The evolutionary consequences of indirect effects

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 23-29

  Walsh, Matthew R ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; NATURAL SELECTION; PRISTINE ENVIRONMENT; TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEM;

ANIMAL; ECOSYSTEM; EVOLUTION; FUNDULIDAE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HERBIVORY; REVIEW; SARRACENIACEAE;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; ECOSYSTEM; FUNDULIDAE; GENETIC VARIATION; HERBIVORY; SARRACENIACEAE; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84871679790     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2012.08.006     Document Type: Review

References (68)

1. Wootton J.M. The nature and consequences of indirect effects in ecological communities. Am. Nat. 1994, 25:443-466.
2. Werner E.E., Peacor S.D. A review of trait-mediated indirect interactions in ecological communities. Ecology 2003, 84:1083-1100.
3. Schmitz O., et al. Trophic cascades: the primacy of trait-mediated indirect interactions. Ecol. Lett. 2004, 7:153-163.
4. Pace M.L., et al. Trophic cascades revealed in diverse ecosystems. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1999, 14:483-488.
5. Wissinger S., McGrady J. Intraguild predation and competition between larval dragonflies: direct and indirect effects of shared prey. Ecology 1993, 74:207-218.
6. Soluk D.A., Collins N.C. Synergistic interactions between fish and stoneflies: facilitation and interference among stream predators. Oikos 1988, 52:94-100.
7. Schmitt R.J. Indirect interactions between prey: apparent competition, predator aggregation, and habitat segregation. Ecology 1987, 68:1887-1897.
8. Schmitz O.J., et al. From individuals to ecosystem function: toward an integration of evolutionary and ecosystem ecology. Ecology 2008, 89:2436-2445.
9. Ritchie E.G., Johnson C.N. Predator interactions, mesopredator release, and biodiversity conservation. Ecol. Lett. 2009, 12:992-998.
10. Preisser E.L., et al. Scared to death? The effects of intimidation and consumption in predator-prey interactions. Ecology 2005, 86:501-509.
11. Reznick D., et al. Experimentally induced life history evolution in a natural population. Nature 1990, 346:357-359.
12. Schluter D. Experimental evidence that competition promotes divergence in adaptive radiation. Science 1994, 266:798-801.
13. Fenster C.B., et al. Pollination syndromes and floral specialization. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2004, 220:375-403.
14. Inouye B., Stinchcombe J.R. Relationships between ecological interaction modifications and diffuse coevolution: similarities, differences, and causal links. Oikos 2001, 95:353-360.
15. Strauss S.Y., Irwin R.E. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of multi-species plant animal interactions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2004, 35:435-466.
16. Strauss S.Y., et al. Toward a more trait centered approach to diffuse (co)evolution. New Phytol. 2004, 165:81-90.
17. Barrett R.D.H., et al. Natural selection on a major armour gene in threespine stickleback. Science 2008, 322:255-257.
18. Price T.D., Grant P.R. Life history traits and natural selection for small body size in a population of Darwin's finches. Evolution 1984, 38:483-494.
19. Turcotte M.M., et al. Adaptive evolution in ecological communities. PLoS Biol. 2012, 10:e1001332.
20. Miller T.E., Travis J. The evolutionary role of indirect effects in communities. Ecology 1996, 77:1329-1335.
21. Lack D. The Natural Regulation of Animal Numbers 1954, Oxford University Press.
22. MacArthur R.H., Wilson E.O. The Theory of Island Biogeography 1967, Princeton University Press.
23. Pimentel D. Population regulation and genetic feedback. Science 1968, 159:1432-1437.
24. Mueller L.D. Theoretical and empirical examination of density dependent selection. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 1997, 28:269-288.
25. Sinervo B., et al. Density cycles and an offspring quantity and quality game driven by natural selection. Nature 2000, 406:985-988.
26. Trussell G.C., et al. Field evidence for trait-mediated indirect interactions in a rocky intertidal food web. Ecol. Lett. 2002, 5:241-245.
27. Astles P.A., et al. Genetic variation in response to an indirect ecological effect. Proc. R. Soc. B 2005, 272:2577-2581.
28. Tetard-Jones C., et al. Genotype-by-genotype interactions modified by a third species in a plant-insect system. Am. Nat. 2007, 170:492-499.
29. Zytynska S.E., et al. Community genetic interactions mediate indirect ecological effects between a parasitoid wasp and rhizobacteria. Ecology 2010, 91:1563-1568.
30. Pilson D. Two herbivores and constraints on selection for resistance in Brassica rapa. Evolution 1996, 50:1492-1500.
31. Stinchcombe J.R., Rausher M.D. Diffuse selection on resistance to deer herbivory in the ivyleaf morning glory, Ipomoea hederacea. Am. Nat. 2001, 158:376-388.
32. Gomez J.M. Herbivory reduces the strength of pollinator-mediated selection in the Mediterranean herb Erysimum mediohispanicum: consequences for plant specialization. Am. Nat. 2003, 162:242-256.
33. Rudgers J.A., Strauss S.Y. A selection mosaic in the facultative mutualism between ants and wild cotton. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2004, 271:2481-2488.
