Prenatal application of the individualized fetal growth reference

American Journal of Epidemiology

Volumn 173, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 539-543

  Zhang, Jun ^a   Mikolajczyk, Rafael ^b   Grewal, Jaceteshwar ^a   Neta, Gila ^a   Klebanoff, Mark ^a  

^a EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BREMEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

fetal growth retardation; infant, small for gestational age; perinatal mortality

Indexed keywords

CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; GROWTH; MORTALITY; PREGNANCY; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICAL APPLICATION;

ADULT; ADVERSE OUTCOME; ARTICLE; BIRTH WEIGHT; CHILDBIRTH; FEMALE; FEMUR; FETUS; FETUS ECHOGRAPHY; FETUS GROWTH; FETUS WEIGHT; GESTATIONAL AGE; HEAD CIRCUMFERENCE; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; INDIVIDUALIZATION; INFANT; INTRAUTERINE GROWTH RETARDATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTICENTER STUDY; PREDICTION; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANT WOMAN; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRENATAL PERIOD; PRENATAL SCREENING; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SMALL FOR DATE INFANT; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BIRTH WEIGHT; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; FEMALE; FETAL DEVELOPMENT; FETAL GROWTH RETARDATION; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, SMALL FOR GESTATIONAL AGE; PERINATAL MORTALITY; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL CARE; REFERENCE VALUES; RESEARCH DESIGN; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, PRENATAL; UNITED STATES;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 79952134861     PISSN: 00029262     EISSN: 14766256     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwq411     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Zhang J, Merialdi M, Platt LD, et al. Defining normal and abnormal fetal growth: promises and challenges. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202(6):522-528.
2. Gardosi J, Chang A, Kalyan B, et al. Customised antenatal growth charts. Lancet. 1992;339(8788):283-287.
3. Brenner WE, Edelman DA, Hendricks CH. A standard of fetal growth for the United States of America. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976;126(5):555-564.
4. Gardosi J, Mongelli M, Wilcox M, et al. An adjustable fetal weight standard. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995;6(3):168-174.
5. Resnik R. One size does not fit all. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(3):221-222. (Pubitemid 47361991)
6. Alexander GR, Himes JH, Kaufman RB, et al. A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87(2):163-168. (Pubitemid 26033124)
7. Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Martinez-Poyer J. In utero analysis of fetal growth: a sonographic weight standard. Radiology. 1991;181(1):129-133.
8. Zhang X, Platt RW, Cnattingius S, et al. The use of customised versus population-based birthweight standards in predicting perinatal mortality. BJOG. 2007;114(4):474-477. (Pubitemid 46393305)
9. Ariyuki Y, Hata T, Kitao M. Evaluation of perinatal outcome using individualized growth assessment: comparison with conventional methods. Pediatrics. 1995;96(1 pt 1):36):36-42.
10. Clausson B, Gardosi J, Francis A, et al. Perinatal outcome in SGA births defined by customized versus population-based birthweight standards. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;108:830-834. (Pubitemid 32695316)
11. Owen P, Farrell T, Hardwick JC, et al. Relationship between customised birthweight centiles and neonatal anthropometric features of growth restriction. BJOG. 2002;109(6):658-662. (Pubitemid 37329277)
12. Bukowski R. Fetal growth potential and pregnancy outcome. Semin Perinatol. 2004;28(1):51-58. (Pubitemid 38298829)
13. Gardosi J, Francis A. Adverse pregnancy outcome and association with small for gestational age birthweight by customized and population-based percentiles. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201(1):28.e1-28.e8.
14. Groom KM, Poppe KK, North RA, et al. Small-for-gestationalage infants classified by customized or population birthweight centiles: impact of gestational age at delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(3):239.e1-239.e5.
15. Lyon V, Howatson A, Khan KS, et al. Unadjusted and customised weight centiles in the identification of growth restriction among stillborn infants. BJOG. 2004;111(12):1460-1463. (Pubitemid 39665042)
16. Hutcheon JA, Zhang X, Cnattingius S, et al. Customised birthweight percentiles: does adjusting for maternal characteristics matter? BJOG. 2008;115(11):1397-1404.
17. Ewigman BG, Crane JP, Frigoletto FD, et al. Effect of prenatal ultrasound screening on perinatal outcome. RADIUS Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(12):821-827. (Pubitemid 23267208)
18. Hadlock FP, Deter RL, Harrist RB, et al. Estimating fetal age: computer-assisted analysis of multiple fetal growth parameters. Radiology. 1984;152(2):497-501. (Pubitemid 14093784)
19. Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS, et al. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements-a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;151(3):333-337. (Pubitemid 15237550)
20. Gardosi J, Francis A. A customized standard to assess fetal growth in a US population. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201(1):25. e1-25.e7.
21. Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Diagnostic tests 4: likelihood ratios. BMJ. 2004;329(7458):168-169.
22. Zhang J, Bowes WA Jr. Birth-weight-for-gestational-age patterns by race, sex, and parity in the United States population. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;86(2):200-208.
23. McIntire DD, Bloom SL, Casey BM, et al. Birth weight in relation to morbidity and mortality among newborn infants. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(16):1234-1238. (Pubitemid 29181643)
24. Bukowski R, Gahn D, Denning J, et al. Impairment of growth in fetuses destined to deliver preterm. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185(2):463-467. (Pubitemid 32769452)
25. Bukowski R, Burgett AD, Gei A, et al. Impairment of fetal growth potential and neonatal encephalopathy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188(4):1011- 1015. (Pubitemid 36530054)