The role of the striatum in goal activation of cascaded actions

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 51, Issue 13, 2013, Pages 2562-2571

  Ness, Vanessa ^a   Beste, Christian ^b  

^a RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

^b DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Action chunking; Action selection; Caudate; Stop change; Striatum

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BOLD SIGNAL; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; BRAIN FUNCTION; CAUDATE NUCLEUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORPUS STRIATUM; FEMALE; FRONTAL CORTEX; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFERIOR FRONTAL GYRUS; MALE; MOTIVATION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NEOCORTEX; NORMAL HUMAN; PARIETAL CORTEX; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ACTION CHUNKING; ACTION SELECTION; CAUDATE; STOP-CHANGE; STRIATUM;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; CORPUS STRIATUM; FEMALE; GOALS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; OXYGEN; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84886265516     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: 18733514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.09.032     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bar-Gad I., Morris G., Bergman H. Information processing, dimensionality reduction and reinforcement learning in the basal ganglia. Progress in Neurobiology 2003, 71:439-473.
2. Boecker M., Drueke B., Vorhold V., Knops A., Philippen B., Gauggel S. When response inhibition is followed by response reengagement: An event-related fMRI study. Human Brain Mapping 2011, 32:94-106.
3. Bor D., Duncan J., Wiseman R.J., Owen A.M. Encoding strategies dissociate prefrontal activity from working memory demand. Neuron 2003, 37:361-367.
4. Botvinick M.M., Cohen J.D., Carter C.S. Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: An update. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2004, 3:539-546.
5. Botvinick M., Nystrom L.E., Fissell K., Carter C.S., Cohen J.D. Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex. Nature 1999, 402:179-181.
6. Brass M., Derrfuss J., Cramon D.Y. The inhibition of imitative and overlearned responses: A functional double dissociation. Neuropsychologia 2005, 43:89-98.
7. Bush G., Luu P., Posner M.I. Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000, 4:215-222.
8. Carter C.S., Mintum M., Cohen J.D. Interference and facilitation effects during selective spatial attention: An H215O PET study of Stroop task performance. NeuroImage 1995, 2:264-272.
9. Chersi F., Ferrari P.F., Fogassi L. Neuronal chains for actions in the parietal lobe: A computational model. PLoS One 2011, 6.
10. Collette F., Olivier L., Van der Linden M., Laureys S., Delfiore G., Luxen A., et al. Involvement of both prefrontal and inferior parietal cortex in dual-task performance. Brain Research Cognitive Brain Research 2005, 24:237-251.
11. Duncan J. The multiple-demand (MD) system of the primate brain: Mental programs for intelligent behavior. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2010, 14:172-179.
12. Duncan J., Owen A.M. Common regions of the human frontal lobe recruited by diverse cognitive demands. Trends in Neurosciences 2000, 23:475-483.
13. Frank M.J. Dynamic dopamine modulation in the basal ganglia: A neurocomputational account of cognitive deficits in medicated and non-medicated parkinsonism. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2005, 17:51-72.
14. Gehring W.J., Knight R.T. Prefrontal-cingulate interactions in action monitoring. Nature Neuroscience 2000, 3:516-520.
15. Graybiel A.M. The basal ganglia and chunking of action repertoires. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 1998, 70:119-136.
16. Henson R. Efficient experimental design for fMRI. Statistical parametric mapping: The analysis of functional brain images 2007, Elsevier/Academic Press, Amsterdam, Boston. 1st ed. W. Penny, K. Friston, J. Ashburner, S. Kiebel, T. Nichols (Eds.).
17. Humphries M.D., Stewart R.D., Gurney K.N. A physiological plausible model of action selection and oscillatory activity in the basal ganglia. Journal of Neuroscience 2006, 26:12921-12942.
18. Jung E.Y., Shim I. Differential DAergic control of D1 and D2 receptor agonist over locomotor activity and GABA level in the striatum. Experimental Neurobiology 2011, 20:153-157.
19. Karch S., Feuerecker R., Leicht G., Meindl T., Hantschk I., Kirsch V., et al. Separating distinct aspects of the voluntary selection between response alternatives: N2- and P3-related BOLD responses. NeuroImage 2010, 15:356-364.
20. Koechlin E., Ody C., Kouneiher F. The architecture of cognitive control in the human prefrontal cortex. Science 2003, 302:1181-1185.
21. Lebloi A., Boraud T., Meissner W., Bergman H., Hansel D. Competition between feedback loops underlies normal and pathological dynamics in the basal ganglia. Journal of Neuroscience 2006, 26:3567-3583.
22. Logan G.D., Cowan W.B. On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control. Psychology Review 1984, 91:295-327.
23. Meyer D.E., Kieras D.E. A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. Psychology Review 1997, 104:3-65.
24. Middleton F.A., Strick P.L. Basal ganglia and cerebellar loops: Motor and cognitive circuits. Brain Research Reviews 2000, 3:236-250.
25. Miller E.K., Cohen J.D. An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2001, 24:167-202.
26. Miller J., Ulrich R., Rolke B. On the optimality of serial and parallel processing in the psychological refractory period paradigm: Effects of the distribution of stimulus onset asynchronies. Cognitive Psychology 2009, 58:273-310.
27. Mückschel M., Stock A.K., Beste C. Psychophysiological mechanisms of interindivdual differences in goal activation modes during action cascading. Cerebral Cortex 2013, ([Epub ahead of print]).
28. Oberauer K., Kliegl R. Simultaneous cognitive operations in working memory after dual-task practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2004, 30:689-707.
29. Plenz D. When inhibition goes incognito: Feedback interaction between spiny projection neurons in striatal function. Trends in Neurosciences 2003, 26:436-443.
30. Redgrave P., Prescott T.J., Gurney K. The basal ganglia: A vertebrate solution to the selection problem?. Neuroscience 1999, 89:1009-1023.
31. Robbins T. Shifting and stopping: Fronto-striatal substrates, neurochemical modulation and clinical implications. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London B: Biological Sciences 2007, 362:917-932.
32. Rogers R., Monsell S. Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1995, 124:207-231.
33. Schwarz W., Ischebeck A. On the interpretation of response time vs. onset asynchrony functions: Application to dual-task and precue-utilization paradigms. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 2001, 45:452-479.
34. Sommer W., Leuthold H., Schubert T. Multiple bottlenecks in information processing? An electrophyisological examination. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2001, 8:81-88.
35. Talairach J., Tournoux P. Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain 1988, Thieme, New York.
36. Verbruggen F., Schneider D.W., Logan G.D. How to Stopp and change a response: The role of goal activation in multitasking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34:1212-1228.
37. Ward B. (2002) Deconvulation analysis of fMRI time series data. Available: http://afni.nimh.nih.gov/pub/dist/doc/manual/Deconvolvem.pdf.%20Accessed%202012%20Jan%2025.
38. Wickens J.R., Arbuthnott G.W., Shindou T. Simulation of GABA function in the basal ganglia: Computational models of GABAergic mechanisms in basal ganglia function. Progress in Brain Research 2007, 160:313-329.
39. Wu C., Liu Y. Queuing Network modeling of psychological refractory period (PRP). Psychological Reviews 2008, 115:912-954.