34. Juenger T., et al. Scarlet gilia resistance to insect herbivory: the effects of early season browsing, plant apparency, and phytochemistry on patterns of seed fly attack. Evol. Ecol. 2005, 19:79-101.
35. Galen C., Geib J.C. Density-dependent effects of ants on selection for bumble bee pollination in Polemonium viscosum. Ecology 2007, 88:1202-1209.
36. Lankau R.A. Specialist and generalist herbivores exert opposing selection on a chemical defense. New Phytol. 2007, 175:176-184.
37. Gomez J.M., et al. A geographic selection mosaic in a generalized plant-pollinator-herbivore system. Ecol. Monogr. 2009, 79:245-263.
38. Lau J.A. Beyond the ecological: biological invasions alter natural selection on a native plant species. Ecology 2008, 89:1023-1031.
39. Cariveau D., et al. Direct and indirect effects of pollinators and seed predators to selection on plant and floral traits. Oikos 2004, 104:15-26.
40. Irwin R.E. The consequences of direct versus indirect species interactions to selection on traits: pollination and nectar robbing in Ipomopsis aggregata. Am. Nat. 2006, 167:315-328.
41. Ashman T., Penet L. Direct and indirect effects of a sex-biased antagonist on male and female fertility: consequences for reproductive trait evolution in a gender-dimorphic plant. Am. Nat. 2007, 169:595-608.
42. Thompson J.N. The Geographic Mosaic of Coevolution 2005, University of Chicago Press.
43. Edelaar P., Benkman C.W. Replicated population divergence caused by localised coevolution? A test of three hypotheses in the red crossbill-lodgepole pine system. J. Evol. Biol. 2006, 19:1651-1659.
44. Parchman T.L., Benkman C.W. The geographic selection mosaic for ponderosa pine and crossbills: a tale of two squirrels. Evolution 2008, 62:348-360.
45. Terhorst C.P. Evolution in response to direct and indirect ecological effects in pitcher plant iquiline communities. Am. Nat. 2010, 176:675-685.
46. Terhorst C.P., et al. Evolution of prey in ecological time reduces the effect size of predators in experimental microcosms. Ecology 2010, 91:629-636.
47. Mopper S., et al. Spatiotemporal variation in leafminer population structure and adaptation to individual oak trees. Ecology 2000, 81:1577-1587.
48. Wardle D.A., et al. Ecological linkages between aboveground and belowground biota. Science 2004, 304:1629-1633.
49. van Ruijven J., et al. Interactions between spatially separated herbivores indirectly alter plant diversity. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8:30-37.
50. Wolfe B.E., et al. Effects of a belowground mutualism on an aboveground mutualism. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8:218-223.
51. Bonte D., et al. Local adaptation of aboveground herbivores towards plant phenotypes induced by soil biota. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e11174.
52. Lau J. Evolutionary indirect effects of biological invasions. Oecologia 2012, 170:171-181.
53. Gilliam J.F., et al. Structure of a tropical stream fish community: a role for biotic interactions. Ecology 1993, 74:1856-1870.
54. Fraser D.F., et al. Habitat quality in a hostile river corridor. Ecology 1999, 80:597-607.
55. Walsh M.R., et al. The direct and indirect effects of guppies (Poecilia reticulata): implications for life history evolution in Rivulus hartii. Funct. Ecol. 2011, 25:227-237.
56. Falconer D.S., Latyszewski M. The environment in relation to selection for size in mice. J. Genet. 1952, 51:67-80.
57. Walsh M.R., Reznick D.N. Interactions between the direct and indirect effects of predators determine life history evolution in a killifish. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008, 105:594-599.
58. Walsh M.R., Reznick D.N. Influence of the indirect effects of guppies on life history evolution in Rivulus hartii. Evolution 2010, 64:1583-1593.
59. Walsh M.R., Reznick D.N. Experimentally induced life history evolution in a killifish in response to the introduction of guppies. Evolution 2011, 65:1021-1036.
60. Hillesheim E., Stearns S.C. The responses of Drosophila melanogaster to artificial selection on body weight and its phenotypic plasticity in two larval food environments. Evolution 1991, 45:1909-1923.
61. Hillesheim E., Stearns S.C. Correlated responses in life-history traits to artificial selection for body weight in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 1992, 46:745-752.
62. Tessier A.J., et al. A fundamental trade-off in resource exploitation by Daphnia and consequences to plankton communities. Ecology 2000, 81:826-841.
63. Barrett R.D.H., et al. Experimental evolution of Pseudomonas fluorescens in simple and complex environments. Am. Nat. 2005, 166:470-480.
64. Carroll S.P., et al. Evolution on ecological time-scales. Funct. Ecol. 2007, 21:387-393.
65. Fussmann G.F., et al. Eco-evolutionary dynamics of communities and ecosystems. Funct. Ecol. 2007, 21:465-477.
66. Post D.M., Palkovacs E.P. Eco-evolutionary feedbacks in community and ecosystem ecology: interactions between the ecological theatre and the evolutionary play. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2009, 364:1629-1640.
67. Schoener T.W. The newest synthesis: understanding the interplay of evolutionary and ecological dynamics. Science 2011, 331:426-429.
68. Walsh M.R., Post D.M. Interpopulation variation in a fish predator drives evolutionary divergence in prey in lakes. Proc. R. Soc. B 2011, 278:2628-2637.