Imbalance of predator and prey armament: Geographic clines in phenotypic interface and natural selection

American Naturalist

Volumn 167, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 105-117

  Toju, Hirokazu ^a,b   Sota, Teiji ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Arms race; Coevolution; Exaggeration; Geographic mosaic; Latitudinal gradient; Predator prey interactions

Indexed keywords

ARMS RACE; CLINE; COEVOLUTION; LATITUDINAL GRADIENT; NATURAL SELECTION; PLANT DEFENSE; PLANT-HERBIVORE INTERACTION; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COPULATION; ECOSYSTEM; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; GEOGRAPHY; JAPAN; MALE; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; PREDATION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SPERMATOGONIUM; WEEVIL;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; COPULATION; ECOSYSTEM; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GEOGRAPHY; JAPAN; MALE; PHENOTYPE; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR; SELECTION (GENETICS); SELECTION, GENETIC; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; SPERMATOGONIA; WEEVILS;

ASIA; EURASIA; FAR EAST; JAPAN;

CAMELLIA; CAMELLIA JAPONICA; CURCULIO CAMELLIAE;

EID: 29844432160     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/498277     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Abrams, P. A. 1986. Adaptive responses of predators to prey and prey to predators: the failure of the arms-race analogy. Evolution 40:1229-1247.
2. _. 2000. The evolution of predator-prey interactions: theory and evidence. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31:79-105.
3. Arnold, S. J., and M. J. Wade. 1984. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: theory. Evolution 38:709-719.
4. Benkman, C. W. 1999. The selection mosaic and diversifying coevolution between crossbills and lodgepole pine. American Naturalist 153(suppl.):S75-S91.
5. Benkman, C. W., W. C. Holimon, and J. W. Smith. 2001. The influence of a competitor on the geographic mosaic of coevolution between crossbills and lodgepole pine. Evolution 55:282-294.
6. Berenbaum, M. R., and A. R. Zangerl. 1998. Chemical phenotype matching between a plant and its insect herbivore. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 95:13743-13748.
7. Bertness, M. D., S. D. Garrity, and S. C. Levings. 1981. Predation pressure and gastropod foraging: a tropical-temperate comparison. Evolution 35:995-1007.
8. Bishop, Y. M. M., P. W. Holland, and S. E. Fienberg. 1975. Discrete multivariate analysis: theory and practice. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
9. Brockhurst, M. A., A. D. Morgan, P. B. Rainey, and A. Buckling. 2003. Population mixing accelerates coevolution. Ecology Letters 6:975-979.
10. Brodie, E. D., III, and E. D. Brodie Jr. 1991. Evolutionary response of predators to dangerous prey: reduction of toxicity of newts and resistance of garter snakes in island populations. Evolution 45: 221-224.
11. _. 1999. Predator-prey arms races? asymmetrical selection on predators and prey may be reduced when prey are dangerous. BioScience 49:557-568.
12. Brodie, E. D., III, and B. J. Ridenhour. 2003. Reciprocal selection at the phenotypic interface of coevolution. Integrative and Comparative Biology 43:408-418.
13. Brodie, E. D., III, A. J. Moore, and F. J. Janzen. 1995. Visualizing and quantifying natural selection. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 10:313-318.
14. Brodie, E. D., Jr., B. J. Ridenhour, and E. D. Brodie III. 2002. The evolutionary response of predators to dangerous prey: hotspots and coldspots in the geographic mosaic of coevolution between garter snakes and newts. Evolution 56:2067-2082.
15. Carroll, S. P., and C. Boyd. 1992. Host race radiation in the soapberry bug: natural-history with the history. Evolution 46:1052-1069.
16. Carroll, S. P., H. Dingle, and S. P. Klassen. 1997. Genetic differentiation of fitness-associated traits among rapidly evolving populations of the soapberry bug. Evolution 51:1182-1188.
17. Carroll, S. P., S. T. P. Klassen, and H. Dingle. 1998. Rapidly evolving adaptations to host ecology and nutrition in the soapberry bug. Evolutionary Ecology 12:955-968.
18. Carroll, S. P., H. Dingle, and T. R. Famula. 2003. Rapid appearance of epistasis during adaptive divergence following colonization. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 270(suppl.):80-83.
19. Chung, M. G., and M. Y. Chung. 2000. Levels and partitioning of genetic diversity of Camellia japonica (Theaceae) in Korea and Japan. Silvae Genetica 49:119-124.
20. Chung, M. G., and S. S. Kang. 1996. Genetic variation within and among populations of Camellia japonica (Theaceae) in Korea. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 26:537-542.
