What corporate environmental sustainability can do for industrial-organizational psychology

Green Organizations: Driving Change with I-O Psychology

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 379-392

  Aguinis, Herman ^a   Glavas, Ante ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886287678     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203142936     Document Type: Chapter

References (37)

1. Aguinis, H. (Ed.) (2004). Test-score banding in human resource selection: Legal, technical, and societal issues. Westport, CT: Praeger.
2. Aguinis, H. (2011). Organizational responsibility: Doing good and doing well. in S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 855-879). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
3. Aguinis, H. (2013). Performance management (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
4. Aguinis, H., Boyd, B. K., Pierce, C. A., & Short, J. C. (2011). Walking new avenues in management research methods and theories: Bridging micro and macro domains. Journal of Management, 37, 395-403.
5. Aguinis, H., Cortina, J. M., & Goldberg, E. (1998). A new procedure for computing equivalence bands in personnel selection. Human Performance, 11, 351-365.
6. Aguinis, H., Cortina, J. M., & Goldberg, E. (2000). A clarifying note on differences between the W.F. Cascio, J. Outzz, S. Zedeck, and I.L. Goldstein (1991) and H. Aguinis, J.M. Cortina, and E. Goldberg (1998) banding procedures. Human Performance, 13, 199-204.
7. Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38, 932-968.
8. Aguinis, H., Joo, H., & Gottfredson, R. K. (2011). Why we hate performance management-and why we should love it. Business Horizons, 54, 503-507.
9. Aguinis, H., & Kraiger, K. (2009). Benefits of training and development for individuals and teams, organizations, and society. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 451-474.
10. Aguinis, H., & Smith, M. A. (2007). Understanding the impact of test validity and bias on selection errors and adverse impact in human resource selection. Personnel Psychology, 60, 165-199.
11. Baritz, L. (1960). The servants of power. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
12. Barney, J. B., Ketchen, D. J., & Wright, M. (2011). The future of resource-based theory: Revitalization or decline? Journal of Management, 37, 1299-1315.
13. Barrett, G. V., & Lueke, S. B. (2004). Legal and practical implications of banding for personnel selection. in H. Aguinis (Ed.), Test-score banding in human resource selection: Legal, technical, and societal issues (pp. 71-111). Westport, CT: Praeger.
14. Bertels, S., Papania, L., & Papaniam, D. (2010). Embedding sustainability in organizational culture: A systematic review of the body of knowledge. London, Ontario: Network for Business Sustainability.
15. Cascio, W. F., & Aguinis, H. (2008). Research in industrial and organizational psychology from 1963 to 2007: Changes, choices, and trends. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1062-1081.
16. Cascio, W. F., & Aguinis, H. (2011). Applied psychology in human resource management (7th).
17. Foss, N. J. (2011). Why micro-foundations for resource-based theory are needed and what they may look like. Journal of Management, 37, 1413-1428.
18. Humphrey, S. E., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: A meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1332-1356.
19. Laszlo, C., & Zhexembayeva, N. (2011). Embedded sustainability: The next big competitive advantage. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
20. Murphy, K. R. (2004). Conflicting values and interests in banding research and practice. in H. Aguinis (Ed.), Test-score banding in human resource selection: Legal, technical, and societal issues (pp. 175-192). Westport, CT: Praeger.
21. Osterman, P. (2009). The truth about middle managers. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
22. Palmer, D. (2006). Taking stock of the criteria we use to evaluate one another’s work: ASQ fifty years out. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51, 535-559.
23. Pratt, M. G., & Ashforth, B. E. (2003). Fostering meaningfulness in working and meaningfulness at work: An identity perspective. in K. Cameron, J. E. Dutton & R. E. Quinn (Eds), Positive organizational scholarship (pp. 309-327). San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
24. Rogelberg, S. G. (2007). Introduction. in S. G. Rogelberg (Ed.), Encyclopedia of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. xxxv-xxxvii). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Rousseau, D. M. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: Written and unwritten agreements. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
26. Rupp, D. E. (2011). An employee-centered model of organizational justice and social responsibility. Organizational Psychology Review, 1, 72-94.
27. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2004). SED banding as a test of scientific values in I/O psychology. in H. Aguinis (Ed.), Test-score banding in human resource selection: Legal, technical, and societal issues (pp. 151-173). Westport, CT: Praeger.
28. Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 225-243.
29. Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology (2012). Mission statement. Retrieved January 29, 2012 from http://www.siop.org/mission.aspx
30. Swanson, D. L. (1999). Toward an integrative theory of business and society: A research strategy for corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 24, 506-521.
31. “The battle for brainpower” (2006, October 5). The Economist. Retrieved January 29, 2012, from http://www.economist.com/node/7961894
32. Turban, D. B. & Greening, D. W. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 658-672.
33. Tushman, M., & O’Reilly, C., (2007). Research and relevance: Implications of Pasteur’s quadrant for doctoral programs and faculty development. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 769-774.
34. Vlachos, P. A., Tsamakos, A., Vrechopoulus, A. P., & Avramidis, P. K. (2009). Corporate social responsibility: Attributions, loyalty, and the mediating role of trust. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37, 170-190.
35. Wrzesniewski, A. (2003). Finding positive meaning in work. in K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline (pp. 296-308). San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
36. Wrzesniewski, A., Dutton, J. E., & Debebe, G. (2003). Interpersonal sense making and the meaning of work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 93-135.
37. Zedeck, S. (Ed.) (2011). APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.