENTS; COMPRESSED SENSING; HYPERPOLARIZED MOLECULES; LOW-RANK RECONSTRUCTION; MRI; NMR; PCA; UNDERSAMPLING; XENON;

BIOSENSING TECHNIQUES; CONTRAST MEDIA; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MODELS, THEORETICAL; MOLECULAR IMAGING; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO; SPIN LABELS; XENON;

EID: 84886420603     PISSN: 15554309     EISSN: 15554317     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cmmi.1543     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Goodson BM. Nuclear magnetic resonance of laser-polarized noble gases in molecules, materials, and organisms. J Magn Reson 2002; 155: 157-216. doi: 10.1006/jmre.2001.2341
2. Witte C, Schröder L. NMR of hyperpolarised probes. NMR Biomed 2012; doi: 10.1002/nbm.2873
3. Ward K, Aletras A, Balaban R. A new class of contrast agents for MRI based on proton chemical exchange dependent saturation transfer (CEST). J Magn Reson 2000; 143: 79-87. doi: 10.1006/jmre.1999.1956
4. van Zijl PCM, Yadav NN. Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST): what is in a name and what isn't? Magn Reson Med 2011; 65: 927-948. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22761
5. Schröder L, Lowery TJ, Hilty C, Wemmer DE, Pines A. Molecular imaging using a targeted magnetic resonance hyperpolarized biosensor. Science 2006; 314: 446-449. doi: 10.1126/science.1131847
6. Kunth M, Döpfert J, Witte C, Rossella F, Schröder L. Optimized use of reversible binding for fast and selective NMR localization of caged xenon. Angew Chem Int Ed 2012; 51: 8393. doi: 10.1002/anie.201202481
7. Spence MM, Rubin SM, Dimitrov IE, Ruiz EJ, Wemmer DE, Pines A, Yao SQ, Tian F, Schultz PG. Functionalized xenon as a biosensor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98: 10654-10657. doi: 10.1073/pnas.191368398
8. Harel E, Schröder L, Xu S. Novel detection schemes of nuclear magnetic resonance and magnetic resonance imaging: applications from analytical chemistry to molecular sensors. Annu Rev Anal Chem 2008; 1: 133-163. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anchem.1.031207.113018
9. Schröder L. Xenon for NMR biosensing - inert but alert. Phys Medica 2011; 29: 3-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2011.11.001
10. 129Xe NMR: the transferrin case. Bioorgan. Med Chem 2011; 19: 4135-4143. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2011.05.002
11. 129Xe MRI probe. Angew Chem Int Ed 2012; 51: 4100-4103. doi: 10.1002/anie.201109194
12. Meldrum T, Schröder L, Denger P, Wemmer DE, Pines A. Xenon-based molecular sensors in lipid suspensions. J Magn Reson 2010; 205: 242-246. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2010.05.005
13. Schröder L, Chavez L, Meldrum T, Smith M, Lowery T, Wemmer D, Pines A. Temperature-controlled molecular depolarization gates in nuclear magnetic resonance. Angew Chem Int Ed 2008; 47: 4316-4320. doi: 10.1002/anie.200800382
14. 129Xe depolarization transfer and its application for ultrasensitive NMR detection. Phys Rev Lett 2008; 100: 257603. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.257603
15. Schilling F, Schröder L, Palaniappan KK, Zapf S, Wemmer DE, Pines A. MRI thermometry based on encapsulated hyperpolarized xenon. Chem Phys Chem 2010; 11: 3529-3533. doi: 10.1002/cphc.201000507
16. Brotin T, Dutasta JP. Cryptophanes and their complexes- present and future. Chem Rev 2009; 109: 88-130. doi: 10.1021/cr0680437
17. Terreno E, Stancanello J, Longo D, Castelli DD, Milone L, Sanders HMHF, Kok MB, Uggeri F, Aime S. Methods for an improved detection of the MRI-CEST effect. Contrast Media Mol Imag 2009; 4: 237-247. doi: 10.1002/cmmi.290