21. Chung, M. Y., B. K. Epperson, and M. G. Chung. 2003. Genetic structure of age classes in Camellia japonica (Theaceae). Evolution 57:62-73.
22. Darwin, C. 1859. On the origin of species by means of natural selection. J. Murray, London.
23. Dawkins, R., and J. R. Krebs. 1979. Arms races between and within species. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 205:489-511.
24. Dietl, G. R. 2003. Coevolution of a marine gastropod predator and its dangerous bivalve prey. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 80:409-436.
25. Dybdahl, M. F., and C. M. Lively. 1996. The geography of coevolution: comparative population structures for a snail and its trematode parasite. Evolution 50:2264-2275.
26. Ehrlich, P. R., and P. H. Raven. 1964. Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution 18:586-608.
27. Fang, H. 1997. Tea oil camellia. Economy Management Press, Beijing. [In Chinese.]
28. Feder, J. L., S. H. Berlocher, J. B. Roethele, H. Dambroski, J. J. Smith, W. L. Perry, V. Gavrilovic, et al. 2003. Allopatric genetic origins for sympatric host-plant shifts and race formation in Rhagoletis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 100: 10314-10319.
29. Forde, S. E., J. N. Thompson, and B. J. M. Bohannan. 2004. Adaptation varies through space and time in a coevolving host-parasitoid interaction. Nature 431:841-844.
30. Geffeney, S., E. D. Brodie Jr., P. C. Ruben, and E. D. Brodie III. 2002. Mechanisms of adaptation in a predator-prey arms race: TTX-resistant sodium channels. Science 297:1336-1339.
31. Geffeney, S. L., E. Fujimoto, E. D. Brodie Jr., P. C. Ruben, and E. D. Brodie III. 2005. Evolutionary diversification of TTX-resistant sodium channels in a predator-prey interaction. Nature 434:759-763.
32. Gomulkiewicz, R., J. N. Thompson, R. D. Holt, S. L. Nuismer, and M. E. Hochberg. 2000. Hot spots, cold spots, and the geographic mosaic theory of coevolution. American Naturalist 156:156-174.
33. Hanifin, C. T., M. Yotsu-Yamashita, T. Yasumoto, E. D. Brodie III, and E. D. Brodie Jr. 1999. Toxicity of dangerous prey: variation of tetrodotoxin levels within and among populations of the newt Taricha granulosa. Journal of Chemical Ecology 25:2161-2175.
34. Hereford, J., T. F. Hansen, and D. Houle. 2004. Comparing strengths of directional selection: how strong is strong? Evolution 58:2133-2143.
35. Hochberg, M. E., and M. van Baalen. 1998. Antagonistic coevolution over productivity gradients. American Naturalist 152:620-634.
36. Hughes, J., and A. P. Vogler. 2004a. Ecomorphological adaptation of acorn weevils to their oviposition site. Evolution 58:1971-1983.
37. _. 2004b. The phylogeny of acorn weevils (genus Curculio) from mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences: the problem of incomplete data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 32:601-615.
38. International Plant Genetic Resource Institute. 1997. Descriptions for tea (Camellia sinensis). International Plant Genetic Resource Institute, Rome.
39. Janzen, F. J., and H. S. Stern. 1998. Logistic regression for empirical studies of multivariate selection. Evolution 52:1564-1571.
40. Keng, H. 1962. Comparative morphological studies in Theaceae. University of California Publications in Botany 33:269-384.
41. Kojima, H., and K. Morimoto. 2004. An online checklist and database of the Japanese weevils (Insecta: Coleoptera: Curculionoidea) (excepting Scolytidae and Platypodidae). Bulletin of the Kyushu University Museum 2:33-147.
42. Kraaijeveld, A. R., and H. C. J. Godfray. 1999. Geographic patterns in the evolution of resistance and virulence in Drosophila and its parasitoids. American Naturalist 153(suppl.):S61-S74.
43. Kunitake, Y. K., M. Hasegawa, T. Miyashita, and H. Higuchi. 2004. Role of a seasonally specialist bird Zosterops japonica on pollen transfer and reproductive success of Camellia japonica in a temperate area. Plant Species Biology 19:197-201.
44. Lande, R., and S. J. Arnold. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37:1210-1226.
45. Lively, C. M., and M. F. Dybdahl. 2000. Parasite adaptation to locally common host genotypes. Nature 405:679-681.
46. Maeto, K., and K. Ozaki. 2003. Prolonged diapause of specialist seed-feeders makes predator satiation unstable in masting of Quercus crispula. Oecologia (Berlin) 137:392-398.
47. Menu, F. 1993. Strategies of emergence in the chestnut weevil Curculio elephas (Coleoptera, Curculionidae). Oecologia (Berlin) 96: 383-390.
48. Nuismer, S. L., J. N. Thompson, and R. Gomulkiewicz. 1999. Gene flow and geographically structured coevolution. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 266:605-609.
49. _. 2000. Coevolutionary clines across selection mosaics. Evolution 54:1102-1115.
50. Oh, G. S., S. S. Kang, and M. G. Chung. 1996. Temporal genetic structure in Camellia japonica (Theaceae). Genes and Genetic Systems 71:9-13.
