Finite element analysis of a novel implant distribution to support maxillary overdentures

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2013, Pages e1-e10

  Osman, Reham B ^a,b   Elkhadem, Amr H ^b   Ma, Sunyoung ^a   Swain, Michael V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^b CAIRO UNIVERSITY   (Egypt)

Author keywords

Finite element analysis; Implant distribution; Implant overdentures; Maxilla

Indexed keywords

ZIRCONIUM; ZIRCONIUM OXIDE; TOOTH IMPLANT;

AGED; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MAXILLA; MECHANICAL STRESS; OVERLAY DENTURE; PREMOLAR TOOTH; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

AGED; BICUSPID; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTURE, OVERLAY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MAXILLA; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TENSILE STRENGTH; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 84885715899     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.11607/jomi.2303     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Engquist B, Bergendal T, Kallus T, Linden U. A retrospective multicenter evaluation of osseointegrated implants supporting overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988; 3: 129-134.
2. Jemt T, Book K, Linden B, Urde G. Failures and complications in 92 consecutively inserted overdentures supported by Brånemark implants in severely resorbed edentulous maxillae: A study from prosthetic treatment to first annual check-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992; 7: 162-167.
3. Palmqvist S, Sondell K, Swartz B. Implant-supported maxillary overdentures: Outcome in planned and emergency cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994; 9: 184-190.
4. Ekfeldt A, Christiansson U, Eriksson T, et al. A retrospective analysis of factors associated with multiple implant failures in maxillae. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12: 462-467.
5. Widbom C, Soderfeldt B, Kronstrom M. A retrospective evaluation of treatments with implant-supported maxillary overdentures. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005; 7: 166-172.
6. Eckert SE, Carr AB. Implant-retained maxillary overdentures. Dent Clin North Am 2004; 48: 585-601.
7. Krennmair G, Krainhofner M, Piehslinger E. Implant-supported maxillary overdentures retained with milled bars: Maxillary anterior versus maxillary posterior concept-A retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23: 343-352.
8. Brunski JB, Puleo DA, Nanci A. Biomaterials and biomechanics of oral and maxillofacial implants: Current status, future developments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000; 15: 15-45.
9. Mericske-Stern R, Venetz E, Fahrlander F, Burgin WB. In vivo force measurements on maxillary implants supporting a fixed prosthesis or an overdenture: A pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 84: 535-547.
10. Geng JP, Tan KBC, Liu GR. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: A review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 85: 585-598.
11. Glantz PO, Nilner K. Biomechanical aspects of prosthetic implantborne reconstructions. Periodontol 2000 1998; 17: 119-124.
12. Kramer A, Benzing U. Implant and prosthetic treatment of the edentulous maxilla using a bar supported prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992; 7: 251-255.
13. Chan M, Narhi T, de Baat C, Kalk W. Treatment of the atrophic edentulous maxilla with implant-supported overdentures: A review of literature. Int J Prosthodont 1998; 11: 7-15.
14. Henry PJ. A review of guidelines for implant rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87: 281-288.
15. Sadowsky SJ. Treatment considerations for maxillary implant overdentures: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2007; 97: 340-348.
16. Duyck J, Naert IE. Biomechanics of oral implants: A review of the literature. Technol Health Care 1997; 5: 253-273.
17. Meyer U, Vollmer D, Runte C, Bourauel C, Joos U. Bone loading pattern around implants in average and atrophic maxillae: A finiteelement analysis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2001; 29: 100-105.
18. Himmlová L, Dostálová T, Kácovský A, Konvičková S. Influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution: A finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 91: 20-25.
19. Baggi L, Cappelloni I, di Girolamo M, Maceri F, Vairo G. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2008; 100: 422-431.
20. Li T, Kong L, Wang Y, et al. Selection of optimal implant diameter and length in type IV bone: A three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 38: 1077-1083.
21. Aparicio C, Perales P, Rangert B. Tilted implant as an alternative to maxillary sinus grafting: A clinical, radiologic and Periotest study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2001; 3: 39-49.
