Developing and applying an information literacy rubric to student annotated bibliographies

Evidence Based Library and Information Practice

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 5-18

  Rinto, Erin E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886302269     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1715720X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.18438/b8559f     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Avery, E.F. (2003). Assessing information literacy instruction. In E.F. Avery (Ed.), Assessing student learning outcomes for information literacy instruction in academic institutions (pp. 1-5). Chicago, IL: ACRL.
2. Arter, J. A. & McTighe, J. (2001). Scoring rubrics in the classroom: Using performance criteria for assessing and improving student performance. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
3. Callison, D. (2000). Rubrics. School Library Media Activities Monthly, 17(2), 34-36, 42.
4. Choinski, E., Mark, A. E., & Murphey, M. (2003). Assessment with rubrics: Efficient and objective means of assessing student outcomes in an information resources class. portal: Libraries & the Academy, 3(4), 563.
5. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37-46.
6. Conger, A.J. (1980). Integration and generalization of kappas for multiple raters. Psychological Bulletin, 88(2), 322-328.
7. Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
8. Emmons, M., & Martin, W. (2002). Engaging conversation: Evaluating the contribution of library instruction to the quality of student research. College & Research Libraries, 63(6), 545-60.
9. Fagerheim, B. A. & Shrode, F.G. (2009). Information literacy rubrics within the disciplines. Communications in Information Literacy, 3(2), 158-170.
10. Fleiss, J.L. (1971). Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin, 76(5), 378-382.
11. Gwet, K. (2010). Handbook of inter-rater reliability, 2nd ed. Gaithersburg, MD: Advanced Analytics.
12. Hand, D.J. (2008). Statistics: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. van Helvoort, J. (2010). A scoring rubric for performance assessment of information literacy in Dutch higher education. Journal of Information Literacy, 4(1), 22-39.
14. Hoffman, D. & LaBonte, K. (2012). Meeting information literacy outcomes: Partnering with faculty to create effective information literacy assessment. Journal of Information Literacy, 6(2), 70-85.
15. Huba, M. E. & Freed, J. E. (2000). Learner-centered assessment on college campuses: Shifting the focus from teaching to learning. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
16. Information literacy competency standards for higher education. (2000). Retrieved August 23, 2013 from http://www.acrl.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/standards/standards.pdf
17. Johnson, R. L., Penny, J. A., & Gordon, B. (2009) Assessing performance: Designing, scoring, and validating performance tasks. New York: The Guilford Press.
18. Knight, L. A. (2006). Using rubrics to assess information literacy. Reference Services Review, 34(1), 43-55. doi: 101108/00907320510631571
19. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159-174. Retrieved august 23, 2013 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2529310
20. Maki, P. (2010). Assessing for learning: Building a sustainable commitment across the institution (2nd ed.). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
21. Mertler, C. A. (2001). Designing scoring rubrics for your classroom. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(25).
22. Montgomery, K. (2002). Authentic tasks and rubrics: Going beyond traditional assessments in college teaching. College Teaching, 50(1), 34-39. doi: 10.1080/87567550209595870
23. Moskal, B. (2003). Recommendations for developing classroom performance assessments and scoring rubrics. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 8(14).
24. Oakleaf, M. (2007). Using rubrics to collect evidence for decision-making: What do librarians need to learn? Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 2(3), 27-42.
25. Oakleaf, M. (2009). Using rubrics to assess information literacy: An examination of methodology and interrater reliability. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(5), 969-983. doi: 10.1002/asi.21030
26. Oakleaf, M. & Kaske, N. (2009). Guiding questions for assessing information literacy in higher education. portal: Libraries & the Academy, 9(2), 273-286. doi: 10.1353/pla.0.0046
27. Rockman, I. F. (2002). Strengthening connections between information literacy, general education, and assessment efforts. Library Trends, 51(2), 185-198.
28. Stemler, S. E. (2004). A comparison of consensus, consistency, and measurement approaches to estimating interrater reliability. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 9(4).
29. Stevens, D. D. & Levi, A. (2005). Introduction to rubrics :An assessment tool to save grading time, convey effective feedback, and promote student learning (1st ed.). Sterling, VA: Stylus.