Automatic passive tracking of an endorectal prostate biopsy device using phase-only cross-correlation

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 59, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 1043-1050

  De Oliveira, André ^a   Rauschenberg, Jaane ^a   Beyersdorff, Dirk ^b   Semmler, Wolfhard ^a   Bock, Michael ^a  

^a GERMAN CANCER RESEARCH CENTER DKFZ   (Germany)

^b CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

MR guided prostate biopsy; Passive device tracking

Indexed keywords

ALIGNMENT; NEEDLES; SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO; UROLOGY;

CROSS CORRELATIONS; NEEDLE PLACEMENT; PASSIVE DEVICES; PASSIVE TRACKING; PHANTOM EXPERIMENT; POSITION INFORMATION; PROSTATE BIOPSY; TIME-CONSUMING PROCEDURE;

BIOPSY;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; DEVICE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOM; PROSTATE BIOPSY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO;

EID: 42549090167     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: 15222594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21430     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. 1 Denis LK, Resnick MI. Analysis of recent trends in prostate cancer incidence. Prostate 2000 ; 43: 247–252.
2. 2 Terris MK. Sensitivity and specificity of sextant biopsies in the detection of prostate cancer: preliminary report. Urology 1999 ; 54: 486–489.
3. 3 Beyersdorff D, Taupitz M, Winkelmann B, Fischer T, Lenk S, Loening SA, Hamm B. Patients with a history of elevated prostate‐specific antigen levels and negative transrectal US‐guided quadrant or sextant biopsy results: value of MR imaging. Radiology 2002 ; 224: 701–706.
4. 4 Hata N, jinzaki M, Kacher D, Cormak R, Nabavi A, Silverman S, D'Amico AV, Kikinis R, Jolesz FA, Tempany CMC. MR imaging‐guided prostate biopsy with surgical navigation software: device validation and feasibility. Radiology 2001 ; 220: 263–268.
5. 5 Beyersdorff D, Winkel A, Hamm B, Lenk S, Loening SA, Taupitz M. MR imaging‐guided prostate biopsy with a closed MR unit at 1.5 T: initial results. Radiology 2005 ; 234: 576–581.
6. 6 Engelhard K, Hollenbach HP, Kiefer B, Winkel A, Goeb K, Engehausen D. Prostate biopsy in the supine position in a standard 1.5‐T scanner under real time MR‐imaging control using a MR‐compatible endorectal biopsy device. Eur Radiol 2006 ; 16: 1237–1243.
7. 7 Anastasiadis AG, Lichy MP, Nagele U, Kuczyk MA, Merseburger AS, Hennenlotter J, Corvin S, Sievert KD, Claussen CD, Stenzl A, Schlemmer HP. MRI‐guided biopsy of the prostate increases diagnostic performance in men with elevated or increasing PSA levels after previous negative TRUS biopsies. Eur Urol 2006 ; 50: 738–748.
8. 8 Krieger A, Susil RC, Menard C, Coleman JA, Fichtinger G, Atalar E, Whitcomb LL. Design of a novel MRI compatible manipulator for image guided prostate interventions. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2005 ; 52: 306–313.
9. 9 Susil RC, Camphausen K, Choyke P, McVeigh ER, Gustafson GS, Ning H, Miller RW, Atalar E, Coleman CN, Menard C. System for prostate brachytherapy and biopsy in a standard 1.5 T MRI scanner. Magn Reson Med 2004 ; 52: 683–687.
10. 10 Nitz WR, Oppelt A, Renz W, Manke C, Lenhart M, Link J. On the heating of linear conductive structures as guide wires and catheters in interventional MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001 ; 13: 105–114.
11. 11 Ladd ME, Quick HH. Reduction of resonant RF heating in intravascular catheters using coaxial chokes. Magn Reson Med 2000 ; 43: 615–619.
12. 12 Fichtinger G, Krieger A, Susil CR, Tanacs A, Whitcomb LL, Atalar E. Transrectal prostate biopsy inside closed MRI scanner with remote actuation, under real‐time image guidance. Fifth International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer‐Assisted Intervention 2002 ;1: 91–98.
13. 13 Fischer SG, Iordachita I, DiMaio PS, Fichtinger G. Design of a robot for transperineal prostate needle placement in MRI scanner. IEEE Int Conf Mechatronics 2006: 592–597.
14. 14 Dimaio SP, Fischer GS, Haker JS, Hata N, Iordachita I, Tempany MC, Kikinis R, Fichtinger G. A system for MRI‐guided prostate interventions. Proc IEEE/EMBS Int Conf Biomed Robotics Biomechatronics 2006: 68–73.
15. 15 Chen QS, Defrise M, Deconinck F. Symmetric phase‐only matched filtering of Fourier‐Mellin transforms for image registration and recognition. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell 1994 ; 16: 1156–1168.
16. 16 Zuo KH, Tuncali K, Silverman SG. Correlation and simple linear regression. Radiology 2003 ; 227: 617–628.
17. 17 Wang JZ, Reinstein LE, Hanley J, Meek AG. Investigation of a phase‐only correlation technique for anatomical alignment of portal images in radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol 1996 ; 41: 1045–1058.
18. 18 Paskalev K, Ma CM, Jacob R, Price R, McNeeley S, Wang L, Movsas B, Pollack A. Daily target localization for prostate patients based on 3D image correlation. Phys Med Biol 2004 ; 49: 931–939.
19. 19 Duan G, Morris AR. The importance of phase in the spectra of digital type. Electron Pub 1989 ; 2: 47–59.
20. 20 Foroosh H, Zerubia JB, Berthod M. Extension of phase correlation to subpixel registration. IEEE Trans Image Process 2002 ; 11: 188–200.
21. 21 Zimmermann H, Muller S, Gutmann B, Bardenheuer H, Melzer A, Umathum R, Nitz W, Semmler W, Bock M. Targeted‐HASTE imaging with automated device tracking for MR‐guided needle interventions in closed‐bore MR systems. Magn Reson Med 2006 ; 56: 481–488.
22. 22 Bock M, Volz S, Zuhlsdorff S, Umathum R, Fink C, Hallscheidt P, Semmler W. MR‐guided intravascular procedures: real‐time parameter control and automated slice positioning with active tracking coils. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004 ; 19: 580–589.
23. 23 Dumoulin CL, Souza SP, Darrow RD. Real‐time position monitoring of invasive devices using magnetic resonance. Magn Reson Med 1993 ; 29: 411–415.