Cancer: A missing link in ecosystem functioning?

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 28, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 628-635

  Vittecoq, Marion ^a,b,c   Roche, Benjamin ^c,d   Daoust, Simon P ^e   Ducasse, Hugo ^a,c   Missé, Dorothée ^a   Abadie, Jérome ^f   Labrut, Sophie ^f   Renaud, François ^a   Gauthier Clerc, Michel ^b,g   Thomas, Frédéric ^a,c  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b STATION BIOLOGIQUE DE LA TOUR DU VALAT   (France)

^c Universite de Montpellier   (France)

^d INSTITUT DE RECHERCHE POUR LE DÉVELOPPEMENT   (France)

^e ENVIRONMENT CANADA   (Canada)

^f Laboratoire d'Acoustique Environnementale)   (France)

^g UNIVERSITÉ DE FRANCHE COMTÉ   (France)

Author keywords

Biotic interactions; Cancer; Ecosystem; Tumor; Wildlife

Indexed keywords

CANCER; ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECT; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HEALTH RISK; LESION; METAZOAN; PATHOGEN; PREDATION RISK; TUMOR; VULNERABILITY; WILD POPULATION;

METAZOA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOTIC INTERACTIONS; CARCINOGENESIS; ECOSYSTEM; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; NEOPLASM; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PLEIOTROPY; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS; WILDLIFE;

BIOTIC INTERACTIONS; CANCER; ECOSYSTEM; TUMOR; WILDLIFE;

ANIMALS; CARCINOGENESIS; ECOSYSTEM; GENETIC FITNESS; GENETIC PLEIOTROPY; NEOPLASMS; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84885911345     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2013.07.005     Document Type: Review

References (78)

