Screening for data clustering in multicenter studies: The residual intraclass correlation

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Wynants, Laure ^a   Timmerman, Dirk ^a,b   Bourne, Tom ^a,c,d   Van Huffel, Sabine ^a   Van Calster, Ben ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^c QUEEN CHARLOTTE S AND CHELSEA HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CA 125 ANTIGEN;

ARTICLE; BLOOD; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MULTICENTER STUDY (TOPIC); OBSERVER VARIATION; OVARY TUMOR; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

CA-125 ANTIGEN; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MULTICENTER STUDIES AS TOPIC; OBSERVER VARIATION; OVARIAN NEOPLASMS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 84885970943     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712288     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-128     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Multicenter collaboration in observational research: improving generalizability and efficiency. Sprague S, Matta JM, Bhandari M, Dodgin D, Clark CR, Kregor P, Bradley G, Little L, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009 91 Suppl 3 80 86
2. Some controversies in planning and analysing multi-centre trials. Senn S, Stat Med 1998 17 15-16 1753 1765 discussion 1799-1800
3. Adjustments for center in multicenter studies: an overview. Localio AR, Berlin JA, Ten Have TR, Kimmel SE, Ann Intern Med 2001 135 2 112 123
4. Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL, Psychol Bull 1979 86 2 420 428
5. Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. McGraw KO, Wong SP, Psychol Methods 1996 1 1 30 46
6. A quantitative review of ethnic group differences in experimental pain response: do biology, psychology, and culture matter? Rahim-Williams B, Riley JL 3rd, Williams AK, Fillingim RB, Pain Med 2012 13 4 522 540
7. Ongoing monitoring of data clustering in multicenter studies. Guthrie LB, Oken E, Sterne JA, Gillman MW, Patel R, Vilchuck K, Bogdanovich N, Kramer MS, Martin RM, BMC Med Res Methodol 2012 12 29
8. Snijders TAB, Bosker RJ, Multilevel analysis: an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling London: London: Sage 2 2012
9. Intraclass correlation coefficients and bootstrap methods of hierarchical binary outcomes. Ren S, Yang S, Lai S, Stat Med 2006 25 20 3576 3588
10. Prediction in multilevel generalized linear models. Skrondal A, Rabe-Hesketh S, J R Stat Soc A Stat Soc 2009 172 3 659 687
11. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y, J Roy Stat Soc Ser B (Methodol) 1995 57 1 289 300
12. Improving strategies for diagnosing ovarian cancer: a summary of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) studies. Kaijser J, Bourne T, Valentin L, Sayasneh A, Van Holsbeke C, Vergote I, Testa AC, Franchi D, Van Calster B, Timmerman D, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013 41 1 9
13. Logistic regression model to distinguish between the benign and malignant adnexal mass before surgery: a multicenter study by the international ovarian tumor analysis group. Timmerman D, Testa AC, Bourne T, Ferrazzi E, Ameye L, Konstantinovic ML, Van Calster B, Collins WP, Vergote I, Van Huffel S, et al. J Clin Oncol 2005 23 34 8794 8801
14. Ovarian cancer prediction in adnexal masses using ultrasound-based logistic regression models: a temporal and external validation study by the IOTA group. Timmerman D, Van Calster B, Testa AC, Guerriero S, Fischerova D, Lissoni AA, Van Holsbeke C, Fruscio R, Czekierdowski A, Jurkovic D, et al. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010 36 2 226 234
15. External validation of diagnostic models to estimate the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses. Van Holsbeke C, Van Calster B, Bourne T, Ajossa S, Testa AC, Guerriero S, Fruscio R, Lissoni AA, Czekierdowski A, Savelli L, et al. Clin Canc Res 2012 18 3 815 825
16. Prospective internal validation of mathematical models to predict malignancy in adnexal masses: results from the international ovarian tumor analysis study. Van Holsbeke C, Van Calster B, Testa AC, Domali E, Lu C, Van Huffel S, Valentin L, Timmerman D, Clin Canc Res 2009 15 2 684 691
17. World Health Organization classification of tumours, Pathology and genetics of the breast and female genital organs Lyon: IARC Press 2003
18. Steyerberg EW, Clinical Prediction Models: A Practical Approach to Development, Validation, and Updating New York, NY: Springer US, New York, NY 2009
19. Methodologic standards for the development of clinical decision rules in emergency medicine. Stiell IG, Wells GA, Ann Emerg Med 1999 33 4 437 447
20. Harrell FE, Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis New York (N.Y.): Springer 2001
21. Assessing potential sources of clustering in individually randomised trials. Kahan B, Morris T, BMC Med Res Methodol 2013 13 1 58
22. Analysis of multicentre trials with continuous outcomes: when and how should we account for centre effects? Kahan BC, Morris TP, Stat Med 2013 32 7 1136 1149
23. Prediction models for clustered data: comparison of a random intercept and standard regression model. Bouwmeester W, Twisk J, Kappen T, Klei W, Moons K, Vergouwe Y, BMC Med Res Methodol 2013 13 1 19
24. Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Maas CJM, Hox JJ, Methodol Eur J Res Meth Behav Soc Sci 2005 1 3 86 92
25. A simulation study of sample size for multilevel logistic regression models. Moineddin R, Matheson FI, Glazier RH, et al. BMC Med Res Methodol 2007 7 34 34
26. Sample size and accuracy of estimates in multilevel models. Paccagnella O, Methodol Eur J Res Meth Behav Soc Sci 2011 7 3 111 120
27. Imputing missing covariate values for the Cox model. White IR, Royston P, Stat Med 2009 28 15 1982 1998