18. Jolliffe I. Principal Component Analysis. Springer: New York, 2002.
19. Witte C, Zaluzec N, Allen L. Extracting physically interpretable data from electron energy-loss spectra. Ultramicroscopy 2010; 110: 1390-1396. doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2010.07.003
20. Balvay D, Kachenoura N, Espinoza S, Thomassin-Naggara I, Fournier LS, Clement O, Cuenod CA. Signal-to-noise ratio improvement in dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and MR imaging with automated principal component analysis filtering. Radiology 2011; 258: 435-445. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100231
21. Zaiss M, Schnurr M, Bachert P. Analytical solution for the depolarization of hyperpolarized nuclei by chemical exchange saturation transfer between free and encapsulated xenon (HyperCEST). J Chem Phys 2012; 136: 144106. doi:10.1063/1.3701178
22. Tsao J, Behnia B, Webb AG. Unifying linear prior-information-driven methods for accelerated image acquisition. Magn Reson Med 2001; 46: 652-660. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1242
23. Pedersen H, Kozerke S, Ringgaard S, Nehrke K, Kim WY. k-t PCA: temporally constrained k-t BLAST reconstruction using principal component analysis. Magn Reson Med 2009; 62: 706-716. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22052
24. Lingala S, Hu Y, DiBella E, Jacob M. Accelerated dynamic MRI exploiting sparsity and low-rank structure: k-t SLR. IEEE T Med Imag 2011; 30: 1042-1054. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2010.2100850
25. Gao H, Hu P, Rapacchi S, Wang D, Moriarty J, Meehan C, Sayre J, Laub G, Finn P. Compressed sensing using prior rank, intensity and sparsity model (PRISM): applications in cardiac cine MRI. In Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance Medicine, Melbourne, Vol. 20, 2012; 2242.
26. Adluru G, Chen L, Feinberg D, Anderson J, Dibella E. Improving rank constrained reconstructions using prior information with reordering. In Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance Medicine, Melbourne, Vol. 20, 2012; 2248.
27. Varma G, Lenkinski RE, Vinogradov E. Keyhole chemical exchange saturation transfer. Magn Reson Med 2012; doi: 10.1002/mrm.23310
28. 129Xe MR. J Magn Reson Ser B 1996; 113: 179-183. doi: 10.1006/jmrb.1996.0173
29. Lustig M, Donoho D, Pauly JM. Sparse MRI: the application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magn Reson Med 2007; 58: 1182-1195. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21391
30. Candès E, Recht B. Exact matrix completion via convex optimization. Found Comput Math 2009; 9: 717-772. doi: 10.1007/s10208-009-9045-5
31. Candès E, Plan Y. Matrix completion with noise. Proc IEEE 2010; 98: 925-936. doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2009.2035722
32. Cai JF, Candès EJ, Shen Z. A singular value thresholding algorithm for matrix completion. SIAM J Optimiz 2010; 20: 1956-1982. doi: 10.1137/080738970
33. Block KT, Uecker M, Frahm J. Undersampled radial MRI with multiple coils. Iterative image reconstruction using a total variation constraint. Magn Reson Med 2007; 57: 1086-1098. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21236
34. Santos JM, Cunningham CH, Lustig M, Hargreaves BA, Hu BS, Nishimura DG, Pauly JM. Single breath-hold whole-heart MRA using variable-density spirals at 3T. Magn Reson Med 2006; 55: 371-379. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20765
35. Liu G, Ali MM, Yoo B, Griswold MA, Tkach JA, Pagel MD. PARACEST MRI with improved temporal resolution. Magn Reson Med 2009; 61: 399-408. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21863
36. Witte C, Kunth M, Döpfert J, Rossella F, Schröder L. Hyperpolarized xenon for NMR and MRI applications. J Vis Exp 2012; e4268. doi: 10.3791/4268
37. Singular Value Threshholding. Available from: http://www-stat.stanford.edu/~candes/svt [1 August 2012].
38. Gudbjartsson H, Patz S. The rician distribution of noisy MRI data. Magn Reson Med 1995; 34: 910-914. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910340618