1. Aktipis C.A., Nesse R.M. Evolutionary foundations for cancer biology. Evol. Appl. 2013, 6:144-159.
2. DeGregori J. Evolved tumor suppression: why are we so good at not getting cancer?. Cancer Res. 2011, 71:3739-3744.
3. Leroi A.M., et al. Cancer selection. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2003, 3:226-231.
4. Folkman J., Kalluri R. Cancer without disease. Nature 2004, 427:787.
5. Antuofermo E., et al. Spontaneous mammary intraepithelial lesions in dogs - a model of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2007, 16:2247-2256.
6. Bissell M.J., Hines W.C. Why don't we get more cancer? A proposed role of the microenvironment in restraining cancer progression. Nat. Med. 2011, 17:320-329.
7. Hochberg M.E., et al. Preventive evolutionary medicine of cancers. Evol. Appl. 2013, 6:134-143.
8. McCallum H., et al. Distribution and impacts of Tasmanian devil facial tumor disease. EcoHealth 2007, 4:318-325.
9. Anderson R.M., May R.M. Population biology of infectious diseases: part I. Nature 1979, 280:361-367.
10. Population Biology of Infectious Diseases. Report of the Dahlem Workshop, Berlin 1982, March 14-19 1982, Springer-Verlag. R.M. Anderson, R.M. May (Eds.).
11. Thomas F., et al. Ecology and Evolution of Parasitism 2009, Oxford University Press.
12. Tumors in Domestic Animals 2008, Iowa State University Press. 4th edn. D.J. Meuten (Ed.).
13. Roche B., et al. Natural resistance to cancers: a Darwinian hypothesis to explain Peto's paradox. BMC Cancer 2012, 12:387.
14. Newman S.J., Smith S.A. Marine mammal neoplasia: a review. Vet. Pathol. 2006, 43:865-880.
15. Ewald P.W. An evolutionary perspective on parasitism as a cause of cancer. Adv. Parasitol. 2009, 68:21-43.
16. Aguirre A.A., Lutz P.L. Marine turtles as sentinels of ecosystem health: is fibropapillomatosis an indicator?. EcoHealth 2004, 1:275-283.
17. Pollock R.E., Roth J.A. Cancer-induced immunosuppression: implications for therapy?. Semin. Surg. Oncol. 1989, 5:414-419.
18. Kim R., et al. Cancer immunosuppression and autoimmune disease: beyond immunosuppressive networks for tumour immunity. Immunology 2006, 119:254-264.
19. Andervont H.B., Dunn T.B. Occurrence of tumors in wild house mice. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1962, 28:1153-1163.
20. McAloose D., Newton A.L. Wildlife cancer: a conservation perspective. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2009, 9:517-526.
21. Walsh M.R. The evolutionary consequences of indirect effects. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2013, 28:23-29.
22. Paine R.T. Food web complexity and species diversity. Am. Nat. 1966, 100:65-75.
23. Price P.W., et al. Parasite mediation in ecological interactions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1986, 17:487-505.
24. Holt R.D., Lawton J.H. The ecological consequences of shared natural enemies. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1994, 25:495-520.
25. Caulin A.F., Maley C.C. Peto's Paradox: evolution's prescription for cancer prevention. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2011, 26:175-182.
26. Seluanov A., et al. Hypersensitivity to contact inhibition provides a clue to cancer resistance of naked mole-rat. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:19352-19357.
27. Lebarbenchon C., et al. Evolution of pathogens in a man-made world. Mol. Ecol. 2008, 17:475-484.
28. Møller A.P., Mousseau T.A. Determinants of interspecific variation in population declines of birds after exposure to radiation at Chernobyl. J. Appl. Ecol. 2007, 44:909-919.
29. Brown E.R., et al. Frequency of fish tumors found in a polluted watershed as compared to nonpolluted Canadian waters. Cancer Res. 1973, 33:189-198.
30. Yablokov A.V. Chernobyl's radioactive impact on fauna. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2010, 1181:255-280.
31. Black J.J., Baumann P.C. Carcinogens and cancers in freshwater fishes. Environ. Health Perspect. 1991, 90:27-33.
32. Martineau D., et al. Cancer in wildlife, a case study: beluga from the St. Lawrence estuary, Quebec, Canada. Environ. Health Perspect. 2002, 110:285-292.
33. Mousseau T.A., Moller A.P. Landscape portrait: a look at the impacts of radioactive contaminants on Chernobyl's wildlife. Bull. Atom. Sci. 2011, 67:38-46.
34. Møller A.P., et al. Historical mutation rates predict susceptibility to radiation in Chernobyl birds. J. Evol. Biol. 2010, 23:2132-2142.
35. Elskus A.A. Toxicant resistance in wildlife: fish populations. PCBs: Recent Advances in Environmental Toxicology and Health Effects 2001, 273-276. University Press of Kentucky. R.W. Robertson, L.G. Hansen (Eds.).
36. Whitehead A., et al. Common mechanism underlies repeated evolution of extreme pollution tolerance. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2012, 279:427-433.
37. Hammouda A., et al. Maternal antibody transmission in relation to mother fluctuating asymmetry in a long-lived colonial seabird: the yellow-legged gull Larus michahellis. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e34966.
38. Principles of Ecotoxicology 2012, CRC Press. R.M. Sibly (Ed.).
39. Matson P.A., et al. Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science 1997, 277:504-509.
40. Bender D.J., Fahrig L. Matrix structure obscures the relationship between interpatch movement and patch size and isolation. Ecology 2005, 86:1023-1033.
41. Dispersal Ecology and Evolution 2012, Oxford University Press. J. Clobert (Ed.).
