Passive marker tracking via phase-only cross correlation (POCC) for MR-guided needle interventions: Initial invivo experience

Physica Medica

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 607-614

  Krafft, Axel Joachim ^a   Zamecnik, Patrik ^a   Maier, Florian ^a   de Oliveira, André ^b   Hallscheidt, Peter ^c   Schlemmer, Heinz Peter ^a   Bock, Michael ^a,d  

^a GERMAN CANCER RESEARCH CENTER DKFZ   (Germany)

^b SIEMENS AG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Interventional magnetic resonance imaging; Interventional radiology; MR guided interventional procedures; MR guided needle intervention; MR guided prostate biopsy

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; FIDUCIAL MARKER; IN VIVO STUDY; INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY; LASER INDUCED THERMAL THERAPY; LASER THERMOTHERAPY; MALE; MR GUIDED NEEDLE INTERVENTION; NEEDLE; NONHUMAN; PHANTOM; PHASE ONLY CROSS CORRELATION; PROSTATE; PUNCTURE; STATISTICAL CONCEPTS;

ANIMALIA; SUIDAE; SUS;

INTERVENTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY; MR-GUIDED INTERVENTIONAL PROCEDURES; MR-GUIDED NEEDLE INTERVENTION; MR-GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSY;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; FIDUCIAL MARKERS; LASER THERAPY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MUSCLES; NEEDLES; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; PROSTATE; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; SWINE;