51. Okamoto, M. 1988a. Interactions between Camellia japonica and its seed predator Curculio camelliae. I. Observations on morphology, phenology and oviposition behaviors in Kinki district, Japan. Bulletin of the Osaka Museum of Natural History 43:15-37.
52. _. 1988b. Interactions between Camellia japonica and its seed predator Curculio camelliae. II. Stability and dynamics in Camellia-Curculio interactions. Plant Species Biology 3:99-108.
53. Price, G. R. 1970. Selection and covariance. Nature 227:520-521.
54. Prince, L. M., and C. R. Parks. 2001. Phylogenetic relationships of Theaceae inferred from chloroplast DNA sequence data. American Journal of Botany 88:2309-2320.
55. Rausher, M. D. 2001. Co-evolution and plant resistance to natural enemies. Nature 411:857-864.
56. Ridenhour, B. J. 2005. Identification of selective sources: partitioning selection based on interactions. American Naturalist 166:12-25.
57. Rudgers, J. A., and S. Y. Strauss. 2004. A selection mosaic in the facultative mutualism between ants and wild cotton. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 271:2481-2488.
58. Saito, T., and M. Suzuki. 1982. Life-history of Curculio camelliae Roelofs (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) and its susceptibility to Metarhizium anisopliae and Beauveria tenella. Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology 26:232-236. [In Japanese; English abstract.]
59. Saloniemi, I. 1993. A coevolutionary predator-prey model with quantitative characters. American Naturalist 141:880-896.
60. Sanford, E., M. S. Roth, G. C. Johns, J. P. Wares, and G. N. Somero. 2003. Local selection and latitudinal variation in a marine predator-prey interaction. Science 300:1135-1137.
61. Sasaki, A., and H. C. J. Godfray. 1999. A model for the coevolution of resistance and virulence in coupled host-parasitoid interactions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 266:455-463.
62. Satake, Y., H. Hara, S. Watari, and T. Tominari. 1989. Wild plants of Japan (woody plants I). Heibonsha, Tokyo. [In Japanese.]
63. Sealy, J. B. 1958. A revision of the genus Camellia. Royal Horticultural Society, London.
64. Sota, T. 1998. Microhabitat size distribution affects local difference in community structure: metazoan communities in treeholes. Researches on Population Ecology 40:249-255.
65. Steinberg, P. D., J. A. Estes, and F. C. Winter. 1995. Evolutionary consequences of food-chain length in kelp forest communities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 92: 8145-8148.
66. Thompson, J. N. 1994. The coevolutionary process. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
67. _. 1999a. The evolution of species interactions. Science 284: 2116-2118.
68. _. 1999b. Specific hypotheses on the geographic mosaic of coevolution. American Naturalist 153(suppl.):S1-S14.
69. _. 2005. The geographic mosaic of coevolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
70. Thompson, J. N., and B. M. Cunningham. 2002. Geographic structure and dynamics of coevolutionary selection. Nature 417:735-738.
71. Thompson, J. N., S. L. Nuismer, and R. Gomulkiewicz. 2002. Coevolution and maladaptation. Integrative and Comparative Biology 42:381-387.
72. Thrall, P. H., and J. J. Burdon. 2003. Evolution of virulence in a plant host-pathogen metapopulation. Science 299:1735-1737.
73. Ueno, S., N. Tomaru, H. Yoshimaru, T. Manabe, and S. Yamamoto. 2002. Size-class differences in genetic structure and individual distribution of Camellia japonica L. in a Japanese old-growth evergreen forest. Heredity 89:120-126.
74. van Valen, L. 1973. A new evolutionary law. Evolutionary Theory 1: 1-30.
75. Van Zandt, P. A., and S. Mopper. 1998. A meta-analysis of adaptive deme formation in phytophagous insect populations. American Naturalist 152:595-604.
76. Vermeij, G. J. 1978. Biogeography and adaptation. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
77. _. 1987. Evolution and escalation. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
78. _. 1994. The evolutionary interaction among species: selection, escalation, and coevolution. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 25:219-236.
79. Vermeij, G. J., and J. D. Currey. 1980. Geographical variation in the strength of Thaidid snail shells. Biological Bulletin 158:383-389.
80. Wendel, J. F., and C. R. Parks. 1985. Genetic diversity and population structure in Camellia japonica L. (Theaceae). American Journal of Botany 72:52-65.
81. West, K., A. Cohen, and M. Baron. 1991. Morphology and behavior of crabs and gastropods from Lake Tanganyika, Africa: implications for lacustrine predator-prey coevolution. Evolution 45:589-607.
82. Zangerl, A. R., and M. R. Berenbaum. 2003. Phenotype matching in wild parsnip and parsnip webworms: causes and consequences. Evolution 57:806-815.