42. Fahrig L. Non-optimal animal movement in human-altered landscapes. Funct. Ecol. 2007, 21:1003-1015.
43. Bonte D., De la Pena E. Evolution of body condition-dependent dispersal in metapopulations. J. Evol. Biol. 2009, 22:1242-1251.
44. Broder S., Waldmann T.A. The suppressor-cell network in cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 1978, 299:1335-1341.
45. Bernstorff W.von, et al. Systemic and local Immunosuppression in pancreatic cancer patients. Clin. Cancer Res. 2001, 7:925s-932s.
46. Gulland F.M. Impact of infectious diseases on wild animal populations: a review. Ecology of Infectious Diseases in Natural Populations 1995, 20-51. Publications of the Newton Institute. B.T. Grenfell, A.P. Dobson (Eds.).
47. Hawley D.M., Altizer S.M. Disease ecology meets ecological immunology: understanding the links between organismal immunity and infection dynamics in natural populations. Funct. Ecol. 2011, 25:48-60.
48. Stein R.A. Super-spreaders in infectious diseases. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2011, 15:e510-e513.
49. Zou W. Immunosuppressive networks in the tumour environment and their therapeutic relevance. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2005, 5:263-274.
50. Beldomenico P.M., Begon M. Disease spread, susceptibility and infection intensity: vicious circles?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2010, 25:21-27.
51. Murray D.L., et al. Interactive effects of sublethal nematodes and nutritional status on snowshoe hare vulnerability to predation. J. Anim. Ecol. 1997, 66:250-264.
52. Møller A.P., Nielsen J.T. Malaria and risk of predation: a comparative study of birds. Ecology 2007, 88:871-881.
53. Romalde J.L., et al. Evidence of retroviral etiology for disseminated neoplasia in cockles (Cerastoderma edule). J. Invert. Pathol. 2007, 94:95-101.
54. McCallum H., Jones M. Infectious cancers in Wildlife. New Directions in Conservation Medicine 2012, 270-283. Oxford University Press. A.A. Aguirre (Ed.).
55. Jones C.G., et al. Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 1994, 69:373-386.
56. Jones C.G., et al. Positive and negative effects of organisms as physical ecosystem engineers. Ecology 1997, 78:1946-1957.
57. Marchesi J.R., et al. Towards the human colorectal cancer microbiome. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e20447.
58. Zarco M., et al. The oral microbiome in health and disease and the potential impact on personalized dental medicine. Oral Dis. 2012, 18:109-120.
59. Cummins J., Tangney M. Bacteria and tumours: causative agents or opportunistic inhabitants?. Infect. Agent Cancer 2013, 8:11.
60. Alves G.J., et al. Odor cues from tumor-bearing mice induces neuroimmune changes. Behav. Brain Res. 2010, 214:357-367.
61. Dorso L., et al. High-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the mandibular salivary gland in a Lion (Panthera leo). Vet. Pathol. 2008, 45:104-108.
62. Finotello R., et al. Mammary carcinoma in a Tiger (Panthera tigris): morphological and immunohistochemical study. J. Zoo Wildl. Med. 2011, 42:134-138.
63. Møller A.P. Interactions between interactions. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2008, 1133:180-186.
64. Navarro C., et al. Predation risk, host immune response, and parasitism. Behav. Ecol. 2004, 15:629-635.
65. Reiche E.M.V., et al. Stress, depression, the immune system, and cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2004, 5:617-625.
66. Martin L.B., et al. The effects of anthropogenic global changes on immune functions and disease resistance. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2010, 1195:129-148.
67. Faivre B., et al. Immune activation rapidly mirrored in a secondary sexual trait. Science 2003, 300:103.
68. Goodpasture E.W. An anatomical study of senescence in dogs, with especial reference to the relation of cellular changes of age to tumors. J. Med. Res. 1918, 38:127-190.
69. Oertel H. Degeneration, senescence, and new growth. J. Med. Res. 1918, 38:485-493.
70. Hueper W.C. Age aspects of environmental and occupational cancers. Public Health Rep. 1952, 67:773-779.
71. Fernandez A.A., Bowser P.R. Selection for a dominant oncogene and large male size as a risk factor for melanoma in the Xiphophorus animal model. Mol. Ecol. 2010, 19:3114-3123.
72. Crespi B.J., Summers K. Positive selection in the evolution of cancer. Biol. Rev. 2006, 81:407-424.
73. Greaves M. Darwinian medicine: a case for cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2007, 7:213-221.
74. TNM Classification of Tumours in Domestic Animals 1980, World Health Organization. L.N. Owen (Ed.).
75. Edge S.B., Compton C.C. The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2010, 17:1471-1474.
76. Zamzow J.P. Cleaning symbiosis between Hawaiian reef fishes and green sea turtles, Chelonia mydas. Proceedings of the 18th International Symposium on Sea Turtle Biology and Conservation 1998, 235-237. F.A. Abreu-Grobois (Ed.).
77. Brill R.W., et al. Daily movements, habitat use, and submergence intervals of normal and tumor-bearing juvenile green turtles (Chelonia mydas) within a foraging area in the Hawaiian islands. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 1995, 185:203-218.
78. Aguirre A.A., Balazs G.H. Blood biochemistry values of green turtles, Chelonia mydas, with and without fibropapillomatosis. Comp. Haematol. Int. 2000, 10:132-137.