22. Calandriello R, Tomatis M. Simplified treatment of the atrophic posterior maxilla via immediate/early function and tilted implants: A prospective 1-year clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005; 7(suppl 1): 1-12.
23. Bellini MC, Romeo D, Galbusera F, et al. A finite element analysis of tilted versus non tilted implant configurations in the edentulous maxilla. Int J Prosthodont 2009; 22: 155-157.
24. Kahnberg KE, Ekestubbe A, Grondahl K, Nilsson P, Hirsch JM. Sinus lifting procedure. I. one-stage surgery with bone transplant and implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12: 479-487.
25. Aparicio C, Ouazzani W, Garcia R, Arevalo X, Muela R, Fortes V. A prospective clinical study on titanium implants in the zygomatic arch for prosthetic rehabilitation of the atrophic edentulous maxilla with a follow-up of 6 months to 5 years. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2006; 8: 114-122.
26. Penarrocha M, Carrillo C, Boronat A, Balaguer J, Penarrocha M. Retrospective study of 68 implants placed in the pterygomaxillary region using drills and osteotomes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24: 720-726.
27. Machado C, Chacon G, Sanchez E. Palatal mini-implants to increase retention and stability of implant-retained maxillary overdentures: A case report. Implant Dent 2008; 17: 402-407.
28. Scher ELC. Use of incisive canal as a recipient site for root form implants: Preliminary clinical reports. Implant Dent 1994; 3: 38-41.
29. Männchen R, Schätzle M. Success rate of palatal orthodontic implants: A prospective longitudinal study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19: 665-669.
30. Sykaras N, Iacopino AM, Marker VA, Triplett RG, Woody RD. Implant materials, designs, and surface topographies: Their effect on osseointegration. A literature review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Prosthodont 2000; 15: 675-690.
31. Oliva J, Oliva X, Oliva JD. One-year follow-up of first consecutive 100 zirconia dental implants in humans: A comparison of 2 different rough surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007; 23: 430-435.
32. Oliva J, Oliva X, Oliva JD. Ovoid zirconia implants: Anatomic design for premolar replacement. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008; 28: 609-615.
33. Pirker W, Kocher A. Immediate, non-submerged, root-analogue zirconia implant in single tooth replacement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 37: 293-295.
34. Kohal RJ, Papavasiliou G, Kamposiora P, Tripodakis A, Strub JR. Three-dimensional computerized stress analysis of commercially pure titanium and yttrium-partially stabilized zirconia implants. Int J Prosthodont 2002; 15: 189-194.
35. Bächle M, Butz F, Hubner U, Bakalinis E, Kohal RJ. Behaviour of CAL72 osteoblast-like cells cultured on zirconia ceramics with different surface topographies. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18: 53-59.
36. Kohal RJ, Klaus G. A zirconia implant-crown system: A case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2004; 24: 147-153.
37. Andreiotelli M, Kohal RJ. Fracture strength of zirconia implants after artificial aging. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009; 11: 158-166.
38. Akagwa Y, Hosokawa R, Sato Y, Kamayama K. Comparison between freestanding and tooth partially stabilized zirconia implants after two years function in monkeys: A clinical and histologic study. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80: 551-558.
39. Kohal RJ, Weng D, Bächle M, Strub JR. Loaded custom-made Zirconia and titanium implants show similar osseointegration: An animal experiment. J Periodontol 2004; 75: 1262-1268.
40. Hoffmann O, Angelov N, Gallez F, Jung RE, Weber FE. The zirconia bone-implant interface: A preliminary histologic evaluation in rabbit. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23: 691-695.
41. Kohal RJ, Waolkwitz M, Hinze M, Han J-S, Bächle M, Butz F. Biomechanical and histological behavior of zirconia implants: An experiment in the rat. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 333-339.
42. Cheng YY, Cheung WL, Chow TW. Strain analysis of maxillary complete denture with three dimensional finite element method. J Prosthet Dent 2010; 103: 309-318.
43. Saab EX, Griggs AJ, Powers MJ, Engelmier RL. Effect of abutment angulation on the strain on the bone around an implant in the anterior maxilla: A finite element study. J Prosthet Dent 2007; 97: 85-92.
44. Clelland NL, Lee JK, Bimbenet OC, Gilat A. Use of an axisymmetric finite element method to compare maxillary bone variables for a loaded implant. J Prosthodont 1993; 2: 183-189.
