Logistic regression model to distinguish between the benign and malignant adnexal mass before surgery: A multicenter study by the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Group

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Volumn 23, Issue 34, 2005, Pages 8794-8801

  Timmerman, Dirk ^a   Testa, Antonia C ^a   Bourne, Tom ^a   Ferrazzi, Enrico ^a   Ameye, Lieveke ^a   Konstantinovic, Maja L ^a   Van Calster, Ben ^a   Collins, William P ^a   Vergote, Ignace ^a   Van Huffel, Sabine ^a   Valentin, Lil ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CA 125 ANTIGEN; TUMOR MARKER;

ADNEXA TUMOR; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASCITES TUMOR; BENIGN TUMOR; BLOOD FLOW; CANCER PAIN; CLINICAL TRIAL; FEMALE; FEMALE GENITAL TRACT CANCER; HORMONAL THERAPY; HUMAN; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; MULTICENTER STUDY; OVARY CANCER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOLID TUMOR; ADNEXA DISEASE; BLOOD; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CYSTADENOMA; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OVARIECTOMY; OVARY CYST; OVARY TUMOR; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS;

ADNEXAL DISEASES; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CA-125 ANTIGEN; CYSTADENOMA, MUCINOUS; CYSTADENOMA, PAPILLARY; CYSTADENOMA, SEROUS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OVARIAN CYSTS; OVARIAN NEOPLASMS; OVARIECTOMY; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TUMOR MARKERS, BIOLOGICAL;

EID: 33644836410     PISSN: 0732183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.7632     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Vergote I, De Brabanter J, Fyles A, et al: Prognostic importance of degree of differentiation and cyst rupture in stage I invasive epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Lancet 357:176-182, 2001
2. Granberg S, Wikland M, Jansson I: Macroscopic characterization of ovarian tumors and the relation to the histological diagnosis: Criteria to be used for ultrasound evaluation. Gynecol Oncol 35:139-144, 1989
3. Sassone AM, Timor-Tritsch IE, Artner A, et al: Transvaginal sonographic characterisation of ovarian disease: Evaluation of a new scoring system to predict ovarian malignancy. Obstet Gynecol 78:70-76, 1991
4. Timor-Tritsch LE, Lerner JP, Monteagudo A, et al: Transvaginal ultrasonographic characterization of ovarian masses by means of color flow-directed Doppler measurements and a morphologic scoring system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 168:909-913, 1993
5. Lerner JP, Timor-Tritsch IE, Federman A, et al: Transvaginal ultrasonographic characterization of ovarian masses with an improved, weighted scoring system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170:81-85, 1994
6. Bourne T, Campbell S, Steer CV, et al: Transvaginal colour flow imaging: A possible new screening technique for ovarian cancer. BMJ 299:1367-1370, 1989
7. Jacobs I, Oram D, Fairbanks J, et al: A risk of malignancy index incorporating CA 125, ultrasound and menopausal status for the accurate preoperative diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 97:922-929, 1990
8. Tailor A, Jurkovic D, Bourne TH, et al: Sonographic prediction of malignancy in adnexal masses using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 10:41-47, 1997
9. Timmerman D, Bourne T, Tailor A, et al: A comparison of methods for the pre-operative discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses: The development of a new logistic regression model. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181:57-65, 1999
10. Timmerman D, Verreist H, Bourne TH, et al: Artificial neural network models for the preoperative discrimination between malignant and benign adnexal masses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 13:17-25, 1999
11. Tailor A, Jurkovic D, Bourne TH, et al: Sonographic prediction of malignancy in adnexal masses using an artificial neural network. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 106:21-30, 1999
12. Aslam N, Banerjee S, Carr JV, et al: Prospective evaluation of logistic regression models for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol 96:75-80, 2000
13. Mol BWJ, Boll D, De Kanter M, et al.: Distinguishing the benign and malignant adnexal mass: An external validation of prognostic models. Gynecol Oncol 80:162-167, 2001
14. Valentin L, Hagen B, Tingulstad S, et al: Comparison of 'pattern recognition' and logistic regression models for discrimination between benign and malignant pelvic masses: A prospective cross validation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 18:357-365, 2001
15. Aerts S, Antal P, Timmerman D, et al: Web based data collection for ovarian cancer: A case study. Proceedings of the 15th IEEE Symposium on Computer Based Medical Systems (CBMS), Maribor, Slovenia, 2002 (abstr)
16. Timmerman D, Valentin L, Bourne TH, et al: Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the ultrasonographic features of adnexal tumors: A consensus opinion from the international ovarian tumor analysis (IOTA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 16:500-505, 2000
17. Heintz APM, Odicino F, Maisonneuve P, et al: Carcinoma of the Ovary: 25th Annual Report on the Results of Treatment in Gynecological Cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 83:S135-S137, 2003 (suppl 1)
18. Harrell FE Jr: Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis. New York, NY, Springer Series in Statistics, 2001
19. Hastie T, Tibshirani R: Generalized Additive Models: Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability. Boca Ratan, FL, Chapman and Hall, 1999
20. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S: Applied Logistic Regression: Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. New York, NY, John Wiley & Sons, 2000
21. De Long ER, De Long DM, Clarke-Pearson DL: Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: A nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44:837-845, 1988
22. Timmerman D, Verrelst H, Collins WP, et al: Distinguishing the benign and malignant adnexal mass: An external validation of prognostic models. Gynecol Oncol 83:166-168, 2001
23. Timmerman D, Schwärzler P, Collins WP, et al: Subjective assessment of adnexal masses using ultrasonography: An analysis of interobserver variability and experience. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 13:11-16, 1999
24. Valentin L: Pattern recognition of pelvic masses by gray-scale ultrasound imaging: The contribution of Doppler ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 14:338-347, 1999
25. Goldstein SR, Subramanyam B, Snyder J, et al: The postmenopausal cystic adnexal mass: The potential role of ultrasound in conservative management. Obstet Gynecol 73:8-10, 1988
26. Obwegeser R, Deutinger J, Bernascheck G: The risk of malignancy with an apparently simple adnexal cyst on ultrasound. Arch Gynecol Obstet 253:117-120, 1993
27. Kroon E, Andolf E: Diagnosis and follow-up of simple ovarian cysts detected by ultrasound in postmenopausal women. Obstet Gynecol 85: 211-214, 1995
28. Gerber B, Muller H, Kulz T, et al: Simple ovarian cysts in premenopausal patients. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 57:49-55, 1997
29. Bailey C, Ueland F, Land GL, et al: The malignant potential of small cystic ovarian tumors in women over 50 years of age. Gynecol Oncol 69:3-7, 1998
30. Ekerhovd E, Wienerroith H, Staudach A, et al: Preoperative assessment of unilocular adnexal cysts by transvaginal sonography: A comparison between sonographic morphological imaging and histopathologic diagnosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184:48-54, 2001
31. Jermy K, Luise C, Bourne T: The characterization of common ovarian cysts in premenopausal women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 17: 140-144, 2001