-
1
-
-
10944223934
-
Intrauterine growth as estimated from liveborn birth-weight data at 24 to 42 weeks of gestation
-
Lubchenco LO, Hansman C, Dressler M, et al. Intrauterine growth as estimated from liveborn birth-weight data at 24 to 42 weeks of gestation. Pediatrics. 1963;32(11):793-800.
-
(1963)
Pediatrics
, vol.32
, Issue.11
, pp. 793-800
-
-
Lubchenco, L.O.1
Hansman, C.2
Dressler, M.3
-
2
-
-
0017172822
-
A standard of fetal growth for the United States of America
-
Brenner WE, Edeman DA, Hendricks CH. A standard of fetal growth for the United States of America. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976;126(5):555-564.
-
(1976)
Am J Obstet Gynecol
, vol.126
, Issue.5
, pp. 555-564
-
-
Brenner, W.E.1
Edeman, D.A.2
Hendricks, C.H.3
-
4
-
-
0026040940
-
In utero analysis of fetal growth: A sonographic weight standard
-
Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Martinez-Poyer J. In utero analysis of fetal growth: a sonographic weight standard. Radiology. 1991;181(1):129-133.
-
(1991)
Radiology
, vol.181
, Issue.1
, pp. 129-133
-
-
Hadlock, F.P.1
Harrist, R.B.2
Martinez-Poyer, J.3
-
5
-
-
84887827892
-
Application of a global reference for fetal-weight and birthweight percentiles in predicting infant mortality
-
Published online ahead of print July doi:10.1111/1471-0528.12381)
-
Ding G, Tian Y, Zhang Y, et al. Application of a global reference for fetal-weight and birthweight percentiles in predicting infant mortality [published online ahead of print July 17, 2013]. BJOG. (doi:10.1111/1471-0528. 12381).
-
(2013)
BJOG
, vol.17
-
-
Ding, G.1
Tian, Y.2
Zhang, Y.3
-
6
-
-
33847786736
-
The use of customised versus population-based birthweight standards in predicting perinatal mortality
-
DOI 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01273.x
-
Zhang X, Platt RW, Cnattingius S, et al. The use of customized versus population-based birthweight standards in predicting perinatal mortality. BJOG. 2007;114(4):474-477. (Pubitemid 46393305)
-
(2007)
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
, vol.114
, Issue.4
, pp. 474-477
-
-
Zhang, X.1
Platt, R.W.2
Cnattingius, S.3
Joseph, K.S.4
Kramer, M.S.5
-
7
-
-
0029010365
-
Birth-weight-for-gestational-age patterns by race, sex, and parity in the United States population
-
Zhang J, BowesWA Jr. Birth-weight-for-gestational-age patterns by race, sex, and parity in the United States population. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;86(2):200-208.
-
(1995)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.86
, Issue.2
, pp. 200-208
-
-
Zhang, J.1
Bowes Jr., W.A.2
-
8
-
-
0030024504
-
A United States National reference for fetal growth
-
DOI 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00386-X
-
Alexander GR, Himes JH, Kaufman RB, et al. A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 87(2):163-168. (Pubitemid 26033124)
-
(1996)
Obstetrics and Gynecology
, vol.87
, Issue.2
, pp. 163-168
-
-
Alexander, G.R.1
Himes, J.H.2
Kaufman, R.B.3
Mor, J.4
Kogan, M.5
-
9
-
-
0035434686
-
A new and improved population-based Canadian reference for birth weight for gestational age
-
Kramer MS, Platt RW,Wen SW, et al. A new and improved population-based Canadian reference for birth weight for gestational age. Pediatrics. 2001;108(2):e35.
-
(2001)
Pediatrics
, vol.108
, Issue.2
-
-
Kramer, M.S.1
Platt Rwwen, S.W.2
-
10
-
-
34548414619
-
Small-forgestational-age infants classified by customized or population birthweight centiles: Impact of gestational age at delivery
-
Groom KM, Poppe KK, North RA, et al. Small-forgestational-age infants classified by customized or population birthweight centiles: impact of gestational age at delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(3):239.e1-239.e5.