45. Jacobson TE, Krol AJ. A contemporary review of the factors involved in complete denture retention, stability, and support. Part I: Retention. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 49: 5-15.
46. Jacobson TE, Krol AJ. A contemporary review of the factors involved in complete dentures. Part II: Stability. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 49: 165-172.
47. Jacobson TE, Krol AJ. A contemporary review of the factors involved in complete dentures. Part III: Support. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 49: 306-313.
48. Chun HJ, Park DN, Han CH, Heo SJ, Heo MS, Koak YJ. Stress distribution in maxillary bone surrounding overdenture implants with different overdenture attachments. J Oral Rehabil 2005; 32: 193-205.
49. Mellal A, Wiskott HWA, Botsis J, Scherrer SS, Belser UC. Stimulating effect of implant loading on surrounding bone. Comparison of three numerical models and validation by in vivo data. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15: 239-248.
50. Stanford CM. Biomechanical and functional behavior of implants. Adv Dent Res 1999; 13: 88-92.
51. Stanford CM, Brand RA. Toward an understanding of implant occlusion and strain adaptive bone modeling and remodeling. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81: 553-561.
52. Tanino F, Hayakawa I, Hirano S, Minakuchi S. Finite element analysis of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant retained overdentures. Int J Prosthodont 2007; 20: 193-198.
53. Ambard AJ. Palatal anchorage for the retention of interim removable prostheses. J Prosthodont 2009; 18: 698-702.
54. Frost HM. From Wolff’s law to the Utah paradigm: Insights about bone physiology and its clinical applications. Anat Rec 2001; 262: 398-419.
55. Frost HM. Perspectives: Bone’s mechanical usage window. Bone Miner 1992; 19: 257-271.
56. Frost HM. A 2003 update of bone physiology and Wolff’s law for clinicians. Angle Orthod 2004; 74: 3-15.
57. Mellal A, Wiskott HWA, Botsis J, Scherrer SS, Belser UC. Simulating effect of implant loading on surrounding bone. Comparison of three numerical models and validation by in vivo data. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15: 239-248.
58. Melsen B, Lang NP. Biological reactions of alveolar bone to orthodontic loading of oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12: 144-152.
59. Ochiai KT, Williams BH, Hojo S, Nishimura R, Caputo AA. Photoelastic analysis of the effect of palatal support on various implantsupported overdenture designs. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 91: 421-427.
60. Schierano G, Mozzati M, Bassi F, Preti G. Influence of thickness of the resin palatal vault on the closest speaking space with complete dentures. J Oral Rehabil 2001; 28: 903-908.
61. Kohal RJ, Finke HC, Klaus G. Stability of prototype two-piece zirconia and titanium implants after artificial aging: An in vitro pilot study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009; 11: 323-329.
62. Siddiqi A, Payne AGT, De Silva RK, Duncan WJ. Titanium allergy: Could it affect dental implant integration? Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22: 673-680.
63. Javed F, Al-Hezaimi K, Almas K, Romanos GE. Is titanium sensitivity associated with allergic reactions in patients with dental implants? A systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2011 Mar 17 [epub ahead of print]
64. Muller KE, Vlentine-Thon E. Hypersensitivity to titanium: Clinical and laboratory evidence. Neuro Endocrinol Lett 2006; 27(suppl): 31-35.
65. Egusa H, Ko N, Shimazu T, Yatani H. Suspected association of an allergic reaction with titanium dental implants: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2008; 100: 344-347.
66. Sicila A, Cuesta S, Coma G, et al. Titanium allergy in dental implant patients: A clinical study on 1500 consecutive patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19: 823-835.
67. Rimondini L, Cerroni L, Carrassi A, Torricelli P. Bacterial colonization of zirconia ceramic surface: An in vitro and in vivo study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002; 17: 793-798.
68. Scarano A, Piattelli M, Caputi S, Favero GA, Piattelli A. Bacterial adhesion on commercially pure titanium and zirconium oxide disks: An in vivo human study. J Periodontol 2004; 75: 292-296.
69. Johns RB, Jemt T, Heath MR, et al. A multicenter study of overdentures supported by Brånemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992; 7: 513-522.
70. Payne AGT, Solomons YF, Tawse-Smith A, Lownie JF. Inter-abutment and peri-abutment mucosal enlargements with mandibular implant overdentures. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12: 179-187.
71. Van Staden RC, Guan H, Loo YC. Application of the finite element method in dental implant research. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 2006; 9: 257-270.