EID: 84885953668     PISSN: 11201797     EISSN: 1724191X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2012.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Weiss C.R., Nour S.G., Lewin J.S. MR-guided biopsy: a review of current techniques and applications. JMagn Reson Imaging 2008, 27(2):311-325.
2. Bock M., Wacker F.K. MR-guided intravascular interventions: techniques and applications. JMagn Reson Imaging 2008, 27(2):326-338. [Epub 2008/01/26].
3. Eliahou R., Sella T., Allweis T., Samet Y., Libson E., Sklair-Levy M. Magnetic resonance-guided interventional procedures of the breast: initial experience. Isr Med Assoc J 2009, 11(5):275-279. [Epub 2009/07/30].
4. Meeuwis C, Mann RM, Mus RDM, Winkel A, Boetes C, Barentsz JO, etal. MRI-guided breast biopsy at 3T using a dedicated large core biopsy set: feasibility and initial results. Eur J Radiol, in press, doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.05.001.
5. Anastasiadis A.G., Lichy M.P., Nagele U., Kuczyk M.A., Merseburger A.S., Hennenlotter J., et al. MRI-guided biopsy of the prostate increases diagnostic performance in men with elevated or increasing PSA levels after previous negative TRUS biopsies. Eur Urol 2006, 50(4):738-749.
6. Beyersdorff D., Winkel A., Hamm B., Lenk S., Loening S.A., Taupitz M. MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy with a closed MR unit at 1.5 T: initial results. Radiology 2005, 234(2):576-581.
7. Engelhard K., Hollenbach H.P., Kiefer B., Winkel A., Goeb K., Engehausen D. Prostate biopsy in the supine position in a standard 1.5-T scanner under real time MR-imaging control using a MR-compatible endorectal biopsy device. Eur Radiol 2006, 16(6):1237-1243.
8. Franiel T., Stephan C., Erbersdobler A., Dietz E., Maxeiner A., Hell N., et al. Areas suspicious for prostate cancer: MR-guided biopsy in patients with at least one transrectal US-guided biopsy with a negative finding-multiparametric MR imaging for detection and biopsy planning. Radiology 2011, 259(1):162-172.
9. Yakar D., Hambrock T., Huisman H., Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C.A., van Lin E., Vergunst H., et al. Feasibility of 3T dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance-guided biopsy in localizing local recurrence of prostate cancer after external beam radiation therapy. Invest Radiol 2010, 45(3):121-125. [Epub 2010/01/13].
10. de Oliveira A., Rauschenberg J., Beyersdorff D., Semmler W., Bock M. Automatic passive tracking of an endorectal prostate biopsy device using phase-only cross-correlation. Magn Reson Med 2008, 59(5):1043-1050.
11. Chen Q.-S., Defrise M., Deconinck F. Symmetric phase-only matched filtering of Fourier-Mellin transforms for image registration and recognition. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal 1994, 16(12):1156-1168.
12. Foroosh H., Zerubia J.B., Berthod M. Extension of phase correlation to subpixel registration. IEEE Trans Image Process 2002, 11(3):188-200.
13. Busse H., Trampel R., Gruender W., Garnov N., Fuchs J., Petersen T.-O., et al. Navigation system for interventional MR image guidance in a closed-bore scanner: system setup and estimation of targeting accuracy. Proceedings 16th scientific meeting 2008, International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, [abstract: 1214].
14. de Poorter J., de Wagter C., de Deene Y., Thomsen C., Stahlberg F., Achten E. Noninvasive MRI thermometry with the proton resonance frequency (PRF) method: invivo results in human muscle. Magn Reson Med 1995, 33(1):74-81. [Epub 1995/01/01].
15. Maier F., Krafft A.J., Jenne J.W., Semmler W., Bock M. TAM - a thermal ablation monitoring tool: invivo evaluation. World congress on medical physics and biomedical engineering, September 7-12, 2009 2009, 247-250. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Munich, Germany. O. Dössel, W.C. Schlegel (Eds.).
16. Sapareto S.A., Dewey W.C. Thermal dose determination in cancer-therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol 1984, 10(6):787-800.
17. Zou K.H., Tuncali K., Silverman S.G. Correlation and simple linear regression1. Radiology 2003, 227(3):617-628.
18. Wang J.Z., Reinstein L.E., Hanley J., Meek A.G. Investigation of a phase-only correlation technique for anatomical alignment of portal images in radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol 1996, 41(6):1045-1058.
19. Paskalev K., Ma C.M., Jacob R., Price R., McNeeley S., Wang L., et al. Daily target localization for prostate patients based on 3D image correlation. Phys Med Biol 2004, 49(6):931-939.
20. Rea M., McRobbie D., Elhawary H., Tse Z., Lamperth M., Young I. Sub-pixel localisation of passive micro-coil fiducial markers in interventional MRI. Magn Reson Mater Phys Biol Med 2009, 22(2):71-76.
21. Stafford R.J., Maier F., Krafft A.J., Bock M., Winkel A., Ahrar K. Phase only cross-correlation tracking of a passive marker for MR-guided interventions. Proceedings 18th scientific meeting 2010, International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Stockholm, Sweden, [abstract: 1861].
22. Foxall D.L. Frequency-modulated steady-state free precession imaging. Magn Reson Med 2002, 48(3):502-508.
23. Zur Y., Wood M.L., Neuringer L.J. Motion-insensitive, steady-state free precession imaging. Magn Reson Med 1990, 16(3):444-459.
24. Blumenfeld P., Hata N., DiMaio S., Zou K., Haker S., Fichtinger G., et al. Transperineal prostate biopsy under magnetic resonance image guidance: a needle placement accuracy study. JMagn Reson Imaging 2007, 26(3):688-694.
25. Zimmermann H., Mueller S., Gutmann B., Bardenheuer H., Melzer A., Umathum R., et al. Targeted-HASTE imaging with automated device tracking for MR-guided needle interventions in closed-bore MR systems. Magn Reson Med 2006, 56(3):481-488.
26. Seevinck P.R., de Leeuw H., Bos C., Bakker C.J.G. Highly localized positive contrast of small paramagnetic objects using 3D center-out radial sampling with off-resonance reception. Magn Reson Med 2011, 65(1):146-156.
27. de Oliveira A., Rauschenberg J., Beyersdorff D., Semmler W., Bock M. Anew system for passive tracking of a prostate biopsy device with automatic 3D needle position estimation. Proceedings 16th scientific meeting 2008, International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, [abstract: 3003].
28. Maier F., Krafft A.J., de Oliveira A., Semmler W., Bock M. MRPen - 3D marker tracking for percutaneous interventions. Proceedings 17th scientific meeting 2009, International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, [abstract: 4421].
29. Maier F., Krafft A.J., Stafford R.J., Yung J.P., Dillmann R., Semmler W., et al. 3D passive marker tracking for MR-guided interventions. Proceedings 19th scientific meeting 2011, International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, [abstract: 3749].
30. Susil R.C., Camphausen K., Choyke P., McVeigh E.R., Gustafson G.S., Ning H., et al. System for prostate brachytherapy and biopsy in a standard 1.5 T MRI scanner. Magn Reson Med 2004, 52(3):683-687.
31. Weiss S., Vernickel P., Schaeffter T., Schulz V., Gleichl B. Transmission line for improved RF safety of interventional devices. Magn Reson Med 2005, 54(1):182-189.
32. Lederman R.J. Cardiovascular interventional magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2005, 112(19):3009-3017.
33. Fichtinger G., Krieger A., Susil R.C., Tanacs A., Whitcomb L.L., Atalar E. Transrectal prostate biopsy inside closed MRI scanner with remote actuation, under real-time image guidance. Lect Notes Comput Sci 2002, 2488:91-98.
34. Krafft A.J., Jenne J.W., Maier F., Stafford R.J., Huber P.E., Semmler W., et al. Along arm for ultrasound: a combined robotic focused ultrasound setup for magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery. Med Phys 2010, 37(5):2380-2393.
35. Krieger A., Susil R.C., Menard C., Coleman J.A., Fichtinger G., Atalar E., et al. Design of a novel MRI compatible manipulator for image guided prostate interventions. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2005, 52(2):306-313.
36. Schouten M.G., Ansems J., Renema W.K.J., Bosboom D., Scheenen T.W.J., Futterer J.J. The accuracy and safety aspects of a novel robotic needle guide manipulator to perform transrectal prostate biopsies. Med Phys 2010, 37(9):4744-4750.