-
(2007)
Am J Obstet Gynecol
, vol.197
, Issue.3
-
-
Groom, K.M.1
Poppe, K.K.2
North, R.A.3
-
11
-
-
0034938991
-
Perinatal outcome in SGA births defined by customised versus population-based birthweight standards
-
DOI 10.1016/S0306-5456(00)00205-9, PII S0306545600002059
-
Clausson B, Gardosi J, Francis A, et al. Perinatal outcome in SGA births defined by customized versus population-based birthweight standards. BJOG. 2001;108(8):830-834. (Pubitemid 32695316)
-
(2001)
British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
, vol.108
, Issue.8
, pp. 830-834
-
-
Clausson, B.1
Gardosi, J.2
Francis, A.3
Cnattingius, S.4
-
12
-
-
84869489161
-
The influence of fetal growth reference standards on assessment of cognitive and academic outcomes of very preterm children
-
Charkaluk ML, Marcharnd-Martin L, Ego A, et al. The influence of fetal growth reference standards on assessment of cognitive and academic outcomes of very preterm children. J Pediatr. 2012;161(6):1053-1058.
-
(2012)
J Pediatr
, vol.161
, Issue.6
, pp. 1053-1058
-
-
Charkaluk, M.L.1
Marcharnd-Martin, L.2
Ego, A.3
-
13
-
-
79957833614
-
A global reference for fetal-weight and birthweight percentiles
-
Mikolajczyk RT, Zhang J, Betran AP, et al. A global reference for fetal-weight and birthweight percentiles. Lancet. 2011; 377(9780):1855-1861.
-
(2011)
Lancet
, vol.377
, Issue.9780
, pp. 1855-1861
-
-
Mikolajczyk, R.T.1
Zhang, J.2
Betran, A.P.3
-
15
-
-
0034157619
-
Race and the inheritance of low birth weight
-
Conley D, Bennett NG. Race and the inheritance of low birth weight. Soc Biol. 2000;47(1-2):77-93.
-
(2000)
Soc Biol
, vol.47
, Issue.1-2
, pp. 77-93
-
-
Conley, D.1
Bennett, N.G.2
-
17
-
-
51749095064
-
Customized birthweight percentiles: Does adjusting for maternal characteristics matter
-
Hutcheon JA, Zhang X, Cnattingius S, et al. Customized birthweight percentiles: Does adjusting for maternal characteristics matter? BJOG. 2008;115(11):1397-1404.
-
(2008)
BJOG
, vol.115
, Issue.11
, pp. 1397-1404
-
-
Hutcheon, J.A.1
Zhang, X.2
Cnattingius, S.3
-
18
-
-
84877578831
-
Customized birthweight models Do they increase identification of at-risk infants
-
Gibbons K, Chang A, Flenady V, et al. Customized birthweight models: Do they increase identification of at-risk infants? J Paediatr Child Health. 2013;49(5):380-387.
-
(2013)
J Paediatr Child Health
, vol.49
, Issue.5
, pp. 380-387
-
-
Gibbons, K.1
Chang, A.2
Flenady, V.3
-
19
-
-
84255169934
-
Risk of morbid perinatal outcomes in small-for-gestational-age pregnancies: Customized compared with conventional standards of fetal growth
-
Larkin JC, Hill ML, Speer PD, et al. Risk of morbid perinatal outcomes in small-for-gestational-age pregnancies: customized compared with conventional standards of fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119(1):21-27.
-
(2012)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.119
, Issue.1
, pp. 21-27
-
-
Larkin, J.C.1
Hill, M.L.2
Speer, P.D.3
-
20
-
-
84876111068
-
Population versus customized fetal growth norms and adverse outcomes in an intrapartum cohort
-
Constantine MM, Lai Y, Bloom SL, et al. Population versus customized fetal growth norms and adverse outcomes in an intrapartum cohort. Am J Perinatol. 2013;30(4):335-341.
