Critical Perspectives on Hate Speech: The Centrality of ‘Dialogic Listening’

International Journal of Listening

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 75-96

  Cornwell, Nancy C ^a   Orbe, Mark P ^a  

^a WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84885810127     PISSN: 10904018     EISSN: 1932586X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10904018.1999.10499028     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Anderson, R., Anonymity, presence, and the dialogic self in a technological culture. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Central States Communication Association. Chicago, IL. April.
2. Arnett, R., 1992. Dialogic education: Conversation about ideas and between persons, Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
3. Arnett, R. C., and Nakagawa, G., 1983. The assumptive roots of empathetic listening: A critique. Communication Education, 32: 368–378.
4. Bentley, S. C., 1997. Benchmarking listening behaviors: Is effective listening what the speaker says it is?. International Journal of Listening, 11: 51–68.
5. Bruneau, T., 1989. Empathy and listening: A conceptual review and theoretical directions. Journal of the International Listening Association, 3: 1–20.
6. Bruneau, T., 1993. “ Empathy and listening ”. In Perspectives on listening, Edited by: Wolvin, A. D., and Coakley, C. G., 185–200. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
7. 1942. Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire 315 U. S. 568
8. Chen, G. M., and Chung, J., 1997. “ The “five Asian dragons”: Management behaviors and organizational communication ”. In Intercultural communication: A reader, Edited by: Samovar, L. A., and Porter, R. E., 317–328. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
9. Chen, G. M., and Starosta, W. J., 1998. Foundations of intercultural communication, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
10. Clement, G., 1996. Care, autonomy and justice: Feminism and the ethic of care, Boulder: Westview Press.
11. Collins, P. H., 1990. Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment, Boston: Unwin Hyman.
12. Dace, K. L., 1994. Dissonance in European-American and African-American communication. Western Journal of Black Studies, 18: 18–26.
13. Deetz, S., 1990. Reclaiming the subject matter as a guide to mutual understanding: Effectiveness and ethics in interpersonal interaction. Communication Quarterly, 38: 226–243.
14. Delgado, R., 1982. Words that wound: A tort action for racial insults, epithets, and name-calling. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 17: 133–181.
15. DeVito, J. A., 1998. The interpersonal communication book, New York: Longman.
16. 1989. Doe v. University of Michigan, 721 Fed. Supp. 852 (E. D. Mich.
17. Emerson, T., 1970. The system of freedom of expression, New York: Random House.
18. Gilligan, C., 1982. In a difference voice: Psychological theory and women's development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19. Glenn, E. C., 1989. A content analysis of fifty definitions of listening. Journal of the International Listening Association, 3: 21–31.
20. Grudin, R., 1996. On dialogue: An essay in free thought, New York: Houghton Mifflin.
21. Jaggar, A. M., 1988. Feminist politics and human nature, Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.
22. Johannesen, R. L., 1971. The emerging concept of communication as dialogue. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 57: 373–382.
23. Kingwell, M., 1995. A civil tongue: Justice, dialogue, and the politics of pluralism, University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
24. Lawrence, C. R., 1990. If he hollers let him go: Regulating racist speech on campus. Duke Law Journal,: 431–483. 1990
25. Massaro, T., 1991. Equality and freedom of expression: The hate speech dilemma. William and Mary Law Review, 32: 211–265.
26. Matsuda, M., 1993. “ Public response to racist speech: Considering the victim's story ”. In Words that wound: Critical race theory, asssaultive speech and the First Amendment, Edited by: Matsuda, M., Lawrence, C. R., Delgado, R., and Crenshaw, K. W., 17–51. Boulder, CO: Westview.
27. McIntosh, P., 1988. White privilege and male privilege: A personal account of coming to see correspondences through work in women's studies, Wellesley, MA: Wellesley College. Center for Research on Women's Working Paper Series
28. Nichols, R., 1995. The lost art of listening, New York: The Guilford Press.
29. Okin, S. M., 1979. Women in western political thought, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30. Orbe, M., 1998. Constructing co-cultural theory: An explication of culture, power, and communication, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. Pateman, C., 1987. “ Feminist critiques of the public/private dichotomy ”. In Feminism and equality, Edited by: Phillips, A., 103–126. New York: New York University Press.
32. Phillips, A., 1991. Engendering democracy, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
33. 1992. R. A. V. v. St. Paul, 505. U. S. 377
34. Rhodes, S. C., Watson, K. W., and Barker, L. L., 1990. Listening assessment: Trends and influencing factors in the 1980s. Journal of International Listening Association, 4: 62–82.
35. Ridge, A., 1993. “ A perspective of listening skills ”. In Perspective on listening, Edited by: Wolvin, A. D., and Coakley, C. G., 1–22. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
36. Rogers, C., 1957. The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21: 95–103.
37. Speicher, B. L., 1994. Interethnic conflict: Attribution and cultural ignorance. Howard Journal of Communication, 5 (3): 195–213.
38. Stewart, J., 1983. Interpretive listening: An alternative to empathy. Communication Education, 32: 379–391.
39. Strossen, N., 1990. Regulating racist speech on campus: A modest proposal?. Duke Law Journal,: 484–573. 1990
40. Tanno, D. V., The communication of intolerance, bigotry, and prejudice: Analysis of theoretical and practical directions for the future. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association. San Antonio, TX. November.
41. Tanno, D. V., A characterization of dialogue. Paper presented at the biannual meeting of the National Communication Association Ethics conference, Gull Lake. MI. May.
42. Tassoni, J. P., and Tayko, G., 1997. “ Why share: Students in pedagogy scholarship ”. In Sharing pedagogies: Students and teachers write about dialogic practices, Edited by: Tayko, G., and Tassoni, J. P., 1–12. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Publishers.
43. Tedford, T., 1993. Freedom of speech in the United States, 2nd ed., New York: McGraw-Hill.
44. Ting-Toomey, S., 1997. “ Managing intercultural conflicts effectively ”. In Intercultural communication: A reader, Edited by: Samovar, L. A., and Porter, R. E., 392–403. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
45. Walker, K. L., 1997. Do you ever listen?: Discovering the theoretical underpinnings of empathic listening. International Journal of Listening, 11: 127–137.
46. Wilson, R., 1991. Racism on the campus. New Politics, Summer: 84
47. Witkin, B. R., and Trochim, W. W. K., 1997. Toward a synthesis of listening constructs: A concept map analysis. International Journal of Listening, 11: 69–87.
48. Wolvin, A. D., and Coakley, C. G., 1995. Listening, 5th ed., New York: McGraw Hill.
49. Wolvin, A. D., and Coakley, C. G., 1994. Listening competency. Journal of International Listening Association, 8: 148–160.