-
(2013)
Am J Perinatol
, vol.30
, Issue.4
, pp. 335-341
-
-
Constantine, M.M.1
Lai, Y.2
Bloom, S.L.3
-
21
-
-
84885735795
-
Customized versus population-based birth weight charts for the detection of neonatal growth and perinatal morbidity in a cross-sectional study of term neonates
-
Carberry AE, Raynes-Greenow CH, Turner RM, et al. Customized versus population-based birth weight charts for the detection of neonatal growth and perinatal morbidity in a cross-sectional study of term neonates. Am J Epidemiol. 2013;178(8):1301-1308.
-
(2013)
Am J Epidemiol
, vol.178
, Issue.8
, pp. 1301-1308
-
-
Carberry, A.E.1
Raynes-Greenow, C.H.2
Turner, R.M.3
-
22
-
-
10844281944
-
Unadjusted and customised weight centiles in the identification of growth restriction among stillborn infants
-
DOI 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00274.x
-
Lyon V, Howatson A, Khan KS, et al. Unadjusted and customized weight centiles in the identification of growth restriction among stillborn infants. BJOG. 2004;111(12): 1460-1463. (Pubitemid 39665042)
-
(2004)
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
, vol.111
, Issue.12
, pp. 1460-1463
-
-
Lyon, V.1
Howatson, A.2
Khan, K.S.3
Owen, P.4
-
23
-
-
79551709747
-
Assessing the value of customized birth weight percentiles
-
Hutcheon JA,Walker M, Platt RW. Assessing the value of customized birth weight percentiles. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173(4):459-467.
-
(2011)
Am J Epidemiol
, vol.173
, Issue.4
, pp. 459-467
-
-
Hutcheon, J.A.1
Walker, M.2
Platt, R.W.3
-
24
-
-
52949112689
-
Perinatal programming of obesity
-
Simmons R. Perinatal programming of obesity. Semin Perinatol. 2008;32(5):371-374.
-
(2008)
Semin Perinatol
, vol.32
, Issue.5
, pp. 371-374
-
-
Simmons, R.1
-
25
-
-
84880330415
-
Customized versus population approach for evaluation of fetal overgrowth
-
Constantine MM, Mele L, Landon MB, et al. Customized versus population approach for evaluation of fetal overgrowth. Am J Perinatol. 2013;30(7):565-572.
-
(2013)
Am J Perinatol
, vol.30
, Issue.7
, pp. 565-572
-
-
Constantine, M.M.1
Mele, L.2
Landon, M.B.3
-
26
-
-
34248598381
-
Are babies born to short primiparous or thin mothers "normally" or ;abnormally" small
-
Zhang X, Cnattingius S, Platt RW, et al. Are babies born to short, primiparous, or thin mothers "normally" or "abnormally" small? J Pediatr. 2007;150(6):603-607.
-
(2007)
J Pediatr
, vol.150
, Issue.6
, pp. 603-607
-
-
Zhang, X.1
Cnattingius, S.2
Platt, R.W.3
-
27
-
-
79958129644
-
A customized standard of large size for gestational age to predict intrapartum morbidity
-
Larkin JC, Speer PD, Simhan HN. A customized standard of large size for gestational age to predict intrapartum morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204(6):499.e1-499.e10.
-
(2011)
Am J Obstet Gynecol
, vol.204
, Issue.6
-
-
Larkin, J.C.1
Speer, P.D.2
Simhan, H.N.3
-
28
-
-
79952134861
-
Prenatal application of the individualized fetal growth reference
-
Zhang J, Mikolajczyk R, Grewal J, et al. Prenatal application of the individualized fetal growth reference. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173(5):539-543.
-
(2011)
Am J Epidemiol
, vol.173
, Issue.5
, pp. 539-543
-
-
Zhang, J.1
Mikolajczyk, R.2
Grewal, J.3
-
29
-
-
84856259570
-
Customised versus population-based growth charts as a screening tool for detecting small for gestational age infants in low-risk pregnant women
-
Carberry AE, Gordon A, Bond DM, et al. Customised versus population-based growth charts as a screening tool for detecting small for gestational age infants in low-risk pregnant women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(12): CD008549.
-
(2011)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
, vol.12
-
-
Carberry, A.E.1
Gordon, A.2
Bond, D.M.3
|